Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Any advantage of using a 700x32c tire over a 700x28C?

Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Any advantage of using a 700x32c tire over a 700x28C?

Old 06-24-09, 06:15 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Sincitycycler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
Posts: 3,218

Bikes: 2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Any advantage of using a 700x32c tire over a 700x28C?

Been commuting on my fixie, but my normal route has been torn up somewhat due to construction, and I even have to run on the sidewalk on some sections w/ those annoying relieve cracks every 4 feet...

Currently running 700x23 tires at 116psi, but the rough sections knock my fillings out

I like get a smoother ride-been thinking of 28s or 32s at <100psi. Suggestions?
__________________
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
Sincitycycler is offline  
Old 06-24-09, 07:40 PM
  #2  
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
Originally Posted by Sincitycycler
Been commuting on my fixie, but my normal route has been torn up somewhat due to construction, and I even have to run on the sidewalk on some sections w/ those annoying relieve cracks every 4 feet...

Currently running 700x23 tires at 116psi, but the rough sections knock my fillings out

I like get a smoother ride-been thinking of 28s or 32s at <100psi. Suggestions?
I've used both. I would say 28's can do almost any firm surface, including gravel.

32's can run at lower pressures and are more stable over potholes, gaping cracks and soft surfaces.

I use 28's and run them at 100 psi, the ride is acceptable. 32's are not going to feel as fast, if that matters.

Michael
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 06-24-09, 08:04 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 108

Bikes: K2 3.0 ZED

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Either size should be a considerable increase in comfort from a 700x23 which I no longer ride. My current tires are 32 cross tires which are dying. I may go for a set of 30's with the round/smooth profile rather than the 32's with cross treads. Keep in mind manufacturers aren't always on the same scale when it comes to measurement; I've seen 32's close to 30's and 28's also close to 30's in actual size.
ajs26 is offline  
Old 06-24-09, 08:43 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,243
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Agreed, although you will notice the increase in rolling resistance. The ride is a lot smoother.
jdon is offline  
Old 06-25-09, 11:20 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 1,213

Bikes: 09 Specialized Tricross Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It depends on if the 700x28 is a city or trekking tire or if it is a road racing tire. The former would be exemplified by something like a vittoria randonneur and the latter would be more like a conti gatorskin or grand prix 4 season.

Basically, the lower of a pressure range is has, the more comfortable it can be, albeit at the expense of more rolling resistance.

The 700x32's I've tried have had noticeably more resistance though I hear the Panaracer Urban Max 70032 @ 100psi rolls pretty fast.
thirdin77 is offline  
Old 06-25-09, 11:24 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,943
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12206 Post(s)
Liked 1,501 Times in 1,111 Posts
I went from a 27c to a 32c this year. The change was not dramatic, but it was welcome. The roads this year are hideous, construction everywhere, potholes, you name it.

I am contemplating something even larger.
late is offline  
Old 06-28-09, 12:36 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
meanwhile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jdon
Agreed, although you will notice the increase in rolling resistance [with increased tyre width]
No. This is one of those everyone-knows things that isn't true. RR depends a lot on tyre compound type and tyre wall thickness, and for a given tyre it descreases with pressure, but wider tyres actually have LOWER RR. Take a look at https://www.terrymorse.com/bike/rolres.html and see the sports touring 28mm kick the ass of the race optimized tyres narrower tyres.

24mm tyres are still faster in real road race conditions, because they take place at speeds where air resistance dominates, and a narrower tyre provides reduced frontal surface area.

So if you seek out a premium compound wider slick then increased RR shouldn't be a problem. I'd see if there is a 32-38mm Rubino, or go for a Sports Contact. Exact tyre width should depend on surface and on ***rider weight.*** Rivendell has a good chart for this.
meanwhile is offline  
Old 07-02-09, 07:35 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Sincitycycler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
Posts: 3,218

Bikes: 2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
So based on the above tests, the Hutchinson Top Speed is the fastest clincher tested?
__________________
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"

Last edited by Sincitycycler; 07-02-09 at 07:43 PM.
Sincitycycler is offline  
Old 07-04-09, 10:06 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
IAMTB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 349
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sincitycycler
So based on the above tests, the Hutchinson Top Speed is the fastest clincher tested?
Yes when not taking into account wind resistance.
IAMTB is offline  
Old 07-04-09, 12:14 PM
  #10  
alk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 117
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sincitycycler
So based on the above tests, the Hutchinson Top Speed is the fastest clincher tested?
Originally Posted by IAMTB
Yes when not taking into account wind resistance.
actually looking at the figure it seems to me that the hutchinson would be the slowest.
alk is offline  
Old 07-04-09, 06:04 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
meanwhile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sincitycycler
So based on the above tests, the Hutchinson Top Speed is the fastest clincher tested?
My bad - I'm looking at this on a Netbook, and I forgot there where several graphs below the one I referred to - which was the "classic" Jobst Brandt graph - https://www.terrymorse.com/bike/imgs/rolres.gif; the fast 28mm there is the Avocet. And performance of tyres of the same width varied a LOT.

Basic lesson: it's the tyre compound that matters most, not the width. Fast compound (with low hysteresis energy) used only to come in a narrow tyres for racers, but you can now get it in wider rubber - eg 1.5 x 26 Rubinos. Otoh performance of "premium" narrow racing tyres varies widely.

..And if you ride too narrow a tyre on a soft or loose surface then the physics gets more complicated and you lose energy in other ways. Ditto for too high a pressure I *think* - the back wheel's tyre needs enough flex to conform to the surface to transfer power ...

Oh - and latex tubes will make you go faster! Good article on RR on the road:

https://www.rouesartisanales.over-blo...e-1503651.html



..And the physics of real offroad tyres for MTBs are so complex I don't even want to think about it!
meanwhile is offline  
Old 07-04-09, 11:39 PM
  #12  
Eternal NooB
 
threeflys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sonoma County,CA
Posts: 939

Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro, Lemond BA, Spec Roubaix, Riv Homer Hilson, Cielo

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sincitycycler
I like get a smoother ride-been thinking of 28s or 32s at <100psi. Suggestions?
Riding 28s or 32s at anything close to 100psi is counter productive... The while point of getting a bigger tire is so you can run much lower pressure... I have a Rivendell that I run 33s on with around 60psi, my cross bike runs around 45-50psi when on trails and I haven't had any problems...

If you go with the bigger tire, I recommend nothing higher than around 80 at the max...

Grant Peterson of Rivendell has pretty strange ideas sometimes, but he is right on with a lot of stuff also... Check out this article https://www.rivbike.com/article/components/tires

Chris
__________________
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team.


threeflys is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.