Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbround Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Jake vs Tricross Triple?

Old 04-06-10, 09:50 AM
  #1  
hagbard
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Jake vs Tricross Triple?

With spring here, its time to get my own wheels (been borrowing my wife's Dew). I'm of two minds, one is to get a Cyclocross the other is a hybrid. Will be riding on roads and flat, fairly smooth gravel bike trails. I'm edging toward Cyclocross because of the handlebars and they're more what I'm used to (road bike).

Of the Cyclocross bikes, I've narrowed to the Kona Jake or the Specialized Tricross Triple. They seem to be in the same price point (my local dealer has the 2009 Jake the Snake for the same price as the 2010 Jake - $999cdn, but its a 58cm, I'm 56cm) .

Of these which would be the better choice?
hagbard is offline  
Old 04-06-10, 11:23 AM
  #2  
Captain Jake
Devil's Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa
Posts: 134

Bikes: Sterling Road bike, Chromolly Specialized Allez, Bianchi was given to me don't know model

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As long as your not too much closer to riding a 54 than a 58 you should be able to put on a stem that's 20 mil shorter than the current one and the reach would be exactly the same as a 56. The Kona Jake the Snake is easily the best option of the bikes your looking at, I would definitely ride it first, but if it doesn't feel too big that would be the way to go.

As far as your being torn between cyclocross and hybrid, unless you plan on strictly relaxed trails, cyclocross is the way to go. With a change of tires it becomes a functional road bike, with racks and fenders it becomes a very serviceable touring or commuting bike, and if you like riding it as is, it has the perfect fusion of comfort and performance. A hybrid bike might be a bit more comfortable, but by no means is a cross bike uncomfortable, and I really don't see any other advantage you would have by going with a hybrid.
Captain Jake is offline  
Old 04-06-10, 03:09 PM
  #3  
AndrewP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 6,521

Bikes: Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If you are not doing hills go for the JTS (105 double) with mods mentioned by Capt Jake. Otherwise go with the colour you like best.
AndrewP is offline  
Old 04-06-10, 03:47 PM
  #4  
hagbard
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The bike shop has had the JTS since at least last Aug, because that's when I first road it. It seemed a bit big at the time. I'm 5"9 (or 10") with a 31" inseam. I was admiring the bike on Saturday and they pretty much told me again it was too big for me...so I'm guessing it likely is or they'd sell it to me.

Suppose I could always try it for a year, then give it to my 6'2", 14 year old son if I can talk him into it.
hagbard is offline  
Old 04-06-10, 04:44 PM
  #5  
moralleper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 167

Bikes: '10 C'Dale CAAD9 4, '09 S-Works Tricross, Gary Fisher Tassahara

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would think that a 58 will be too big. I am 6' with a 33.5 inseam and I ride a 58.
moralleper is offline  
Old 04-06-10, 05:43 PM
  #6  
Andy_K 
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 13,152

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 384 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2268 Post(s)
Liked 943 Times in 478 Posts
I'm 5'9" and ride a 52cm Jake. I can't imagine the 58 would fit you. Eliminating that, the only thing I can see that the TriCross Triple has going for it is the carbon fork. The components on the Jake are better than on the base Tri Cross triple (I believe 2300 components are basically Sora-level). If you can swing it in the budget, the Kona Jake the Snake is a nice upgrade over either, but then again you might like the triple crankset on the base Jake.
Andy_K is offline  
Old 04-06-10, 06:32 PM
  #7  
Captain Jake
Devil's Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa
Posts: 134

Bikes: Sterling Road bike, Chromolly Specialized Allez, Bianchi was given to me don't know model

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The JST is definitely too big, I'm 5' 11'' with a 32" inseam and I ride a 54.
Captain Jake is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 02:53 PM
  #8  
hagbard
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well, most think JTS in the right sized frame is the way to go of these options. How about that verses the Specialized Tricross Comp?
hagbard is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 04:20 PM
  #9  
Jabba Degrassi
FNG
 
Jabba Degrassi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2,313

Bikes: 2008 IRO Angus, 2008 Jamis Exile 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Seconding (or fifthing, I lost count) the too big comment. We are pretty much the exact same height (5'10") and inseam. I was just testing the 56 and 54 JTS today, and the 54 had a good horizontal fit, but I had no stand-over clearance. I'm going with a 54 anyway. With legs like ours you can either have stand-over or a top-tube length that fits, not both. I went with stand-over on the Angus and regretted it. Look at all the seatpost and stem I'm showing, all so my bike will fit properly when I'm not riding it.
Jabba Degrassi is offline  
Old 04-10-10, 02:58 PM
  #10  
hagbard
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just had one of the bike shops that told me back in Sept. that I was 56cm that I'm really 54cm!? They also had the same bike I looked at back then, now discounted - a 2009 Tricross Sport 56cm for $1100cdn cash. I remember it seems large when I road it.
hagbard is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jahlon
General Cycling Discussion
36
04-21-18 08:24 PM
TexasKid
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
37
05-08-17 08:14 AM
bbarnett51
Hybrid Bicycles
31
05-09-14 10:50 PM
MacAttack
General Cycling Discussion
5
07-28-10 08:08 AM
bjlesm
General Cycling Discussion
21
05-09-10 12:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.