Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Nashbar Steel Cyclocross bike?

Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbround Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Nashbar Steel Cyclocross bike?

Old 08-18-11, 08:19 PM
  #1  
reshp1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nashbar Steel Cyclocross bike?

https://www.nashbar.com/bikes/Product..._10000__202339
What do you guys think? Seems like a heck of a deal for a 105 equipped bike. Looking at the geometry, it seems more like a cyclocross bike than their aluminum cross frame (headtube not too slack, chainstays look long enough for big tires and fenders). I'm looking for a commuter, but racing it is not out of the question either. Geez, I'm really tempted, they've got a 20% off coupon right now too.
reshp1 is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 09:19 AM
  #2  
Andy_K 
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 12,973

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 370 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2167 Post(s)
Liked 767 Times in 405 Posts
You know, I was all set to groan and point you at the thread on the $79 Nashbar CX frame, but then you mentioned the 105 components which made me do a double take and look at the spec for this bike. Doing so, I see that it's not the same frame as the $79 model that Nashbar sells. The fact that it's steel should have tipped me off, but I really had never paid very close attention to the other frame either.

Anyway, at 20% off this definitely seems like something worth taking a chance on. It would definitely work for commuting, and you could race it, though I expect it would be a bit heavy by racing standards.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 10:04 AM
  #3  
M_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,693
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The shifters and derailleurs are certainly higher end than a lot of the other components like wheels and brakes, but heck, for 600 bucks it is still a steal and the frame is pretty much a freebie along with the components. Look at it this way: a new set of 105 STIs alone is like 250 dollars at the cheapest.

It does have a carbon fork too though with a steel steerer i can't imagine it is light. Actually I think Fuji did that several model years ago, so I bet the fork at least is one of those considering that nashbar's parent company is Performance.

If I was on the market with a limited budget I would get this bike in a heartbeat, thanks for bringing it up. I also like that it has no decals.
M_S is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 11:28 AM
  #4  
reshp1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_K View Post
You know, I was all set to groan and point you at the thread on the $79 Nashbar CX frame, but then you mentioned the 105 components which made me do a double take and look at the spec for this bike. Doing so, I see that it's not the same frame as the $79 model that Nashbar sells. The fact that it's steel should have tipped me off, but I really had never paid very close attention to the other frame either.
Yeah, I was already contemplating the X frame, but was a little leary of the slack headtube and poor chainstay clearance issues people were reporting. This frame seems to get around both. I ended up talking myself out of it yesterday (or my girlfriend talked me out of it ), but I'll be keeping my eye out for the next 20% deal for sure.
reshp1 is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 11:30 AM
  #5  
reshp1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by M_S View Post
I also like that it has no decals.
That matte finish with matching matte fork looks sharp too.
reshp1 is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 11:56 AM
  #6  
Barrettscv 
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,266

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 848 Post(s)
Liked 165 Times in 100 Posts
Originally Posted by reshp1 View Post
https://www.nashbar.com/bikes/Product..._10000__202339
What do you guys think? Seems like a heck of a deal for a 105 equipped bike. Looking at the geometry, it seems more like a cyclocross bike than their aluminum cross frame (headtube not too slack, chainstays look long enough for big tires and fenders). I'm looking for a commuter, but racing it is not out of the question either. Geez, I'm really tempted, they've got a 20% off coupon right now too.
It's a no brainer. I might get one as a rain & winter bike.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 12:32 PM
  #7  
Rumpled
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 903
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Spec'd almost identical to my '09 Fuji Cross Comp which weighs 23 lbs with pedals. Same wheels, shifters, brakes, cranks. My Fuji has Ultegra RD.
How much more will the steel frame weigh to my alu? 1-2 lbs?
Rumpled is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 07:20 PM
  #8  
Barrettscv 
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,266

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 848 Post(s)
Liked 165 Times in 100 Posts
Originally Posted by Rumpled View Post
Spec'd almost identical to my '09 Fuji Cross Comp which weighs 23 lbs with pedals. Same wheels, shifters, brakes, cranks. My Fuji has Ultegra RD.
How much more will the steel frame weigh to my alu? 1-2 lbs?
I would presume 24-25 lbs. My Soma Double Cross with 105 comes in @ 23.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 08-19-11, 10:30 PM
  #9  
Andy_K 
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 12,973

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 370 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2167 Post(s)
Liked 767 Times in 405 Posts
Originally Posted by Barrettscv View Post
I would presume 24-25 lbs. My Soma Double Cross with 105 comes in @ 23.
Yeah, my Cross Check with 105/Ultegra/Gossamer triple crank weighs about 25 pounds. I'd guess the Nashbar bike is very close to that--maybe a pound lighter with the steel/carbon fork and the double crank.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 08-22-11, 10:29 PM
  #10  
GipsyKing
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm the guy who wrote the review on that bike's page, so count me as a fan. Wish I'd seen that bike earlier! I may even grab it and sell my Fuji Cross Comp. Tough decision. I also like the matte finish, black fork and zero decals.
GipsyKing is offline  
Old 08-23-11, 05:41 PM
  #11  
cs1
Senior Member
 
cs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clev Oh
Posts: 7,067

Bikes: Specialized, Schwinn

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by GipsyKing View Post
I'm the guy who wrote the review on that bike's page, so count me as a fan. Wish I'd seen that bike earlier! I may even grab it and sell my Fuji Cross Comp. Tough decision. I also like the matte finish, black fork and zero decals.
I read your review this morning. Nice job. My only question is there's no stand over height in the specs.
cs1 is offline  
Old 08-24-11, 11:57 AM
  #12  
robo
Senior Member
 
robo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 1,142

Bikes: 1990 Burley Bossa Nova, 1992 Paramount PDG-70, 1993 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2005 Jamis Dakar XC Pro, 2007 Rivendell Bleriot

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
In a similar vein, just saw this on the BikesDirect site: https://www.bikesdirect.com/products/...fantom_cxx.htm

I wish they had a slightly higher specced model though. Manufacturers seem convinced that people who want steel frames also want low end components.
robo is offline  
Old 08-24-11, 11:42 PM
  #13  
GipsyKing
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cs1 View Post
I read your review this morning. Nice job. My only question is there's no stand over height in the specs.
Thanks, kind of an oddball review, but the specs make it look like such a sweet deal for those of us who like 105, I had to put something down in hopes that others might take a closer look. I thought it was funny how many people on that page have called the review "unhelpful."

But yeah, I was bummed there was no geometry listed. I'm trying to figure out who the frame maker is and then extrapolate the geo from a major brand that uses that frame. (After all, how many major frame makers are there, 3 or 4, that service most of the major brands?) Kinda' hard to pin down, though. Reminds me a little of Bianchi or Surly frames. Doesn't look like my Fuji CC, that is certain.
GipsyKing is offline  
Old 08-24-11, 11:57 PM
  #14  
GipsyKing
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by robo View Post
In a similar vein, just saw this on the BikesDirect site: https://www.bikesdirect.com/products/...fantom_cxx.htm

I wish they had a slightly higher specced model though. Manufacturers seem convinced that people who want steel frames also want low end components.
I'll agree, although from what I've read, Apex is fairly comparable to 105. My guess is BD is pricing that against the Fuji CC and other "entry- to mid-level" cross bikes. So the price isn't too bad, but I'd guess 699 or even 749 would probably move a lot more volume for them. Yeah, it would be nice to see more steel priced and spec'd like that Nashbar. Which is still tempting me. Dang 20% off coupon was one-day only!
GipsyKing is offline  
Old 08-25-11, 09:30 AM
  #15  
M_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,693
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That moto is a great deal for Apex, plus the frame looks like it has horizontal drops. SS friendly? Hmmmm...

EDIT: I wonder what the tire clearance is like. That bike looks disturbingly similar to a crosscheck. Seriously.

EDIT 2: Holy crap, it comes in chrome. I wonder if I really want to pay rent this month

Last edited by M_S; 08-25-11 at 09:34 AM.
M_S is offline  
Old 08-25-11, 09:50 AM
  #16  
JWalton215
splendid splendidness
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Thrilladelphia
Posts: 170
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If BD made an 853 / Rival version I would be all over it.
JWalton215 is offline  
Old 08-25-11, 11:39 AM
  #17  
reshp1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Geo for the Nashbar bike is available under the "sizing chart" link by the select item pull-down. It doesn't list stand-over height, but it should be pretty standard for a given seat-post length.
reshp1 is offline  
Old 08-29-11, 12:57 PM
  #18  
GipsyKing
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just took another look at the BD mentioned above. Nice ride, lots of quality branded components for the price. They need pix of the other colors.
GipsyKing is offline  
Old 09-10-11, 05:23 PM
  #19  
foofighter29er
Senior Member
 
foofighter29er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
bumping this to find out how many tooth the front CR's have
foofighter29er is offline  
Old 09-10-11, 05:31 PM
  #20  
StanSeven
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,389

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 842 Post(s)
Liked 684 Times in 497 Posts
I saw a thread somewhere that the Nashbar weighs 25 lbs. That's a lot. I decide to look elsewhere even if it means more money.
StanSeven is offline  
Old 09-11-11, 02:03 AM
  #21  
cs1
Senior Member
 
cs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clev Oh
Posts: 7,067

Bikes: Specialized, Schwinn

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by M_S View Post
That moto is a great deal for Apex
Apex is bottom of the line in finish only. It's comparable to better SRAM groups in performance. I wouldn't sell it short. You're right M_S, that is a great buy for an all SRAM equipped bike.
cs1 is offline  
Old 09-21-11, 01:44 PM
  #22  
cs1
Senior Member
 
cs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clev Oh
Posts: 7,067

Bikes: Specialized, Schwinn

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven View Post
I saw a thread somewhere that the Nashbar weighs 25 lbs. That's a lot. I decide to look elsewhere even if it means more money.
I'm thinking the buyers interested in an all steel bike aren't too concerned about weight. Still it's nice bike for the money. Comparable or better than a Cross Check for less money.
cs1 is offline  
Old 09-21-11, 02:03 PM
  #23  
himespau 
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 11,716
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2477 Post(s)
Liked 1,042 Times in 614 Posts
Yeah, but the carbon fork means no front rack which I'd find to be a bummer. Yup, I'm one of those who think 25 sounds kinda light.
himespau is offline  
Old 09-21-11, 04:05 PM
  #24  
matimeo
Senior Member
 
matimeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 801

Bikes: It's the motor, not the bike, right?

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 10 Posts
The one review on Nashbar's website says it weighed 25 out of the box. However, I'm pretty sure I read on bikeforums (unless I misunderstood the post- I can't find it on a search) that the person who wrote that review hadn't actually bought the bike- he had just written the review to generate interest in the bike (or something). It made me question the review. Anybody else remember that?
matimeo is offline  
Old 09-22-11, 01:46 AM
  #25  
cs1
Senior Member
 
cs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clev Oh
Posts: 7,067

Bikes: Specialized, Schwinn

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by matimeo View Post
The one review on Nashbar's website says it weighed 25 out of the box. However, I'm pretty sure I read on bikeforums (unless I misunderstood the post- I can't find it on a search) that the person who wrote that review hadn't actually bought the bike- he had just written the review to generate interest in the bike (or something). It made me question the review. Anybody else remember that?
Yeah, he's on this thread. See #4 GypsyKing.
cs1 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.