Cyclocross frame and fork for tougher than average road bike
#1
Lover of Old Chrome Moly
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 2,949
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times
in
17 Posts
Cyclocross frame and fork for tougher than average road bike
I have been riding a MTB hybrid fitness/touring bike and am looking at getting a road bike. My concerns are that I am a big guy at 6'0" 230 pounds and ride many less than ideal roads including some gravel and broken pavement. I'm considering getting a cyclocross frame and fork and building a "road" bike around it. I'm not worried about super light weight and have no delusions of or aspirations to competitive road racing, but I want something that will perform similar to a mid-level road bike. My main focus is recreation/fitness and participating in non-competitive group and charity rides.
Is this a good idea? Any suggestions on the frame and/or build?
Is this a good idea? Any suggestions on the frame and/or build?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sherwood, OR
Posts: 1,279
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Liked 309 Times
in
180 Posts
A stock Surly Cross Check sounds right up your alley. If you want to build from the F&F up, you can definitely set it up the way you want, although it will cost more unless the stock CC has too many components that you will want to replace. For a variety of riding, a cross bike is an excellent choice. It isn't the best at anything (except cross) but it is good at everything.
If you have the coin, I would also look at the Gunnar Cross-hairs. This is a high end steel cross bike made in the USA.
If you have the coin, I would also look at the Gunnar Cross-hairs. This is a high end steel cross bike made in the USA.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Los Alamos, NM
Posts: 1,846
Bikes: Fuji Cross Comp, BMC SR02, Surly Krampas
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have been very pleased with my Fuji Cross Comp with 105's. I have ridden probably 99.95% of the miles I have since purchasing it on the road - I use 28's for tires. Have commuted most of the summer, lots of rides on the road (several centuries), and am totally happy with the bike. I did install an 11-28 cassette to help with hills, but otherwise it's pretty much the bike I brought home from the store (Performance). Aluminum frame, carbon fork, nice bike. Paid $849, got 20% rebate after that - was a steal of a deal.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: EagleRiver AK
Posts: 1,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 60 Times
in
33 Posts
I doubt that a CX bike is any studier than a comparable road bike. Most any non-featherweight road bike would work fine for your proposed gravel riding if it will accomidate sufficiently wide tires (such as 700x30mm). Road bike brakes stop better IF you dont need the mud clearance that cantilevers provide. The geometry of a dedicated CX bike is made with compromises that may make it less than ideal than a good fitting road bike if you are doing long road rides.
#5
The Weird Beard
Join Date: May 2005
Location: COS
Posts: 8,554
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I doubt that a CX bike is any studier than a comparable road bike. Most any non-featherweight road bike would work fine for your proposed gravel riding if it will accomidate sufficiently wide tires (such as 700x30mm). Road bike brakes stop better IF you dont need the mud clearance that cantilevers provide. The geometry of a dedicated CX bike is made with compromises that may make it less than ideal than a good fitting road bike if you are doing long road rides.
#6
Have bike, will travel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
158 Posts
Most road bikes are using short reach brakes and are limited to 700x25 size tires. My Titanium road bike with an Alpha Q fork is no-where as beefy as my Soma Double Cross with a Ridley fork.
I'm also 6' and about 210 lbs. See this: https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...a+double+cross
https://www.somafab.com/frames.html
I'm also 6' and about 210 lbs. See this: https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...a+double+cross
https://www.somafab.com/frames.html
Last edited by Barrettscv; 09-06-11 at 07:26 PM.
#7
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Porter Square
Posts: 35
Bikes: Somec Promax, Philips 3-Speed, Spec. Crux
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
why do people think that road bikes are so wimpy? A entry level Allez (for example) is much more sturdy then an expensive hybrid.
#8
Have bike, will travel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
158 Posts
Some road bikes & CX bikes get a bit flexy in the larger sizes. A good CX bike has a stiffer fork than most road bikes. The fork on a CX bike needs to be stiffer to withstand off-road use and to reduce brake shudder. A normal or lighter rider has less need for a beefy bike than a XL rider.
#9
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Porter Square
Posts: 35
Bikes: Somec Promax, Philips 3-Speed, Spec. Crux
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Some road bikes & CX bikes get a bit flexy in the larger sizes. A good CX bike has a stiffer fork than most road bikes. The fork on a CX bike needs to be stiffer to withstand off-road use and to reduce brake shudder. A normal or lighter rider has less need for a beefy bike than a XL rider.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sherwood, OR
Posts: 1,279
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Liked 309 Times
in
180 Posts
any bike can get flexy in a larger size. A road bike is by design something that people with a lot of power-output are trying to flex the hell out of. Sure racers are traditionally small guys but what they are doing to a frame is much worse then what an XL rider is doing to a frame.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 247
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For what the OP wants to do with his bike, a cx bike seems unnecessary. not that it would be bad, just overkill. lots of people (even heavy ones) ride road bikes over rough terrain with no ill effects. if building a bike from the frame up, i would be primarily concerned with getting a quality hand built wheelset rather than a burlier frameset.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jixr
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
31
07-11-17 11:38 AM
livedinbars
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
8
10-19-11 11:23 PM