Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

is a cyclocross bike right for me?

Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

is a cyclocross bike right for me?

Old 09-25-11, 05:23 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
is a cyclocross bike right for me?

i had a road bike a few years ago and really enjoyed it. i ended up selling it due to some financial constraints but things are great now and im wanting to get another bike. i started a new job a few months ago and a group of the guys go biking every once in a while, mostly its some small trails in NW metro Atlanta. they've been asking me to join and i'd love to jump on a nice mountain bike but i have a feeling im going to want to do some road biking as well. my wife and i are looking for a house near my work so i could ride to work too. i guess my fear is can these bikes handle some light trails. i went to a few LBS and got mixed answers on this.
HiImSean is offline  
Old 09-25-11, 07:56 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,854

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 532 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3298 Post(s)
Liked 4,081 Times in 1,510 Posts
Cyclocross bikes can easily handle light trails. Rocks and roots are no problem (for the bike, at least). A mountain bike will be faster over technical terrain, and more forgiving of poor line choices. A cyclocross bike requires more handling skill for tricky terrain, but you can definitely do it.

What you need to figure out is what your friends mean by "light trails". If they're talking about hard-packed dirt with smooth surfaces, a cyclocross bike will be a better choice than a mountain bike. If they're talking about winding singletrack through the woods with lots of rocks and roots, a cyclocross bike can handle it but as a relative off-road newbie you may find it challenging. Then again, you may enjoy the challenge.

A mountain bike, I think, would be much worse as a road bike than a cyclocross bike would be as as trail bike.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 09-25-11, 10:10 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,360 Times in 866 Posts
functionally a road bike with capacity of wider tires, BB is a bit higher..
want to carry stuff?, look for rack mounts.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 09-25-11, 10:25 PM
  #4  
Ridin' South Cackalacky
 
dahut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by HiImSean
i had a road bike a few years ago and really enjoyed it. i ended up selling it due to some financial constraints but things are great now and im wanting to get another bike. i started a new job a few months ago and a group of the guys go biking every once in a while, mostly its some small trails in NW metro Atlanta. they've been asking me to join and i'd love to jump on a nice mountain bike but i have a feeling im going to want to do some road biking as well. my wife and i are looking for a house near my work so i could ride to work too. i guess my fear is can these bikes handle some light trails. i went to a few LBS and got mixed answers on this.
The answer is TWO bikes. The right tool for the job, and all that.

Today's mountain bike is a pretty specialized piece of gear. When it is wanted, little else will do.
Meanwhile, the cyclocross bike is a (slightly) relaxed road bike with wide clearance for bigger tires.
Remember, cyclocross racers carry their bikes over most of the heavy "technical" stuff.

As others have said, if the trails are gravel or packed dirt, then a CX bike may do. Anything rougher and I'd want an MTB.
Id buy a decent used one of each, CX and MTB, if it were me.
dahut is offline  
Old 09-26-11, 07:48 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,854

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 532 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3298 Post(s)
Liked 4,081 Times in 1,510 Posts
Originally Posted by dahut
Remember, cyclocross racers carry their bikes over most of the heavy "technical" stuff.
Generally, that's not true.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 09-26-11, 01:51 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: rockford, il
Posts: 2,646

Bikes: Trek 7700, C'dale R2000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a very nice CX bike and enjoy it on very bumpy trails. The 700 mm wheels allow me to go fast on these trails with 35 mm tires and some profile. You can also put knobby tires on and go more challenging but not like a MTB.
I go 20 MPH average on a road with a CX CF bike and 25 x 700 tires.
I average 16 MPH on an unpaved bumpy trail.
That is what a CX is good at. Speed!
A MTB with smaller diameter wheels, suspension, big and fat tires, is a horse of a different color. They can not compete with me on speed and I can not go where they go.
will dehne is offline  
Old 09-26-11, 07:38 PM
  #7  
Ridin' South Cackalacky
 
dahut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Andy_K
Generally, that's not true.
We must be watching different races.
dahut is offline  
Old 09-26-11, 08:10 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,854

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 532 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3298 Post(s)
Liked 4,081 Times in 1,510 Posts
Originally Posted by dahut
We must be watching different races.
Maybe you're watching me race.

Unless you're watching beginners, I would expect that the racers generally only run deep sand, thick mud and up hills that are too steep for the gearing dictated by the rest of the course. In each of these cases, they run because it's faster than riding. They also run over barriers, of course, except in the case of elite riders who bunny hop the barriers. And there are times, particularly on the first lap of a race, where a rider might run a technical section if there's a bottleneck of people taking the section slowly and an advantage can be gained by running.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 09-26-11, 08:20 PM
  #9  
Ridin' South Cackalacky
 
dahut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Andy_K
Maybe you're watching me race.

Unless you're watching beginners, I would expect that the racers generally only run deep sand, thick mud and up hills that are too steep for the gearing dictated by the rest of the course. In each of these cases, they run because it's faster than riding. They also run over barriers, of course, except in the case of elite riders who bunny hop the barriers. And there are times, particularly on the first lap of a race, where a rider might run a technical section if there's a bottleneck of people taking the section slowly and an advantage can be gained by running.
Which pretty much explains my point - when the **** gets tuff, they tote their bike.

I say get several bikes, each for its own purpose. You can not have too many bikes...
dahut is offline  
Old 09-26-11, 08:45 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,854

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 532 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3298 Post(s)
Liked 4,081 Times in 1,510 Posts
I guess we just disagree about what constitutes "technical" terrain. I'd carry a mountain bike over that stuff too if I cared about how fast I was going.

Of course, there was an incident here a couple of years ago when the course designers left a log across the course in a CX race. About half the people in the lower level races dismounted for it, but a whole lot of taunting followed.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 09-26-11, 09:07 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,360 Times in 866 Posts
Plus 1 .. or so.. you need more bikes .. ,
and practice those flying dismount/remounts at a full run too.

just know Portland is weird ..
fietsbob is offline  
Old 09-26-11, 10:36 PM
  #12  
Ridin' South Cackalacky
 
dahut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Andy_K
I guess we just disagree about what constitutes "technical" terrain.
Yeah.
dahut is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
derek_o
General Cycling Discussion
4
05-13-15 04:25 PM
mjwarner
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
37
10-22-13 11:16 PM
sd_mike
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
5
09-06-10 04:47 PM
TechKnowGN
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
1
08-28-10 06:50 PM
erichkopp
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
7
06-17-10 08:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.