Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Is it ok to own TWO cyclocross bikes?

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Is it ok to own TWO cyclocross bikes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-11, 08:23 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 26

Bikes: 2006 Redline Conquest Cross, 09 Trek Madone

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is it ok to own TWO cyclocross bikes?

I know in "cycling" world, owning 2 of any one kind of bike is considered "normal." I see nothing wrong with that. However, being a person who straddles between "cycling" world and "two young kids, marathon-running wife, 50+ hour job" world, I ask, is it ok to own 2 cyclocross bikes? My current CX, a 2006 Redline Conquest, is a great bike, even with the (very) basic component group it came with. I was more than happy with its performance this year (my 1st in racing). But now that I know I can be "competitive" in CX racing (as a lowly CAT 4), I look at my bike, and all I see is possible upgrades. Brakes, shifters, wheels, carbon fork-the list goes on.

So my question is, do I upgrade my current bike? Or do I start looking at a 2k-level bike that has some of the upgrades I'm looking for, and keep the Redline as my pit bike? I'm trying to stay half way between "cycling world" and real life, "you already have a freaking cross bike" world here, so any past experience is welcome.
pmaz77 is offline  
Old 11-23-11, 08:35 PM
  #2  
L-time Cat4 & proud of it
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NoVA for now
Posts: 173

Bikes: There's 4... 1 of ea

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Easier to get a newer, nicer bike as the 'A' bike and use the RL for the pit bike/'B' bike.

Wait till after the new year/nationals tho. Lots of stuff for sale...

M
Gummee is offline  
Old 11-23-11, 09:53 PM
  #3  
Mud, Gore & Guts
 
eddubal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bloomfield, NJ
Posts: 497

Bikes: 2012 Van Dessel Gin & Trombones; 2011 Masi Speciale SSCX; '87 Peugeot Cannonball Express

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I agree with Gummee. If you are looking to upgrade everything that you are listing, It'll be a better value to get a new bike (along with updated componentry). If you are satisfied with the performance of your current bike, you don't need a new bike, but it will motivate you more to get a new one. Since the season's coming to a close, you probably want to wait until bikes go on sale in the winter and use it for training and then racing next season. You'll get a better deal that way.
eddubal is offline  
Old 11-23-11, 11:34 PM
  #4  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by pmaz77
I know in "cycling" world, owning 2 of any one kind of bike is considered "normal." I see nothing wrong with that. However, being a person who straddles between "cycling" world and "two young kids, marathon-running wife, 50+ hour job" world, I ask, is it ok to own 2 cyclocross bikes? My current CX, a 2006 Redline Conquest, is a great bike, even with the (very) basic component group it came with. I was more than happy with its performance this year (my 1st in racing). But now that I know I can be "competitive" in CX racing (as a lowly CAT 4), I look at my bike, and all I see is possible upgrades. Brakes, shifters, wheels, carbon fork-the list goes on.

So my question is, do I upgrade my current bike? Or do I start looking at a 2k-level bike that has some of the upgrades I'm looking for, and keep the Redline as my pit bike? I'm trying to stay half way between "cycling world" and real life, "you already have a freaking cross bike" world here, so any past experience is welcome.
Crazy talk. You need a backup, right?
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 11-24-11, 01:02 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times in 1,439 Posts
I'm never one to say you shouldn't get a new bike, but (1) better components don't really make you faster, and (2) being competitive on an old bike is bad a$$.

My experience: I'm slow and not competitive. For the first three years I was slow and not competitive on a Kona Jake. Last winter I found a good deal on a Major Jake and this year I've been slow and not competitive on that. I have three CX bikes (the other being a Cross Check).

If you want a new bike, get something nice. If you want to be faster get some tubulars and train hard.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 11-24-11, 12:38 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Need Someone to Hose off the other bike, next.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 11-24-11, 01:28 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 614
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i ride my B bike on gravel roads during th eweek, chuck it in the van for a pit bike and race my A bike... keeps down on night before the race maintenance (and 'accidental' mechanicals)
adam_mac84 is offline  
Old 11-25-11, 05:32 PM
  #8  
Ice Bites
 
Cycocross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: cYa tossers
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I thought you were s'posed have two bikes, I was just at a bike store today telling myself I don't need a third.
During the Winter I've got one bike ready for snow and slop and one ready for speed on dry roads.
Having a second bike will help your pitcrew to be lazy and drunk on race day.
Cycocross is offline  
Old 11-27-11, 04:11 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_K
I'm never one to say you shouldn't get a new bike, but (1) better components don't really make you faster, and (2) being competitive on an old bike is bad a$$.

My experience: I'm slow and not competitive. For the first three years I was slow and not competitive on a Kona Jake. Last winter I found a good deal on a Major Jake and this year I've been slow and not competitive on that. I have three CX bikes (the other being a Cross Check).

If you want a new bike, get something nice. If you want to be faster get some tubulars and train hard.
Was that you in front of me?

Lee
lml999 is offline  
Old 11-27-11, 05:32 PM
  #10  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 26

Bikes: 2006 Redline Conquest Cross, 09 Trek Madone

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thanks for the responses gentlemen. I've decided to to get a "new" bike. Problem now: internet vs. LBS. Not many shops have 58-60cm bikes for me to hop on, so I have to order sight unseen anyway....To be continued.....
pmaz77 is offline  
Old 11-27-11, 07:39 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by lml999
Was that you in front of me?
Only if you were about to lap me.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 11-28-11, 11:41 AM
  #12  
Tiocfáidh ár Lá
 
jfmckenna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The edge of b#
Posts: 5,476

Bikes: A whole bunch-a bikes.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 462 Post(s)
Liked 123 Times in 76 Posts
FWIW I've been racing cross now for 11 years. For about 7 of those years I had a pit bike. In that time period I did not use my pit bike once. The one time I was close to using it was when I flatted with one lap to go and the pit was on the other side of the course. There was another time I didn't have the pit bike and that was when I broke my stem on the first lap. Pit bike would had been nice there.

Point being, I had the thing, traveled with it, took up bike rack space on the car and space in the hotel room and it never got any use. I just have a spare wheel set these days.
jfmckenna is offline  
Old 11-28-11, 12:26 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Breal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chi Town
Posts: 129

Bikes: Tarmac S- Works; Cervelo S5; Lynskey Helix; Crux

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Only problem with owning 2 is that #3 is just around the corner......
Breal is offline  
Old 11-28-11, 07:50 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Breal
Only problem with owning 2 is that #3 is just around the corner......
Problem? That's not a problem. it's a habit!
lml999 is offline  
Old 11-28-11, 07:50 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_K
Only if you were about to lap me.
Maybe...if I were completely lost!
lml999 is offline  
Old 11-29-11, 05:15 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
canflyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 204
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Back to your original question about owning two cross bikes, I have a similar situation to the OP. I had an older entry level cross bike. This bike is now my pit bike (needed to use it twice this year), training cross bike and sometime commuter. My newest cross bike is always set up for strickly racing and race specific training rides. Two cross bikes are working out great for me.

Canflyboy
canflyboy is offline  
Old 12-01-11, 06:48 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 185

Bikes: 2001 Trek XO1, 2009 Ridley Crossbow

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_K
I'm never one to say you shouldn't get a new bike, but (1) better components don't really make you faster, and (2) being competitive on an old bike is bad a$$.

My experience: I'm slow and not competitive. For the first three years I was slow and not competitive on a Kona Jake. Last winter I found a good deal on a Major Jake and this year I've been slow and not competitive on that. I have three CX bikes (the other being a Cross Check).

If you want a new bike, get something nice. If you want to be faster get some tubulars and train hard.
Right on!!!!
arctic hawk is offline  
Old 12-02-11, 09:52 AM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This is a simple math problem. If N = Number of bicycles currently owned, N+1 is the correct number of bicycles that you need. D'oh.



Lee
lml999 is offline  
Old 12-02-11, 11:40 AM
  #19  
Mud, Gore & Guts
 
eddubal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bloomfield, NJ
Posts: 497

Bikes: 2012 Van Dessel Gin & Trombones; 2011 Masi Speciale SSCX; '87 Peugeot Cannonball Express

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
+1

I just remembered a conversation with the designer of one the race courses around here. He was talking about getting a third bike.

One for preriding muddy courses.
One for a pit bike.
One for the race.

That way he wouldn't have to worry about starting with mud on the primary bike, and wouldn't have to worry about getting his secondary bike to the pits after the preride.
eddubal is offline  
Old 12-02-11, 01:23 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by lml999
This is a simple math problem. If N = Number of bicycles currently owned, N+1 is the correct number of bicycles that you need. D'oh.
No, no, no. That equation applies to cycling in general, but for cyclocross you need backups of everything, including your backups, so the formula for the number of cyclocross bikes you need is 2(N+1).
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 12-02-11, 01:39 PM
  #21  
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
I'll have three road bikes with Cantilever brakes and drop-bars, but none will be racing-oriented Cyclocross bikes. Does N+1=4?
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 12-02-11, 03:30 PM
  #22  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_K
No, no, no. That equation applies to cycling in general, but for cyclocross you need backups of everything, including your backups, so the formula for the number of cyclocross bikes you need is 2(N+1).
You make an excellent point. I'll go tell SWMBO I need six more cyclocross bikes.

Wish me luck.

Lee
lml999 is offline  
Old 12-02-11, 07:51 PM
  #23  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lml999
I'll go tell SWMBO I need six more cyclocross bikes.

Wish me luck.

Lee
RIP Lee.
rpfleger is offline  
Old 12-04-11, 09:53 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Lee
lml999 is offline  
Old 12-11-11, 05:11 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
trustnoone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 520

Bikes: 2011 Colnago World Cup, 2012 Eddy Merckx AMX-2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
N+1. Though I've found that W+2 is a temporary therapy for N+1.

W= Wheel-sets.
trustnoone is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.