andrew.waye

So...

If I owned one of these and threw on knobby tires, and wanted to have some fun, is there any reason not to cyclocross with it?

https://www.mec.ca/product/5030-652/m...icycle-unisex/

Prob a ton heavier than a proper cyclocross bike, and much different geometry, but it's got the right gear ratios and brifters. Could be fun, since I'm in good enough shape? Or is it a terrible idea?

Buying a proper cyclocross bike is not an option (too poor, haha) so don't reply just to tell me to buy a cyclocross bike.

Kopsis

I say go for it. No reason you can't ride CX on that bike and have a ton of fun. I wouldn't set my sights on a podium finish, but in the beginner categories, it's certainly more about fitness and experience than it is equipment, so a non-ideal bike isn't a huge handicap.

It's not unusual to see amateurs with bikes in the low 20 lbs range, so the weight isn't that unusual. I've seen people race on MTBs that are heavier. It will add to the challenge of carrying the bike over barriers, but if you wanted easy, you'd stay far away from CX

Having the cables routed under the top tube will make shouldering the bike a little harder, but I don't think it should be a deal breaker for a new rider.

Give it a try. Worst case is you finish dead last but have a lot of fun doing it

ambro

I say try it - assuming you have the similar crank as listed - you'll probably leave it in the 39 chain ring. Yes, it will be very heavy, and the geometry sucks for cyclocross racing - but remember, back in the old days - everyone raced with their heavy steel road rigs anyway. Assuming you have cantilever brakes and wider tires with knobs suitable for cyclcoross, I say go for it and have some fun.

fietsbob

would be lighter as a single speed..

stick a soft pad on the top tube if the courses have Run-up sections..

1speedlos

At that price, I'd think you should be able to find a decent used CX bike. The touring geometry isn't going to do you any favo(u)rs.

Los