Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Max Tire Width

Old 02-20-15, 02:59 PM
  #1  
Ride First, Work Later!!!
Thread Starter
 
af2nr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,492

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Trek Superfly, Raleigh Rush Hour

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Max Tire Width

What does everyone recommend as far as a minimum max tire width for a gravel/cross bike? I like the geometry of the Grade and Diverge but they seem "limited" to a 35mm tire, or at least thats what is "recommended". On the other hand the CX bikes seem to have a racier geometry but more tire clearance. SO, how much is too little or too much?
af2nr is offline  
Old 02-20-15, 03:58 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Kopsis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It all depends on what kind of riding you plan to do. For some, "gravel" means well-groomed unpaved roads. For others, it might mean something a lot uglier. CX racing has its own unique requirements. In most cases, 35 is plenty. On nice gravel people routinely ride 28s. For CX, bigger than 35 will usually slow you down. It's only the extreme stuff where you might want more (and then you have to ask yourself if a full-rigid MTB might be a better answer).
Kopsis is offline  
Old 02-20-15, 04:33 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,119
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kopsis
For CX, bigger than 35 will usually slow you down.
I know a really fast guy who swears by 40mm Clement MSO for dry courses. Because of the UCI 33mm rule and the trickle-down effect, you don't see many fast guys going wider than that, but if the rules were relaxed, I think you would see tires pushing 40.

The wider the tire, the lower the rolling resistance. The trade-off is weight and aerodynamics.

Last edited by flargle; 02-20-15 at 04:37 PM.
flargle is offline  
Old 02-20-15, 04:55 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Show-Me State
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I like riding 42's - and personally would not get a gravel bike that took a max size of only 35's. Fatter tires allow for more excursions on singletrack, as well as bombing down rocky descents with a bit more confidence. But, it all depends on the kind of gravel you ride - some of the roads around here are hardpack and are rideable on 25's, while others are very rocky and require caution even with a 42.

My bike will only fit 42's - which is unfortunate because I'd like to try the BG Rock 'n Road tires, which only come in a 43.
DirtRoadRunner is offline  
Old 02-20-15, 05:55 PM
  #5  
Seņor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Liked 295 Times in 218 Posts
Softer and rougher surfaces are more difficult on narrower tires. Heavier riders often find it easier on wider tires.

And many bikes have limited clearance for tires in the fork and rear triangle.
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Old 02-20-15, 09:03 PM
  #6  
Ride First, Work Later!!!
Thread Starter
 
af2nr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,492

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Trek Superfly, Raleigh Rush Hour

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier
Softer and rougher surfaces are more difficult on narrower tires. Heavier riders often find it easier on wider tires.

And many bikes have limited clearance for tires in the fork and rear triangle.
The clearance is what I am asking about, I want the most options dependent upon the course. How much is the question?
af2nr is offline  
Old 02-20-15, 09:25 PM
  #7  
Seņor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Liked 295 Times in 218 Posts
Depends on the surface you are riding on. The well maintained gravel road I ride to work is fine with 32mm tires in the dry season (some people use narrower), but the unmaintained roads I ride for fun are iffy with 38s.
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Old 02-20-15, 09:48 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Gus90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Chicago (suburbs)
Posts: 810

Bikes: A few too many

Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've found 35's to be plenty adequate for the task. Even 32's are good.
Gus90 is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 08:51 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 341

Bikes: Giant Advanced TCR

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would also note that if you're riding a carbon chainstay bike, be very careful with tire clearance on muddy gravel rides. Mud/gravel/stones accumulates very quickly and can erode a chainstay. My Redline CX can accommodate a 38 but very little clearance on the chainstay. After a grueling 40 mile ride in the muck, I noticed the drive side chainstay eroded to the bare carbon when cleaning. I applied 3m clear tape and reduced my 38 to a 35. But unfortunately even a 35 will probably do similar damage. This obviously leads to a dilemma on my 3 upcoming 100 mile gravel races if its raining or the course has had significant rain. This is why I'm leaning towards a steel or Ti frame.
keepamonte is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 09:13 AM
  #10  
cs1
Senior Member
 
cs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clev Oh
Posts: 7,095

Bikes: Specialized, Schwinn

Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Originally Posted by af2nr
What does everyone recommend as far as a minimum max tire width for a gravel/cross bike? I like the geometry of the Grade and Diverge but they seem "limited" to a 35mm tire, or at least thats what is "recommended". On the other hand the CX bikes seem to have a racier geometry but more tire clearance. SO, how much is too little or too much?
After reading all the reoplies so far (9) I agree with you on steel. A Surly Cross Check or Straggler might make a good fit. You can get a CF fork to save a pound or two. The total race weight is definitely going to be more than your current CF rig. Good luck on whatever you choose.
cs1 is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 09:29 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SGV So Cal
Posts: 884

Bikes: 80's Schwinn High Plains, Motobecane Ti Cyclocross

Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 21 Posts
The BD Ti cross bikes will handle a 42

There's a huge difference between 32's and 42's on unmaintained fire roads.
TGT1 is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 11:24 AM
  #12  
Ride First, Work Later!!!
Thread Starter
 
af2nr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,492

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Trek Superfly, Raleigh Rush Hour

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for all the insight and replies! This is becoming one of the toughest decisions I've had to make bike wise, so many options and so many variables! The Niner RLT is still a consideration and while I like some of the "custom" options the price difference is quite hard to justify but maybe it's viable?
af2nr is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 03:04 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 341

Bikes: Giant Advanced TCR

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stay in touch with Frostbike 2015 | Feb 20 - Feb 22 event. Salsa Warbird has a carbon bike coming out with 43 tire clearance as well as a smaller aluminum frame clearance of 42.
keepamonte is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 03:18 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Show-Me State
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by af2nr
Thanks for all the insight and replies! This is becoming one of the toughest decisions I've had to make bike wise, so many options and so many variables! The Niner RLT is still a consideration and while I like some of the "custom" options the price difference is quite hard to justify but maybe it's viable?
I would get the AWOL, rather than the Diverge, unless you plan to actually race CX on it. It would definitely be a better gravel rig - and you could tour on it or ride singletrack. It definitely looks like a great multipurpose bike. The X PLORER version even comes with panniers. You'll never regret getting a bike with too much tire clearance for mixed-terrain riding.,
DirtRoadRunner is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 03:34 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 341

Bikes: Giant Advanced TCR

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would seriously consider what the main purpose of this bike will be. I race cross and am signed up for three 100 mile gravel races this spring. I have an awesome 16lb carbon CX machine that is very nimble and quick, But on gravel rides, it sucks the life out of me if I'm on it more than 3 hours. that race geometry makes a difference! I am limited to 38's on front an rear when dry, if the weather creates peanut butter from mud and gravel, I'm screwed due to my carbon chainstays and the wear from mud/gravel. If I race more gravel, I will surely get a steel or Ti frame with at least 40-42 clearance, longer head tube, and longer chain stays. I'm a roadie so I love to climb but I don't think I really want one bike to race CX and gravel(yeah, I know it's all about the money too). Just throwing this out there for you to chew on.
keepamonte is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 04:02 PM
  #16  
Ride First, Work Later!!!
Thread Starter
 
af2nr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,492

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Trek Superfly, Raleigh Rush Hour

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It will be a multi-puprose bike for me, it may actually take the place of my road bike as well? The intended purpose would be charity rides, gravel rides/racing, and possibly cx racing as well. Maybe I am expecting too much from one bike but I am searching?! Thanks for the info on the new Salsa too!
af2nr is offline  
Old 02-22-15, 05:10 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Kopsis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by af2nr
It will be a multi-puprose bike for me, it may actually take the place of my road bike as well? The intended purpose would be charity rides, gravel rides/racing, and possibly cx racing as well. Maybe I am expecting too much from one bike but I am searching?!
CX racing is significantly different than the other uses you mention. If you're talking about a race or two each season for fun, then focus on your other needs and what you end up with will be adequate for the occasional CX race. I you're talking about a dozen CX races or more each season and a desire to be competitive, you want a dedicated CX bike and probably something different for on/off road endurance events.
Kopsis is offline  
Old 02-24-15, 09:02 AM
  #18  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 260

Bikes: Space Horse Disc, Domane SL5 Disc

Liked 30 Times in 18 Posts
For what it's worth I have 35mm Winter Marathon Studs on my Grade right now, with fenders. I still have about 4-5 mm of tire clearance on both sides of the tire at the tightest spot, which is the at the chain stays. I'll probably put some X'Plor USHs on them once the ice and snow is totally gone.
RocThrower is offline  
Old 02-24-15, 10:31 AM
  #19  
Full Member
 
justin1138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 482

Bikes: yes...

Liked 122 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Kopsis
CX racing is significantly different than the other uses you mention. If you're talking about a race or two each season for fun, then focus on your other needs and what you end up with will be adequate for the occasional CX race. I you're talking about a dozen CX races or more each season and a desire to be competitive, you want a dedicated CX bike and probably something different for on/off road endurance events.
+1
justin1138 is offline  
Old 02-24-15, 10:48 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,130

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Liked 4,147 Times in 2,673 Posts
More on gravel vs CX. FOr CX, a high bottom bracket clears stuff. Not as nice a ride, but nice and CX are not usually in the same sentence. The huge tire clearances aren't for huge tires, they are so mud buildup doesn't slow the bike. A really serious CX bike will not have fender eyes; it is a racing machine.

And for gravel grinders: if you want to see what the ultimate gravel grinder looks like, look at any ancient Tour de France photo. Those are what the world's best framebuilders created to go fast on gravel when all the money was on the table. (I am now riding a 40 year old Raleigh Carlton International, clearance with fenders for 37c easily, 72 head angle and a few miles of fork rake. Take a B&W photo and it would look right 30 years before. And off road? Like it was born for it.)

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Old 02-24-15, 12:28 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,595

Bikes: 8

Liked 1,361 Times in 867 Posts
Like NASCAR has gages for the shpe of the cars, UCI has a Max Tire gage to pass/fail your tire choice, but an informal GG with your buddies does not have to Comply.

So af2nr, how wide is your Frame clearance where the tire is closest?
fietsbob is offline  
Old 02-24-15, 04:30 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I'd say probably a 32 or 35 is the sweet spot.
09box is offline  
Old 02-26-15, 05:54 PM
  #23  
Ride First, Work Later!!!
Thread Starter
 
af2nr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,492

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Trek Superfly, Raleigh Rush Hour

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I understand that there are geometry differences between cross and "gravel/adventure", BB height, chainstay length, etc. CX would be something for fun and infrequent compared to gravel/dirt road riding and road. If I could "get away" with 35's the Diverge makes a nice compromise, the Renegade/RLT can go up to 40's, the Grade seems somewhere between? 3 of those 4 are carbon, benefit or drawback could be debated. I'm looking to replace my Emonda with a bike I can ride most anywhere and participate in most anything with. That new carbon Salsa Warbird is nice but it's low spec'd for the money compared to others in that price range?! Thanks again for all the insight and replies, keep'em coming!
af2nr is offline  
Old 02-27-15, 07:48 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Show-Me State
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by af2nr
I understand that there are geometry differences between cross and "gravel/adventure", BB height, chainstay length, etc. CX would be something for fun and infrequent compared to gravel/dirt road riding and road. If I could "get away" with 35's the Diverge makes a nice compromise, the Renegade/RLT can go up to 40's, the Grade seems somewhere between? 3 of those 4 are carbon, benefit or drawback could be debated. I'm looking to replace my Emonda with a bike I can ride most anywhere and participate in most anything with. That new carbon Salsa Warbird is nice but it's low spec'd for the money compared to others in that price range?! Thanks again for all the insight and replies, keep'em coming!
The Raleigh Tamland has pretty nice geometry, and would make a great gravel bike, and it clears fat tires. It is steel, so it isn't light, however unless you are actually racing this really should not make much more of a difference. The Ultegra version has a oddly-spec'd 52-36 crankset, while the 105 version has a much better 50-34 crank.

I wouldn't get rid of your road bike, though - if you plan to participate in fast group rides, or just go out on a solo hammer fest, a true road bike will always be faster than than a compromise gravel/cx/touring bike. The difference is noticeable. If you have the room, two bikes are the way to go - one for hammering down paved roads, and one for everything else. I love my Space Horse gravel bike, and would definitely pick it if I only could have one bike, but my CAAD9 is definitely better for riding fast on paved roads.

Last edited by DirtRoadRunner; 02-27-15 at 07:54 AM.
DirtRoadRunner is offline  
Old 02-27-15, 08:01 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,682

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Liked 3,810 Times in 2,215 Posts
Originally Posted by DirtRoadRunner
I would get the AWOL, rather than the Diverge, unless you plan to actually race CX on it. . . . You'll never regret getting a bike with too much tire clearance for mixed-terrain riding.,
+ 1.
bikemig is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.