BMC vs Tricross vs Colnago (for immediate order)
#1
NYC
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times
in
62 Posts
BMC vs Tricross vs Colnago (for immediate order)
I'm about to pull the trigger and agree to doing the Fall Cyclocross season with my buddy.
So I have to get a bike, and I have to get it fast. I'm buying/ordering something tomorrow, racing starts next weekend (for me... the season has already started here).
Choices:
2009 BMC CX02 swiss white camo, with Rival and Aksiums. $1895
2009 Tricross Expert (Rival and Roval wheels): $2000
2008 Colnago World Cup CX w/ 105 and Aksiums: $1499 from JensonUSA
The Tricross.... I had a Tricross sport, and I was less than thrilled by the fork, hated the brakes, and despised the components. I know the components and wheels are better on the expert... but how much better compared to the aksiums? And the fork and brakes? Anyone have racing experience w/ these?
The Colnago is only available mail order, and only in a 58... and I'm thinking I should go one size down from my road bike for CX racing.
I'm leaning towards the BMC... it seems to be the most purpose built bike, being spec'd by Cadence specifically for CX racing w/ good tires and really good tight cantis. I forget which cantis, but the overall build had a quality that goes beyond mere component selection... it goes to just plain top quality wrenching.
So... thoughts?
So I have to get a bike, and I have to get it fast. I'm buying/ordering something tomorrow, racing starts next weekend (for me... the season has already started here).
Choices:
2009 BMC CX02 swiss white camo, with Rival and Aksiums. $1895
2009 Tricross Expert (Rival and Roval wheels): $2000
2008 Colnago World Cup CX w/ 105 and Aksiums: $1499 from JensonUSA
The Tricross.... I had a Tricross sport, and I was less than thrilled by the fork, hated the brakes, and despised the components. I know the components and wheels are better on the expert... but how much better compared to the aksiums? And the fork and brakes? Anyone have racing experience w/ these?
The Colnago is only available mail order, and only in a 58... and I'm thinking I should go one size down from my road bike for CX racing.
I'm leaning towards the BMC... it seems to be the most purpose built bike, being spec'd by Cadence specifically for CX racing w/ good tires and really good tight cantis. I forget which cantis, but the overall build had a quality that goes beyond mere component selection... it goes to just plain top quality wrenching.
So... thoughts?
Last edited by nycphotography; 09-26-08 at 05:47 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,693
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Whether you go a size down or not depends on the specific measurments of the bike. I'd size it mor eor less like your road bike, but a 58 may have a 60cm or so ETT for some brands, so look closely at the numbers.
#5
Buy low, sell high
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bmc tt
The BMC has a triangular TT with the pointed side down, so it will dig into your shoulder during carrying. If there is a worse design I can't think of it. This would be a deal killer for me.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The third argument isn't even a reason, it's an excuse. And even so, there are limits to how many stem spacers are recommended to use, especially on a full carbon fork.
You might as well get a frame that fits.
But don't take my word for it:
https://cyclocrossworld.com/Tech.cfm?...ey=3&theKey=43
#7
NYC
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times
in
62 Posts
If standover clearance and weight shaving were such important issues in cross bike design, you'd see all kinds of mtb-like compact geometries out there. If anything, it's just the opposite, with cross frames tending toward more horizontal top tubes, because a larger triangle is actually easier to portage, especially while shouldering.
The third argument isn't even a reason, it's an excuse. And even so, there are limits to how many stem spacers are recommended to use, especially on a full carbon fork.
You might as well get a frame that fits.
But don't take my word for it:
https://cyclocrossworld.com/Tech.cfm?...ey=3&theKey=43
The third argument isn't even a reason, it's an excuse. And even so, there are limits to how many stem spacers are recommended to use, especially on a full carbon fork.
You might as well get a frame that fits.
But don't take my word for it:
https://cyclocrossworld.com/Tech.cfm?...ey=3&theKey=43
Both the Tricross and the BMC would be sized by local dealers w/ race support, so I would trust their judgement on size. The colnago is mail order, and the decision would have to come from the geometry chart.
Question: How long are the portages? I hadn't really expected them to be longer than a staircase, so I didn't expect to actually rest it on the shoulder. What should i really expect for such things?
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Don't smoke, Mike.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,295
Bikes: Devinci Tosca, IRO Rob Roy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Get the BMC since that's the one you want. Take a close look at the numbers though and don't buy an undersized frame ... go with something that'll fit you properly.
As for hitting the family jewels, to be perfectly honest you'll very rarely find yourself straddling the top tube Fred Flintstone-ing it along the course, and even if you do your junk will be stuffed up in your shorts anyway and not just dangling there.
As for hitting the family jewels, to be perfectly honest you'll very rarely find yourself straddling the top tube Fred Flintstone-ing it along the course, and even if you do your junk will be stuffed up in your shorts anyway and not just dangling there.
#10
NYC
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times
in
62 Posts
OK, utter and complete change of direction here. Sometimes something rare and special comes along and you just have to let go of all your old ideas about what you're doing.
2008 Blue CXC
LETS GO RACING!
Big Picture
2008 Blue CXC
LETS GO RACING!
Big Picture
#11
yeahh, becky
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: DC
Posts: 1,395
Bikes: 1990 Kotter Albuch, 2005 Empella Spaar Select Cross, 2007 Ridley Aedon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nice buy. I love those Blues. Everyone I know thinks they're hideously ugly, but I think they're just ugly. I'd race one.
#12
dutret has a posse
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: washington dc
Posts: 3,155
Bikes: IRO Angus 53, Marinoni Special 54, LMNO Custom Road Bike, Guerciotti TT, Late 60s Bottechia Road, Univega Via Montega beater/polo/rain bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
RE: TT on the BMC.
Yeah, it has the more narrow end down, but it is rounded, not pointy. I do have a little bruise from shouldering last week, but nothing crazy.
RE: 'smacking the jewels'
What scenario would have you putting your testicles over your top tube? Especially during a race. None that I can think of. Get the right sized bike, as evidenced by the CXMagazine link.
Yeah, it has the more narrow end down, but it is rounded, not pointy. I do have a little bruise from shouldering last week, but nothing crazy.
RE: 'smacking the jewels'
What scenario would have you putting your testicles over your top tube? Especially during a race. None that I can think of. Get the right sized bike, as evidenced by the CXMagazine link.