Digital Drive
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Salem Oregon
Posts: 963
Bikes: 2019 Trek Stash 7, 1994 Specialized Epic 1986 Diamondback Ascent 1996 Klein Pulse Comp, 2006 Specialized Sequoia Elite
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 334 Post(s)
Liked 391 Times
in
223 Posts
Digital Drive
I had never heard of digital drive. It certainly wouldn't make any sense for my type of riding, but it might make sense for some ebike users. I could understand for some who ride throttle ebikes could use the pedals to generate electricity for charging the battery rather than actually engaging the wheel. It might be a sensible way to increasing range...
Likes For mtnbud:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 688
Bikes: 1969 Peugeot PX10, 1992 Della Santa, Linus Roadster 8, Biria 700C ST-8
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 668 Post(s)
Liked 432 Times
in
262 Posts
Yes, another stupid thing to sell to wannabees. Hope they make millions.
Likes For Joe Bikerider:
#3
Lopsided biped
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 666
Bikes: 2017 Day 6 Cyclone (the Buick); 2015 Simcoe Deluxe (the Xebec); Street Strider 3i (the not-a-bike)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
71 Posts
At least they were honest about the shortcomings.
Likes For rollagain:
#5
Lopsided biped
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 666
Bikes: 2017 Day 6 Cyclone (the Buick); 2015 Simcoe Deluxe (the Xebec); Street Strider 3i (the not-a-bike)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
71 Posts
These bikes are going to weigh about 70 pounds already, without adding a battery (and more control circuitry) to it--and remember that the frame has to be
As much as I have a philosophical objection (and one very practical one) to derailleur drives, even I have to admire their efficiency. The only way to turn a bicycle wheel more efficiently is to make it a single-speed coaxial drive, typical of the old penny-farthings and most unicycles.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,142
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 846 Post(s)
Liked 816 Times
in
520 Posts
Don't look for it to get much different. No matter what they try they aren't going to substantially improve the electrical efficiency of motors or generators, and adding more sophisticated control electronics will only make it worse by siphoning off more power to run those.
These bikes are going to weigh about 70 pounds already, without adding a battery (and more control circuitry) to it--and remember that the frame has to bestrengthened made heavier to accommodate that. And can you say, 'proprietary parts'?
As much as I have a philosophical objection (and one very practical one) to derailleur drives, even I have to admire their efficiency. The only way to turn a bicycle wheel more efficiently is to make it a single-speed coaxial drive, typical of the old penny-farthings and most unicycles.
These bikes are going to weigh about 70 pounds already, without adding a battery (and more control circuitry) to it--and remember that the frame has to be
As much as I have a philosophical objection (and one very practical one) to derailleur drives, even I have to admire their efficiency. The only way to turn a bicycle wheel more efficiently is to make it a single-speed coaxial drive, typical of the old penny-farthings and most unicycles.
#7
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,771
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 748 Times
in
504 Posts
Moved from General
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#8
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,207
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 148 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3246 Post(s)
Liked 2,650 Times
in
1,541 Posts
You'll have energy loss from both the generator and the motor; a chain drive would be more efficient.
Likes For JohnDThompson:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 1,327
Bikes: GT Transeo & a half dozen ebike conversions.
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 328 Post(s)
Liked 221 Times
in
157 Posts
Tried more than a few times. The Mando Footlose was one of the early flops. A human being pedaling a generator cannot generate enough power to turn the motor on an ebike. So when the battery is dead, you gotta sit there and pump for an hour to get enough charge to go a few minutes.
Likes For Doc_Wui:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,411
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2104 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
362 Posts
What has 10 - 15 years till the present time brought in the way of innovation in e-bike development? Seems to me that interesting ideas like the Tidal Force and SuperPedestrian projects briefly got the interest of consumers and Venture Capitalists but ... so I'm not taking that bet. Rather I am predicting more of the same. Smartphones will be self aware in 15 years but e-bikes will still rely on Li-ion batteries and Class 1 will still be 20mph or it may be less! 12mph is a possible restriction on the top speed of an assisted bicycle in 10 years. How much sophistication does a vehicle with that limited a performance envelope need? <shrug>
Likes For Leisesturm:
#11
Senior Member
I am the first to say that I like belt drive. It offers almost chainlike efficiency along with cleanliness (but don't let anyone tell you that you can't throw a belt in traffic).
It comes down to how much inefficiency I am willing to deal with. the generator/motor drive (yes, I refuse to use the Analog / Digital nomenclature) is just too inefficient. It might work as a way to cheat into Class 3 with no real effort on the part of the user. However, I think it would be easier just to ramp up the torque sensor sensitivity. I can see it potentially easier to change the tyres.
I can see a use in some velomobiles. particularly velomobiles focused on transportation instead of enthusiasts. The more I think about it, I see this as a good application.
All that said, I see it as a solution in search of a problem.
It comes down to how much inefficiency I am willing to deal with. the generator/motor drive (yes, I refuse to use the Analog / Digital nomenclature) is just too inefficient. It might work as a way to cheat into Class 3 with no real effort on the part of the user. However, I think it would be easier just to ramp up the torque sensor sensitivity. I can see it potentially easier to change the tyres.
I can see a use in some velomobiles. particularly velomobiles focused on transportation instead of enthusiasts. The more I think about it, I see this as a good application.
All that said, I see it as a solution in search of a problem.