going for speed! Phoenix 4840 vs Cyclone 500 Watt kit
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
going for speed! Phoenix 4840 vs Cyclone 500 Watt kit
i'm going for speed. around 35mph top speed + decent range, around ten miles at top speed, or around 15-20 at a "quick" pace. what would be a better setup? i have around a 1000-1500 to spend.
so far i've been looking at these kits:
Cyclone 500 Watt Bicycle Motor Kit
or
the Phoenix 4840
which do you guys think would be better?
also what batteries should i go with?
so far i've been looking at these kits:
Cyclone 500 Watt Bicycle Motor Kit
or
the Phoenix 4840
which do you guys think would be better?
also what batteries should i go with?
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#5
Both Coasts...
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 299
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yeah, what he said - while people do it, bicycles were never designed with 30-35mph powered speeds in mind. Frame, wheels, brakes, tires, etc. plus weight of motor, batteries were never intended for that much stress and it's simply not realistic to attempt IMO. 20mph peak is about all air resistance is gonna allow on upright bikes. I'm happy with 15mph and sticking to bike lanes, trails, etc. Still moves faster than traffic - at least I'm moving forward and finding free friendly electricity at most destinations.
Recumbents - different animal altogether and you could reach high speeds fairly safely but not with that budget.
Recumbents - different animal altogether and you could reach high speeds fairly safely but not with that budget.
#6
Motorized Bastard
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Uh, dude, I've gone 50 mph on a $250 upright Trek mountainbike (with disc brakes added). The air resistance is not a problem at all.
#8
Motorized Bastard
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
30 mph is perfectly safe, and 35 mph isn't too bad either. Beyond that, it gets dangerous, at least with a regular cheap bicycle (good road bikes or downhill bikes should be fine though).
#9
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 34
Bikes: Trek MTB + 2 e bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Perfectly safe if you don't crash that is... Most motorcyclists are doing 30-40mph when they crash and some are fatalities or lingering injuries, on an upright bike it might be worse since you have farther to fall than on a scooter or motorcycle. Plus a bicycle helmet is probably useless at a crash 30+mph.
#10
Hooligan
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Base of the Rocky Mountains, Canada. Wonderous things!
Posts: 1,431
Bikes: 2010 Cannondale Hooligan 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
i'm going for speed. around 35mph top speed + decent range, around ten miles at top speed, or around 15-20 at a "quick" pace. what would be a better setup? i have around a 1000-1500 to spend.
so far i've been looking at these kits:
Cyclone 500 Watt Bicycle Motor Kit
or
the Phoenix 4840
which do you guys think would be better?
also what batteries should i go with?
so far i've been looking at these kits:
Cyclone 500 Watt Bicycle Motor Kit
or
the Phoenix 4840
which do you guys think would be better?
also what batteries should i go with?
That Cyclone motor is listed as reaching 27mph @ 24v, you would need to increase the voltage to have it match up to the Phoenix and i'm not sure that the Cyclone is meant to do so. Conversly, if you're not attached to your well being, the Phoenix will run at 72v, allowing you to ride down a highway. Thats really not a good idea.
My personal suggestion would be the Crystalyte series 5 (Phoenix) hub, but thats mostly due to personal knowledge of that particular hub and the fact that I know firsthand that they go like rockets if set up properly. Crystalyte is also reliable, and their parts are very open ended and interchangeable, which is the other reason for the vote.
As for the batteries, you should get some idea of personal preference. Reading https://ebikes.ca/batteries.shtml could help you figure it out some more. One thing to mention though, is that a 5 series is already a heavy beast. Packing on another 25lbs in SLA is going to make your bike weigh down like a cow.
I'd be worried about safety. Like others have said, thats a lot of speed to be putting on a bike. I don't personally feel safe with my 48v Crystalyte 406 at full throttle, and the Phoenix will probably put out noticeably more than that. Not going to tell you what to do, but watch yourself and research your setup!
#11
Motorized Bastard
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Perfectly safe if you don't crash that is... Most motorcyclists are doing 30-40mph when they crash and some are fatalities or lingering injuries, on an upright bike it might be worse since you have farther to fall than on a scooter or motorcycle. Plus a bicycle helmet is probably useless at a crash 30+mph.
#12
Both Coasts...
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 299
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
30-35mph perfectly safe on a bike that was never intended to be "powered" while carrying an additional 30-90lbs in addition to the rider?
Seriously, I'm not trying to argue or flame here - I admire high performance and pushing things to their limits. I've done it myself - but, that's R&D, testing, etc. It's not a reasonable goal to grab some bike that was never intended to go much over 20mph in the 1st place, hang a bunch of extra weight on the thing, power a wheel and ride it around in traffic at 30-35mph as if it's built to handle those demands just because somebody saw somebody else do it.
Pot holes, road surfaces, debris always seem to appear at the worst moment. Like when traffic prohibits you from weaving around something in the road, etc. You gotta take the hit and you better KNOW wheels, spokes, tires, brakes, frame, mounting hardware can handle it.
What I'm saying to new riders - start-out with the best odds of good performance with respect to safe operation. Enjoy it for what it is while learning what it needs to be. Then make improvements that will get closer to your goals while maintaining a reasonable working safety margin.
Wind is no more problem at 50mph than 20mph? Anbody care to explain that to me???
I believe m/c statistics indicate helmets are proven most effective when people fall over at near a stand still. The whipping action of this type fall slams the head into the ground/pavement and is the cause of most m/c head injuries. Most head injuries and the cycle isn't even moving!
Seriously, I'm not trying to argue or flame here - I admire high performance and pushing things to their limits. I've done it myself - but, that's R&D, testing, etc. It's not a reasonable goal to grab some bike that was never intended to go much over 20mph in the 1st place, hang a bunch of extra weight on the thing, power a wheel and ride it around in traffic at 30-35mph as if it's built to handle those demands just because somebody saw somebody else do it.
Pot holes, road surfaces, debris always seem to appear at the worst moment. Like when traffic prohibits you from weaving around something in the road, etc. You gotta take the hit and you better KNOW wheels, spokes, tires, brakes, frame, mounting hardware can handle it.
What I'm saying to new riders - start-out with the best odds of good performance with respect to safe operation. Enjoy it for what it is while learning what it needs to be. Then make improvements that will get closer to your goals while maintaining a reasonable working safety margin.
Wind is no more problem at 50mph than 20mph? Anbody care to explain that to me???
I believe m/c statistics indicate helmets are proven most effective when people fall over at near a stand still. The whipping action of this type fall slams the head into the ground/pavement and is the cause of most m/c head injuries. Most head injuries and the cycle isn't even moving!
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thanks for all the replies guys, and no i don't plan on going over 35mph. i would mostly be going at a cruising speed of 20mph, but would like to have the ability to go faster if need be. just like any car today can go well over 100mph, even thought theirs no real place to do it. again thanks for all the help guys, i guess I'll probably be going with the Phoenix after a little more research.
#14
Motorized Bastard
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's not a reasonable goal to grab some bike that was never intended to go much over 20mph in the 1st place, hang a bunch of extra weight on the thing, power a wheel and ride it around in traffic at 30-35mph as if it's built to handle those demands just because somebody saw somebody else do it.
Wind is no more problem at 50mph than 20mph? Anbody care to explain that to me???
Have you ridden 35 mph on an e-bike extensively? I have and speak from experience.
#15
ǝıd ǝʌol ʎllɐǝɹ I
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 518
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yes, the only reason to wear a bicycle helmet is so the vents allow you to stay cool when you're working hard pedaling. Anyone who is not pedaling should wear a motorcycle helmet, particularly at those speeds, and they should wear padded motorcycle clothing as well.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 273
Bikes: Rocky Mountain electric bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You sound like the Ralph Nader of ebikes.
#17
Hooligan
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Base of the Rocky Mountains, Canada. Wonderous things!
Posts: 1,431
Bikes: 2010 Cannondale Hooligan 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Downhill bikes also typically feature rear suspension. Having broken a 75kg rated rear rack using only 12kg of SLA batteries before, twice, I would suggest that if you only have a seatpost rack as a mounting option either stick with lithium or mount your batteries in the frame (if applicable). Anything else would be suicide. It would only take one wrong bump packing around a 48v SLA or even NiMH pack on a seatpost rack to send it wedging into your rear tire, bringing your ride to an abrupt and unpleasant end.
You could overcome these problems with hardpack/road tires and a lithium power setup, but,
Honestly, a downhill bike would probably be my last choice for frame style to meet this kind of project. There's a lot to be said for the strength of the frame, but the overall design just isn't optimized for it, not to mention that once its all said and done, downhill bikes are pricey. Very much so. And usually they're used for downhill, but once you add a 20+lb hub motor, attach your controllers, throttle, replace your 8-9 speed cassette shifter with a 7 speed freewheel shifter and so on, you've weakened the bike considerably and pretty much nullified its use as a downhill bike. Those electric hubs would withstand a small drop, but nothing that your bike would. Its pretty much a case of design mismatch.
In my opinion,
If you picked out a cross country bike, you could retain suspension but keep the bike more in line with its design. Going with a steel frame road bike would also be a good choice.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 273
Bikes: Rocky Mountain electric bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tires should be pavement types for sure. Maxxis Hookworms are excellent for high speed on road stuff. I've used Maxxis knobbies on pavement, and they definitely wander all over the place at speed, although they do work excellent on the downhll runs of Whistler/Blackcomb.
Note that I said E mountain bike with downhill components. Specifically wheels, brakes and front fork. The frame is open to debate, as the more relaxed head tube angles of downhill frames give better high speed stability, but if you're only talking 35mph it won't make much difference. Same goes for wheelbase, as downhill bikes can stretch out to 48" on some models.
Note that I said E mountain bike with downhill components. Specifically wheels, brakes and front fork. The frame is open to debate, as the more relaxed head tube angles of downhill frames give better high speed stability, but if you're only talking 35mph it won't make much difference. Same goes for wheelbase, as downhill bikes can stretch out to 48" on some models.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 431
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tires should be pavement types for sure. Maxxis Hookworms are excellent for high speed on road stuff. I've used Maxxis knobbies on pavement, and they definitely wander all over the place at speed, although they do work excellent on the downhll runs of Whistler/Blackcomb.
Note that I said E mountain bike with downhill components. Specifically wheels, brakes and front fork. The frame is open to debate, as the more relaxed head tube angles of downhill frames give better high speed stability, but if you're only talking 35mph it won't make much difference. Same goes for wheelbase, as downhill bikes can stretch out to 48" on some models.
Note that I said E mountain bike with downhill components. Specifically wheels, brakes and front fork. The frame is open to debate, as the more relaxed head tube angles of downhill frames give better high speed stability, but if you're only talking 35mph it won't make much difference. Same goes for wheelbase, as downhill bikes can stretch out to 48" on some models.
LOL
Last edited by EbikeHawaii; 09-30-07 at 08:42 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 540
Bikes: GT3 trike,Viper chopper, electric assist Viper chopper,Electric moped(Vespa style)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ebikehawaii, is completely wrong as usual.
eg. 500w on a MTB is ~26mph
1000w is only ~33 mph
And that is running high pressure slicks.
A velomobile will just about hit 45mph on 500w, and a velomobile is along way from a Huffy MTB.
eg. 500w on a MTB is ~26mph
1000w is only ~33 mph
And that is running high pressure slicks.
A velomobile will just about hit 45mph on 500w, and a velomobile is along way from a Huffy MTB.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 273
Bikes: Rocky Mountain electric bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well he's certainly wrong if he means 500W, but overvolting a '500W' motor might give more power, provided it doesn't turn into a smoking disc like Ken Trough's Hawaii Pancake Special did.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 431
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Like I said with a high voltage controller a 500 watt motor should get to 45 mph. Oviously you would need a hi voltage battery pack and your peak motor wattage may exceed 2000 watts your speed will depend on many variubles.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 431
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What is funny is that the same type of design made it up a 10,005 ft volcano in 3 hours and has lasted over 25,000 miles of ebike use.
Last edited by EbikeHawaii; 10-01-07 at 01:17 AM.
#24
Both Coasts...
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 299
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Nope, haven't ridden an 35mph eBike extensively because I'm a motorcycle rider and after 250k miles street riding, I know what's too fast for what equipment and situation. I do ride about 50 miles per week on an eBike but I'm sure that's nothing for most of you.
Say what you will - this thread has become a disgrace to the chap who started it simply asking about motors. I'm very sorry to have contributed to this downfall and will remove myself from any further discussion. Best of luck to the original poster and I hope they find what they're looking for.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 431
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i'm going for speed. around 35mph top speed + decent range, around ten miles at top speed, or around 15-20 at a "quick" pace. what would be a better setup? i have around a 1000-1500 to spend.
so far i've been looking at these kits:
Cyclone 500 Watt Bicycle Motor Kit
or
the Phoenix 4840
which do you guys think would be better?
also what batteries should i go with?
so far i've been looking at these kits:
Cyclone 500 Watt Bicycle Motor Kit
or
the Phoenix 4840
which do you guys think would be better?
also what batteries should i go with?