Ideal bike for conversion
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 428
Bikes: 92 Bridgestone xo-2 Turner Sultan
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ideal bike for conversion
What do you feel is the best type bike to convert to a ebike ?
old steel mountain bike
hybrid
commuter
recumbent
old steel mountain bike
hybrid
commuter
recumbent
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 270
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Mtn bike (front suspension only) aluminum frame, add torque arms, even steel frame drop outs will fail.
Mtn bikes usually have wider rims for bigger tires like Schwalbe BA's or Maxxis Hookworms.
They have front suspension which is good.
If you want higher speeds, usually, they have mounts for disc's (e.g. large rotor 8" disc brakes)
Mtn bikes usually have wider rims for bigger tires like Schwalbe BA's or Maxxis Hookworms.
They have front suspension which is good.
If you want higher speeds, usually, they have mounts for disc's (e.g. large rotor 8" disc brakes)
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Mtn bike (front suspension only) aluminum frame, add torque arms, even steel frame drop outs will fail.
Mtn bikes usually have wider rims for bigger tires like Schwalbe BA's or Maxxis Hookworms.
They have front suspension which is good.
If you want higher speeds, usually, they have mounts for disc's (e.g. large rotor 8" disc brakes)
Mtn bikes usually have wider rims for bigger tires like Schwalbe BA's or Maxxis Hookworms.
They have front suspension which is good.
If you want higher speeds, usually, they have mounts for disc's (e.g. large rotor 8" disc brakes)
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I think a recumbent is the way to go, if you could only choose one. I have six ebikes, one 16" folder, one 20" Giant Revive, one Walmart Mongoose MTB, one beach cruiser Nexus, a 20/16 recumbent and and a 26/20 EZ sport CX recumbent. For comfort and range and efficiency the big recumbent wins hands down. The others are better in town. The nice thing with the recumbent is that I can put dual Ping batteries 48/15Ahr directly under the seat, very low down on the bike, and still use my rear rack and basket combo for two panniers and a basket on top. The aero definitely makes a meaningful efficiency difference. With a big Apple tire on the back it is very comfortable as well. I'm good now for 70 miles of range averaging 20mph with moderate pedalling in moderately hilly terrain, in total comfort. The MTB is nice with dual suspension as well and front disk brake. I have an assortment of Crystalyte and Nine continent motors. The Nine C is more waterproof which is thus better with Halls - start immediate is better on recumbents to get help moving when they are a bit wobbly - otherwise I would go sensorless/pedal-first for better reliability/no Halls. I have a geared brushed on the Revive - it is my best urban shopper bike I would say. The small folder is good when I go to Arizona in my van. So each bike has a niche. I am awed by the big recumbent though, and can load up dual pings and 40 pounds of gear on to the chromolly frame and head out of town. Or attach a Bob trailer to it and haul the batteries on there. I love my lithium iron phosphate Pings running in parallel through a diode. At one C on them each, with 48 volts, I can pull about 1100 watts and go easy on them.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 428
Bikes: 92 Bridgestone xo-2 Turner Sultan
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think a recumbent is the way to go, if you could only choose one. I have six ebikes, one 16" folder, one 20" Giant Revive, one Walmart Mongoose MTB, one beach cruiser Nexus, a 20/16 recumbent and and a 26/20 EZ sport CX recumbent. For comfort and range and efficiency the big recumbent wins hands down. The others are better in town. The nice thing with the recumbent is that I can put dual Ping batteries 48/15Ahr directly under the seat, very low down on the bike, and still use my rear rack and basket combo for two panniers and a basket on top. The aero definitely makes a meaningful efficiency difference. With a big Apple tire on the back it is very comfortable as well. I'm good now for 70 miles of range averaging 20mph with moderate pedalling in moderately hilly terrain, in total comfort. The MTB is nice with dual suspension as well and front disk brake. I have an assortment of Crystalyte and Nine continent motors. The Nine C is more waterproof which is thus better with Halls - start immediate is better on recumbents to get help moving when they are a bit wobbly - otherwise I would go sensorless/pedal-first for better reliability/no Halls. I have a geared brushed on the Revive - it is my best urban shopper bike I would say. The small folder is good when I go to Arizona in my van. So each bike has a niche. I am awed by the big recumbent though, and can load up dual pings and 40 pounds of gear on to the chromolly frame and head out of town. Or attach a Bob trailer to it and haul the batteries on there. I love my lithium iron phosphate Pings running in parallel through a diode. At one C on them each, with 48 volts, I can pull about 1100 watts and go easy on them.
That range is eye-popping... and has me wondering about the feasibility of fully-loaded touring with a Bob trailer.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 428
Bikes: 92 Bridgestone xo-2 Turner Sultan
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I didn't mention them, but I'm surprised that touring bikes are rarely mentioned. The Raleigh Sojourn for example looks like a great candidate for a conversion kit.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would liket to second the recumbent suggestion. My son rides a Lightfoot World Traveler with a cyclone 500. Most comfortble bike I have ever ridden. Using 24 volts you can get the big batteries with a lot of amps giving you super range.
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 15
Bikes: Way too many and portions thereof
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My current bike is a ca. 1984 Miyata Ridge Runner. I think the key is to start with a bike that can carry a lot of weight and be stable. A long wheelbase and a lot of rake to the fork are things that an old Schwinn cruiser, a touring bike and a 1980's mountain bike have in common. The Miyat is much more comfortable than the 1997 Rockhopper I used to have the motor on.
#10
Lyen
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA
Posts: 126
Bikes: Dahon 2007 Cadenza, 2006 Speed Pro, 2005 Helios SL, 2004 Roo El, Minimoto Electric Bike, USPD Currie Electro Drive Electric Bike, Schwinn Scooter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If weight & rolling resistance are not your enemies, then go with a full suspension mountain bike. However, I preferred foldability, least rolling resistance, lightweight, and maximum power utilization. So I built myself a 2007 Dahon Cadenza with 700c wheels upgrade, a non-hub motor, and high density LiPo battery pack. I optimized my ebike for daily commute in San Francisco to work.
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 15
Bikes: Way too many and portions thereof
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If you have a steel bike with big tires there's no need for a suspension! At least to my crotchety old mind. Geometry that will handle a lot of weight with style and grace is still key. My bike, 30+ pounds of lead acid batteries, a last-generation Wilderness Energy hub motor and an old fat guy on top is close to a 300 pound juggernaut. The 1997 Rockhopper was nimble and a bit twitchy without the motor, and rough riding and a little unstable with the motor, etc. The long wheelbase and slack headtube angle of the Miyata makes a huge difference, while the steel frame soak up a lot of the shocks.
#12
e-biker
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: mizzery- the state
Posts: 6
Bikes: schwinn searcher 500watt rearhub 36volt lifepo4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How about a full suspension with big fat tires? That's how I'm doing my 2nd conversion. The first is a 26in scwinn searcher w/front suspension and it's still too bumpy on gravel roads w/potholes. I'm sure it won't be as efficient, but I'll compensate with more battery power....but, that's just my opinion
#13
Uninformed Informer
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 171
Bikes: Specialized Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For me it's always been about mountain bike with slicks. Mainly because I like the non-hub motors versatility being that I live in an area with some decent hills. I prefer zero suspension just because in my budget range the suspension systems are junk. I'd go with a secondhand bike off craigslist for your first build, cheap and disposable. You should be able to get a really nice bike for around $50-75. I've had my cyclone 500W for about a week now and so far the only thing that has me down is the weather preventing me from riding more
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CyJackX
Commuting
16
10-16-11 04:05 PM
swbluto
Mountain Biking
36
02-25-10 10:18 PM