Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

New Dynamo Light Announced - B&M IQ-X, 100 lux, Aluminum Casing, Redesigned Reflector

Search
Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

New Dynamo Light Announced - B&M IQ-X, 100 lux, Aluminum Casing, Redesigned Reflector

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-16, 10:50 AM
  #226  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
I have no idea what the actual issue thayvmay have had, or why other than B&M saying they need to be hooked up correctly. It works fine with my tail light.

Yes, it definitely brighter, casts useable light further, and illuminates a larger area than the 80 lux Cyo, the posted beam shots are deceptive.
if you have a cycle computer exactly how fast do you have to be going when the iq-x light first turns to full brightness? since this light has 8 led's installed I read I'm curious. my cyo gets to full brightness almost at a fast walking speed. I think the drawback with these bright lights is you have to go faster for them to reach full brightness. with my old cyo & rear toplight with single led's each, that system got bright at walking speed, but now with my new rear light with brake tek & the new cyo, I noticed you have to go a little faster for full brightness, not much but a little. the new cyo has 5 led's & the new brake tec rear light I think 2 led's when the old system had a total of 2 led's between the headlight & taillight....
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-06-16, 01:50 PM
  #227  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
[QUOTE=kickstart;18639284]Did a 45 minute test ride in light rain, and can say I'm very impressed with the IQ

is it the light from those 2 side lights that give the wide beam near the bike?

i was told there was 8 led's installed in this light. 2 for the illuminated switch, 2 for the sidelights, 1 for the main beam & 3 for the daytime running lights. is this how it's configured?
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-06-16, 01:54 PM
  #228  
Senior Member
 
southpawboston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somerville, MA and Catskill Mtns
Posts: 4,134
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times in 89 Posts
[QUOTE=saturnsc2;18669363]
Originally Posted by kickstart
Did a 45 minute test ride in light rain, and can say I'm very impressed with the IQ

is it the light from those 2 side lights that give the wide beam near the bike?

i was told there was 8 led's installed in this light. 2 for the illuminated switch, 2 for the sidelights, 1 for the main beam & 3 for the daytime running lights. is this how it's configured?
The two side lights are their own LEDs, and they are rather dim. They do not contribute at all to the wide beam near the bike. That is created entirely by the reflector inside the light for the 1 main LED.
southpawboston is offline  
Old 04-06-16, 04:04 PM
  #229  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by saturnsc2
I think the drawback with these bright lights is you have to go faster for them to reach full brightness.
In general, the faster you go, the more light you need, so this could work out just fine, depending on where you ride and how fast you go.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 04-06-16, 07:59 PM
  #230  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by saturnsc2
if you have a cycle computer exactly how fast do you have to be going when the iq-x light first turns to full brightness? since this light has 8 led's installed I read I'm curious. my cyo gets to full brightness almost at a fast walking speed. I think the drawback with these bright lights is you have to go faster for them to reach full brightness. with my old cyo & rear toplight with single led's each, that system got bright at walking speed, but now with my new rear light with brake tek & the new cyo, I noticed you have to go a little faster for full brightness, not much but a little. the new cyo has 5 led's & the new brake tec rear light I think 2 led's when the old system had a total of 2 led's between the headlight & taillight....
While I do have a computer, its not lit......

Seat of the pants say 1 or 2 mph more is needed to get to full brightness, maybe. In use it doesn't make any practical difference. Overall its a much better light than the 80 lux Cyo premium plus.
kickstart is offline  
Old 04-06-16, 08:05 PM
  #231  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by southpawboston

The two side lights are their own LEDs, and they are rather dim. They do not contribute at all to the wide beam near the bike. That is created entirely by the reflector inside the light for the 1 main LED.
That's correct, the side marker lights don't add anything to the main beam pattern. They do cast a slight peripheral glow, but its not useful light to see by. The main beam is strictly the single primary LED, the 2 secondary LED's only function in DRL mode. The side marker LEDs are on in both active modes, and standlight mode.

Last edited by kickstart; 04-06-16 at 08:08 PM.
kickstart is offline  
Old 04-06-16, 08:17 PM
  #232  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
The main LED is actually two LEDs.



Teardown pics here
Ausflug ins Blaue » Der IQ-X von Innen ? Demontage des Scheinwerfers

I think max brightness is around 15kph buy its hard to gauge exactly, it may slowly ramp up after that. Usable light from brisk walking speed, nice and bright from around 7-8kph, no problems even on steep hills with tired legs.
znomit is offline  
Old 04-06-16, 09:14 PM
  #233  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by znomit
The main LED is actually two LEDs.



Teardown pics here
Ausflug ins Blaue » Der IQ-X von Innen ? Demontage des Scheinwerfers

I think max brightness is around 15kph buy its hard to gauge exactly, it may slowly ramp up after that. Usable light from brisk walking speed, nice and bright from around 7-8kph, no problems even on steep hills with tired legs.
Sure is isn't it. Its just so small, looking at it through the lens it looks like only one. Amazing.
kickstart is offline  
Old 04-06-16, 10:08 PM
  #234  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
that reflector is pretty interesting. In the past, there have been more facets. Still haven't hooked mine up, tomorrow maybe
unterhausen is offline  
Old 04-07-16, 09:23 AM
  #235  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
That's correct, the side marker lights don't add anything to the main beam pattern. They do cast a slight peripheral glow, but its not useful light to see by. The main beam is strictly the single primary LED, the 2 secondary LED's only function in DRL mode. The side marker LEDs are on in both active modes, and standlight mode.
so their just to be seen then. they really don't light up the sides of the road...
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-07-16, 09:24 AM
  #236  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by znomit
The main LED is actually two LEDs.



Teardown pics here
Ausflug ins Blaue » Der IQ-X von Innen ? Demontage des Scheinwerfers

I think max brightness is around 15kph buy its hard to gauge exactly, it may slowly ramp up after that. Usable light from brisk walking speed, nice and bright from around 7-8kph, no problems even on steep hills with tired legs.
well that's why it's so bright then.
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-07-16, 01:20 PM
  #237  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
That's correct, the side marker lights don't add anything to the main beam pattern. They do cast a slight peripheral glow, but its not useful light to see by. The main beam is strictly the single primary LED, the 2 secondary LED's only function in DRL mode. The side marker LEDs are on in both active modes, and standlight mode.
do the drl's at night turn completely off? on my cyo premium they still glow but dimly & during the day the main led also glows dim, while the drl's then are fully illuminated.....
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-07-16, 01:42 PM
  #238  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by saturnsc2
so their just to be seen then. they really don't light up the sides of the road...
Yes, the side marker lights are just as their name implies, "to be seen", not "to see".
kickstart is offline  
Old 04-07-16, 02:45 PM
  #239  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
In general, the faster you go, the more light you need, so this could work out just fine, depending on where you ride and how fast you go.
Yeah, I wouldn't call it a drawback at all. With the older Cyo (non premium) you could get enough light walking the bike to walk it, or ride it at 2-3mph. That was sufficient for that speed. When you went faster and needed more light you got it.
PaulRivers is offline  
Old 04-07-16, 02:56 PM
  #240  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
one thing I didn't like about my Luxos is that if you are on a really long climb and not going very fast, then the flashing can get really annoying. I have upgraded my secondary backup battery light for those situations, but there was one ride where I really regretted my lighting choices.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 04-07-16, 05:05 PM
  #241  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
Yeah, I wouldn't call it a drawback at all. With the older Cyo (non premium) you could get enough light walking the bike to walk it, or ride it at 2-3mph. That was sufficient for that speed. When you went faster and needed more light you got it.
The IQ-X doesn't put out light at walking speed, but does at around 3 mph. The standlight being the main beam dimmed rather than the DRLs, is enough for walking speeds.
kickstart is offline  
Old 04-07-16, 05:09 PM
  #242  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
The IQ-X doesn't put out light at walking speed, but does at around 3 mph. The standlight being the main beam dimmed rather than the DRLs, is enough for walking speeds.
Really? Weird. I can say from personal experience that the older Cyo (non-premium) works at walking speed without annoying flicker (I mean it might flicker not sure, but not enough to be annoying). Weird (though certainly not impossible) that they would move away from that.

Last edited by PaulRivers; 04-07-16 at 05:13 PM.
PaulRivers is offline  
Old 04-07-16, 07:33 PM
  #243  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
Really? Weird. I can say from personal experience that the older Cyo (non-premium) works at walking speed without annoying flicker (I mean it might flicker not sure, but not enough to be annoying). Weird (though certainly not impossible) that they would move away from that.
so does my cyo premium it puts out bright light at walking speed, it pulsates, but the light is pretty bright just for walking. the iq-x doesn't put out ANY light at walking speed? well that's how they get the 100 lux out of it then. it's dead or very dim at low speed when other lights are already bright at very low speeds. the iq-x sounds like it needs more speed then others to get up to good brightness.

it has 8 led's so i guess it needs more current than most lights.

Last edited by saturnsc2; 04-07-16 at 07:39 PM.
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-07-16, 07:36 PM
  #244  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
here's a video on you tube the first time i seen it showing a person who has this light on his bike: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3K5FOOZpw

in all the b&m photos it shows a wide beam near the bike. both sides are totally lit up, but in all the pics i seen in real life it seems to show a narrower beam near the bike without all that side light...

Last edited by saturnsc2; 04-07-16 at 07:39 PM.
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-07-16, 08:22 PM
  #245  
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
from the manual about rear light hook up

Two duplex cables of different length are incorporated in the headlamp:

connect the long cable 1 with the hub dynamo (cut as required)
/connect the short cable (with integral plugs) 2 with the enclosed

cable or with the cable attached to the bicycle to the rear light.

SMartin is offline  
Old 04-07-16, 11:02 PM
  #246  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by saturnsc2
so does my cyo premium it puts out bright light at walking speed, it pulsates, but the light is pretty bright just for walking. the iq-x doesn't put out ANY light at walking speed? well that's how they get the 100 lux out of it then. it's dead or very dim at low speed when other lights are already bright at very low speeds. the iq-x sounds like it needs more speed then others to get up to good brightness.

it has 8 led's so i guess it needs more current than most lights.
I rigged up a light so I could see my computer, and this is what I came up with.

At 2 mph, or a brisk walk it starts emitting a dim, but usable light via the standlight.
At 3 mph it transitions to the main beam.
It continues to brighten, and at 5 mph its casting the full beam.
At 8 mph its at full output.

It will flicker if one stays right at the transition speed between the standlight and main beam, but is otherwise steady. The Cyo is brighter at walking speed, but the IQ-X surpasses it at around 4 mph, and beyond that there's no comparison.

The standlights are completely different.
The Cyo is brighter up close, almost annoying as one is looking directly at the LEDs and it casts a pool of light around the front wheel, but not much further.
The IQ-X isn't as bright up close as its the main beam dimmed with the cutoff effect, but its brighter further away, and extremely bright if viewed below the cutoff. It also casts light out about 30' rather than just a pool like the Cyo.

Last edited by kickstart; 04-07-16 at 11:18 PM.
kickstart is offline  
Old 04-07-16, 11:18 PM
  #247  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by saturnsc2
here's a video on you tube the first time i seen it showing a person who has this light on his bike: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3K5FOOZpw

in all the b&m photos it shows a wide beam near the bike. both sides are totally lit up, but in all the pics i seen in real life it seems to show a narrower beam near the bike without all that side light...
The IQ-X and Cyo are similar for the first 50', but beyond that the IQ-X beam is almost like there's a 2nd brighter light where the Cyo is fading out. It gives the illusion that its narrower because it casts a much longer beam but overall its wider further out, and hard to compare because they are different shapes.

From what I see, the pictures and videos are fairly useless in making a comparison.

Last edited by kickstart; 04-07-16 at 11:21 PM.
kickstart is offline  
Old 04-08-16, 08:22 AM
  #248  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
The IQ-X and Cyo are similar for the first 50', but beyond that the IQ-X beam is almost like there's a 2nd brighter light where the Cyo is fading out. It gives the illusion that its narrower because it casts a much longer beam but overall its wider further out, and hard to compare because they are different shapes.

From what I see, the pictures and videos are fairly useless in making a comparison.
since this light uses 2 led's as the main illumination, there's like 2 separate beams, & you can see the slight dark area between them.
do you yourself own a cyo premium?
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-08-16, 08:26 AM
  #249  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
did you sayin an earlier post that the side lights light up with the standlight?
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-08-16, 08:28 AM
  #250  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
I have a cyo premium which I just installed. I'll have to get the IQ-X installed and then compare
unterhausen is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.