![]() |
On principle I believe batteries should be replaceable, regardless of their chemistry. Throwing away an otherwise working device because it was made with a non-replaceable rechargeable battery is wasteful. That said, the lithium chemistry rechargeable batteries have been improving over time and product designers have been making lighter and brighter lithium chemistry powered lighting products, My main ride has a dynohub and powered lighting front and rear so no real batteries there other than my wrist worn Garmin Foretrex 601, which I use mostly with rechargeable AAA batteries or disposable (and increasingly expensive) Energizer lithium AAA batteries. On other bikes, we use a collection of Planet Bike Superflash Turbo and Portland Design Works rear blinking lights with the aforementioned rechargeable and disposable batteries. We do have some rechargeable lights around but they don't see much use.
I would like to see a device that could use multiple types of batteries and be able to charge NiMH or LIthium rechargeables by connecting a USB-C power cable. Unfortunately, while technnically possible, without proprietary cell packaging so the device would be able to detect what type of battery chemistry was installed, such a device would rely on the user to make sure they didn't try to charge nonrechargeable cells or use the wrong setting for a particular cell chemistry, which in turn might increase the risk of fire or explosion. That's why it is uncommon to see devices that can use either replaceable disposable or rechargeable batteries have any ability to charge batteries in the device. |
Originally Posted by honcho
(Post 22714227)
... it is uncommon to see devices that can use either replaceable disposable or rechargeable batteries have any ability to charge batteries in the device.
When I go backpacking, canoeing or kayaking, I really like having the ability to just swap phone batteries when my battery goes down. There is enough room under my phone inside this weatherproof case to hold two spare phone batteries which are user replaceable. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...0889990ce2.jpg I also bring spare batteries for my camera on such trips. But bike touring, I can charge up the batteries from my dynohub pass through cache battery, so that is less of an issue. Thus, I bring fewer spares on such trips. |
Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
(Post 22714360)
I think it is simpler. For example phones, it is very hard to find a phone these days that has a user replaceable battery. Phone companies have figured out that if your battery goes bad in three years, instead of paying a shop to replace the battery you are more likely to replace the phone. And they hope that you will be a repeat (profitable)
Phones are a special use case where the tight integration of the non replaceable battery has become ingrained in the design and engineering of virtually all smartphones, hence very few current model phones have replaceable battery packs. Further, those that do have replaceable battery packs cannot accomodate difference battery chemistries such as switching from Lithium to NiMH as an example. Finally, while I usually carry a mobile phone, I relish leaving my phone behind or turned off and being immune to interruptions from a mobile device on my rides. |
Originally Posted by honcho
(Post 22714227)
On principle I believe batteries should be replaceable, regardless of their chemistry. Throwing away an otherwise working device because it was made with a non-replaceable rechargeable battery is wasteful. That said, the lithium chemistry rechargeable batteries have been improving over time and product designers have been making lighter and brighter lithium chemistry powered lighting products, My main ride has a dynohub and powered lighting front and rear so no real batteries there other than my wrist worn Garmin Foretrex 601, which I use mostly with rechargeable AAA batteries or disposable (and increasingly expensive) Energizer lithium AAA batteries. On other bikes, we use a collection of Planet Bike Superflash Turbo and Portland Design Works rear blinking lights with the aforementioned rechargeable and disposable batteries. We do have some rechargeable lights around but they don't see much use.
I would like to see a device that could use multiple types of batteries and be able to charge NiMH or LIthium rechargeables by connecting a USB-C power cable. Unfortunately, while technnically possible, without proprietary cell packaging so the device would be able to detect what type of battery chemistry was installed, such a device would rely on the user to make sure they didn't try to charge nonrechargeable cells or use the wrong setting for a particular cell chemistry, which in turn might increase the risk of fire or explosion. That's why it is uncommon to see devices that can use either replaceable disposable or rechargeable batteries have any ability to charge batteries in the device. All this waste means they have to make new stuff, which means there are factories spilling out climate change gases, which tells me that climate change being caused by humans is a huge lie, otherwise they would be working diligently to make things last as long as possible, and be able to repair stuff, change batteries etc to prolong the life of the object. Of course all this remaking of stuff means using up valuable natural resources as well. I have a friend who has a International refrigerator made sometime in the 40's that is still running! They've been using ever since they inherited from her mom who had also never stopped using it; never any repairs just a couple of seals. I know we can make stuff to last a very long time, but they don't want to because of corporate stock holders need their shares to go up. It would be nothing to do, and cost nothing extra, to make a light that the user could open it up and replace the battery when they no longer will take a charge. Then the company who made the light would just make and sell you a battery...as long as they don't get stupid and charge as much, or even near as much as a new light! Or make the battery so it only will recharge for a couple of years! |
Originally Posted by honcho
(Post 22714388)
...
For example, if a device used AAA batteries, you could install AAA NiMH batteries and use a charging cable to charge the installed cells. If you instead installed non rechargeable alkaline AAA batteries, the charging system would not attempt to charge them as that could cause accelerated leakage or other damage. ... ... Finally, while I usually carry a mobile phone, I relish leaving my phone behind or turned off and being immune to interruptions from a mobile device on my rides. Most months my cell phone is not used, I only have it for travel. I give out my cell number to almost nobody, I do not want them to call or text me, and then they get pissed when I do not respond. If you give people your number, they assume that they can call you and actually get you. I only give out my land line number. But I carry the phone on the bike on longer rides in case for some reason I need help. When I travel, I usually am trying to get a forecast a couple times a day so I can plan what I want to do and when. And if I am on a bike tour, backpacking or canoe trip my sister will panic if she does not hear from me every 2 or 3 days, so I need to make some calls or send some e-mails when I travel so the family does not worry. That said, the phone is always either off or in airplane mode if I am not using it. |
Originally Posted by rekmeyata
(Post 22707282)
There might be a couple of other AAA lights but I could not locate one in a brief search.
In comparison, the CatEye ViZ 450 lithium rechargeable is mfr rated @ 40 lumen flash, 40 lumen constant and a retina-searing 450 lumen 'Daytime Hyperflash'. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:52 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.