Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

how does a wireless speedo work?

Search
Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

how does a wireless speedo work?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-07, 05:53 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
how does a wireless speedo work?

How exactly does a wireless speedo work? I'm about to buy a cat-eye micro-wireless speedo online and it says its "wireless", but that doesnt seem possible?? --what is wireless about it?
digbellspeedo is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 06:00 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 89 Posts
There's a magnet attached to a spoke, a sensor attached to the fork (in line with the magnet), the sensor senses each time the magnet passes by (one wheel revolution) and sends a signal to the receiver (mounted on or near the handlebars). The "receiver" is also the brains of the unit, you enter wheel size info into it and it computes speed, distance, etc. based on that-
well biked is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 06:05 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah i knew that, i thought that those were called magnetic speedo. So if those are called wireless, then what is a nonwireless speedo? thanks
digbellspeedo is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 06:14 PM
  #4  
Death fork? Naaaah!!
 
top506's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The other Maine, north of RT 2
Posts: 5,325

Bikes: Seriously downsizing.

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Liked 629 Times in 280 Posts
AAhhhh, one with the sensor and 'receiver' connected with a wire.
What's not to understand? Wireless=no wire.
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.

(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
top506 is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 06:17 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 89 Posts
Yep, that's it, it sends the signal from the fork to the receiving unit without a wire, therefore it's wireless. Follow the directions carefully when setting it up, they can be a little finicky, but once working, they're great-
well biked is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 07:11 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i have one and those things are nice; very accurate. i had the LBS install mine; no troubles with it at all
rpmfast is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 07:16 PM
  #7  
Call me The Breeze
 
I_bRAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cooper Ontario
Posts: 3,702

Bikes: 2004 Litespeed Siena, 1996 Litespeed Obed, 1992 Miele (unknown model), 1982 Meile Uno LS.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
I've got several "wireless" computers and I don't really see the point.

Less reliability, more weight, higher cost and twice as many batteries to replace. Give me some advantages.
I_bRAD is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 07:17 PM
  #8  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 19 Posts
Originally Posted by well biked
Yep, that's it, it sends the signal from the fork to the receiving unit without a wire, therefore it's wireless. Follow the directions carefully when setting it up, they can be a little finicky, but once working, they're great-
Not really. The wireless units will always be suceptible to outside interference, especially moreso in the city than in country.
operator is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 07:43 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by operator
Not really. The wireless units will always be suceptible to outside interference, especially moreso in the city than in country.
I ride in the city with mine every time I ride, never a problem. Have you ever used one?
well biked is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 07:45 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by I_bRAD
Give me some advantages.
No wire?
well biked is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 08:35 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 658

Bikes: Diamondback centurion. Home built tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
how does a wireless speedo work?
very carefully
bassplayinbiker is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 08:43 PM
  #12  
B.C. to D.C.
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: between the Popeye's, the liquor store, the funeral home, and the strip club
Posts: 576

Bikes: 1992 Miyata Nine 14; 1971 Raleigh Super Course fixie conversion; 2006 Jamis Nova (853 version); 2001 Diamondback Topanga (SS conversion); 1956 Rudge Sports; 1971 Raleigh Competition (processing); 199? Schwinn World Sport (processing)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
string?

and maybe a rolled sock.
comradehoser is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 09:06 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931

Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by I_bRAD
I've got several "wireless" computers and I don't really see the point.

Less reliability, more weight, higher cost and twice as many batteries to replace. Give me some advantages.
You don't need the wire, which could get in the way of things, it has a cleaner "look" without the wire, and
you can use the same computer on two bikes (you just need a second sender unit, tuned to the same frequency).
Wogster is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 09:14 PM
  #14  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 19 Posts
Originally Posted by I_bRAD
I've got several "wireless" computers and I don't really see the point.

Less reliability, more weight, higher cost and twice as many batteries to replace. Give me some advantages.
Looks cool, no wires to break. If I lived in the city, i'd never use wireless - interference from every single stoplight sensor.
operator is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 09:19 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
To answer the OP in better detail.

A wired cyclometer has a wheel magnet that passes a pickup placed near it on the fork. The pickup generates an electrical pulse every time the magnet passes it. That pulse travels up the wire to the cyclometer head where the pulse is counted and the interval between pulses timed. That information allows the cyclometer to calculate your speed and distance.

A wireless cyclometer has the same magnet except the pickup not only reads the magnetic pulse, it contains a small battery powered transmitter that sends that pulse as a radio signal. The cyclometer head has a receiver that reads that signal and does the same calculations as a wired cyclometer.

The tricky part is the sending unit and cyclometer head have to be aligned properly so the head "sees" the signal. Also, there are two batteries to be concerned with as both the sending unit and receiver have their own. And as noted, outside radio frequency sources can interrupt or interfer with the signal.
HillRider is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 09:33 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 89 Posts
As for these claims of problematic interference, I must be lucky and live in a wireless cyclometer-friendly city. I've used them for about five years and never had a problem with that. What happens during these periods of interference?
well biked is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 09:59 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
erader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: silicon valley
Posts: 1,774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by I_bRAD
I've got several "wireless" computers and I don't really see the point.

Less reliability, more weight, higher cost and twice as many batteries to replace. Give me some advantages.
no contacts to get wet and fail. my cateye wireless works flawlessly...i change the battery once a year like any other computer and at this point in life body weight is a bigger issue than a couple of grams of computer weight. .

ed rader

Last edited by erader; 03-22-07 at 10:04 PM.
erader is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 10:01 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
erader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: silicon valley
Posts: 1,774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by operator
Not really. The wireless units will always be suceptible to outside interference, especially moreso in the city than in country.
i live in the city. my cateye wireless has never failed or shown any signs of being influenced by outside interference.

ed rader
erader is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 10:02 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
erader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: silicon valley
Posts: 1,774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by well biked
As for these claims of problematic interference, I must be lucky and live in a wireless cyclometer-friendly city. I've used them for about five years and never had a problem with that. What happens during these periods of interference?
i think these claims are made by the same sorts who argued against index shifting. my wireless works flawlessly .

ed rader
erader is offline  
Old 03-22-07, 11:58 PM
  #20  
# BF-STL-00020
 
marengo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 323

Bikes: Cinelli, Pinarello, Rossin, Gitane, Trek

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I use a wireless computer, live in the city, and yes I'm plagued by interferance on almost every ride. The only thing affected is my max speed which reads 74.9 most of the time. For $10? And I can easily swich it between bikes? Yeh, I can live with that.


P.S. I think indexing is overrated.
P.P.S. The max speed spike seams to be so brief that even though it jumps to a very high speed it doesn't affect my average speed, which I do tend to be interested in.

Last edited by marengo; 03-23-07 at 12:03 AM.
marengo is offline  
Old 03-23-07, 07:55 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by erader
i think these claims are made by the same sorts who argued against index shifting. my wireless works flawlessly .

ed rader
Most do but it depends on where you live and how new your cyclometer is. Newer designs are much better at ignoring rf interference than the first models.

My funniest (funny=strange, not funny=hahaha) experience with RF interference was the heart rate monitor a friend was using at his doctor's recommendation after heart surgery a few years ago. It was a cheap, non-coded Nashbar unit since he didn't want to put out lot of money for temporary use.

We were riding easily and his heart rate was in the desired range when we passed an electrical substation. All of the sudden his heart rate reading spikes to 250 and then falls to zero! Talk about panic. It took a moment for us to realize why the reading suddenly got so alarming and it returned to normal about 1/4 mile later. His next purchase was an expensive but coded Polar monitor.
HillRider is offline  
Old 03-23-07, 09:01 AM
  #22  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 19 Posts
Originally Posted by erader
i live in the city. my cateye wireless has never failed or shown any signs of being influenced by outside interference.

ed rader
I'm about to leap to the improbable conclusion that we live in different cities. Either that or your city has a population of 2.
operator is offline  
Old 03-23-07, 09:34 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 146
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wogsterca
and
you can use the same computer on two bikes (you just need a second sender unit, tuned to the same frequency).
You can also easily buy a second wired mount/sensor for a second bike. I suspect it is cheaper for a second wired mount/sensor than a wireless sender unit (but I may be wrong).
TurdFerguson2 is offline  
Old 03-23-07, 10:04 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lansing, IL
Posts: 246

Bikes: Fuji Grand Fondo 2.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've ridden under 13800 volt transmission lines and never ever experienced any inteference with my wireless. The only thing that ever affected it was the antilock wheel sensor, which guess what uses a magnet to generate a pulse. The first time I saw that I couldn't understand how I could have ridden at 60mph and never even got on the bike. I had the computer sitting in a bag on the back seat of the car.

torgrot
Torgrot is offline  
Old 03-23-07, 10:21 AM
  #25  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 19 Posts
Originally Posted by TurdFerguson2
You can also easily buy a second wired mount/sensor for a second bike. I suspect it is cheaper for a second wired mount/sensor than a wireless sender unit (but I may be wrong).
Marginally. The DB4l wired unit is $7.50 and the 4LW wireless is $9. Not a huge difference. For that price i'd just buy the whole package as the wired one is only $12.50.
operator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.