Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-22-08, 03:26 AM   #1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Garmin 205 Vs Polar CS200 (Both with Cadence)

Hey guys,
Looking at getting a cycle computer and want a good one that I can use to get myself pushed and hopefully get into better shape.

Was looking at the Polar CS200cad with cadence and heart rate monitor and it looked ideal.
Between the HR monitor and cadence I could really measure myself and push myself (and also use the calorie watcher on it to try loose some weight).

Just started looking at the Garmin Edge's though and they look like they're a hell of a lot more for the money so to speak. They look pretty fancy and like there's alot to it whereas the Polar just feels alot more like a fancy little cycle computer but still just a basic cycle computer.

Wondering what peoples opinions are between the two and the pro's and con's of each against each other.
Could stretch to the 305 probably as I'm single with an ok job but just dont really feel I can justify it for how much I cycle.

I usually cycle to work and back every day (only a 5km cycle each way) and then try go on the weekend off road (11km there, 11km off road track, 11km back).

I want to push myself to do more and think something like this might help me as I can measure and push myself with it.

Looking for wiser more experienced peoples opinions and thoughts.

nila is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-08, 06:20 PM   #2
urban biker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Bikes: Haro MTB for commuting and a LHT for everything else.
Posts: 205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm a big fan of Polar units but I don't recommend the CS200. It has (or maybe had) a flaky reputation for reliability.

You don't need a HRM to get motivated. Your rate of breathing is more than sufficient for determing how hard your working. A simple wired computer, with cadence, should be fine. But if you really want a nice HRM, look at the Suunto T3, which an be used for running, biking, etc., including wireless hookup to speed.The T2 isn't bad either.
paulrad9 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 AM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.
  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.