![]() |
Bright-brighter-brightest
I am confused about the various bulb applications regarding flashlights and bike headlights using standard batteries.
If you take a two cell DD flashlight and swapped out the bulb which would be the brightest? Incandescent--Krypton--led or halogen. I want to upgrade the bulb in my vintage headlight. There are krypton bulbs with screw bases which would make life easier than a socket conversion. I wonder if they are any brighter than the standard PR2 bulb? Any ideas? |
Originally Posted by bobn
(Post 6679944)
I am confused about the various bulb applications regarding flashlights and bike headlights using standard batteries.
If you take a two cell DD flashlight and swapped out the bulb which would be the brightest? Incandescent--Krypton--led or halogen. I want to upgrade the bulb in my vintage headlight. There are krypton bulbs with screw bases which would make life easier than a socket conversion. I wonder if they are any brighter than the standard PR2 bulb? Any ideas? |
3-volts severely limits what you can do. It's probably best to just keep your vintage light just as it is. An LED conversion is a possibility but the reflector in your light is not going to provide a good pattern so your not going to be happy with that. High Power LED's require heat sinks and that complicates the conversion as well. It's best to build from scratch. Here is a good site with lots of information on building very good lights for your bike.
http://pilom.com/BicycleElectronics/...lectronics.htm Here is a good place to obtain high power LED's and optics. http://www.dealextreme.com/ |
There are LED modules made by Terralux that are 50 lumens. The standard 2D bulb is more like 15-30 lumens, so it's a decent upgrade. 50 lumens may well be insufficient for night riding by itself w/o background lighting, but anyway it's a decent start.
Warning: make sure you get the polarity right, as getting the polarity backwards could fry the quite expensive LED. Most LED modules are pos at the tip of the base, and neg on the surrounding body. |
Originally Posted by Ngchen
(Post 6681928)
There are LED modules made by Terralux that are 50 lumens. The standard 2D bulb is more like 15-30 lumens, so it's a decent upgrade. 50 lumens may well be insufficient for night riding by itself w/o background lighting, but anyway it's a decent start.
Warning: make sure you get the polarity right, as getting the polarity backwards could fry the quite expensive LED. Most LED modules are pos at the tip of the base, and neg on the surrounding body. |
Originally Posted by n4zou
(Post 6683627)
I hate to say this but that bulb will produce less light than the filament bulb you would be replacing it with due to the change in pattern with the original reflector. The beam will be excessively wide wasting most of the light where you don't need it. The only advantage with the LED replacement bulbs are long life and extended run time with batteries. Granted, there are advantages to long run times and a bulb that lasts 50,000 hours but they simply will not produce enough usable light with reflectors designed to be used with filament bulbs to actually see where your going. The Cree XR-E Q5 high power emitter produces 228 lumen coupled with a good optic designed for that emitter will produce more light than an MR-16 20-watt halogen bulb and only consume 3 watts.
I agree with everything else, however. |
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 6684142)
That's gonna have to be soooome optics;)
http://www.quickar.com//25x6.gif No wasted light illuminating areas that don't need it and concentrating it where you do. http://www.quickar.com/imsheader.jpg |
Originally Posted by n4zou
(Post 6685383)
They are! Optics are keeping pace with emitters. Note this graph for the latest 6X15 elliptical lens and holder.
No wasted light illuminating areas that don't need it and concentrating it where you do. |
n4zou - I agree that optics are getting better. But the bottom picture you attached is comparing optics to reflectors. Are reflectors better than optics? Looks like it to me.
|
Originally Posted by JB01245
(Post 6686332)
n4zou - I agree that optics are getting better. But the bottom picture you attached is comparing optics to reflectors. Are reflectors better than optics? Looks like it to me.
|
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 6685479)
So they are getting to about the point that the MR bulbs are at now?;)
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:58 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.