Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

Blinkie testing: PBSF vs MARS 4.0 vs Cateye LD1100

Search
Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

Blinkie testing: PBSF vs MARS 4.0 vs Cateye LD1100

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-09, 04:45 AM
  #1  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Thread Starter
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
Blinkie testing: PBSF vs MARS 4.0 vs Cateye LD1100

I finally gathered up all of these lights so thought I would do some testing.

Planet Bike SUPERFLASH


Blackburn Mars 4.0


Cateye LD1100



Side by side



Last edited by znomit; 05-25-09 at 05:50 AM.
znomit is offline  
Old 05-25-09, 04:46 AM
  #2  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Thread Starter
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
Initial tests are on Energizer Max alkaline batteries.

Central beam comparison:
This is on steady after 6hrs.
Distance 2M



A few notes.
  • The SF and Mars have crappy beams, not symmetrical.
  • The Cateye is by far the brightest in the middle of the beam.
  • The Cateye is the narrowest beam so needs to be well mounted.
  • I've spent a bit of time looking at all three and I can't pick a clear winner.

Last edited by znomit; 05-25-09 at 06:29 AM.
znomit is offline  
Old 05-25-09, 04:49 AM
  #3  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Thread Starter
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
Runtime Testing
Energizer Max Batteries. The Cateye takes AAs so should run much longer than the others.
Specified runtimes:
  • SF 30hrs
  • Mars 50hrs
  • Cateye 50hrs

Fresh:


6hrs


12hrs


18hrs


24hrs


30hrs


42hrs


60hrs

Last edited by znomit; 05-25-09 at 05:07 AM.
znomit is offline  
Old 05-25-09, 04:49 AM
  #4  
Galveston County Texas
 
10 Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,222

Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1350 Post(s)
Liked 1,243 Times in 621 Posts
Originally Posted by znomit
Initial tests are on Energizer Max alkaline batteries.

Central beam comparison:
This is on steady after 6hrs



A few notes.
  • The SF and Mars have crappy beams, not symmetrical.
  • The Cateye is by far the brightest in the middle of the beam.
  • The Cateye is the narrowest beam so needs to be well mounted.
  • I've spent a bit of time looking at all three and I can't pick a clear winner.
SF winner on your test.
Your too close.
10 Wheels is offline  
Old 05-25-09, 09:12 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
lutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks a lot for the comparison Znomit!!!
Do you have nay idea why the biggest light might with multiple LEDs produces the most fouced light (cateye)?
Almost looks to me like the cateye has the advantage, although certainly not price-wise.
lutz is offline  
Old 05-25-09, 09:26 AM
  #6  
Oooooooofffff SALESMAN!
 
The Big Wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Local trails
Posts: 309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks for sharing your results with us. Can you also test this light? https://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.20333

How would it compare to the ones you listed?
The Big Wheel is offline  
Old 05-25-09, 09:55 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: portland or
Posts: 1,888
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have the mars 4 and the superflash. the mars 4 seems to eat batteries. but that could be a defective unit. the mars has better side lighting with the leds facing out. but overall I think the superflash is a bit better and more noticeable.
both are brighter then the cateye except from the side. lost my cateye when the mount broke when my bike fell over.
steveknight is offline  
Old 05-25-09, 10:53 AM
  #8  
uke
it's easy if you let it.
 
uke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: indoors and out.
Posts: 4,124
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by The Big Wheel
Thanks for sharing your results with us. Can you also test this light? https://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.20333

How would it compare to the ones you listed?
I don't have the Cateye or the Mars, but I do have two SF and the Ultrafire, and compared them here.

OP, thanks for the reviews. If more folks took beamshots, we'd all be better off.
uke is offline  
Old 05-25-09, 11:16 AM
  #9  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
can you do a side view test?
but I know the TLD1100 should be the clear winner in that.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 05-26-09, 02:25 AM
  #10  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Thread Starter
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
Comparison with older blinkies

This is to give a little perspective to the inevitable, and good natured, flame war that will follow, when we argue the differences between these three bright lights.

I have an LD600 and a Mars 2.0, compared to the LD1100
Freshly charged NiMH in all three.
Over exposed to show the Mars 2.0

znomit is offline  
Old 05-26-09, 02:47 AM
  #11  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Thread Starter
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
Side beam test

I made a simple test rig to see the beam pattern over a quarter circle.
Propped up some computer paper and marked 0 45 90 degrees on it.
Blinkie in the middle pointing at zero.
Camera across the room pointed at the 45 mark.





Here we have PBSF, MARS 4.0, LD1100
Camera settings the same for all three.
Central pattern over exposed.





Yes the mars sidelights point forward a little, same on the 2.0 version.
znomit is offline  
Old 05-26-09, 05:22 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 511
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I had the LD1100 for a while. The top and bottom rows are independent ... and that's cool. But, they go out of sync and it kind of destroys the "blink" function.

The PBSF is cheaper anyway.
BearSquirrel is offline  
Old 05-26-09, 05:46 AM
  #13  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Thread Starter
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
Side Beam Test #2

I thought I'd try this from another angle.

Taped the lights to a door and swung it through 180 degrees.



5second exposure at f11, and an ND filter.

5s exposure F11 with a ND filter added.


Note the superflash ... is flashing at a high frequency...

Just for kicks here they are on blink
znomit is offline  
Old 05-26-09, 02:35 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,418
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
https://www.vetta.com/product_show.asp?ptype=whole&id=60
https://www.amazon.com/Vetta-TSL-C-Fl...pr_product_top

Why don't you test a real tail light? 4AA batteries instead of 2AAA indicates that this is a much more serious light and it has a broader viewing area. It puts the three that you tested to shame. The Dinotte is the only one brighter. After seeing this tail light I wish that I had not fooled with any of the others.
dekindy is offline  
Old 05-26-09, 02:38 PM
  #15  
Galveston County Texas
 
10 Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,222

Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1350 Post(s)
Liked 1,243 Times in 621 Posts
Originally Posted by dekindy
https://www.vetta.com/product_show.asp?ptype=whole&id=60
https://www.amazon.com/Vetta-TSL-C-Fl...pr_product_top

Why don't you test a real tail light? 4AA batteries instead of 2AAA indicates that this is a much more serious light and it has a broader viewing area. It puts the three that you tested to shame. The Dinotte is the only one brighter. After seeing this tail light I wish that I had not fooled with any of the others.
He Did.
The Vetta is No Brighter then the PBSF.



__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"

10 Wheels is offline  
Old 05-26-09, 03:05 PM
  #16  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Thread Starter
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
Please PM me if anyone wishes to donate Blinkies to the cause!
znomit is offline  
Old 05-26-09, 03:11 PM
  #17  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
interesting stuff
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 05-27-09, 12:41 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've also tested these three lights, and have found that both the Mars 4 and the TL-1100 are better than the SF for daytime riding as cars seem to give me more room when using these. I assume that they are more visible during daytime.

Currently I use the Mars 4 (I dropped and broke the TL-1100), and it does consume batteries quickly, although it's not really an issue as I use rechargeables.
Cyclist0383 is offline  
Old 05-27-09, 12:54 AM
  #19  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Thread Starter
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
Comparison with a 1W led

The PBSF has a 1/2W LED and the Mars has a huge 1W.
Note they don't actually claim to drive the LEDs at these powers, and the AAA batteries would only run for an hour or two at 1W power.

Here is a cree red LED driven at 500mA, approximately 1W.
The LD1100 is used for comparison.
I tried a few different optics and found this reflector looked a bit like the cateye beam.
The central brightness is similar but the cateye only covers a small fraction on the area.





This is about what you would expect from a red torch from DX.
It is a huge amount of light.
znomit is offline  
Old 05-27-09, 03:40 AM
  #20  
-
 
seeker333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,865

Bikes: yes!

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Liked 38 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by 10 Wheels
He Did.
The Vetta is No Brighter then the PBSF.
I've got both. My vetta is much brighter than my pbsf. Actually it's brighter than 2 of my pbsfs. They're not even close. On a wall bounce, the vetta obliterates the pbsf. Since they're priced nearly the same, it's a simple decision to buy the vetta, if light output is your primary objective. Side-by-side, their output very closely resembles Znomit's "DIY red cree vs cateye" picture above.

The vetta is not a perfect taillight. The 4AA batteries are heavy. The holder and head assembly mount 2 or 3 different ways, and all of them are sorta bad. The actual battery life is much shorter than specified (120hrs on strobe), especially for nimh. If you use nimhs with 1.2v nominal, ~1.35v fresh off the charger, you've only got a short time till the voltage drops until it's inadequate to power the circuit. The light quits on you at about 1.15v/per cell. In my case I get about 4-5 hrs out of sanyo eneloops on strobe, then she's dead. By extrapolation, I estimate you'd get only 10 hrs runtime on strobe with 1.5v alkaline batteries. I don't know how Vetta figures 120 hrs.
seeker333 is offline  
Old 05-27-09, 03:56 AM
  #21  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Thread Starter
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
Yes guys I'm testing blinkies.
Small self contained lights you can leave on your bike and expect to change the batteries monthly, not after every ride.
Next up, runtime tests in flash mode.
See y'all in about 150hrs...
znomit is offline  
Old 05-27-09, 07:50 AM
  #22  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
znomit, what reflector did you use with the Cree? I haven't gotten around to building my rear light yet since I only have spot reflectors. I figure they would work, but if someone hit the bright spot it might blind them and then they would run me over.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 05-27-09, 07:54 AM
  #23  
aka Phil Jungels
 
Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Aurora, IL
Posts: 8,234

Bikes: 08 Specialized Crosstrail Sport, 05 Sirrus Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Given the old eyball test, side by side, with new batteries, there is no doubt that my Mars 3.0 is the better light.

Hard to believe, but the SF comes in a very good second. It's still a good light, but the Mars is better to the human eye.
Wanderer is offline  
Old 05-28-09, 02:01 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,418
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by 10 Wheels
He Did.
The Vetta is No Brighter then the PBSF.



I hope you know more about other topics that you comment on than you do about tail lights since it is obvious to me that you know absolutely nothing about tail lights. The Vetta I referenced is so much brighter than the other lights reviewed that it is laughable.
dekindy is offline  
Old 05-28-09, 02:06 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,418
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by seeker333
I've got both. My vetta is much brighter than my pbsf. Actually it's brighter than 2 of my pbsfs. They're not even close. On a wall bounce, the vetta obliterates the pbsf. Since they're priced nearly the same, it's a simple decision to buy the vetta, if light output is your primary objective. Side-by-side, their output very closely resembles Znomit's "DIY red cree vs cateye" picture above.

The vetta is not a perfect taillight. The 4AA batteries are heavy. The holder and head assembly mount 2 or 3 different ways, and all of them are sorta bad. The actual battery life is much shorter than specified (120hrs on strobe), especially for nimh. If you use nimhs with 1.2v nominal, ~1.35v fresh off the charger, you've only got a short time till the voltage drops until it's inadequate to power the circuit. The light quits on you at about 1.15v/per cell. In my case I get about 4-5 hrs out of sanyo eneloops on strobe, then she's dead. By extrapolation, I estimate you'd get only 10 hrs runtime on strobe with 1.5v alkaline batteries. I don't know how Vetta figures 120 hrs.
I have not used my Vetta enough yet to deplete the original batteries or to gauge battery life. I will use hybrid rechargeables next. Even if the run time is short the batteries can be recharged hundreds of times and the superior light is worth the effort to recharge them even if it is after every ride.

The bulk of the light does present some mounting challenges. Again the light output is worth the effort.
dekindy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.