Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

Cyclometer or Handheld GPS??

Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

Cyclometer or Handheld GPS??

Old 12-06-06, 01:44 PM
  #1  
MegadetH
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Blue Ridge, Georgia
Posts: 160

Bikes: Brodie Omega

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cyclometer or Handheld GPS??

Im looking to get something for my bike that at least tells me my altidude along with speed , average speed distance blah blah... but Im wondering if a handheld GPS unit would be better. I like the idea of seeing on a display where Ive been and having a trail to look back on as well. But do GPS units display speed?
flair1111 is offline  
Old 12-06-06, 03:00 PM
  #2  
Know Your Onion!
 
badkarma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,011

Bikes: Kestrel Talon, Motobecane Le Champion SL

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by flair1111
But do GPS units display speed?
Yep
badkarma is offline  
Old 12-06-06, 03:39 PM
  #3  
Urban Biker
 
jimmuter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 731

Bikes: Trek 720 hybrid; 2007 Specialized Tricross Comp

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Keep in mind that a GPS works by using satellites. I love mine, but every once in a while, it'll blip and say my max speed was 400 MPH or something like that. In general though, it works well. It doesn't work as well if you use it amongst tall buildings and it doesn't work at all if you can't see the sky. I've found that I use it when I drive now too. I'm chronically lost. It's a cool toy.
jimmuter is offline  
Old 12-06-06, 04:06 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Nermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Farmington, NM
Posts: 2,308

Bikes: Giant Cypress SX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Will it do cadence and heart rate? My preference is to have everything in one unit, though gps is not in the budget for quite a while.
__________________
Some people are like a Slinky ... not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs.
Nermal is offline  
Old 12-06-06, 05:22 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
bbunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sierra Vista, Arizona, USA
Posts: 238

Bikes: Trek 7200

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Both?

https://www.garmin.com/products/edge305/pt-edge305Gal10.jpg
bbunk is offline  
Old 12-07-06, 12:03 AM
  #6  
N_C
Banned.
 
N_C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bannation, forever.
Posts: 2,887
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think what the OP is looking for is a bicycle computer that has a GPS built into it. Frankly I'm surprised Shimano has not developed a Flight Deck model of one yet. Give them time I'm sure they will.
N_C is offline  
Old 12-07-06, 12:15 AM
  #7  
Trans-Urban Velocommando
 
ax0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lenexa, KS
Posts: 2,400

Bikes: 06 Trek 1200 - 98 DB Outlook - 99 DB Sorrento

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just bolt my eTrex to the top tube or handlebar. I couldn't care less about actually measuring cadence or heart rate at this point. The GPS tracks distance, time, average speed, top speed, current speed, and has a backtrack log and navigation ability to waypoints I've stored.


Fun stuff, but they're separate tools. A cyclometer can't replace a GPS if you need GPS features, nor vise versa.
ax0n is offline  
Old 12-07-06, 01:34 AM
  #8  
Videre non videri
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208

Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
GPS is accurate, at any given moment, to about 20 ft on average. That is, your reported position is anywhere within about 20 ft from the true position. This shifts back and forth as you move. In narrow streets with relatively little sky visible, you could easily appear to move completely opposite your true direction, because the error moves backwards faster than you move forwards! Not only that, but the error could shift between positions as far apart as 100-200 ft in a second...

GPS is fine for finding your way, but for precision work such as showing and recording speed and distance, it's not good at all. Unless you live in a flat desert with only a few very low buildings...

A cyclometer, when properly calibrated, is accurate in any condition, to about 0.3% or better. That is, the error in recorded distance for exactly 100 miles, for example, is only about 1500 ft or so at the most.
CdCf is offline  
Old 12-07-06, 04:09 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,018
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
https://www.ja-gps.com.au/gpscomparison.html

Altitude is the complicated one, there are multiple ways each device calculates it.
geo8rge is offline  
Old 12-13-06, 02:21 PM
  #10  
Just another brick.......
 
PinkFloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 105

Bikes: 2004 Tommasini Carbo-Fire, 2004 Giant Cypress

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Since a decent cyclocomputer only costs about $30-35 (i.e., Sigma BC1600 w/ cadence on eBay), why worry about it? Go buy one.
PinkFloyd is offline  
Old 12-13-06, 03:02 PM
  #11  
Perineal Pressurized
 
dobber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In Ebritated
Posts: 6,555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bbunk
Both?
Agree. I had my Garmin Legend zip tied atop my Planet Bike cyclo-puter for yesterdays ride. Not for any particular reason other than I wanted to see if the two were in agreement on total mileage and average speed.

My plan is to drag the GPS along on the long meandering ride-abouts, where I find myself befuddled to where I actually am.

Unless they have a barometric altimeter, they're generally useless for elevation.
__________________
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
dobber is offline  
Old 12-13-06, 04:38 PM
  #12  
Walmart bike rider
 
gpsblake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,117
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times in 24 Posts
I've been using a GPS for years now. I have found they are very accurate most of the time and never need calibrating. I can switch the GPS to any bicycle I want without having to do a thing to it. Today's ride is an example. According to my GPS, I rode 23.36 miles. I then went to my Delorme mapping software, plotting out the exact route I rode today and used their software to determine the miles. 23.27 miles the software determined what I rode. That's pretty darn accurate.

Now in a downtown area with large skyscrapers or in a dense forest environment, the GPS probably isn't going to be as accurate as a probably calibrated cyclometer. But the key is PROPERLY calibrated cyclometer, meaning you take a ruler to measure your diameter of your tire rotation and use that figure, not the generic figure that the instructions tell you.

But there isn't a rule that says you can't use both? With a GPS you can download your rides to a map or use the GPS itself as a map. Cyclometers are very inexpensive and I used both on my tour in 2005.

I wouldn't say the altitude on a non-barometric GPS is useless but it isn't nearly as accurate as a probably calibrated barometric GPS altimeter. But if you got a low pressure system coming through your area and you don't calibrate the barometric altimeter, it isn't going to be accurate either. According to the manual, a barometric GPS altimeter should be calibrated every few hours.
gpsblake is offline  
Old 12-13-06, 05:37 PM
  #13  
MegadetH
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Blue Ridge, Georgia
Posts: 160

Bikes: Brodie Omega

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Im going with both. Im keeping my current cyclometer and have ordered the Garmin Vista Cx.
flair1111 is offline  
Old 12-13-06, 05:46 PM
  #14  
Perineal Pressurized
 
dobber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In Ebritated
Posts: 6,555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by flair1111
Im going with both. Im keeping my current cyclometer and have ordered the Garmin Vista Cx.
Be prepared to shell out another $80 for decent maps.........*cough*bittorrent*cough*
__________________
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
dobber is offline  
Old 12-13-06, 06:15 PM
  #15  
Videre non videri
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208

Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by gpsblake
I've been using a GPS for years now. I have found they are very accurate most of the time and never need calibrating. I can switch the GPS to any bicycle I want without having to do a thing to it. Today's ride is an example. According to my GPS, I rode 23.36 miles. I then went to my Delorme mapping software, plotting out the exact route I rode today and used their software to determine the miles. 23.27 miles the software determined what I rode. That's pretty darn accurate.

Now in a downtown area with large skyscrapers or in a dense forest environment, the GPS probably isn't going to be as accurate as a probably calibrated cyclometer. But the key is PROPERLY calibrated cyclometer, meaning you take a ruler to measure your diameter of your tire rotation and use that figure, not the generic figure that the instructions tell you.

But there isn't a rule that says you can't use both? With a GPS you can download your rides to a map or use the GPS itself as a map. Cyclometers are very inexpensive and I used both on my tour in 2005.
Sure, in a flat area, with few and low hills, and no forests or tall buildings, the GPS is fairly accurate. Your close match was likely luck more than actual precision, though errors could average out over longer distances to some extent.

The cyclometer, on the other hand, has almost no sources of error if calibrated properly (which is easy to do, if the unit allows detailed settings). Just ride a known distance (straight street/road measured on a detailed map, or in a GIS) and adjust the distance per revolution setting to produce that distance.
CdCf is offline  
Old 12-13-06, 06:33 PM
  #16  
Curmudgeon
 
Wil Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nausea, New Hamster
Posts: 1,572

Bikes: (see https://wildavis.smugmug.com/Bikes) Bianchi Veloce (2005), Nishiki Cascade (1992), Schwinn Super Sport (1983)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Both. I have CatEye CC-CD300-DWs on both the road bikes, and a CatEye Micro-Wireless on the MTB; I have a Garmin Quest which I've used on all the bikes for just over a year (i.e. all of 2006 season, and from about the fall of 2005).

The Quest is so convenient; I've ridden centuries, metrics, long and short rides, all without reference to a single map whilst on the bike - well, OK, planned routes have to be set up to start with, but how else would you do it? Even without pre-loaded routes, the maps in the Quest are quite adequate for navigation.

I've found the GPS to be such a boon for cycling - it certainly beats stopping at every junction to read a paper map! Of course it would be almost useless if the DoD decided to switch on Selective Availability, or if the maintenance of the constellation of satellites was less than stellar… (so to speak…)

- Wil
Wil Davis is offline  
Old 12-13-06, 06:38 PM
  #17  
Videre non videri
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208

Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Yes, GPS serves extremely well as a wayfinding tool. For recording distance travelled, average speeds and so on, it's not so good.
CdCf is offline  
Old 12-13-06, 09:43 PM
  #18  
MegadetH
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Blue Ridge, Georgia
Posts: 160

Bikes: Brodie Omega

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dobber
Be prepared to shell out another $80 for decent maps.........*cough*bittorrent*cough*

Thanks, *cough*Ill do that as soon as it arrives*cough* As a matter of fact Ill do that right now*cough* *cough*thanks again*cough*
flair1111 is offline  
Old 12-13-06, 10:36 PM
  #19  
Walmart bike rider
 
gpsblake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,117
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times in 24 Posts
Originally Posted by CdCf
Sure, in a flat area, with few and low hills, and no forests or tall buildings, the GPS is fairly accurate. Your close match was likely luck more than actual precision, though errors could average out over longer distances to some extent..
Not luck. I document and download every single ride I do. Very rarely is it off by even 1 percent. Now in all fairness, I do live in a rural, non-mountainous area but it is heavily forested. I guess if I rode around downtown NYC or along steep cliffs, it would be less accurate. The GPS is also great for average MPH, my unit always knows when I have stopped and will stop calculating a moving average speed and time moved.

But if I was really in need to be deadly accurate, I would get a cyclometer & calibrate it properly. But I find that being always under 1 percent is pretty darn good.

The only time I kick myself is the times I'll go walking for a geocache with my GPS while using it for bicycling. Or if I drive my car and forget to clear out the data. Then yes, it does mess up the data and I've got to reconstruct it from the GPS log taking out the distance and time walking or riding in the car.

Still a GPS is a great tool to have on a bike. And there's so many other things you can do with it besides bicycling.

I can't see them ever going back to Selective Availbity, too many public services and businesses now rely on GPS.
gpsblake is offline  
Old 12-13-06, 10:37 PM
  #20  
Curmudgeon
 
Wil Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nausea, New Hamster
Posts: 1,572

Bikes: (see https://wildavis.smugmug.com/Bikes) Bianchi Veloce (2005), Nishiki Cascade (1992), Schwinn Super Sport (1983)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by CdCf
Yes, GPS serves extremely well as a wayfinding tool. For recording distance travelled, average speeds and so on, it's not so good.
Well, it might vary with different devices (although I don't see why it should), I've found that the Garmin Quest is pretty consistent with the cyclometer on each of my bikes, usually to within 1 or 2%.

- Wil
Wil Davis is offline  
Old 12-13-06, 11:14 PM
  #21  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by flair1111
Thanks, *cough*Ill do that as soon as it arrives*cough* As a matter of fact Ill do that right now*cough* *cough*thanks again*cough*
That cough sounds bad. You should go see a doctor *cough* utorrent.
operator is offline  
Old 12-14-06, 08:17 PM
  #22  
Perineal Pressurized
 
dobber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In Ebritated
Posts: 6,555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Nudge, nudge.
__________________
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
dobber is offline  
Old 12-14-06, 08:22 PM
  #23  
Walmart bike rider
 
gpsblake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,117
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times in 24 Posts
I did notice near the end of my tour that the cyclometer was showing a difference of 3 to 4 percent from the GPS unit while the beginning it was around 1 percent. I think it was the result of my tires wearing down and thus making the cyclometer more inaccurate. Air pressure probably also affects cyclometer accuracy, especially on mountain bike tires. The less pressure, the more tire that is constant with the road.

I probably should have done a wheel circumference measurement to bring the cyclometer back to being totally accurate but when you're riding 70 miles a day, it's not a real high priority.

Anyhow like I said with cyclometers being so cheap, no law says you can't have both a cyclometer and a GPS.
gpsblake is offline  
Old 12-15-06, 02:14 AM
  #24  
Videre non videri
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208

Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Pump your tyres up...
CdCf is offline  
Old 12-16-06, 04:34 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
kokomo61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 914

Bikes: Giant OCR C2, Kona Jake the Snake, Scattante 650-R

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 7 Posts
Im going with both. Im keeping my current cyclometer and have ordered the Garmin Vista Cx.
I've got both - an eTrex Vista Cx, and a Cateye Micro wireless. I pay more attention to the Garmin, since the numbers are bigger. I also use it to plot the elevation of the rides, too. The cyclocomputer I use essentially for overall speed and average speed.
__________________
2020 Giant Defy 2
Fuji Cross Pro
Scattante 650-R trainer bike
'06 Kona Jake the Snake



kokomo61 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.