Portland Design Works RADBOT 1000
#1
One Man Fast Brick
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,121
Bikes: Specialized Langster, Bianchi San Jose, early 90s GT Karakoram, Yuba Mundo, Mercier Nano (mini velo), Nashbar Steel Commuter, KHS Tandemania Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Portland Design Works RADBOT 1000
Does anybody have any experience with this taillight? More intensity than a Superflash, but around the same price point? I like the integrated reflector - keeps you legal. Not sure what kind of drain the 1W led would have on a couple AAAs though.
https://www.ridepdw.com/goods/lights/radbot-1000
https://www.ridepdw.com/goods/lights/radbot-1000
#3
Mr.Schwinn F'in Armstrong
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: parma ohio
Posts: 1,515
Bikes: tarmac pro, SJ HT 29er expert, Trek Xo2, atomlab trailpimp, cannondale f5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just got mine. Should be replacing the pb superflash as the new 'standard' once it catches on. The ZZZpop mode is awesome, and the light itself is much more intense than the superflash.
I will be running the rb1k on my seatpost and the pbsf on the jersey pocket
I will be running the rb1k on my seatpost and the pbsf on the jersey pocket
#4
Mr.Schwinn F'in Armstrong
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: parma ohio
Posts: 1,515
Bikes: tarmac pro, SJ HT 29er expert, Trek Xo2, atomlab trailpimp, cannondale f5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here is a quick side by side comparison with the superflash: pbsf on left rb1k on right
#7
Mr.Schwinn F'in Armstrong
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: parma ohio
Posts: 1,515
Bikes: tarmac pro, SJ HT 29er expert, Trek Xo2, atomlab trailpimp, cannondale f5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
[QUOTE=
Hey, can you project the two beams on the wall in steady mode and take a photo, so we can see the beam spread on the two lights for comparison?[/QUOTE]
I was able to do a video capture. I don't have a convienent way to take a photo. Hope it helps. first one is superflash, second is the radbot
Hey, can you project the two beams on the wall in steady mode and take a photo, so we can see the beam spread on the two lights for comparison?[/QUOTE]
I was able to do a video capture. I don't have a convienent way to take a photo. Hope it helps. first one is superflash, second is the radbot
#8
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times
in
366 Posts
Woah! Looks like a good light. Whats the runtime?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Looks good! If you're in the market for a rear light, also compare to the new Mars 4.0 tail-light - it's brighter than PBSF, and probably on par with the radbot, and I got mine on Amazon for $19.99 without a sale last month.
#10
Mr.Schwinn F'in Armstrong
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: parma ohio
Posts: 1,515
Bikes: tarmac pro, SJ HT 29er expert, Trek Xo2, atomlab trailpimp, cannondale f5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#12
Mr.Schwinn F'in Armstrong
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: parma ohio
Posts: 1,515
Bikes: tarmac pro, SJ HT 29er expert, Trek Xo2, atomlab trailpimp, cannondale f5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
superflash says 100 hours which may be a fib. So, 2 x bright or 2 x eat your batteries. pick your poison.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
SuperFlash on left, RB1k on right. I like the beam spread on the RB1k, it's going to be able to cover a lot wider of an angle. And quite a lot of power, too.
They tried to deliver mine today, but I wasn't here. I'll have to do the signature-release slip and play with mine tomorrow
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 511
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We have a winner!!! I'm getting one.
Though, I suppose this will just kick off an arms race of rear tail lights. Which, I think will be awesome!!! BTW, no reason to abandon the superflash. Just put it on a chainstay. I like the constant blinking action. Probably helps oncoming cars judge your distance.
Though, I suppose this will just kick off an arms race of rear tail lights. Which, I think will be awesome!!! BTW, no reason to abandon the superflash. Just put it on a chainstay. I like the constant blinking action. Probably helps oncoming cars judge your distance.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 511
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If it's a choice between this and the $160 Dinotte, it's a no brainer.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Ok, got mine and took a first look at it.
^ It's bigger than a SuperFlash.
^ Side view. The button has a tactile, audible "ca-click" when pushed.
^ Rear view, showing the screw that holds the two halves together
^ The batteries go in the section on the left, and the circuitry's on the right. Those spring contacts at the bottom of the photo make contact with the square metal "pads" on the white circuit board. I hope they're stainless steel so corrosion doesn't cause problems.
The following photos were all taken at the same full-manual camera settings, and all of them are using NiMH rechargable AAA cells running in steady mode, so you can compare the photos directly. As you can see, the RB1k is approaching the performance of the LOW mode on a DiNotte 140L, although the beam's not quite as wide.
^ It's bigger than a SuperFlash.
^ Side view. The button has a tactile, audible "ca-click" when pushed.
^ Rear view, showing the screw that holds the two halves together
^ The batteries go in the section on the left, and the circuitry's on the right. Those spring contacts at the bottom of the photo make contact with the square metal "pads" on the white circuit board. I hope they're stainless steel so corrosion doesn't cause problems.
The following photos were all taken at the same full-manual camera settings, and all of them are using NiMH rechargable AAA cells running in steady mode, so you can compare the photos directly. As you can see, the RB1k is approaching the performance of the LOW mode on a DiNotte 140L, although the beam's not quite as wide.
Last edited by mechBgon; 12-11-09 at 09:33 PM.
#21
One Man Fast Brick
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,121
Bikes: Specialized Langster, Bianchi San Jose, early 90s GT Karakoram, Yuba Mundo, Mercier Nano (mini velo), Nashbar Steel Commuter, KHS Tandemania Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, it doesn't even sniff the Dinotte in terms of brightness. I will get one or two anyway and use them in circumstances when I don't think the retina searing ability of my 140L is quite necessary, but where my superflashes might lack.
#22
Galveston County Texas
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,221
Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1349 Post(s)
Liked 1,243 Times
in
621 Posts
[QUOTE=mechBgon;10135854]Ok, got mine and took a first look at it.
^ It's bigger than a SuperFlash.
^ Side view. The button has a tactile, audible "ca-click" when pushed.
^ Rear view, showing the screw that holds the two halves together
^ The batteries go in the section on the left, and the circuitry's on the right. Those spring contacts at the bottom of the photo make contact with the square metal "pads" on the white circuit board. I hope they're stainless steel so corrosion doesn't cause problems.
The following photos were all taken at the same full-manual camera settings, and all of them are using NiMH rechargable AAA cells running in steady mode, so you can compare the photos directly. As you can see, the RB1k is approaching the performance of the LOW mode on a DiNotte 140L, although the beam's not quite as wide.
Nice work, Thanks
^ It's bigger than a SuperFlash.
^ Side view. The button has a tactile, audible "ca-click" when pushed.
^ Rear view, showing the screw that holds the two halves together
^ The batteries go in the section on the left, and the circuitry's on the right. Those spring contacts at the bottom of the photo make contact with the square metal "pads" on the white circuit board. I hope they're stainless steel so corrosion doesn't cause problems.
The following photos were all taken at the same full-manual camera settings, and all of them are using NiMH rechargable AAA cells running in steady mode, so you can compare the photos directly. As you can see, the RB1k is approaching the performance of the LOW mode on a DiNotte 140L, although the beam's not quite as wide.
Nice work, Thanks
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"
Fred "The Real Fred"
#23
Senior Member
I'm getting one, but it's out of stock on their website. I couldn't find it in stock anywhere else. Anyone have any luck tracking one down?
#25
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts