Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

GPS vs Sensor for speed

Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

GPS vs Sensor for speed

Old 02-03-12, 10:48 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2

Bikes: Merida 903

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
GPS vs Sensor for speed

I've just bought the BRYTON Ryder 30, which is a great unit, awesome screen and features.

In the box, it came with 1 sensor and a heart rate monitor, so if you want to track cadence, you are defaulted to use the GPS for speed.

I've always had a magnet sensor telling me my speed, so it feels a little different but have nothing to go from

Has anyone had any experience on the performance and accuracy of the GPS units vs a standard sensor? I'm considering buying another sensor for speed, but it's another $60, so if the GPS is accurate there may not be any need for it.

Thanks in advance.
PerthPete is offline  
Old 02-03-12, 12:26 PM
  #2  
747 Freight Pilot
 
bicycleflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 458

Bikes: Rivendell, Bike-Friday Pocket-Rocket and one home made fixed gear

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I once tested both simultaneously on a ride. The GPS was a Garmin Forerunner and the computer was a cateye. There were some minor differences in speed and distance, but they are so insignificant in my opinion that they don't even merit discussion. I wouldn't hesitate to use GPS. Think about it...No wires to break, No sensors, No wheel size needs to be programmed. It is the ultimate wireless.

The only real issue was reception. In cities with tall building, and I mean a lot of buildings, reception could be lost. Additionally under really, really, heavy tree cover you could also lose the signal. But it was a rare occurrance. This test was in 1997, and I undrstand the antennas in use now are even better.

I still use the forerunner on my Bike Friday. The lack of sensors and wires make packing it up for a trip easy.
bicycleflyer is offline  
Old 02-03-12, 01:39 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central Louisiana
Posts: 3,055
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
The accuracy of a speedometer/odometer, wired or wireless, which derives its readings from magnetic sensors mounted on fork and wheel should depend upon the circumference of the wheel, which is entered by the user when the unit is installed on the bike.
doctor j is offline  
Old 02-03-12, 01:47 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,418
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Read your instruction manual; the GPS probablyuses the GPS exclusively for location, distance, speed, etc., everything but cadence, and only uses the sensor if the GPS signal is lost. That is they way that the Garmin works. The GPS calibrates the sensor unlike a non-GPS computer where the user does this manually. Your unit may work the same way.
dekindy is offline  
Old 02-03-12, 02:58 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by dekindy
...only uses the sensor if the GPS signal is lost. That is they way that the Garmin works. ....
Incorrect. Garmin uses primarily the wheel sensor. You can set the diameter or let it auto calibrate it. If it loses the sensor, it starts using GPS for distance and speed. GPS position is noisy over short distances and clips corners if you ride a tortuous path. That's why they have the wheel sensor.
Looigi is offline  
Likes For Looigi:
Old 02-04-12, 01:48 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
JimF22003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,654

Bikes: 2008 Trek Madone 5.5, 2009 Cervelo R3SL tdf edition, Cervelo R5 with Di2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I don't bother with the wheel sensor on my Garmins. The gps is plenty good enough.
JimF22003 is offline  
Likes For JimF22003:
Old 02-04-12, 10:24 AM
  #7  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2

Bikes: Merida 903

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for your feedback guys. I'll stay with the GPS for speed and distance and save the $$. I live in a pretty open city (Perth, Western Australia), so it's all good.

I appreciate your feedback on this.

I took the unit out for a ride yesterday and was very happy with the results. Bryton Rider 30 is looking like a top unit so far. The screen size and customisation on what is where is awesome.

I use the cadence sensor and it's proving to be a big help to push me a little harder.
PerthPete is offline  
Old 08-17-16, 06:24 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
rsilvers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: MA, USA.
Posts: 90

Bikes: Giant Trance X 0 29er, LaPierre Aircode Dura Ace Di2, Merlin Titanium Mountain XTR, Vitus 979 Mavic/Dura Ace, Lightspeed Titanium Solano Ultegra

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I decided I needed the speed sensor for trail riding MTB because there is no way that the GPS can track the tight turns. Also, when you climb and descend over a small hill, the GPS will only see the horizontal movement component and not the up and down. Two of my friends went for the same 20 mile trail ride and their distances were over one mile apart. This is both due to GPS error and auto-pause errors. The wheel sensor ends the auto-pause errors.

Is one mile off over 20 miles good enough? No, not for me. No way. I use Strava and I don't want the GPS to say I went 19.0 MPH when I went 20.0.

For a road bike I think it is much less important - though a GPS will still clip corners when you turn, so I just got one for my road bike.
rsilvers is offline  
Old 08-20-16, 03:48 PM
  #9  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,297
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,407 Times in 908 Posts
Originally Posted by JimF22003
I don't bother with the wheel sensor on my Garmins. The gps is plenty good enough.
This.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Likes For RobbieTunes:
Old 08-20-16, 04:20 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
bobwysiwyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 961' 42.28° N, 83.78° W (A2)
Posts: 2,344

Bikes: Mongoose Selous, Trek DS

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times in 189 Posts
Originally Posted by rsilvers
I decided I needed the speed sensor for trail riding MTB because there is no way that the GPS can track the tight turns. Also, when you climb and descend over a small hill, the GPS will only see the horizontal movement component and not the up and down. Two of my friends went for the same 20 mile trail ride and their distances were over one mile apart. This is both due to GPS error and auto-pause errors. The wheel sensor ends the auto-pause errors.

Is one mile off over 20 miles good enough? No, not for me. No way. I use Strava and I don't want the GPS to say I went 19.0 MPH when I went 20.0.

For a road bike I think it is much less important - though a GPS will still clip corners when you turn, so I just got one for my road bike.
What phone/gps are you using? Newer, more current iterations of hardware and software are pretty accurate, including barometric elevation detection.
bobwysiwyg is offline  
Old 08-20-16, 05:37 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
NYMXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Middletown NY
Posts: 1,495

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix EVO w Hi-Mod frame, Raleigh Tamland 1 and Giant Anthem X

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
I ride a lot of "metric" centuries (doing another tomorrow) and most participants will be using a GPS type of device. I use a Garmin 800 because it also saves the rides to my computer and now I also use a HRM, so the ride data is all there (except for cadence, which will be next).
Anyway, at the end of those rides, the GPS's vary in ride length, climbs and ave speed. The wheel magnet ones, are all very VERY close. I will add that we are in the rural country and maybe hills, trees and other things might help cause the GPS to be harder to track and throw it off a little.
For me, a GPS is plenty accurate enough and if it loses a mile of so, I'm okay with that. I'm not a professional athlete or have plans to be one at 58 years old. I just like have a fairly good account of my activities.
NYMXer is offline  
Old 08-20-16, 06:56 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
rsilvers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: MA, USA.
Posts: 90

Bikes: Giant Trance X 0 29er, LaPierre Aircode Dura Ace Di2, Merlin Titanium Mountain XTR, Vitus 979 Mavic/Dura Ace, Lightspeed Titanium Solano Ultegra

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bobwysiwyg
What phone/gps are you using? Newer, more current iterations of hardware and software are pretty accurate, including barometric elevation detection.
It is impossible. GPS is +- 10 feet at best when it is working optimally.

Garmin 520 with 1-second recording interval and GPS+GLONASS.

This 25.9 mile ride at 7.6 mph average (with a Garmin speed sensor that I measured to the mm and it just so happened to auto-calibrate to the exact same value which I let it do when I was riding on a straight road):

https://www.strava.com/activities/681888403

When I took the Garmin file, stripped out the speed-sensor data, and let Strava calculate the distance using only GPS+GLONASS, it came out to 24.1 miles and since the distance was recorded as less than it really was but the time was the same, the average speed in Strava became 6.9 MPH.

I for one would rather have Strava say 7.6 than 6.9 for the same ride.
rsilvers is offline  
Old 08-20-16, 07:28 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
bobwysiwyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 961' 42.28° N, 83.78° W (A2)
Posts: 2,344

Bikes: Mongoose Selous, Trek DS

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times in 189 Posts
Originally Posted by rsilvers
It is impossible. GPS is +- 10 feet at best when it is working optimally.

Garmin 520 with 1-second recording interval and GPS+GLONASS.

This 25.9 mile ride at 7.6 mph average (with a Garmin speed sensor that I measured to the mm and it just so happened to auto-calibrate to the exact same value which I let it do when I was riding on a straight road):

https://www.strava.com/activities/681888403

When I took the Garmin file, stripped out the speed-sensor data, and let Strava calculate the distance using only GPS+GLONASS, it came out to 24.1 miles and since the distance was recorded as less than it really was but the time was the same, the average speed in Strava became 6.9 MPH.

I for one would rather have Strava say 7.6 than 6.9 for the same ride.
What exactly is it I said you are stating is impossible?
bobwysiwyg is offline  
Old 09-23-16, 08:46 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
chong67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 342

Bikes: Trek FX 7.4 + Sirrus Expert Carbon X1

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have the Garmin speed sensor and I read on the manual, it use this to calculate speed. If I dont have this, then it use the GPS to calculate the speed, ie the mph?
chong67 is offline  
Old 09-23-16, 08:50 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
chong67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 342

Bikes: Trek FX 7.4 + Sirrus Expert Carbon X1

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dekindy
Read your instruction manual; the GPS probablyuses the GPS exclusively for location, distance, speed, etc., everything but cadence, and only uses the sensor if the GPS signal is lost. That is they way that the Garmin works. The GPS calibrates the sensor unlike a non-GPS computer where the user does this manually. Your unit may work the same way.
Incorrect. If you read the Garmin manual, it says if speed sensor is lost or not use, it will use the GPS to calculate the speed, ie, mph.
chong67 is offline  
Old 06-21-17, 03:41 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,418
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by chong67
Incorrect. If you read the Garmin manual, it says if speed sensor is lost or not use, it will use the GPS to calculate the speed, ie, mph.

Garmin Edge 305 used GPS for everything but cadence(used the GSC10 cadence feature) unless GPS signal becomes too weak and then used the speed sensor until GPS signal resumes. I tried to copy the manual text but was unable to. Were you talking about a different model Garmin?


Think about it, you could use a GPS enabled Garmin Edge 305 without a GSC10 sensor and cadence would be the only bike data not displayed. You also had the option of manually entering the wheel size or letting the GPS automatically calculate it. BTW, I used a refurbished Garmin Edge 305 for five years and read the manual extensively.
dekindy is offline  
Old 06-23-17, 07:59 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,671

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 243 Times in 180 Posts
Originally Posted by dekindy
Garmin Edge 305 used GPS for everything but cadence(used the GSC10 cadence feature) unless GPS signal becomes too weak and then used the speed sensor until GPS signal resumes. I tried to copy the manual text but was unable to. Were you talking about a different model Garmin?


Think about it, you could use a GPS enabled Garmin Edge 305 without a GSC10 sensor and cadence would be the only bike data not displayed. You also had the option of manually entering the wheel size or letting the GPS automatically calculate it. BTW, I used a refurbished Garmin Edge 305 for five years and read the manual extensively.
I'm pretty sure you have this backwards. I owned a 305 as well.

In every GPS based bike computer I've ever owned, the GPS is the fallback when the speed sensor is absent. Garmin units will use the GPS to calibrate the wheel circumference and thereafter use the more accurate speed sensor.

The speed sensor gives more accurate speed and distance than does the GPS because of the sampling rates and the inherent accuracy of +/- 4 to 7.8m for GPS when at it's most accurate. The speed sensor will be accurate within some fraction of a wheel circumference (or the time to make that rotation) which is much less (and therefore more accurate) than the 1 second sampling plus between 4 to 7.8m accuracy of the GPS.


J.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 06-23-17, 01:14 PM
  #18  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 245

Bikes: 2017 Sirrus Sport

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 420 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Manual here:

https://www.gpscity.com/pdfs/manuals...-EN-MANUAL.pdf

Page 76, speed sensor is only used when GPS is turned off.
Sal Bandini is offline  
Old 06-23-17, 02:41 PM
  #19  
- Soli Deo Gloria -
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,782

Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix

Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times in 469 Posts
For Edge 820 it says that GPS is used for speed if no sensors are paired.

https://www8.garmin.com/manuals/webh...E6557007B.html
TimothyH is offline  
Old 06-23-17, 02:41 PM
  #20  
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
The newer Garmin models (knowing for a fact that my 520 does) will use the sensor for speed, only defaulting to GPS if no sensor is found. The 520 also constantly auto-calibrates the speed sensor on the fly, so it's about as accurate as one could hope for.

The speed sensor is worth every penny if you ride anywhere with heavy tree cover-- on several rides in the local mountains, I've had the 520 completely lose satellite lock for several minutes, so without a sensor, speed would've dropped to zero.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 06-23-17, 02:44 PM
  #21  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 245

Bikes: 2017 Sirrus Sport

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 420 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
My post was to clarify the 305 argument/debate.
Sal Bandini is offline  
Old 06-23-17, 04:50 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,671

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 243 Times in 180 Posts
Originally Posted by Sal Bandini
Manual here:

https://www.gpscity.com/pdfs/manuals...-EN-MANUAL.pdf

Page 76, speed sensor is only used when GPS is turned off.
I was surprised to see this. Explains some of the wonkiness of the 305 I owned which was one of the reasons I upgraded.

Originally Posted by TimothyH
For Edge 820 it says that GPS is used for speed if no sensors are paired.

https://www8.garmin.com/manuals/webh...E6557007B.html
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
The newer Garmin models (knowing for a fact that my 520 does) will use the sensor for speed, only defaulting to GPS if no sensor is found. The 520 also constantly auto-calibrates the speed sensor on the fly, so it's about as accurate as one could hope for.

The speed sensor is worth every penny if you ride anywhere with heavy tree cover-- on several rides in the local mountains, I've had the 520 completely lose satellite lock for several minutes, so without a sensor, speed would've dropped to zero.
Originally Posted by Sal Bandini
My post was to clarify the 305 argument/debate.
Here's the quote from the Edge 1000 manual:

About the Speed and Cadence Sensors
Cadence data from the cadence sensor is always recorded. If no speed and cadence sensors are paired with the device, GPS data is used to calculate the speed and distance.
Presumably, since the Edge 1000 (and the 820) are much newer than the 305, their GPS capability is more advanced. So it's surprising that Garmin made a big about face in how they treat speed sensors vs GPS.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 06-27-17, 08:40 PM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have been wondering about this too, especially I don't find a place to set the wheel size for the speed sensor. still no clue for this.
regulation is offline  
Old 06-28-17, 09:57 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,240
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4221 Post(s)
Liked 1,321 Times in 916 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnJ80
Originally Posted by About the Speed and Cadence Sensors
Cadence data from the cadence sensor is always recorded. If no speed and cadence sensors are paired with the device, GPS data is used to calculate the speed and distance.
Presumably, since the Edge 1000 (and the 820) are much newer than the 305, their GPS capability is more advanced. So it's surprising that Garmin made a big about face in how they treat speed sensors vs GPS.
They probably mean if there is no "speed" or "speed/cadence" sensor.

A "speed/cadence" sensor is just a "speed" sensor with cadence added. That is, as far a speed is concerned, they are the same thing.

Small/cheap GPS can't detect fast changes in speed.

The speed sensor is still, even for the newer units, much better for speed.
njkayaker is offline  
Old 06-28-17, 02:06 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,671

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 243 Times in 180 Posts
Originally Posted by njkayaker
They probably mean if there is no "speed" or "speed/cadence" sensor.

A "speed/cadence" sensor is just a "speed" sensor with cadence added. That is, as far a speed is concerned, they are the same thing.

Small/cheap GPS can't detect fast changes in speed.

The speed sensor is still, even for the newer units, much better for speed.
I agree and I guess that was sort of my point. Garmin made a big about face on how they treat speed. In the 305, the GPS seems to have preferred and the default where a speed sensor was not really necessary unless you were indoors. In the subsequent units, Garmin seems to have shown a strong preference for the speed sensor over the GPS sensor and only going to the GPS sensor in the event that no other sensor is available. I agree with you that that is the way it should be and Garmin came around to that in between the 305 and the later units at some point.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.