which cycle computer
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
which cycle computer
There are a ton of cycle computers out there, Which one to get is the million dollar question. I've been looking at the garmin 500 are they worth the 350 dollars? What other cycle computers are out there that are nice . I have to at least have cadence. This is for a road bike....
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
The main benefit the Garmin offers is recording your track so you can upload it to your computer or a website and see where you've been, your speeds, cadence and HR at various points along the ride, as well as the elevation profile along your ride. Non-GPS computers can't record your track, but some do record your speed, cadence and HR as function of distance or time. Most only tell you your current parameters and the average for the past ride.
Another feature of the Garmin 500 is you can download a route to it which can be depicted on the screen as a breadcrumb track that you can follow, though it won't show any roads. You can also set up a virtual training partner which you race against, training workouts, etc.
Most if not all this functionality is available on smartphones with appropriate apps and accessories. Smartphones also will have maps, where the 500 will not. You will need to go to a 705, 800, or 810 to get maps on a Garmin Edge.
Another feature of the Garmin 500 is you can download a route to it which can be depicted on the screen as a breadcrumb track that you can follow, though it won't show any roads. You can also set up a virtual training partner which you race against, training workouts, etc.
Most if not all this functionality is available on smartphones with appropriate apps and accessories. Smartphones also will have maps, where the 500 will not. You will need to go to a 705, 800, or 810 to get maps on a Garmin Edge.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 749
Bikes: Specialized Crux Elite X1, Specialized Roubaix SL4 Expert, Specialized Crux Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Best cycle computer I have (and I have a few) is my iPhone! Cyclemeter App!
__________________
Gary F.
2019 Specialized Crux Elite X1
2015 Specialized Roubaix SL4 Expert
My bike page: https://www.gwfweb.com/bicycles
Build a bike stand! https://www.gwfweb.com/bicycles/stands.html
Gary F.
2019 Specialized Crux Elite X1
2015 Specialized Roubaix SL4 Expert
My bike page: https://www.gwfweb.com/bicycles
Build a bike stand! https://www.gwfweb.com/bicycles/stands.html
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
well i have an i-phone 5. and cycle meter which i like but i dont have any of the cadence on it or speed on it. I wouldn't know where to began to get bluetooth stuff for it.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I got thinking though on average how long does the i phone run using cycle meter, when i go on a 3 hour bike ride its almost dead. Will it be able to handle a century plus?
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
31 Posts
You maximize battery life on an iPhone by turning off WiFi and display, there are other tricks too. In that state, running Cyclemeter, I find my 4S battery will last 6 hours or a bit more. That isn't enough for a century, since you don't want to get stuck with 5% battery trying to make an emergency call. You can get external batteries to recharge the iPhone, anything from 1 charge from something the size of a pack of chewing gum to 5+ charges from something the size of two decks of cards. On long rides (100 miles) I carry one of those in the saddlebag.
What's the battery life of a Garmin with GPS? I don't know. EDIT: looks like it can be up to 10 hours if you don't use backlight or map display. Per posts I found.
Of course, the Garmin sits right on your handlebar and you can look at speed, distance, etc as you ride. The iPhone can be mounted on the bar, but having the display on will shorten battery life. There is a product coming, the Wahoo RFLKT, that is a bar-mounted remote display/control for an iPhone tucked safely in your jersey pocket.
What's the battery life of a Garmin with GPS? I don't know. EDIT: looks like it can be up to 10 hours if you don't use backlight or map display. Per posts I found.
Of course, the Garmin sits right on your handlebar and you can look at speed, distance, etc as you ride. The iPhone can be mounted on the bar, but having the display on will shorten battery life. There is a product coming, the Wahoo RFLKT, that is a bar-mounted remote display/control for an iPhone tucked safely in your jersey pocket.
Last edited by jyl; 02-07-13 at 04:39 AM.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
jyl,
Thats exactly what worried me about using my i phone have to make a call and battery dead. Typically i listen to music also when i ride and that really seems to suck down the juice. Also i really like to see my speed and cadence when i'm riding, that way when i'm slacking I can push myself. I just don't know what to do. I need a new cycle computer all my buttons are stuck in. Do i really wanna spend the 349.00, or do i want to get the wahoo fitness package price i don't know. Then not be 100 percent happy. That is my dilema i don't know if i'll be happy with using my i phone, i wish i could test drive it.
Thats exactly what worried me about using my i phone have to make a call and battery dead. Typically i listen to music also when i ride and that really seems to suck down the juice. Also i really like to see my speed and cadence when i'm riding, that way when i'm slacking I can push myself. I just don't know what to do. I need a new cycle computer all my buttons are stuck in. Do i really wanna spend the 349.00, or do i want to get the wahoo fitness package price i don't know. Then not be 100 percent happy. That is my dilema i don't know if i'll be happy with using my i phone, i wish i could test drive it.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
When I was using my iPhone 3hrs was about it. I'd turn off Wifi and Bluetooth but leave the screen on at low illumination as I wanted to see the route, speed, etc.. With an aux battery and bluetooth sensors it would probably be fine. It's only recently that Bluetooth "Smart" has been introduced and there are sensors using it. BT Smart is much less power hungry/wasteful than original BT and makes BT sensors practical. Check to make sure you're phone supports BT Smart...
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Garmin 500 is not worth $350. 500 and 800 are being phased out in favor of new 510 and 810 (which are basically the same except that 510 has a bigger screen than 500, and both have bluetooth connectivity.) Older models can be had for a substantial discount off MSRP.
I already have a HR sensor and a cadence sensor, and I just got a new 800, the GPS unit only, for $325. 500 is OK too, but 800 has mapping (which I do occasionally use) and a much bigger screen. As far as I know, 500 can display 8 data fields, 800 supports up to 10.
I already have a HR sensor and a cadence sensor, and I just got a new 800, the GPS unit only, for $325. 500 is OK too, but 800 has mapping (which I do occasionally use) and a much bigger screen. As far as I know, 500 can display 8 data fields, 800 supports up to 10.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,271
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4254 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times
in
940 Posts
I have a Bontrager Node 2.1 (ANT+ based). The list price is about $200 (computer + speed/cadence transmitter + HRM). I got it for significantly less than that from Summit in California.
It's fairly expensive for a non-GPS computer but, for me, it was worth it. One big advantage is that you don't have to worry about recharging it every day or so (the battery life of this computer is excellent). While basic GPS (non mapping) computers aren't much more money, they don't really do that much more (and you have to recharge them frequently).
Anyway...
It used to be that ANT+ was the only "fancy" wireless option available. With the BTLE stuff, that's no longer the case.
I suspect that ANT+ won't be as important in the future. But things are complicated with there being a mix of ANT+ and BTLE stuff that people might want to use.
If the Node 2.1 was BTLE, I could use the transmitter for the phone too. (I'm leaning towards using the phone + external battery instead of getting a Garmin 8xx.) But, if you have a computer, you really don't need the phone for that.
There is a HRM ($100) that will recieve ANT+ signals and retransmit them as BTLE.
This site does a good job at looking at this stort of stuff.
https://www.dcrainmaker.com/
It's fairly expensive for a non-GPS computer but, for me, it was worth it. One big advantage is that you don't have to worry about recharging it every day or so (the battery life of this computer is excellent). While basic GPS (non mapping) computers aren't much more money, they don't really do that much more (and you have to recharge them frequently).
Anyway...
It used to be that ANT+ was the only "fancy" wireless option available. With the BTLE stuff, that's no longer the case.
I suspect that ANT+ won't be as important in the future. But things are complicated with there being a mix of ANT+ and BTLE stuff that people might want to use.
If the Node 2.1 was BTLE, I could use the transmitter for the phone too. (I'm leaning towards using the phone + external battery instead of getting a Garmin 8xx.) But, if you have a computer, you really don't need the phone for that.
There is a HRM ($100) that will recieve ANT+ signals and retransmit them as BTLE.
This site does a good job at looking at this stort of stuff.
https://www.dcrainmaker.com/
#13
Full Member
I went with Node 2.1 as well. Great computer and I use my iPhone for GPS when needed. For me I decide this was the best way to go and have had no regrets.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,271
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4254 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times
in
940 Posts
I think the speed number is too big and the distance traveled number is too small (especially, the tenths digit).
The distance traveled is more useful (to me) because it's what you use to keep track of cue-sheet distances.
Last edited by njkayaker; 02-07-13 at 05:35 PM.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i know the i phone 5 has the newer blue tooth capabilities on it, sorry i dont understand the wireless stuff, i thought blue tooth was blue tooth. Which cadence sensors are the new updated blue tooth? oh and heart rate monitor, sorry if i'm asking simple questions but if i decide to use my phone as the way i want to go i want to make sure i get the correct stuff.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
sorry for the simple questions again either way i go its alot of money to spend. I haven't found a good case for the i phone 5 yet that is water proof, either to put in my jersey or mount on my bike...
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,271
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4254 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times
in
940 Posts
The iPhone supports BT 4, which includes the low energy stuff.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth_low_energy
Later versions of BT support earlier versions (eg, BT 4 will work with BT 3 and BT 2 devices).
See post # 4. Look for stuff compatible with the iPhone 5.
Last edited by njkayaker; 02-09-13 at 07:31 AM.
#18
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 29
Bikes: Trek 1.2 2011
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
While expensive, I really enjoy my edge 810. What I like about it the most..... customization of the info displayed, the large touch screen (for a bike computer), the perfect out-front mounts available, wireless uploading of your workouts/travels, and of course pre-planning trips and courses/gps mapping. Again, it is pricey but worth it if you like to keep track of your info for training and like to be able to just headout and wing it if need be.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BGAndrea
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
22
12-06-11 05:18 PM
pjcampbell
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
3
08-28-10 08:59 AM
AngryScientist
Road Cycling
15
12-23-09 02:44 PM