![]() |
Cheap overkill lights
1 Attachment(s)
I live in Tampa Bay, Florida - Drivers are completely insane here. Everyone's looking at their phone, no one pays attention to the road. We have many accidents daily here. I've been hit once already. I want my bike to resemble an EMS vehicle to stay visible and hopefully, alive. There are so many great lights out there and if money was no object, I would have the DS-500. However, I don't have the money to buy top of the line stuff so I have to improvise. This is what I've come up with for about $70.00. I have just one of these lights on the front now and it's crazy bright for being a cheap light, and that's just using 1.
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=428904 BELL Radian 550 Locking Bike Light Set - SportsAuthority.com I know these are cheap department store lights but they are surprisingly bright, and that's what's important to me. My plan is to get 3 sets: have 2 red lights and a white light on the rear, and 2 white lights and a red on the front. All the rear lights will be strobing. One of the whites on the front will be steady and the others will strobe. This will make me super visible, and I will have only spent about $70. I know it's not common to have a white on the back or a red on the front but by alternating colors I think it will draw more attention, and also meet the legal requirement to have red on the rear and white on the front. If anyone has input I'd be interested in hearing it. |
Why do you have both white and red on both front and rear? It will confuse drivers and others on the road.
Edit: is this first-time poster doing advertisement? |
On my commuter I have a ton of lights because the drivers in New England plus the darkness with few streetlights means I am not visible otherwise. I bought a headlight/taillight pair from Target for $12, used taillight from my LBS for $3, front and back blinkers for $10, plus a modified headlamp from the Ocean State for like, $5. All included batteries. I spent about $20 for high vis lights. My commuter is intentionally fred-ly, so I don't care about the appearance/weight.
|
Originally Posted by vol
(Post 17478281)
Why do you have both white and red on both front and rear? It will confuse drivers and others on the road.
Edit: is this first-time poster doing advertisement? |
Originally Posted by vol
(Post 17478281)
Why do you have both white and red on both front and rear? It will confuse drivers and others on the road.
Edit: is this first-time poster doing advertisement? No, I'm not advertising, I'm presenting an idea and asking for input from a community of cyclists. |
Originally Posted by Crawford53
(Post 17478291)
I'd have to agree here. Red and white in both front and back will confuse drivers, thus negate the safety purpose you were initially trying to achieve. I'd stick with the traditional and recognized white in front and red in back that signifies a moving vehicle. If you want to be noticed, wear a reflective vest, set some lights solid and some flashing.
|
Frankly, I think the extra lights are not going to raise your visual profile substantially. However, I didn't read what you wear and would recommend a jacket or vest in hi-vis orange or yellow (with reflective tape).
|
Originally Posted by sporch
(Post 17478270)
I want my bike to resemble an EMS vehicle to stay visible and hopefully, alive.
Is this even legal over there (its not here). This things run 45-50 hours off 6aaa batteries. So they won't be very bright at all. And a right pita to recharge or buy batteries for. |
White front. Red back. Don't mix.
|
Originally Posted by sporch
(Post 17478309)
I'm not concerned with drivers being confused, I'm concerned about eliminating the possibility that they can't see me. If they're confused about my lighting then at least that means they are paying attention to me.
|
If your lighting setup causes drivers to be confused as to what you are (a cyclist), what direction you are going in, and what speed you are traveling at, then you aren't helping yourself. Put another way, if they can see you but can't understand what they are seeing then expect confused behavior on their end.
Personally, I would go with multiple ready lights on steady, and one very bight flashing rear light. For the front, one very bright flashing light and one light on steady (only when it's dark) to help light the road. YMMV |
Originally Posted by sporch
(Post 17478309)
It will be 2 red lights and 1 white light in the rear. It will be 2 white lights and 1 red in the front. It's mostly red in the rear and mostly white in the front. I'm not concerned with drivers being confused, I'm concerned about eliminating the possibility that they can't see me. If they're confused about my lighting then at least that means they are paying attention to me.
Your proposed lights look like they're rather dim by current standards. The headlight is only specified to put out 35 lumens as compared to all the MagicShine clones that are speced at 1200 lumens and probably deliver about 600. Those are available for about $20 and hard to beat on a visibility/price basis. Just keep them aimed down a bit so as not to blind and use the lower power settings when on MUPS with other users. There are also much brighter tail lights available. I'd recommend getting at least 2 rear lights since if anything goes wrong with one you may not even notice it for awhile and would be vulnerable to traffic not seeing you in the meantime. Maybe a HotShot (bright but rather directional) and a Serfas Thunderbolt ( wide angle) pair of rear lights. Total cost of the three lights should be not much more than what you proposed, but would be far brighter and more visible. And all are rechargeable so you wouldn't have additional battery costs. |
Originally Posted by sporch
(Post 17478296)
Because white and red alternating strobes will get more attention than just red or just white. Same reason emergency vehicles alternate colors.
No, I'm not advertising, I'm presenting an idea and asking for input from a community of cyclists.
Originally Posted by FL Statutes, Title XXIII, Chapter 316
(7) Every bicycle in use between sunset and sunrise shall be equipped with a lamp on the front exhibiting a white light visible from a distance of at least 500 feet to the front and a lamp and reflector on the rear each exhibiting a red light visible from a distance of 600 feet to the rear. A bicycle or its rider may be equipped with lights or reflectors in addition to those required by this section. A law enforcement officer may issue a bicycle safety brochure and a verbal warning to a bicycle rider who violates this subsection or may issue a citation and assess a fine for a pedestrian violation as provided in s. 318.18. The court shall dismiss the charge against a bicycle rider for a first violation of this subsection upon proof of purchase and installation of the proper lighting equipment.
3. Before you buy any more of those Bell lights, see how they measure up to what the law requires. I'd be surprised if they were legal. Even if they somehow are, they would be washed out by any light source that is stronger nearby- like another car. 4. If budget is a concern, concentrate on beefing up the rear until you can afford better for the front. |
Originally Posted by randomgear
(Post 17478384)
If your lighting setup causes drivers to be confused as to what you are (a cyclist), what direction you are going in, and what speed you are traveling at, then you aren't helping yourself. Put another way, if they can see you but can't understand what they are seeing then expect confused behavior on their end.
Personally, I would go with multiple ready lights on steady, and one very bight flashing rear light. For the front, one very bright flashing light and one light on steady (only when it's dark) to help light the road. YMMV Motorists, while often stupid, do not often crash into police cars and ambulances because they have confusing light colors. These light arrays are designed to attract the most attention possible and do so with busy, alternating, and varied lights. I really don't feel that most drivers here are competent and coherent enough to process the light color to determine which direction I'm traveling. Drivers here often slow down and gawk for every type of blinking light - I feel that this is an advantage. |
Originally Posted by sporch
(Post 17478270)
My plan is to get 3 sets: have 2 red lights and a white light on the rear, and 2 white lights and a red on the front. All the rear lights will be strobing. One of the whites on the front will be steady and the others will strobe. This will make me super visible, and I will have only spent about $70. I know it's not common to have a white on the back or a red on the front but by alternating colors I think it will draw more attention, and also meet the legal requirement to have red on the rear and white on the front.
If anyone has input I'd be interested in hearing it. |
Florida requires you to have a white light in the front and a red light and red reflector in the rear. If you put a red light on the front you will be in violation of Florida Traffic law and if you put a white light on the rear you will also be in violation of Florida traffic law.
I don't know if it can be stated any more plainly that that. I suggest a good front headlight that is bright and has different settings and two good red tail lights that have multiple settings one placed on the seat post and one placed on the left seat stay about half way down the seat stay tube. The only thing a white light to the rear is going to do is blind traffic coming up from behind. Florida traffic law is very clear on the lighting requirements so if you do your own thing don't complain when you get cited for failing to obey the law on lighting. |
Originally Posted by sporch
(Post 17479538)
Motorists, while often stupid, do not often crash into police cars and ambulances because they have confusing light colors. These light arrays are designed to attract the most attention possible and do so with busy, alternating, and varied lights. I really don't feel that most drivers here are competent and coherent enough to process the light color to determine which direction I'm traveling. Drivers here often slow down and gawk for every type of blinking light - I feel that this is an advantage.
|
Try deal extreme. I bought a 1200 lumen light for $32.00. It may be more like 8-900, but bright.
|
|
Originally Posted by Mxfarm
(Post 17487827)
I don't recall any major brand of tail lights that flashes white. |
My plan is to get 3 sets: have 2 red lights and a white light on the rear, and 2 white lights and a red on the front. All the rear lights will be strobing. so if you just see the white stern light the Boat is going the same way You Are. |
Originally Posted by Leebo
(Post 17487708)
Try deal extreme. I bought a 1200 lumen light for $32.00. It may be more like 8-900, but bright.
|
Originally Posted by Mxfarm
(Post 17487827)
I will join the chorus, white on the back is a VERY bad idea. Go with one of the excellent $30 lights - Axiom Pulse 60, Cygolite Hotshot, etc. If you are going to go with a magicshine style front light, then get the Magicshine taillight - it's $30 with a Y adapter so it runs off your headlight battery, and will beat anything else on the market for that money |
Originally Posted by Crawford53
(Post 17478291)
I'd have to agree here. Red and white in both front and back will confuse drivers, thus negate the safety purpose you were initially trying to achieve.
|
see page 8:
http://www.tampabaycycle.com/wp-cont...BLEG072007.pdf other good stuff: Bicycle Safety | City of Tampa |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.