![]() |
Netherlands vs Belgium
We're touring next year in the low countries, but we're debating whether to do Holland or Belgium. Originally it was Holland now we're leaning to Belgium. We're going for a week in May/june 2008 - can anyone give us the pros and cons of each country. Many thanks
|
very personal view and just generalized impressions -> I don't feel up to being able to justify a full tilt pros/cons...
-slightly more varied countryside in belgium (in terms of hills etc.) although the dutch would prob. love to argue that point -more water/coast etc. in (literally!) the netherlands if you like that (like me), a tour around the Ijselmeer through all the quaint towns is real nice -very interesting historical towns & cities & architecture in both so no advantage to either imho -urban city flair: on that one note, the dutch beat belgium with "the 'dam" hands down, sorry -how's your french or flemish? Belgium leans more towards those while the Dutch are often near accent free -great time of the year to go btw I've been to both repeatedly, and like both very much. Hard to call, sorry |
From my very limited experience with Belgium, Holland has a better, much more widespread system of bicycle paths (smooth, paved ones) than Belgium. If you enjoy riding on cobblestones and/or on the street shoulders then Belgium is you choice. Belgium is very beautiful in its own way and you can't go wrong with either choice as far as scenery, culture, history, etc.
|
Originally Posted by bummel
We're touring next year in the low countries, but we're debating whether to do Holland or Belgium. Originally it was Holland now we're leaning to Belgium. We're going for a week in May/june 2008 - can anyone give us the pros and cons of each country. Many thanks
pros: better food. better beer. better terrain. more to see. weather is marginally better. cons: the roads are a tad rougher. |
Originally Posted by automatic_sheep
very personal view and just generalized impressions -> I don't feel up to being able to justify a full tilt pros/cons...
-slightly more varied countryside in belgium (in terms of hills etc.) although the dutch would prob. love to argue that point
Originally Posted by automatic_sheep
-more water/coast etc. in (literally!) the netherlands if you like that (like me), a tour around the Ijselmeer through all the quaint towns is real nice
Originally Posted by automatic_sheep
-very interesting historical towns & cities & architecture in both so no advantage to either imho
-urban city flair: on that one note, the dutch beat belgium with "the 'dam" hands down, sorry
Originally Posted by automatic_sheep
-how's your french or flemish? Belgium leans more towards those while the Dutch are often near accent free.
-great time of the year to go btw I've been to both repeatedly, and like both very much. Hard to call, sorry IME You won't have a problem finding people who speak fluent English in Belgium (at least not in Flanders). |
Originally Posted by automatic_sheep
_well I said "lean to" in language didnt I?
_ijselmeer is personal taste _brussels at least left me wanting in terms of exciting city life. Appart from the great historical parts, it has big office buildings filled with boring eurocrats who leave the city asap you wrote it. ;) |
Originally Posted by automatic_sheep
err, am I not getting you or you not reading me? anyway, it's just my experience and I certainly DIDNT say there would be noone speaking english
Originally Posted by automatic_sheep
_well I said "lean to" in language didnt I?
nope. you wrote it. ;) got it this time? |
Poor Luxembourg...
|
I compared the pros and cons of some countries and the results are in ariezone.volkskrantblog.nl/132465.
Belgium is 7, Netherlands 8. I agree to the first reactions (automatic sheep & Estrmnky). Adding some experiences after much cycling in both countries (born in Belgium, living in the Netherlands!). Belgians are sligtly nicer and more helpful, finding your way. In the Frenchspeaking part hardly anyone speaks English. The scenery is nicer (such as has been said) but - that's only in the south east, the hilly Ardennen; - and it's more an adventure to enjoy it because it's pretty dangerous on many through-roads. Because of the excellent cycle-path system you'll ride nuch more relaxed in the Netherlands. Actually I should advice you to ride the Vlaanderen Fiets (= bicycle) route. Together 800 km. but the itinerary along the language-border is very interesting. Roughly from Tongeren via Leuven, Brussels, Geraardsbergen, Kortrijk and Ieper to the coast. Or the other way round, depending on wind and next plans/airport to leave etc. Startinbg in Brussels you may ride the western loop. Then you can also visit Brugge, Gent and Mechelen. Hae a nice trip. Arie Geraardsbergen (B)/Borne (NL) |
Originally Posted by bummel
(Post 4746110)
We're touring next year in the low countries, but we're debating whether to do Holland or Belgium. Originally it was Holland now we're leaning to Belgium. We're going for a week in May/june 2008 - can anyone give us the pros and cons of each country. Many thanks
|
Originally Posted by botto
(Post 4814575)
my vote: Belgium.
pros: better food. better beer. better terrain. more to see. weather is marginally better. cons: the roads are a tad rougher. |
Originally Posted by bummel
(Post 4746110)
We're touring next year in the low countries, but we're debating whether to do Holland or Belgium. Originally it was Holland now we're leaning to Belgium. We're going for a week in May/june 2008 - can anyone give us the pros and cons of each country. Many thanks
Don't want to be predisposed, but Belgian roads have a lot more to offer... Unless you want to see polder and water for 10 days. Some of the bad roads are just part of experience, they are part of the myths and legends of some of the nicest one day races in cycling. If you go to sites with touristic information, you should be able to find places with exclusive arrangements for cyclists. The advantage is that next to the cycling, you will be able to enjoy great food and, if interested but certainly a must, the luxury beers. Also, even the smallest town should have its own bike shop (can be very useful in case of bad luck), but that is probably also the case in Holland.
Originally Posted by automatic_sheep
(Post 4746383)
-how's your french or flemish? Belgium leans more towards those while the Dutch are often near accent free
|
Originally Posted by Huvi
(Post 5063889)
Also, even the smallest town should have its own bike shop (can be very useful in case of bad luck), but that is probably also the case in Holland.
Yes you will find at least one small LBS in every town (dorp) and usually more. And I'm going with you on the food point too. You must be joking, right... |
Bummel did our answers help you in your debating-session?
E.g. it helps me a lot because there are some new views after cycling then and when in both the Netherlands and Belgium ( and France + Germany) |
Holland has no hills .. so much for thier "varied terrain" as someone stated. The French speaking/cultured part of Belgium, Wallonia,is mountainous, it's the southern quarter of the country. Many great cyclists hail from there. Actually though, many cyclists come out of the the Dutch speaking/ Femmish part of Belgium as well, that's flat too. Great cyclists including great climbers from terrain as flat as the Mississippi Delta, go figure.
|
I would lean towards Belgium just because of the Ardennes. There are some beautiful rides through out the Ardennes linking many beautiful cities. Also, if you like Beer (who doesn't) there are some very famous and great Breweries to visit.
The only drawbacks to Belgium I would say are the weather and the lack of English or willingness to speak English here in Wallonia (No offense to anyone). |
Originally Posted by old and new
(Post 5199163)
Holland has no hills .. so much for thier "varied terrain" as someone stated. The French speaking/cultured part of Belgium, Wallonia,is mountainous, it's the southern quarter of the country. Many great cyclists hail from there. Actually though, many cyclists come out of the the Dutch speaking/ Femmish part of Belgium as well, that's flat too. Great cyclists including great climbers from terrain as flat as the Mississippi Delta, go figure.
|
I would advise you to go to Belgium!
|
Luxembourg is great fir touring albeit small.
Richard |
Hello there, just out of curiosity, Bummel, have you decided yet ? Maybe you should post an idea of the route you visioned , so we can comment and add places or routes .I was born in Holland( which is a very nice country) ,but i live in Belgium for a long time now (which is nice too)
Since we all can access google-maps ,maybe i can give you a few nice places to visit. Hopefully this thread doesn't mess up your ideas. |
Originally Posted by speed demon
(Post 5744057)
Hello there, just out of curiosity, Bummel, have you decided yet ? Maybe you should post an idea of the route you visioned , so we can comment and add places or routes .I was born in Holland( which is a very nice country) ,but i live in Belgium for a long time now (which is nice too)
Since we all can access google-maps ,maybe i can give you a few nice places to visit. Hopefully this thread doesn't mess up your ideas. |
Well Bummel how 're you doing?
Please choose for Antarctica, we like people who also like to communicate, in Belgium and the Netherlands. Antarctica is wonderful. Happy New Year, Feliz Navidad. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:05 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.