Ice
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#4
Full Member
The fatties will handle rough ice at 4-5 PSI to get a good squish, the frozen rain coated stuff has almost no friction, it's almost like oil.. I have seen people ride frozen lakes with studded tires.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Fargo ND
Posts: 628
Bikes: Lynskey R350, Ritchey Breakaway, Ritchey Double Switchback, Lynskey Ridgeline, ICAN Fatbike
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 315 Post(s)
Liked 351 Times
in
191 Posts
Toward the end of winter here we get thaw, freeze, thaw, freeze cycles that turn things into a sheet of ice. I switch over to studded tires until the ice is gone.
Likes For DangerousDanR:
Likes For FREEBIRD1:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,791
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4129 Post(s)
Liked 3,086 Times
in
2,010 Posts
On ice, the best pressure is so soft the tires feel squirmy on the pavement. Yes, pavement cornering is reduced a lot. That might bai you out when you hit the ice.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks all for the help!
Likes For Gyro:
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 173
Bikes: 1969 Raleigh Twenty, 1975 Raleigh DL-1, 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport, 1989 Schwinn Voyageur
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Liked 70 Times
in
40 Posts
Another thing to keep in mind with studs is that if there is a light snow over ice, the studs may not be able to reach the ice through the snow & then you're really no better than non-studded tires. This probably isn't a frequent concern, but worth keeping in mind.
#10
Senior Member
Nowadays I ride on 8 psi. Not too much to bounce like a basket ball.
Likes For Daniel4:
#11
Junior Member
If you ride low pressure, you are much better off going tubeless. Studs are a very good idea but can be annoyingly noisy when riding dry surface. Not all studded tires are equal either. Higher stud count means better traction on ice.
Likes For pipeliner:
#12
Senior Member
Likes For prj71:
#13
meh
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,668
Bikes: 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 17 Breezer Radar Pro; 15 Surly Pugsley; 13 Felt Z85; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1086 Post(s)
Liked 981 Times
in
504 Posts
Studs are the only answer to ice, it's true with its 35 mm tires or 4" tires (Top Contact Winter tires are the only exception to this rule ... and they don't make it for fatbikes). With studded tires, you want high pressures for icy conditions, for me (170 lbs / 77 kg), I ride 12-14 psi with Dillinger 4 tires. The only draw back, at these high pressures, deep snow is very difficult to ride. This YouTube edit from a race on a frozen Lake Minnetonka shows my high pressure tires are great on the bare ice, and I struggle (& fall) in the deep snow.
Last edited by Hypno Toad; 03-10-23 at 07:26 AM. Reason: typo
Likes For Gyro:
#15
meh
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,668
Bikes: 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 17 Breezer Radar Pro; 15 Surly Pugsley; 13 Felt Z85; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1086 Post(s)
Liked 981 Times
in
504 Posts
Likes For Hypno Toad:
#16
Senior Member
Why do you need high pressures for studs? I've been fine with 6 and 5 psi for... uuh... I think me and the bike are probably around 300lbs.
#17
Senior Member
I've ridden on 5psi for a few years. Too much rolling resistance. Now I'm on 8psi. It's a little bouncy but I can go faster, and longer without getting so tired.
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 123
Bikes: Trek Émonda SL 5, Trek Checkpoint SL 5, Giant Trance X 2, Trek Farley
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times
in
43 Posts
I've been thinking about this. My limited experience with studs on ice so far has been good with low pressure.
However, in addition to being a measurement of air pressure inside the tire, PSI is also the amount of contact pressure between the tire and the road surface. A tire with low pressure will deform around its studs, and more of the tire between studs will support the weight of the bike and rider. The area around the stud not contacting the road translates to force being applied downward on the stud (into the road/ice). If that area is about a square inch, and the tire is inflated to 5 PSI, then that means the stud only has 5 pounds of force pushing it into the ice. Higher air pressure will cause the tire to deform less, resulting in more of the tire's surface standing away from the road surface and directing pressure through the stud instead, and the pressure being directed toward that stud will be greater. Both factors would combine to produce much more force behind each stud, resulting in more penetration into ice?. In theory, higher pressure should make studs more effective.
On the other hand, lower pressure means the tire deforms more and the contact surface of the tire against the road is larger. The result is that more studs will make contact with the road/ice. The design of the tire is certainly a factor.
It may be that these two things basically cancel each other out, and the direct effect of tire pressure is minimal. The math, geometry, and fluid dynamics are certainly beyond my ability to calculate. There's probably a way to measure the relative effectiveness. Probably, other benefits of high or low tire pressure are more relevant.
However, in addition to being a measurement of air pressure inside the tire, PSI is also the amount of contact pressure between the tire and the road surface. A tire with low pressure will deform around its studs, and more of the tire between studs will support the weight of the bike and rider. The area around the stud not contacting the road translates to force being applied downward on the stud (into the road/ice). If that area is about a square inch, and the tire is inflated to 5 PSI, then that means the stud only has 5 pounds of force pushing it into the ice. Higher air pressure will cause the tire to deform less, resulting in more of the tire's surface standing away from the road surface and directing pressure through the stud instead, and the pressure being directed toward that stud will be greater. Both factors would combine to produce much more force behind each stud, resulting in more penetration into ice?. In theory, higher pressure should make studs more effective.
On the other hand, lower pressure means the tire deforms more and the contact surface of the tire against the road is larger. The result is that more studs will make contact with the road/ice. The design of the tire is certainly a factor.
It may be that these two things basically cancel each other out, and the direct effect of tire pressure is minimal. The math, geometry, and fluid dynamics are certainly beyond my ability to calculate. There's probably a way to measure the relative effectiveness. Probably, other benefits of high or low tire pressure are more relevant.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times
in
108 Posts
As stated above, studded tires.
Use the PSI that's comfortable.
Don't worry about snow covered ice with studs.
If you hit ice, the studs will take care of it, if you float above the ice with studs, the tire takes care of it.
Use the PSI that's comfortable.
Don't worry about snow covered ice with studs.
If you hit ice, the studs will take care of it, if you float above the ice with studs, the tire takes care of it.
#20
meh
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,668
Bikes: 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 17 Breezer Radar Pro; 15 Surly Pugsley; 13 Felt Z85; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1086 Post(s)
Liked 981 Times
in
504 Posts
I've been thinking about this. My limited experience with studs on ice so far has been good with low pressure.
However, in addition to being a measurement of air pressure inside the tire, PSI is also the amount of contact pressure between the tire and the road surface. A tire with low pressure will deform around its studs, and more of the tire between studs will support the weight of the bike and rider. The area around the stud not contacting the road translates to force being applied downward on the stud (into the road/ice). If that area is about a square inch, and the tire is inflated to 5 PSI, then that means the stud only has 5 pounds of force pushing it into the ice. Higher air pressure will cause the tire to deform less, resulting in more of the tire's surface standing away from the road surface and directing pressure through the stud instead, and the pressure being directed toward that stud will be greater. Both factors would combine to produce much more force behind each stud, resulting in more penetration into ice?. In theory, higher pressure should make studs more effective.
On the other hand, lower pressure means the tire deforms more and the contact surface of the tire against the road is larger. The result is that more studs will make contact with the road/ice. The design of the tire is certainly a factor.
It may be that these two things basically cancel each other out, and the direct effect of tire pressure is minimal. The math, geometry, and fluid dynamics are certainly beyond my ability to calculate. There's probably a way to measure the relative effectiveness. Probably, other benefits of high or low tire pressure are more relevant.
However, in addition to being a measurement of air pressure inside the tire, PSI is also the amount of contact pressure between the tire and the road surface. A tire with low pressure will deform around its studs, and more of the tire between studs will support the weight of the bike and rider. The area around the stud not contacting the road translates to force being applied downward on the stud (into the road/ice). If that area is about a square inch, and the tire is inflated to 5 PSI, then that means the stud only has 5 pounds of force pushing it into the ice. Higher air pressure will cause the tire to deform less, resulting in more of the tire's surface standing away from the road surface and directing pressure through the stud instead, and the pressure being directed toward that stud will be greater. Both factors would combine to produce much more force behind each stud, resulting in more penetration into ice?. In theory, higher pressure should make studs more effective.
On the other hand, lower pressure means the tire deforms more and the contact surface of the tire against the road is larger. The result is that more studs will make contact with the road/ice. The design of the tire is certainly a factor.
It may be that these two things basically cancel each other out, and the direct effect of tire pressure is minimal. The math, geometry, and fluid dynamics are certainly beyond my ability to calculate. There's probably a way to measure the relative effectiveness. Probably, other benefits of high or low tire pressure are more relevant.
To be clear, tire pressures for winter/ice are a complex equation, take the video I posted above, most riders have studded tires and it's the tire pressure the separates the riders falling and the ones riding through (bike-handling skills too). In the video, this Toad is running a high pressure because I knew the lake was mostly bare ice, but that's also why you'll see that I fall in the deep snow between to islands. If you ever watch pro CX, the commentators say during tough races: you want to use the tires/pressure that will be fastest on most of the course and just struggle with the short bits were your tires aren't ideal.
Likes For Hypno Toad: