Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

Anyone Using A 50/34 Compact Double

Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

Anyone Using A 50/34 Compact Double

Reply

Old 02-11-19, 05:40 PM
  #1  
OldsCOOL
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 12,388

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Anyone Using A 50/34 Compact Double

Just curious what your impressions of the gearing change might be. This I installed on my Ď88 Cannondale Criterium Series that has a 7sp 12-28 cassette. Being a lifelong 53/39 road double guy this spring should be interesting.
OldsCOOL is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-19, 05:50 PM
  #2  
delbiker1 
Senior Member
 
delbiker1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 361

Bikes: 1991 Ochsner steel frame, 2002 Airborne Zeppelin titanium, Schwinn DBX SS aluminum, Orbea MD 40 carbon fiber

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Most road bikes now come with 50/34 compact crank sets these days. Does the bike still have the same cassette. Obviously, most bikes now also come with 10 or 11 speed cassettes. Gives a very wide choice of gear inches.
delbiker1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-19, 07:17 PM
  #3  
deacon mark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,428

Bikes: Habanero Titanium Team Nuevo

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
I am 57 and use a 50/34. I have have a 53/39 but really no reason. I am a fairly strong rider but I would not be using the 53/11 unless going downhill for awhile, much better working a long steep grade knowing I have a 34/28. Frankly a 34/30 if I lived in the mountains. The 50/11 is plenty no reason to have a standard double anymore.
deacon mark is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-19, 08:20 PM
  #4  
Hondo Gravel
misanthrope
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Hondo,Texas
Posts: 648

Bikes: Motobecane Boris Fatbike, Motobecane Omni Strada Pro,Fantom Pro CX, Fantom X7 MTB, Gravity SS MTB.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
My gravel bike has. 50/34 11speed 11-32 works well for me.
Hondo Gravel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-19, 08:27 PM
  #5  
wgscott
VectorPotential sensitive
 
wgscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: The Timbers of Fennario (CL77)
Posts: 4,229

Bikes: Steel

Mentioned: 56 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2226 Post(s)
I use a 46/30T crank and an 11-34 (or 11-36) cassette. Without apologies.
wgscott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-19, 08:46 PM
  #6  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 21,458
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7817 Post(s)
I still run pretty tight on the rear.

9/23.

There are some hill climbs up in Portland that Whupped me. Good descending gears though.

So, the second year I changed from a 54/39 to 53/34. It made a big difference.

I did go back with my older Colnago, 54/41 x 9/26, I think. Those couple extra gears in the rear made the difference to be able to get up the hills.

34/23 = 1.48 gear ratio
41/26 = 1.58 gear ratio (only slightly higher).

Still a strain for some climbing, or pulling cargo, but I'm generally fine.
CliffordK is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-19, 09:29 PM
  #7  
nomadmax 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 532
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 220 Post(s)
I jumped the 42/52-53 ship way back when Campy first started producing 39/53 cranks. Then I put a TA 50T chainring on. I went to the 34/50 after that and it's been my standard ever since. I do have one bike with old Super Record on it so it has a 42/49 in front.
nomadmax is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-19, 09:43 PM
  #8  
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 4,023
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 952 Post(s)
48/34. Fewer double shifts, more time in the big ring,

impress your buds on the hills.
woodcraft is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-19, 09:51 PM
  #9  
daoswald
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, UT (Formerly Los Angeles, CA)
Posts: 907

Bikes: 2008 Cannondale Synapse (AL) w/105 components, Conti GP4000sII 28mm tires, Fulcrum Racing Quattro wheels, Tubus Fly Evo rack -- 2014 Cannondale Quick CX w/Alivio components, Tubus Cargo Evo rack, Conti GP4Season 32mm tires.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Totally agree that the standard double has become the exception, not the rule nowadays for consumer/enthusiast level road bikes. If my 30/39/50 by 11-28 ever would finally wear out I'd go with 34/50 by 11-32. I live in the hills, so going with a less forgiving gear than a 30x28 or 34x32 isn't going to work out for me. But I'd love to have a less fussy drive train than a triple will typically provide.
daoswald is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-19, 10:53 PM
  #10  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,312

Bikes: Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel, Centurion Ironman Expert

Mentioned: 139 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2511 Post(s)
Over the past couple of years I've gone from my Ironman's original 52/42, 13-24 gearing to 52/39, 13-25, and recently to 50/39, 13-25. If I can find a 38T 130mm chainring I may try that, and I'm looking for the 13-28 version of my current chromed SunRace 13-25.

But I may switch the big ring back to a 52 or 53. I miss the top end on downhill blasts. There are a couple of fun downhills where I could get just a little faster.
canklecat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-19, 05:24 AM
  #11  
srode1
Gravel Rocks
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Ohio
Posts: 133

Bikes: Trek Domane and Crockett, Niner RLT9

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
The only downsides I see to compact over traditional gearing are the speed I can go down hill (I'll spin out on a 50/11 sooner) and how smooth the front shifts. The 53/39 front really shifts noticeably smoother. A mid compact crank helps with the speed loss but not the front shifting, might be the best compromise for strong riders IMHO.
srode1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-19, 05:40 AM
  #12  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 21,075
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7733 Post(s)
DA 9000 50/34 with a 12-28.

indyfabz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-19, 06:09 AM
  #13  
nomadmax 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 532
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 220 Post(s)
Originally Posted by woodcraft View Post
48/34. Fewer double shifts, more time in the big ring,

impress your buds on the hills.
Oddly enough, I just ordered one of these (48T) for my Campy compact crank.

https://www.bike-components.de/en/St...mm-BCD-p54480/
nomadmax is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-19, 06:34 AM
  #14  
Hondo Gravel
misanthrope
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Hondo,Texas
Posts: 648

Bikes: Motobecane Boris Fatbike, Motobecane Omni Strada Pro,Fantom Pro CX, Fantom X7 MTB, Gravity SS MTB.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Having the 32 granny has been great in the Texas hill country especially on gravel.
Hondo Gravel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-19, 06:37 AM
  #15  
kingston 
Jedi Master
 
kingston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lake Forest, IL
Posts: 2,478

Bikes: http://stinkston.blogspot.com/p/my-bikes.html

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 991 Post(s)
I can run a standard crank, a sub-compact or a triple, but a 50/34 compact crank doesn't work for me. The 50 is too big and the 34 is too small at my speed and cadence with my preferred narrow cassette, so I'm constantly cross-chained and shifting back and forth between the chainrings. I swapped the 50T for a 46T on the one compact crank I have, and I like that a lot better. I don't mind coasting downhill.
kingston is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-19, 09:04 AM
  #16  
OldsCOOL
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 12,388

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Up here it is incredibly hilly and steep. There is one 2-mile grade that I want to be faster on. The 39/28 bailout is not at all a bailout even when in top condition and weight. Toss in several of these and it makes a 40mi ride feel like 65. I need the 50 for the flats and doing personal TT training that this bike was built for. Most of you guys probably have more gears on the back but I want to keep the 7sp to preserve some era integrity.

I wish I could go out and ride but today we are getting another foot of snow.
OldsCOOL is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-19, 10:29 AM
  #17  
scozim 
Ellensburg, WA
 
scozim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 3,354

Bikes: See my signature

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 177 Post(s)
I used a 50-36 with a 7 spd a couple of years ago and didn't like it much. Spun out on the downhills and felt the gaps when dropping to the 36 were too much. I found using a triple up front a little better with the older 6 and 7 spd gearing and was more comfortable with a 52-39-28 or something along that line. I really only used the smallest chainring on the steepest hills.
__________________
1984 Gitane Sprint; 1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1982 Trek 610; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1972 Peugeot PX-10; 1987 Trek 800 Antelope (touring/commuting set up); 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1997 Klein Pulse Comp mtb; 1989 Peugeot Limestone hybrid (for touring); 1975 Gitane Olympic; 1983 Vitus 979; 1989 Spectrum Titanium:
scozim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-19, 10:44 AM
  #18  
Steve B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 3,050

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Soma Smoothie, Miyata City Liner, Specialized FSR Comp, Fuji Professional

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Completely flat with some short steep, Long Island, NY.

I run a 34/50 plus a junior cassette 14-28 11 spd. I’m in my big ring most of the time. If I’m in need I go to the 34 and that’ll get me up most of the hills. There’s few places where we get up to 40mph and my 50/14 will get me to 30 and that’s all I need, I don’t race. If I’m heading someplace hillier like upstate NY, I bring my Soma steel road bike, it has a triple.
Steve B. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-19, 10:59 AM
  #19  
rm -rf
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,009
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Mike Sherman's Gear Calculator can show three chainrings, so it's easy to compare old and new.

Your 7 speed 12-28, showing speeds at typical flat road cadences.
53 chainring in blue
50 chainring in black
34 chainring in red.

switching 53 to 50: It's about a half shift difference.


Next, the 50, 39, 34 chainrings.

The 39 can go past 20 mph, but it's harder on hills, of course.
The 34 is one shift easier on the hills -- a significant change.

Last edited by rm -rf; 02-12-19 at 11:03 AM.
rm -rf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-19, 11:07 AM
  #20  
rm -rf
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,009
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Steve B. View Post
Completely flat with some short steep, Long Island, NY.

I run a 34/50 plus a junior cassette 14-28 11 spd. Iím in my big ring most of the time. If Iím in need I go to the 34 and thatíll get me up most of the hills. Thereís few places where we get up to 40mph and my 50/14 will get me to 30 and thatís all I need, I donít race. If Iím heading someplace hillier like upstate NY, I bring my Soma steel road bike, it has a triple.
14-32 11 speed!

I have the same cassette, 14-28.
I combined it with a 11-32 to make a 14-32. It's great for fast group rides, with close shifts around 20 mph where I'm trying to hang with the group. And low gears for the steep hills.
See this post on the 14-32 setup.

The downside is having to shift 4 or 5 cogs when I shift chainrings, 50 & 34. But I have Di2, so the shifts are fast and easy.
rm -rf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-19, 01:06 PM
  #21  
h2oxtc
Senior Member
 
h2oxtc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Okanagan, BC
Posts: 1,257

Bikes: Cannondale Caad 8; Jamis Aurora Elite, Kona Disc road bike, Rocky Mntn Equipe, Apollo Imperial, KHS Aero Comp SS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
@OldsCOOL I'm surprised you've waited this long to consider switching to compact cranks. We similarly live in a hilly / mountainous area and I began the process of switching out my bikes to 50/34 a few years ago after a particularly difficult (for me) century ride. The most recent addition to the family is a 48/32 (gravel bike) with an 11-34 in the rear. My days of riding 53/39 are long gone except for the ride to the local coffee shop (almost flat).

h2oxtc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-19, 05:43 PM
  #22  
OldsCOOL
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 12,388

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Originally Posted by h2oxtc View Post
@OldsCOOL I'm surprised you've waited this long to consider switching to compact cranks. We similarly live in a hilly / mountainous area and I began the process of switching out my bikes to 50/34 a few years ago after a particularly difficult (for me) century ride. The most recent addition to the family is a 48/32 (gravel bike) with an 11-34 in the rear. My days of riding 53/39 are long gone except for the ride to the local coffee shop (almost flat).

Nice Jamis!
I finally came to that conclusion just last season when realizing the taxing of endurance with hills. The 39/28 ratio didnt give me the cadence, just couldnt spin it up. This spring will probably be revolutionary on my conditioning.
OldsCOOL is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-19, 07:24 PM
  #23  
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 39,628

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 167 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6190 Post(s)
70s, 80s had some 52, 36, because freewheels did not go to 11 back then.. & I was younger

13 ~ 28t freewheels..
fietsbob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-19, 06:00 AM
  #24  
jppe
Let's do a Century
 
jppe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 7,245

Bikes: Pinarello Prince/Campy SR; Cervelo R3/Sram Red; Trek 5900/Duraace, Cervelo P2C/Duraace, Cannondle Tandem/Ultegra, Lynskey GR260 Ultegra

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 281 Post(s)
You guys are killing me with some of you’re higher gear ratios! The only 53/39 chainring I have is on my TT bike where it’s ridden on pretty flat routes. I’ve been using 50/34s on all my other bikes paired with an 11-32 cassette. While there are some double shifts on normal riding the wide gear range lets me climb the steepest hills and have good acceleration on long descents.

However my new road disc bike came with a 52/36 crankset. I have put an 11/34 cassette on that bike to keep the lower gear ratio the same as the 34-32 on my other bikes. The 52-11 is a pretty huge gear for riding around here but should serve well for long descents.
__________________
Ride your Ride!!
jppe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-19, 02:00 PM
  #25  
rutan74
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 87

Bikes: Felt ZR3, Specialized Sectur

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Here is a gear calculator tool. Fun to play with and it will give you plenty of information to compare with.

Over the last 10 years, the defacto standard now for normal riders is a 50-34. Unless you are a racer or run a triple in front, almost all new(er) bikes are set up with a 50-34 in front.

Bicycle Gear Calculator
rutan74 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service