![]() |
Originally Posted by Eddy_G
(Post 23648869)
. We're all "weirdos in their way" to many non-cyclists.
|
Originally Posted by prj71
(Post 23649661)
Speak for yourelf.
|
Originally Posted by prj71
(Post 23643109)
I rode with downtube shifters...Back in 1987.
Wouldn't even think of it now. |
Originally Posted by Wildwood
(Post 23641800)
Most of the folks I know who still ride old bikes, regularly or exclusively, ignore comments that we crash more often = distracted (because of DT shifting issues). :rolleyes:.
In the real world, crashes occur for many reasons - DT malfeasance does not even make the list. Cyclists on old road bikes most often have far more experience - we were riding with traffic before bike lanes were invented in USA. And survived. All the break downs and crashes I hear/read of lately occur most frequently on bicycles with far greater technologically advanced equipment than DT friction shifters and rim brakes on wheels with glued-on tires (how ancient? is glue technology). Probably distracted by focusing on power, speed, cadence, HR, distance, location, battery status displays, texts, etc. Or maybe they never learned to hold a straight line with one hand on the bars, or when reaching for a water bottle. :foo:. Clear your handlebars and your mind will follow. :50: https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...cf5377ed7.jpeg No crashes. Rubber side down. WORD! The whole experience, value, rests on one simple thing. Ride On YUri |
I rode with DT shifters for years without issue. And I still really like the aesthetic of old level top tube with handful of seat post. They just look right to me. Love all the pics above that show off that look.
|
Originally Posted by _ForceD_
(Post 23638136)
The other day I was riding one of my old road bikes that has down tube shifters (Motobacane Mirage). One of several old bikes that I’ve restored/maintain, and ride weekly. When I made a turn onto a long straight road, I saw another rider about ½-mile ahead of me and decided to try to catch him. About 2-3 miles later, I rolled up beside him, and I mentioned that I’d been chasing him for a little over two miles. He was around my age, in his mid-60s, but riding a more modern CF road bike. He looked over at my bike and said “That’s a nice looking old classic.” and I thanked him. Then he commented that he got rid of is last bike with down tube shifters a couple years ago. On one of his last rides on that bike, a young 20- or 30-something guy rolled up next to him. After a minute or two, the young guys asked “What are those things on the down tube?” — Dan
|
Originally Posted by Wildwood
(Post 23638286)
And...btw...original paint and decals on a patina'd frame is the best bike vibe.
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...ba76b7eb0d.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...afb837e47d.jpg We're both 53 years older than we were before we found one another; she's wearing nothing she was wearing that day besides frame & headset, but she still performs admirably if at a slower pace than back then. There are hills where we ride now that challenge us both, but compared to the 'Flatlandia' we knew before The Big Move, this truly is God's Country where before it was simply what was beyond the door... nothing special. She doesn't seem to mind the newcomers to our address either, point of fact being I think she enjoys the company of the younger set even if they don't quite speak the same language. They have a lot in common after all.... |
He has taken me some nice places, that Mondia. ;)
|
Originally Posted by spclark
(Post 23665157)
Yes, but even with a patina that's lacking 90% of the original clear coat and decals that bore even less of what once was readable, this '72 'Becane GR still gives me smiles every time I 'saddle up' even if it's for commuting now 'stead of miles upon miles.
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...afb837e47d.jpg We're both 53 years older than we were before we found one another; she's wearing nothing she was wearing that day besides frame & headset, but she still performs admirably if at a slower pace than back then. There are hills where we ride now that challenge us both, but compared to the 'Flatlandia' we knew before The Big Move, this truly is God's Country where before it was simply what was beyond the door... nothing special. She doesn't seem to mind the newcomers to our address either, point of fact being I think she enjoys the company of the younger set even if they don't quite speak the same language. They have a lot in common after all.... |
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...910488392.jpeg
The old, still in service on rainy days https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...d94973432.jpeg The newer, not ridden in rain much |
I miss downtube shifters. I have no gripes with brifters, but no DT shifter ever pinched my glove. I've never tried indexed DT shifters. The concept seems odd to me, but I just picked up an SBC 4130 that has a 1x setup with a single DT shifter that I've heard is indexed. I haven't finished assembling it yet. We'll see.
|
Originally Posted by rsbob
(Post 23665435)
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...910488392.jpeg
The old, still in service on rainy days https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...d94973432.jpeg The newer, not ridden in rain much https://photos.smugmug.com/Other/Bik...MG_3617-XL.jpg Brent |
There's a lot of nostalgia-generating material above!
Our tandem has brifters, and they work perfectly, but I was never enamored with them. Unless I'm climbing, my hands are usually on the aerobars, so it makes sense to have bar-end shifters (indexed for the rear) on the aerobars. Bar-end friction shifters existed when I was working at the bike shop in the late 1970's, but they were always on drop bars, primarily for loaded touring. Aerobars didn't exist yet. Three of the bikes in our family have 9-speed Dura Ace bar-end shifters on the ends of aerobars. Tied with my current OCLV carbon-fiber Trek, my favorite bike was my '77 Mondia Special, of Reynolds 531 double-butted tubing throughout. That bike handled so well, and had a wonderful feel that it just wanted to be part of you. I met two other owners of Mondias of the same vintage, who said the same thing. All very, very happy owners. Don't let anyone tell you that the 21st century has a corner on great-handling bikes! My carbon-fiber Trek is nice too, but not in the same ways. It would be nice to have all the best qualities of both bikes in one bike. Unfortunately, since it was steel, I broke it, at the bottom of the seat tube, just above the bottom bracket. That seems to be the most common place for steel bikes to break. There was not a speck of rust in it either. I have several friends who've broken steel frames, one of them having broken several. I got a new tube put in mine, and broke it again, all in under 20,000 miles. I decided my next one would have to be carbon. I have 64,000 miles on my carbon Trek now (and I have a friend who races and has over 200,000 miles on his carbon Ridley). I would still like to have a really nice late-1970's bike again, kind of like a classic car that you drive only on Sundays. The only modernizations I would give it are clipless pedals, cycle computer, and maybe aerobars. Those who did not grow up with down-tube shifters don't realize that when slowing way down or coming to a stop, we used to quickly work both shifters at once with the right hand while operating the all-important front brake with the left at the same time. The handlebar shape that was common back then used to make it more conducive to ride in the drops, and arm extension was about the same from there to the shift levers; so it wasn't really a reach. Before there was indexing, freewheel cogs were fewer and farther apart, so experienced riders could shift accurately and very quickly. At a large, 5-point intersection near home, if I punched it hard when my light turned green, I could reach nearly 30mph in the space of this large intersection, shifting up three or four times in the process, with down-tube shifters. Down-tube indexed shifters have the most snappy response, because there's almost no cable housing. They're more reliable than brifters and pretty much maintenance-free, and you can operate both at once with one hand while braking with the other. I have 9-speed Dura-Ace indexed down-tube shifters on my errand bike. It was given to me with a 6-speed cassette on a freehub body that was missing an important part that was no longer available, so I put a 9-speed-equipped wheel in it. I initially tried friction shifters, but I had to give that up. Even when I'd look down to try to make sure I had the chain centered on the cog, when I'd get out of the saddle and torque on things I'd get a skip, with a loud bang. I had to resign myself to getting 9-speed indexed shifters, even though they were down-tube. Grant Peterson, the beloved retrogrouch of Rivendell Bicycle Works, said indexed shifting brought a lot of shifting improvements, even though he doesn't agree that indexing itself was particularly one of them. There were shifters integrated with the brake levers as far back as the 1930's; but making indexing work work well required several things that came later:
(or maybe the shifter came out of the dashboard like the Renault 2CV, it was a long time ago.) |
Originally Posted by John E
(Post 23664150)
I still love the simplicity, clean design, and precise control, but I have switched to SunTour friction barcons for most of my new road bike builds. My physical coordination has always been well below average, and I am losing confidence with age. To keep cycling, I have moved to barcons, wider tires, and lower gear ratios.
|
Originally Posted by SaltyShorts
(Post 23665480)
.... Tied with my current OCLV carbon-fiber Trek, my favorite bike was my '77 Mondia Special, of Reynolds 531 double-butted tubing throughout. That bike handled so well, and had a wonderful feel that it just wanted to be part of you. I met two other owners of Mondias of the same vintage, who said the same thing. All very, very happy owners. Don't let anyone tell you that the 21st century has a corner on great-handling bikes! .
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...16f58137e8.jpg |
Originally Posted by SaltyShorts
(Post 23665480)
There's a lot of nostalgia-generating material above!
.... I have 64,000 miles on my carbon Trek now (and I have a friend who races and has over 200,000 miles on his carbon Ridley). I would still like to have a really nice late-1970's bike again, kind of like a classic car that you drive only on Sundays. The only modernizations I would give it are clipless pedals, cycle computer, and maybe aerobars. . 200,000 mi on a CF frame bike - what model year is that ? and does he have/use other bikes??? I can see 8K steady, each year, but on just one bike - don;t know many (or any) who do that kind of mileage on ONE bike, for al that time - or even have just one bike... If you're interested, I have a bunch of 70's bikes, in somewhat good condition, which almost never get ridden, and good sewup wheelsets, along with cassette based wheels, which almost never are ridden... Over years, without any intention, I seem to have become a 'collector'... probably more accurate would be 'hoarder'... :twitchy: :o I see them and what emerges is a vision of a 'life well ridden'... :) Ride On Yuri They could use a 'Tune-up' LOL! |
Originally Posted by bikemig
(Post 23665250)
Great bike. Have you thought about thumb shifters? I'd be sorely tempted to install them on a flat bar bike like this.
The flat bar (and the threadless stem adapter it's fixed to) got installed when I took the drop bars off. Using her for shortish 'commuter' rides had me seeking a more upright posture than what a road bike requires. Making the gearing changes (14-34 in back, 3x up front) for the hills 'round here came first but as the original friction shifters worked so well (still!) I never felt need of changing anything in that mech. My Kona Dew+ has a thumb shifter though so I'm familiar with the concept albeit in a limited way. After acquiring first a Spesh Tarmac last year, then a Diverge late this year, I've pretty much burned through my 'disposable' income budget for biking stuff... but always interested in learning more about things yet unexplored. |
I was happy riding my old steel bike with downtube shifters . . . until I got behind a guy with brifters. I could keep up with him fine as long as the gradient didn't change. But if I had to shift, I'd drop behind a bit, partly because my gears were further apart than his were, partly because I had to take one hand off the bars. I'd ridden that bike a lot, in fact I'd done the one-day STP on it, but the difference in efficiency was quite noticeable. My next riding goal was RAMROD. I bought a new 9-speed carbon bike with a triple. RAMROD went just fine. That carbon bike is the only single I ride now. Our tandem is now a 10-speed, also with a triple. Nostalgia is cool, but it doesn't get me up the road nearly as well as technology does. I don't regard triples to be nostalgic - they're just a superior system largely abandoned because they're a tiny bit less profitable and yes, they're more finicky to adjust. I know a lot of riders who take their bikes to the shop for adjustments. My first modern bike, back in '63, a full Campy Legnano, I took completely apart, even the hubs, and put it all back together, all cleaned and lubed. Bikes are really simple compared with internal combustion engines. Yeah, I'm nuts, but it's been fun.
I haven't been tempted to get a new bike with electronic shifting. I like stuff which I can fix myself. Besides, I was once riding with a person on one of those bikes when her battery went dead. I left her to her own devices which included a cell phone. She called a taxi. Similar to that, I have broken a rear cable at least a couple times but I just jimmied it to keep it in an appropriate cog and still had a 3-speed bike, finished the ride with the group. Good grief, what a grump I am today. I shouldn't listen to the news on NPR. |
Originally Posted by cyclezen
(Post 23665650)
200,000 mi on a CF frame bike - what model year is that ? and does he have/use other bikes???
I can see 8K steady, each year, but on just one bike - don;t know many (or any) who do that kind of mileage on ONE bike, for al that time - or even have just one bike... |
Originally Posted by spclark
(Post 23665659)
No, but tell me more!
The flat bar (and the threadless stem adapter it's fixed to) got installed when I took the drop bars off. Using her for shortish 'commuter' rides had me seeking a more upright posture than what a road bike requires. Making the gearing changes (14-34 in back, 3x up front) for the hills 'round here came first but as the original friction shifters worked so well (still!) I never felt need of changing anything in that mech. My Kona Dew+ has a thumb shifter though so I'm familiar with the concept albeit in a limited way. After acquiring first a Spesh Tarmac last year, then a Diverge late this year, I've pretty much burned through my 'disposable' income budget for biking stuff... but always interested in learning more about things yet unexplored. https://www.modernbike.com/product-2...MaAsKjEALw_wcB I used indexed thumb shifters on my 1993 Trek 750 which I hope to take out on a ride on Christmas if this weather holds up. These pics are from a ride I took on Christmas day a year ago: https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...d6a9df4543.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...e4c0284796.jpg |
Those Old Bikes look so Classic.......;)
|
Originally Posted by bikemig
(Post 23665672)
I installed a set on an '87 Rockhopper I built for my nephew. He's been riding that bike now for over 5 years with no probems:
https://www.modernbike.com/product-2...MaAsKjEALw_wcB
Originally Posted by bikemig
(Post 23665672)
I used indexed thumb shifters on my 1993 Trek 750 which I hope to take out on a ride on Christmas if this weather holds up.
|
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
(Post 23665665)
I was happy riding my old steel bike with downtube shifters . . . until I got behind a guy with brifters. I could keep up with him fine as long as the gradient didn't change. But if I had to shift, I'd drop behind a bit, partly because my gears were further apart than his were, partly because I had to take one hand off the bars.
|
Originally Posted by SaltyShorts
(Post 23665480)
Unfortunately, since it was steel, I broke it, at the bottom of the seat tube, just above the bottom bracket. That seems to be the most common place for steel bikes to break. There was not a speck of rust in it either. I have several friends who've broken steel frames, one of them having broken several. I got a new tube put in mine, and broke it again, all in under 20,000 miles. I decided my next one would have to be carbon. I have 64,000 miles on my carbon Trek now (and I have a friend who races and has over 200,000 miles on his carbon Ridley).
|
Originally Posted by RichSPK
(Post 23665705)
That's where I part ways with some of y'all. I can't remember an instance where I worried about catching or keeping up with another rider. I've never ridden competitively, even informally. I did one charity ride, decades ago, but I was just participating, not competing.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:11 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.