![]() |
As several others have noted, the wheelset is what really counts. During acceleration the weight of the tires and rims is twice as important as the weight of the frame, because of moment of inertia. Variations in tire rolling resistance can also be noticeable.
At some point, frame weight does matter, but I do not agonize over it. When I ride with a local club, I do fine on either the Bianchi (10 kg. = 22lb. total) or Capo #1 (about 1 kg. heavier), but I do seem to be somewhat slower on the UO-8, which weighs another couple of kg. and whose tire pressure I restrict to 80 PSI because of the smooth-walled rims. When my commute included a 12% climb, I definitely did notice the 4 kg. = 9 lb. difference between a Schwinn Varsity and a Peugeot UO-8, both of which I had converted to aluminum rims. |
Originally Posted by Deanster04
(Post 5173902)
215 + 23 = 238 lbs. 4lbs difference is a mere 1.6% difference. Lose the weight off your body and you will be ahead.
|
Originally Posted by Aldo
(Post 5173330)
...I liked the feeling I got when I was test riding the Kestrel up a steep hill and it felt almost effortles compared to my 22.5 lbs Bianchi.
I'm not a weight weenie but I'll take my 16 lb bike over a 20-22 lb bike any day!! I've used both types on 100 mile rides in the mountains and for some reason I'm always a lot faster on the 16 lb bike........ |
Originally Posted by BSLeVan
(Post 5175871)
This is true, and if you lose 4 lbs off the bike, now you're 8 lbs ahead.
The weight taken off the bike makes more of an impact because it also makes you wallet SO much lighter. :D |
Originally Posted by Aldo
(Post 5173258)
Stepfam,
Thanks for the post, it supports the idea that a lighter bike does make a difference in a lot of ways. Is there a comfort/buzziness issue with the aluminum frame of your New Boreas? I did a Google search on New Boreas and came up with nothing...who makes it? To be honest- All my frames are aluminium- The MTB with short travel stiff front Suspension. The Tandem with Full Downhill spec front suspension and the Rolls of Suspension seat posts- The "Thud Buster"- The Giant OCR3 that I did have a problem on road buzz with till I changed the wheels- and the Boreas. The Boreas has Ultegra wheels an 23mm tyres at 140psi and no road buzz. I put this down the frame having no flex in it and the Forks and seat post being C.F. But then the Giant has C.F.Forks and that was a problem- But there is C.F. parts that are made of C.F. to sell and then there are C.F.Parts designed to work. The boreas forks work. http://www.boreas-bikes.dk/pages/ignis.html Now as to that lightness- I have noticed that The Boreas not only feels better to ride- It gives a better ride-Accelerates faster and Downhill is very stable. I am not a speed merchant so do not hammer it in many places- but a 60 mile ride on the Boreas is done with ease- Different bike in a different class but the Giant leaves me Tired after the same ride. |
Originally Posted by BluesDawg
(Post 5176213)
The weight taken off the bike makes more of an impact because it also makes you wallet SO much lighter. :D
It was estimated a few years ago that the average weight of a Rigid Mountain bike was 23lbs- To get down to a 20lbs bike would cost $200 per lb. Then you start really paying. And that was when a $1,500 bike was the top one. |
Yes, wallet lightness. I was looking at a couple of high end bents, two identical bikes from the same manufacturer, same top components, tires, wheelsets, etc. The only difference was that one was aluminum and one titanium. Price difference exactly $1000!
I'd have to have a lot of convincing for a grand a pound! Ha! |
[QUOTE=Deanster04;5173902]215 + 23 = 238 lbs. 4lbs difference is a mere 1.6% difference. Lose the weight off your body and you will be ahead.
I'm not convinced that it's true. The leg muscles have to exert a force proportional to the 22.5 lbs weight of the bike to make it go forward. If the bike is 4 lbs lighter (18% less weight) I would expect the muscles to require 18% less effort to make it move, not 1.6%. |
[QUOTE=Aldo;5180197]
Originally Posted by Deanster04
(Post 5173902)
215 + 23 = 238 lbs. 4lbs difference is a mere 1.6% difference. Lose the weight off your body and you will be ahead.
I'm not convinced that it's true. The leg muscles have to exert a force proportional to the 22.5 lbs weight of the bike to make it go forward. If the bike is 4 lbs lighter (18% less weight) I would expect the muscles to require 18% less effort to make it move, not 1.6%. |
Originally Posted by Aldo
(Post 5173330)
Yup, lots of hills, some group rides...I liked the feeling I got when I was test riding the Kestrel up a steep hill and it felt almost effortles compared to my 22.5 lbs Bianchi.
Bottom line though, upgrading wheels to make up for frame weight increase doesn't make much sense. Just my 1PHP (1 philippine peso = $0.02 USD) |
I have often seen the fastest and strongest rider in the group was the person on the heaviest bike. Weight means something when you are accelerating or going up hills but otherwise, it is not that big a deal.
I have seen plenty of people who put down big bucks on really high end bikes to discover that the high end bike did not make them any faster. Shoot, I had a friend who got a pricier bike and I swear he slowed down (we used to discuss this when he was not around so other people noticed it too). Now I have noticed geometry changes affect things. I went from a touring bike to a rigid short wheel base racing bike and it made a noticeable difference on cornering and seemingly acceleration. It might have just handled better which meant I was going through corners faster. But if you are on a bike whose handling you really like, you will probably see a performance advantage. A friend of mine looked at a ultra high end bike that was leaning against a wall and sniffed saying "Without a rider, that is the fastest that bike is going today". |
[QUOTE=BluesDawg;5180694]
Originally Posted by Aldo
(Post 5180197)
Are you not on the bike when you ride it? How do you do that? |
Originally Posted by Red Baron
(Post 5181644)
Try a madone, I have seen it written that ~6lbs body is 1 lb on a bike. I believe it. Don't mean you have to. But thats why I don't ever use a Camelbak. And have planned water stops on a long ride.
Bottom line though, upgrading wheels to make up for frame weight increase doesn't make much sense. Just my 1PHP (1 philippine peso = $0.02 USD) Now on the lighter bike- It is a bit unfair as the Boreas is a different geometry but it is a 15lbs bike. That thing goes up hills and the only thing that is stopping me from Trying the Steeper hills is a lack of confidenece in my ability. I weigh the same- Same toolkit, pump and water bottle but On the 10%'s I am faster than on the Giant. In fact-Except top speed- which I do not concern myself with- The light bike is 2mph average faster. The hills take less time to get up(But are still hard) and I can go further because I am not putting as much effort into riding to get the same effect. Now as to whether a rider needs to spend $200 on a set of wheels or a lot more on a lighter bike is up to the quality of the rider. For many- a standard wheelset or cheaper bike is completly adequate and no amount of "Upgrades" would improve that rider on a bike. It is only when you have spent the money that you find out that the Upgrade was worth it or a waste of money. Only thing is- I am glad that I was able to spend the money to get a significent improvement in my riding. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:46 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.