Experimentation is Good
09-20-08, 08:36 AM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Experimentation is Good
I'm in my early 60s and got back into biking for exercise. Got a new road bike with 700x25c tires that I found too hard for putting on the miles. Could never get comfortable even w/gel shorts/saddle. So, experimented with 32c tires and they are a world of difference! Seems easier to ride (rolls easier) but subjectively seems heavier and little slower. But at lower speeds, it seems easier to ride uphill AND it's easier on the seat (mine). Any similar experiences?
09-20-08, 11:10 AM
#2
Time for a change.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
I use a 23 and on the occasions when I have gone to a wider tyre-the bike felt sluggish.
Most of my riding has been offroad and I use a comparitively narrow tyre on that aswell. 1.8 as to most using 1.95 That is because I am a light weight and I don't Know any better.
Once again it is down to Drag on the Trails- but also because I am a light rider.
Most of my riding has been offroad and I use a comparitively narrow tyre on that aswell. 1.8 as to most using 1.95 That is because I am a light weight and I don't Know any better.
Once again it is down to Drag on the Trails- but also because I am a light rider.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
09-20-08, 08:51 PM
#3
Roadkill
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 858
Bikes: 2002 Lightspeed Classic; 2010 Pedalforce RS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There is a definite trade off between tire width - comfort - performance and you need to find the spot that works for you. I'm bigger than stapfam and I also use 23's but may switch to 25's eventually.
If the 32c tires suit your style and let you enjoy your rides, then that is exactly the right width.
09-20-08, 08:57 PM
#4
His Brain is Gone!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paoli, Wisconsin
Posts: 9,979
Bikes: RANS Stratus, Bridgestone CB-1, Trek 7600, Sun EZ-Rider AX, Fuji Absolute 1.0, Cayne Rambler 3
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My new bike came with 28s and I had them switched to 32. I run them at 85psi. Definitely smooths out the vibrations & ride. Performance is not a big deal to me, as I have so little of it.
__________________
"Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen." Louis L'Amour
There are two types of road bikers: bikers who are faster than me, and me. Bruce Cameron - Denver Post
"Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen." Louis L'Amour
There are two types of road bikers: bikers who are faster than me, and me. Bruce Cameron - Denver Post
09-20-08, 09:03 PM
#5
Senior Member
I've increasingly a fan of larger tires. I have 32c's on my commuter bike, and find that it's much safer to be watching traffic than to be constantly watching the pavement to avoid cracks and potholes.
I also just increased the size of the tires on my long-distance bike (the Davidson in my sig line) to 28c's from 25c. A lot of the riding I do w/that bike is out in the hills and mountains; frequently there is gravel on the edge of the road and pavement problems...it now feels more stable and sure-footed than it did with 25c's.
I've also been reading "Bicycle Quarterly", including a bunch of back issues; the editor (a very accomplished and fast randoneer) has been systematically testing wider perfromance tires and is a big advocate of bigger tires for fast, long-distance riding. If you're really interested in the topic it's worth getting some of their back issues where they explore the benefits of wider tires (wider = 32c and 35c).
I also just increased the size of the tires on my long-distance bike (the Davidson in my sig line) to 28c's from 25c. A lot of the riding I do w/that bike is out in the hills and mountains; frequently there is gravel on the edge of the road and pavement problems...it now feels more stable and sure-footed than it did with 25c's.
I've also been reading "Bicycle Quarterly", including a bunch of back issues; the editor (a very accomplished and fast randoneer) has been systematically testing wider perfromance tires and is a big advocate of bigger tires for fast, long-distance riding. If you're really interested in the topic it's worth getting some of their back issues where they explore the benefits of wider tires (wider = 32c and 35c).
09-20-08, 09:14 PM
#6
His Brain is Gone!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paoli, Wisconsin
Posts: 9,979
Bikes: RANS Stratus, Bridgestone CB-1, Trek 7600, Sun EZ-Rider AX, Fuji Absolute 1.0, Cayne Rambler 3
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Many tourers use 32 tires. In fact, many touring bikes are configured with 32s as standard equipment.
One of the old standard tires was the 27" x 1.25" size, which is a 32.
One of the old standard tires was the 27" x 1.25" size, which is a 32.
__________________
"Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen." Louis L'Amour
There are two types of road bikers: bikers who are faster than me, and me. Bruce Cameron - Denver Post
"Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen." Louis L'Amour
There are two types of road bikers: bikers who are faster than me, and me. Bruce Cameron - Denver Post
09-20-08, 11:05 PM
#7
Lincoln, CA
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lincoln, CA
Posts: 2,229
Bikes: 94 Giant ATX 760, 2001 Biachi Eros, 2005 Giant OCR2 Composite +
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I've never used 32s, but 28s, 25s and 23s, mostly the latter. Frankly, I can't tell much difference. I'm 195, pump 'em up pretty hard (120) and go. I ride lots of miles, but have never felt any kind of fatigue or pain I could associate with the tires.
__________________
Truth is stranger than reality.
'96 Giant ATX 760 MTB
'01 Bianchi Eros
'05 Giant OCR Llimited Carbon Fiber + upgrades
Truth is stranger than reality.
'96 Giant ATX 760 MTB
'01 Bianchi Eros
'05 Giant OCR Llimited Carbon Fiber + upgrades
09-21-08, 05:31 AM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,260
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I running 32's (1 1/4) @ 100 psi on my Volae and I love them!! I've got
1 1/2" tires on the LWB recumbents and love them, on those bikes. However,
I run 23's on my Schwinn Road Bike and would never think of swapping them
out for anything else. I guess it's all about personal preference and use.
Happy Trails
1 1/2" tires on the LWB recumbents and love them, on those bikes. However,
I run 23's on my Schwinn Road Bike and would never think of swapping them
out for anything else. I guess it's all about personal preference and use.
Happy Trails
