Frank Berto's recommended low gearing for "wise old riders"
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Frank Berto's recommended low gearing for "wise old riders"
A couple of threads about gearing here today had me thinking about Frank Berto, who was Bicycling Magazine's technical editor "back in the day." He wrote clearly and frequently about gearing set-ups, and had a big influence on the way I set up my bikes. His book, "Upgrading Your Bike", is still a very good read if you want to understand your bike, and especially if you own a bike from the 60's through 80's you want to fiddle around with.
Frank is a proponent of low gears and spinning (vs. mashing). Since the topic often comes up here about low gears, I thought I would convey his recommendations on the low gears that one should have for various types of riders. Understanding his recommendations means that you have to understand the concept of Gear Inches (some background and a gear calculator here: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears).
Here are Frank Berto's recommendation for the low gear that "wise old riders" should have on their bikes. In most of the cases outlined below, he recommends that "Strong Young Riders" can make do with gearing that is 5 Gear Inches higher, so if you're feeling brave or strong you can go 5 inches higher (though he also used to say that "strong young riders" who wanted to keep their knees their whole lives would be well advised to move to "wise old rider" low gears when they were still young...that's what I did).
One of his frequent complaints was that most bikes intended for recreational use were set up by manufacturers with gearing that was more aimed at racers than "normal" use....IMHO this got a lot better during the mountain bike boom, especially with the growth of triples...but I still see people struggling with too-high gears and, of course, we see variations of these questions asked here on BF all the time.
Without further ado, Frank's "low gear" recommendations:
Kind of Riding / Recommended Low Gear (in gear inches)
Racing (level course) 55
Racing (hilly course) 45
Triathlon (level course) 55
Triathlon (hilly course) 40
Recreational riding (flat terrain) 40
Recreational riding (hilly terrain) 32
Recreational riding (steep hills) 27
Loaded touring (flat terrain) 24
Loaded touring (hilly terrain) 19
(note: for loaded touring in hilly terrain, he also says that even "strong young riders" should have a low gear of 19).
Of course, once you pick a low gear, you have to arrange the rest of your gearing to have a proper "high" gear...and his book has pages and pages of discussions on various ways to get there. Frank's book is almost always available (used) at Amazon for a few bucks, a great bargain:
https://www.amazon.com/Bicycling-Maga...9004204&sr=8-1
Frank is a proponent of low gears and spinning (vs. mashing). Since the topic often comes up here about low gears, I thought I would convey his recommendations on the low gears that one should have for various types of riders. Understanding his recommendations means that you have to understand the concept of Gear Inches (some background and a gear calculator here: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears).
Here are Frank Berto's recommendation for the low gear that "wise old riders" should have on their bikes. In most of the cases outlined below, he recommends that "Strong Young Riders" can make do with gearing that is 5 Gear Inches higher, so if you're feeling brave or strong you can go 5 inches higher (though he also used to say that "strong young riders" who wanted to keep their knees their whole lives would be well advised to move to "wise old rider" low gears when they were still young...that's what I did).
One of his frequent complaints was that most bikes intended for recreational use were set up by manufacturers with gearing that was more aimed at racers than "normal" use....IMHO this got a lot better during the mountain bike boom, especially with the growth of triples...but I still see people struggling with too-high gears and, of course, we see variations of these questions asked here on BF all the time.
Without further ado, Frank's "low gear" recommendations:
Kind of Riding / Recommended Low Gear (in gear inches)
Racing (level course) 55
Racing (hilly course) 45
Triathlon (level course) 55
Triathlon (hilly course) 40
Recreational riding (flat terrain) 40
Recreational riding (hilly terrain) 32
Recreational riding (steep hills) 27
Loaded touring (flat terrain) 24
Loaded touring (hilly terrain) 19
(note: for loaded touring in hilly terrain, he also says that even "strong young riders" should have a low gear of 19).
Of course, once you pick a low gear, you have to arrange the rest of your gearing to have a proper "high" gear...and his book has pages and pages of discussions on various ways to get there. Frank's book is almost always available (used) at Amazon for a few bucks, a great bargain:
https://www.amazon.com/Bicycling-Maga...9004204&sr=8-1
Last edited by BengeBoy; 08-17-08 at 05:02 PM.
#2
just keep riding
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560
Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
22 Posts
Looks about right to me, at least the recreational categories. I've not done the others and couldn't say.
#3
His Brain is Gone!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paoli, Wisconsin
Posts: 9,979
Bikes: RANS Stratus, Bridgestone CB-1, Trek 7600, Sun EZ-Rider AX, Fuji Absolute 1.0, Cayne Rambler 3
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If I had a bike with a low gear of 55 gi, it wouldn't get ridden much. I almost never ride above 75 and my normal cruising gear is 60.
My bent's low gear is 17, but it never gets used.
Those numbers seem reasonable to me, except I would lower that "Recreational Rider - Steep Hills" from 27 down to 22 or 23. A typical hybrid is geared 48/38/28 and 11-32, or 48/36/26. That produces a 22-23 gi.
My bent's low gear is 17, but it never gets used.
Those numbers seem reasonable to me, except I would lower that "Recreational Rider - Steep Hills" from 27 down to 22 or 23. A typical hybrid is geared 48/38/28 and 11-32, or 48/36/26. That produces a 22-23 gi.
__________________
"Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen." Louis L'Amour
There are two types of road bikers: bikers who are faster than me, and me. Bruce Cameron - Denver Post
"Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen." Louis L'Amour
There are two types of road bikers: bikers who are faster than me, and me. Bruce Cameron - Denver Post
Last edited by Tom Bombadil; 08-17-08 at 03:19 PM.
#4
just keep riding
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560
Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
22 Posts
#5
His Brain is Gone!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paoli, Wisconsin
Posts: 9,979
Bikes: RANS Stratus, Bridgestone CB-1, Trek 7600, Sun EZ-Rider AX, Fuji Absolute 1.0, Cayne Rambler 3
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Because it was there and to obey N+1.
__________________
"Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen." Louis L'Amour
There are two types of road bikers: bikers who are faster than me, and me. Bruce Cameron - Denver Post
"Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen." Louis L'Amour
There are two types of road bikers: bikers who are faster than me, and me. Bruce Cameron - Denver Post
#6
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,765
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1384 Post(s)
Liked 1,294 Times
in
819 Posts
I have used a 42/26 = 43.6 gear-inch bottom gear for many years. I save it for extremely steep (15%+) hills or for "bonking," using only my second (42/23 = 49.3) and higher gears for almost all of my riding. I do have a 24" low gear on my mountain bike, and I am not sure I could use anything lower without falling over.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#7
Lincoln, CA
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lincoln, CA
Posts: 2,229
Bikes: 94 Giant ATX 760, 2001 Biachi Eros, 2005 Giant OCR2 Composite +
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Interesting. By chance, I have mine set up close to the Recreational-steep hills, which fits my riding area. I find I don't use the two or three super-grannies much at all, but they're there. I wasn't sure of my crank length, but found it didn't make much difference anyway.
I have a triple, but calculated the equivalent of a compact double gear inches would be with my cassette (I done this "unoffically" before). I try not to go easier than that. I guess I have just a little "macho" in me.
I have a triple, but calculated the equivalent of a compact double gear inches would be with my cassette (I done this "unoffically" before). I try not to go easier than that. I guess I have just a little "macho" in me.
__________________
Truth is stranger than reality.
'96 Giant ATX 760 MTB
'01 Bianchi Eros
'05 Giant OCR Llimited Carbon Fiber + upgrades
Truth is stranger than reality.
'96 Giant ATX 760 MTB
'01 Bianchi Eros
'05 Giant OCR Llimited Carbon Fiber + upgrades
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,868
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
4 Posts
I read much of what Berto wrote back then and always kept it in mind when I set up a bike. Once I installed my first triple, I never went back.
I wonder what he's doing these days.
I wonder what he's doing these days.
#9
His Brain is Gone!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paoli, Wisconsin
Posts: 9,979
Bikes: RANS Stratus, Bridgestone CB-1, Trek 7600, Sun EZ-Rider AX, Fuji Absolute 1.0, Cayne Rambler 3
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
__________________
"Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen." Louis L'Amour
There are two types of road bikers: bikers who are faster than me, and me. Bruce Cameron - Denver Post
"Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen." Louis L'Amour
There are two types of road bikers: bikers who are faster than me, and me. Bruce Cameron - Denver Post
Last edited by Tom Bombadil; 08-17-08 at 06:50 PM.
#11
just keep riding
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560
Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
22 Posts
#12
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,765
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1384 Post(s)
Liked 1,294 Times
in
819 Posts
When the first edition of The Dancing Chain came out, I emailed Frank with a few typos and minor errors I had discovered. He always cordially responded, signing off with "Gears 2 U." I always enjoyed his objective tests of bicycle transmissions and his analytical approach to gearing.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#13
Version 7.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,100
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1327 Post(s)
Liked 2,440 Times
in
1,426 Posts
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I was looking for this information the other day and then remembered I had it in a post. Hooray for me -- I should put my to do list, shopping list, anniversary date, etc. in a post so I know where to find it.
#15
Senior Member
Summary: Buy a compact double for your first bike when you come back to cycling in you 50's. After a year, if it's too much, get a triple. If you're doing fine with it after the first year, ride it another year, and consider a standard double if you're still getting stronger. This also presents the opportunity to buy multiple bikes.
Just about everyone will be pretty happy most of the time with a compact double.
Just about everyone will be pretty happy most of the time with a compact double.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
How does a compact double get a "wise old rider" down to 19 gear inches for loaded touring in hilly terrain?
#17
Senior Member
#18
Senior Member
Nice summary BengeBoy. Thanks
>(note: for loaded touring in hilly terrain, he also says that even "strong young riders" should have a low gear of 19).
A lot of the touring setups described at CGOAB ( https://crazyguyonabike.com ) have a granny gear under 20 gear inches. My current setup is 18 gear inches and I'm considering dropping to around 16.5
>(note: for loaded touring in hilly terrain, he also says that even "strong young riders" should have a low gear of 19).
A lot of the touring setups described at CGOAB ( https://crazyguyonabike.com ) have a granny gear under 20 gear inches. My current setup is 18 gear inches and I'm considering dropping to around 16.5
#19
Plays in traffic
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,971
Bikes: 1996 Litespeed Classic, 2006 Trek Portland, 2013 Ribble Winter/Audax, 2016 Giant Talon 4
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
9 Posts
I've never been accused of being wise, and hooray! I guess I'm not old any more.
Except for winter, I've been riding around using a 45 inch gear as my low for a couple of years now. I typically ride in the 70s and 80s.
That said, two of my bikes are triples, but even then, their three-season low gears are 35, and I very rarely use the granny, staying in the middle for the 45 low gear. Only in the winter do I drop to a 30 inch and use the granny with any frequency.
As for compact doubles, the meat and potatoes of my power range is in the transition between the two rings. Between stoplights I'd have to shift rings, then shift back again so I'm not cross-chaining from the stop. Too much of a PITA. For my kind of riding, the middle ring on my triples or the small ring on my standard doubles gets the most use. In fact, I wore out the middle ring on the Portland and had to replace it recently.
Except for winter, I've been riding around using a 45 inch gear as my low for a couple of years now. I typically ride in the 70s and 80s.
That said, two of my bikes are triples, but even then, their three-season low gears are 35, and I very rarely use the granny, staying in the middle for the 45 low gear. Only in the winter do I drop to a 30 inch and use the granny with any frequency.
As for compact doubles, the meat and potatoes of my power range is in the transition between the two rings. Between stoplights I'd have to shift rings, then shift back again so I'm not cross-chaining from the stop. Too much of a PITA. For my kind of riding, the middle ring on my triples or the small ring on my standard doubles gets the most use. In fact, I wore out the middle ring on the Portland and had to replace it recently.
Last edited by tsl; 06-21-10 at 03:14 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
BTW, I would agree w/your point -- for most people a compact double ought to do it -- steep hills, long climbs, commuting or touring with heavy loads would seem to require gearing down below the level that compact doubles can reach. Even *that* is changing now, though, with the availability of groups like the SRAM Apex that work with a 32T rear cassette.
Last edited by BengeBoy; 06-21-10 at 03:20 PM.
#21
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,918
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
343 Posts
I was happy with my 34-26 low gear, that's about 34 gear inches. I just got a 13-29 Campagnolo cog set, a 30.7 gear inch low gear. It's not supposed to fit with a normal derailleur, but many riders have gotten it to work with no problems. I can just barely run the 34-13 cross chained combination with just enough tension on the derailleur.
It's nice to have on 7% or higher grades. To recover while on a long 7-8% grade, I can slow down to about 3-4 mph and keep the cranks turning over without tiring out my legs, then pick up the cadence when rested. I was surprised it made that much difference, since it's only 11% easier. With a 25 or 26 cog, I would be alternating standing up and sitting much of the way.
It's nice to have on 7% or higher grades. To recover while on a long 7-8% grade, I can slow down to about 3-4 mph and keep the cranks turning over without tiring out my legs, then pick up the cadence when rested. I was surprised it made that much difference, since it's only 11% easier. With a 25 or 26 cog, I would be alternating standing up and sitting much of the way.
#22
gone ride'n
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 4,050
Bikes: Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My Tarmac and I was running 31.5 and now down to 29.2 and about to go to 28.2. The Simoncini runs 35.7 but I don't do serious long climbs with it.
#23
Climbing Above It All
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Basking in the Sun.
Posts: 4,146
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Two of my road bikes have 34/28 (32") for lowest gears. The other has been changed to 34/32 (28") for extreme steep hills expected late in long rides. What I like about the 34/32 is that I can ride in the 50/25 and stay in the large chainring more. That was an unexpected benefit. But for most rides that low gear is way overkill.
#24
"Chooch"
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Prairieville, Louisiana
Posts: 1,659
Bikes: Late 1990s Ciocc Titan
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I live in flat country where the steepest climbs are overpasses, so I can easily get by with a 47-inch low (very rarely used) and a 95.4-inch high (also very rarely used). I currently have 47-41 chainrings and a 13-15-17-19-21-23 freewheel (Frank's "Crossover" pattern from his May 1978 Bicycling magazine article, "All About Twelve Speeds") on my Ciocc, which gives me seven usable nicely-spaced gears with NO double shifts. Shifting is very smooth/fast thanks to my old Campy Super Record derailleurs with downtube friction shifters.
Last edited by ciocc_cat; 06-21-10 at 05:45 PM. Reason: Added photo
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I think it's an interesting tribute to Mr. Berto that you know the date of the article that cites this gearing pattern.