![]() |
Originally Posted by The Weak Link
(Post 11570330)
Seattle's ticked off because it's not Portland.
That's it. |
Originally Posted by The Weak Link
(Post 11570330)
Seattle's ticked off because it's not Portland.
That's it. The short answer (as I understand it) is "no." The problems is that there are too many natural barriers (mainly steep hills) running across too many important neighborhoods. Therefore, even if bike infrastructure is improved, it's still going to be difficult to get casual riders interested in bike commuting because too many routes are too difficult. http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/0...ycle-analysis/ So: we are not Portland. We are tougher. |
Originally Posted by Metric Man
(Post 11569834)
It's always extremist when you don't agree.
|
Originally Posted by BengeBoy
(Post 11570555)
There have been at least a couple of efforts by graduate students using GIS mapping data to try to figure out whether Seattle can ever be as bike-friendly as Portland.
http://i373.photobucket.com/albums/o...g?t=1286485354 We liked the Columbia River Gorge area. Great for cycling!! :thumb: |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:39 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.