Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

I sold my MTB today

Search
Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

I sold my MTB today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-10, 08:09 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
bjjoondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO.
Posts: 2,116

Bikes: 2011 ICE Sprint Special Edition

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 101 Times in 66 Posts
I totally understand, infact I too I'm going to sell my Jamis Durango 3 hardtail and get a new fitness road bike, keep my other for "utility and backup"! I have chronic Reiter's Syndrome and found that my major joints just can't take the "pounding" of off-road riding anymore!
__________________
Take Care, Ride Safe, have FUN! :)
Jo: 2009 ICE Trice T
BJ: 2011 ICE Sprint Special Edition










Last edited by bjjoondo; 12-19-10 at 09:54 AM.
bjjoondo is offline  
Old 12-15-10, 11:27 AM
  #27  
Dirt Bomb
 
sknhgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,865
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5468 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 239 Posts
The last time I rode trails with a group of younger riders I broke a rim.
sknhgy is offline  
Old 12-16-10, 10:19 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Moraga, CA
Posts: 1,701

Bikes: 2008 Cervelo RS, 2011 Scott CR1 Elite, 2014 Volagi Liscio

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I sold my mtb once I figured out that going downhill on trails scared the crap out of me. I don't have that problem on the road.
RoboCheme is offline  
Old 12-16-10, 10:31 AM
  #29  
Erect member since 1953
 
cccorlew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Antioch, CA (SF Bay Area)
Posts: 7,000

Bikes: Trek 520 Grando, Roubaix Expert, Motobecane Ti Century Elite turned commuter, Some old French thing gone fixie

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 38 Times in 21 Posts
I feel the same way. I'll never be a mountain biker. But I kept mine for the occasional trail ride. Sometimes it's just too beautiful to not do. But I ride it like a roadie. I don't slide, I keep both wheels on the ground and I hate the loose stuff.

Here's a photo I shot of my wife on the Flume Trail in Tahoe. I'm not ready to never ride this again.


Tricia rides the Flume Trail by ccorlew, on Flickr
cccorlew is offline  
Old 12-16-10, 01:06 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
jboyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 778

Bikes: Giant "Rainier"

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sknhgy
I prefer to explore the gravel roads and trails that few other people see. I love beginner to intermediate level mtb trails. I love getting far away from everything and looking over at my mtb and seeing how that little piece of metal pipe with some wheels on it got me there.
Dude, you read my mind

Where are you from in IL? I live in the end with all the hills. I thought the rest was corn fields.
jboyd is offline  
Old 12-16-10, 02:48 PM
  #31  
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
4 Years ago- Before I got a road bike- I used to love getting out on the trails round our way. Hardtail was the way to go for (Lack of) expense- lightness for XC and manoueverability. Still feel that is the way to go- although the Tandem did get a Thud Buster suspension post for comfort. 4 years of road and I have lost some of that offroad ability. Can still do the technical stuff but the fast downhills are taken a lot slower now.

But the fun element of mountain biking has to be tried to be believed. Just imagine climbing that scree covered slope for a mile with the lack of grip that ensues- That MUDDY grass covered hill where you have to look for the available grip to get to the top- or the root covered singletrack that you have to take at speed- just so you can bunny hop up the 12" ridges that will stop you dead if you don't- or the drop off that gives the stomach a turn as you realise that if you don't come down soon- it is going to be a heavy landing.

Been there- done that but now realise that more than the bike would break if I were to go at it as aggressively as I used to.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Old 12-17-10, 05:53 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
xizangstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Colorado-California-Florida-(hopefully soon): Panama
Posts: 1,059

Bikes: Vintage GT Xizang (titanium mountain bike)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've had a monogamous relationship with my Xizang mountain bike for over 15 years. No intention to trade her for a skinny tired thing, nor to add any others to my stable of one. I began with thick-tired bikes back in the 1950's and when MTBs came along, that's the direction I went.

As I've aged, my little gal has changed to accommodate my needs. Riser stem and bars, and a second set of tires/wheels with Marathon Plus road tires, have helped me adjust to more mellow road and hardpack rides. There are ways to 'morph' the bike to keep up with your physical changes and interests.

I'm very satisfied with a stout, strong and reliable mountain bike that can adapt for me.
xizangstan is offline  
Old 12-17-10, 09:45 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
BikeArkansas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Maumelle, AR
Posts: 1,075

Bikes: 2012 Scorpion FX trike, 2016 Catrike 700

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I tried my first trail mountain bike ride yesterday with the bike a friend of mine sent to me. I was scared most of the time. The only time I felt safe was when the bike was stopped. Now, I have to say I did travel one flat trail through the woods with lost of turns, a few dips and some roots, but no rocks and steep downhill single track where you are out of control bouncing through rocks and roots.

I plan to box this puppy up and send it back. I got tired of being scared very quickly.
BikeArkansas is offline  
Old 12-18-10, 08:29 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 830
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would think it would be wise before running around on trails scaring one's self, an understanding of the required techniques for riding safely would be in order. Apparently not.

If one doesn't understand how to ride in the classic "attack" position, then you are very vulnerable to damage. It's a stupid name "attack", but I guess it sounds better to young folks than "safe".

The attack position keeps you from going over the bars in all conditions, handle rock-strewn steep downhills and fly around rough turns at phenominal speed. That's after some practice and experience of course.

Get a copy of Mastering Mountain Bike Skills, second edition, By Brian Lopes & Lee McCormack. Then you'll be safe and fear free; or at least far safer than road riding.
I've been mountain biking on advanced trials in the N Georgia/Tenn./NC mountains for about 10 years now starting around 61. I still keep up with latest literature to make sure I'm safe while having a ball. Nothing like a refresher once in a while as you tend to get sloppy.

What scares me are the roads full of SUVs, trucks and dysfunctional drivers on cell phones and old people who shouldn't be driving. I have several books on riding roads safely as well. My favorite is written by a NY City messenger rider. Now there's a survivor.

Al
alcanoe is offline  
Old 12-18-10, 12:43 PM
  #35  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times in 836 Posts
I really like my old school, non-suspension mountain bike, but it admittedly sees more use onroad than off. I have neither the coordination nor the fast-twitch musculature required for hard-core technical mountain biking, to I stick to multitrack fire roads and the like.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 12-18-10, 06:25 PM
  #36  
Dirt Bomb
 
sknhgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,865
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5468 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 239 Posts
Originally Posted by jboyd
Dude, you read my mind

Where are you from in IL? I live in the end with all the hills. I thought the rest was corn fields.
I live north of St. Louis, along the river. We have hills (and swamps) here too.
sknhgy is offline  
Old 12-20-10, 12:27 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
semsd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 60

Bikes: Road

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well guys I did get myself a rigid 29er it’s a GT Peace. Was about $500 and that’s a fraction of the carbon. I’ve got to say I like riding old dirt roads what some call fire roads. But you can keep the rocks, mud and sand. See you out there.
semsd is offline  
Old 12-20-10, 06:24 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 830
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Some folks have gone from full suspension to 29er hard tails. The bigger tires, especially run tubless (tube-type tires with out tubes) and very low pressures with Stan's provide a lot of comfort. Though 29ers are faster in some conditions, the higher gearing is not all that suited to climbing for us old guys or those suspceptible to knee problems. Some have gone to 29" front wheels and 26" rear wheels because of that.

The lefty Canondale is easily converted to 29 front and some manufacturers offer bikes with the 29/26 combination.

Al
alcanoe is offline  
Old 12-21-10, 11:35 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
xizangstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Colorado-California-Florida-(hopefully soon): Panama
Posts: 1,059

Bikes: Vintage GT Xizang (titanium mountain bike)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm really glad you brought that up. I'm having a new rear wheel built using a new Shimano XTR disc hub and a new Mavic 719 V-brake rim, 36 spokes.

But because my GT Xizang is a vintage titanium-framed hardtail mtn. bike, I'm staying with the 26" V-brake setup on the back. I want to step up to a new front suspension fork that can handle disc brakes in the front. And you mention going with a 29" wheel. I like the concept. Especially for my intended uses - some off-road, some cross country, and some real touring... Simply by changing out the wheels/tires.

Thanks for the idea of mixing 26" rear with a 29" front!

Originally Posted by alcanoe
Some folks have gone from full suspension to 29er hard tails. The bigger tires, especially run tubless (tube-type tires with out tubes) and very low pressures with Stan's provide a lot of comfort. Though 29ers are faster in some conditions, the higher gearing is not all that suited to climbing for us old guys or those suspceptible to knee problems. Some have gone to 29" front wheels and 26" rear wheels because of that.

The lefty Canondale is easily converted to 29 front and some manufacturers offer bikes with the 29/26 combination.

Al

Last edited by xizangstan; 12-21-10 at 11:40 AM.
xizangstan is offline  
Old 12-21-10, 11:40 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,768

Bikes: Trek Mountaineer modified with a NuVinci; Montegue Paratrooper folding mountain bike; Greenspeed recumbent; Surly Big Dummy with Stokemonkey

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Or a hybrid with knobby tires.
Elkhound is offline  
Old 12-21-10, 12:51 PM
  #41  
just keep riding
 
BluesDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560

Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by xizangstan
I'm really glad you brought that up. I'm having a new rear wheel built using a new Shimano XTR disc hub and a new Mavic 719 V-brake rim, 36 spokes.

But because my GT Xizang is a vintage titanium-framed hardtail mtn. bike, I'm staying with the 26" V-brake setup on the back. I want to step up to a new front suspension fork that can handle disc brakes in the front. And you mention going with a 29" wheel. I like the concept. Especially for my intended uses - some off-road, some cross country, and some real touring... Simply by changing out the wheels/tires.

Thanks for the idea of mixing 26" rear with a 29" front!
Be careful. The larger wheel and the required longer fork will change the geometry of your bike in more ways than just the larger wheel diameter. Your bike will have slower steering and higher center of gravity at a minimum. another option might be going with a 650B (27") front wheel. It will still compromise the handling, but not as much as a 29" wheel. Some frames can be converted to 650B front and rear, but many things need to be considered. Much discussion of 650B and 69ers at this forum. https://forums.mtbr.com/forumdisplay.php?f=135
BluesDawg is offline  
Old 12-21-10, 04:39 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 830
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BluesDawg
Be careful. The larger wheel and the required longer fork will change the geometry of your bike in more ways than just the larger wheel diameter. Your bike will have slower steering and higher center of gravity at a minimum. another option might be going with a 650B (27") front wheel. It will still compromise the handling, but not as much as a 29" wheel. Some frames can be converted to 650B front and rear, but many things need to be considered. Much discussion of 650B and 69ers at this forum. https://forums.mtbr.com/forumdisplay.php?f=135
True, it will slow the steering by increasing the effective head tube angle so it shouldn't be dangerous. A higher center of gravity of the rider can be an advantage for handling. And of course a full 29 is even higher yet.

An acquaintance of mine went from 26 to a 29 with a Canondale lefty as suggested by his local bike shop. The bike shop owner told me that he had added a spacer to the lefty fork to reduce travel. So far the rider loves it.

How it turns out will depend on the original head tube angle. If it's a slow stearer to begin with like for a more downhill bike, it might be a real dog.

I probably would not like it as I can't imagine living with that much slower steering. I ride a cross-country racing frame with 73/73 seat and head tubes which are noted for very quick turning/handling. However, my acquaintance has raced for many years (he's 65) and a much better biker than me.

Another negative I can think of is possibly frame stress. The warranty on my 2008 (acquired in 2010) Santa Cruze Blur XC frame will be voided if I exceed a 4" travel fork which is equivalent to raising the effective head-tube angle. I don't know the specific reason why they void the warranty.

The too, you have to make sure there will be adequate stand-over height. It's tough to provide suspension, stand-over height and 29" wheels all together.

All in all, there is a case for buying a frame designed for the 26/29 set up.

Al

Last edited by alcanoe; 12-21-10 at 04:42 PM.
alcanoe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatpunk
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
4
04-17-18 12:28 AM
Shuffleman
Road Cycling
2
04-04-16 11:54 AM
CarLo
Mountain Biking
6
09-27-11 05:49 PM
HIPCHIP
Fifty Plus (50+)
13
02-18-10 11:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.