Reply/view 50+ thread ratios - significant?
 

Some longer-standing 50+ threads run a very high reply/view ratio, while others have much lower ratios. Is there any significance to this? If so, what?



For example:

Sticky: 50+ Racing/training for racing Thread

Replies: 687
Views: 7,658

ratio - 1:11


Sticky: Special Thread For 50+yo Bicyclists

Replies: 1,118
Views: 81,353

ratio: 1:72


did you ride today

Replies: 5,180
Views: 103,040

Ratio: 1:20


Did you exercise today? (other than biking)


Replies: 122
Views: 914

ratio 1:7.5


If you can answer this, would you kindly explain to me the meaning of life? :)

42

Well done sir.

So, the ultimate ratio would be

1:42 ?

How many gear inches would that be?

[QUOTE=DnvrFoxIf you can answer this, would you kindly explain to me the meaning of life? :)[/QUOTE]

Pie

Pi

The meaning of life depends on the topic.

4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42

you Lost me on that one!

Depends

That's not a cassette I've ever seen.

One of those new "comfort bikes" I believe. 6 speed in the hub.

And, as to the original question******************************???

Some like to read. Some like to type. Some even enjoy doing both.

I've replied to this thread once, but viewed it twice.

1:2

;)

Well I didn't read the thread, just thought I would reply. 1:0 :50:

Lots of people are on the path to become 50+ but are to chicken to admit it. The rest of us don't have a choice as we've arrived.

No, that would be the answer on the 90+ Forum.

:thumb:

It means that different threads have different read/write ratios. As to the meaning of life, only humans maintain the fantasy that it has to have meaning.

I tend to reply more frequently to threads w/ short reply lists than to those which have been beaten into the ground. This would affect my personal view/reply ratio.

A whole new area of research. The zen of personal view/reply ratios.