![]() |
Originally Posted by DnvrFox
(Post 13129360)
I am totally missing your point. Yes, of course there is a number involved. Are you trying to say it is the same number for all of us? If so, you are denying genetics. The obituaries are full of folks for whom "old age" was 62. Others, genetically, aren't even close at 62. So, who determines that number? You? I sure hope not. Me - YES, I (and only I) get to determine my "old age" number. Hey, I'm not there yet. It may take a few years - oh, say 20, before I determine "my number" is up.
There are some who dwell on that number, and some that don't. I am not a dweller. I am a doer. How about you? Doer or dweller? So, what is your point? We should all sit around and dwell on the fact (or not) that we are now in "old age" because we reached a "number." Not I. You are welcome to do that. Me, I will continue thinking I am young. It is MUCH more fun. My point is not about the number, but about the way many posts define the term. There seems to be a reluctance to say "I am old." Why? Like every other period of life, "old:" has its upsides and its downside. Our culture tends to over-value the upside of youth and under-value the upside of old age. This is not a good thing and the posts I'm referring to seem to reflect and reinforce that negative attitude by suggesting that for humans the measure of "old" is somehow different than for everything else on the planet. Therefore, "I'm not old till I say I am." I'm certainly not suggesting we should dwell on being old. I'm suggesting we embrace rather than deny old age, however we choose to live it. I'm suggesting we change the culture. |
Old Age Sticks
old age sticks up Keep Off signs)& youth yanks them down(old age cries No Tres)&(pas) youth laughs (sing old age scolds Forbid den Stop Must n't Don't &)youth goes right on gr owing old -- ee cummings |
Originally Posted by rkokish
(Post 13131691)
Yes, I suppose the number is pretty much the same for all of us and no, it's not worth arguing about exactly what that number is.
So, I guess we will simply have to disagree here, as we see "old" entirely differently. |
Originally Posted by DnvrFox
(Post 13132769)
"Old is SO MUCH MORE than a number. When someone describes another person as "He is SO old," they mean a whole lot more than a number - they mean an attitude, a posture, a measure of invigoration, strength and a whole lot of other characteristics. It is not a complimentary term, IMHO.
So, I guess we will simply have to disagree here, as we see "old" entirely differently. |
Actually, I don't understand the question. What is this old of which you speak.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:47 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.