Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

If we want respect from motorist, we need to respect the rules of the road.

Search
Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

If we want respect from motorist, we need to respect the rules of the road.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-11, 01:56 PM
  #101  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by DnvrFox
A new Colorado law allows the auto to cross the center line to pass and give 3 feet clearance to bicyclists, assuming it is safe. Any other states allow this?

https://bicyclecolo.org/dir/117/files...pPosterweb.pdf
Florida's Slow Moving Vehicle (SMV) law has allowed crossing the yellow line when safe for passing any SMV since before I took their drivers test in 1976.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 01:57 PM
  #102  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
dguest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Foothills, NC
Posts: 415

Bikes: 2009 Specialized Crosstrail Elite, 2008 Cannondale Six13 3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I can see where a lot of people believe we have the right to be on the road with our bicycles, I totally agree. I also agree that in theory we have the right to take the lane legally. But in an environment where the car is much larger much stronger and much faster than us there are some of these rights we may have to defer in order to stay alive. In my opinion my choice is going to be give the lane and go single file and let the cars pass, instead of being dead right for taking the lane. In the very recent past there have been cyclists killed in accidents with cars for trying to prove they were right. In one case the cyclist was struck by a female driver that never even slowed down after striking him. Once she was tracked down by the same trooper that was involved in this incident she stated that she needed to get home. The trooper did his job and arrested her for felony homicide by vehicle, driving while license was revoke for 4 previous DUIs and leaving the scene of an accident involving injury (felony). Once this case went to trial the jury found the driver guilty of driving while license revoked and sentenced her to 8 months probation and permanent revocation of her license. So after speaking to the trooper again today I asked him about the incident and his response was he wanted the cyclists to understand that even though they were correct according to the law it may be in their best interest to think about their safety when they are challenging a 2000 pound car to prove they are right.

Last edited by dguest; 09-08-11 at 02:06 PM.
dguest is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:03 PM
  #103  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NH
Posts: 117

Bikes: Trek 1400, Trek 6500

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This is very much like the maritime Rules of the Road, the boat on Starboard may have the right of way but it comes down to one thing...big boat, little boat. And I'm always in the little boat.
Frosty861 is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:14 PM
  #104  
I need speed
 
AzTallRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,550

Bikes: Giant Propel, Cervelo P2

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by dguest
I can see where a lot of people believe we have the right to be on the road with our bicycles, I totally agree. I also agree that in theory we have the right to take the lane legally. But in an environment where the car is much larger much stronger and much faster than us there are some of these rights we may have to defer in order to stay alive. In my opinion my choice is going to be give the lane and go single file and let the cars pass, instead of being dead right for taking the lane. In the very recent past there have been cyclists killed in accidents with cars for trying to prove they were right. In one case the cyclist was struck by a female driver that never even slowed down after striking him. Once she was tracked down by the same trooper that was involved in this incident she stated that she needed to get home. The trooper did his job and arrested her for felony homicide by vehicle, driving while license was revoke for 4 previous DUIs and leaving the scene of an accident involving injury (felony). Once this case went to trial the jury found the driver guilty of driving while license revoked and sentenced her to 8 months probation and permanent revocation of her license. So after speaking to the trooper again today I asked him about the incident and his response was he wanted the cyclists to understand that even though they were correct according to the law it may be in their best interest to think about their safety when they are challenging a 2000 pound car to prove they are right.
Your argument presumes it is safer to hug the side of the road, allowing cars to squeeze by, instead of taking the lane, requiring them to either wait, or to pass you by changing lanes - just as they would do to pass a car, truck, forklift, or whatever. Most experienced cyclists, especially those of us who commute in traffic, believe your presumption to be wrong. There are far more cyclists hit while on the shoulder, in a bike lane, or riding far to the right, than there are cyclists run down from behind when they are in the middle of a lane. Motorists may get pissed, but they see you. I'd rather have a driver honk and yell at me, than brush by, knocking me onto the sidewalk or shoulder as they drive away.
AzTallRider is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:20 PM
  #105  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
dguest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Foothills, NC
Posts: 415

Bikes: 2009 Specialized Crosstrail Elite, 2008 Cannondale Six13 3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You opinion is valid but I am not going to risk my life with some dumb red neck that really could care less and knows that nothing is going to happen. But then that is why people have opinions and need to do what they fell is best for them. The woman did see the cyclist and he did have bright clothing on the impact was center grill so I do not think he was on the edge or she even felt she needed to go in the other lane. She just needed to go up the road. This is not in every case. But there are no bike lanes here and all these routes are marked as bike routes and the share the road sign is everywhere. Actually I have seen where these signs do nothing but make the drivers even more aggressive.

Last edited by dguest; 09-08-11 at 02:23 PM.
dguest is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:27 PM
  #106  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by AzTallRider
Your argument presumes it is safer to hug the side of the road, allowing cars to squeeze by, instead of taking the lane, requiring them to either wait, or to pass you by changing lanes - just as they would do to pass a car, truck, forklift, or whatever. Most experienced cyclists, especially those of us who commute in traffic, believe your presumption to be wrong. There are far more cyclists hit while on the shoulder, in a bike lane, or riding far to the right, than there are cyclists run down from behind when they are in the middle of a lane. Motorists may get pissed, but they see you. I'd rather have a driver honk and yell at me, than brush by, knocking me onto the sidewalk or shoulder as they drive away.
+1
There are numerous stories of cyclist on shoulders and bike lanes getting run over and killed. Hawaii even had a cyclist killed while sidewalk riding. One of our own BF members was killed in the bike lane.

Seems dguest thinks I am dead by about 12,000 times over (maybe he thinks I am even dead right).

12,000 = approximate number of cycle commutes (6,000 days of commuting) during which I needed to take the lane for my safety over the years.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:27 PM
  #107  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern california
Posts: 3,498

Bikes: Lapierre CF Sensium 400. Jamis Ventura Sport. Trek 800. Giant Cypress.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by AzTallRider
To reiterate what has already been stated in this thread, there are at least two reasons NOT to do so in this situation:

A. There is insufficient room for cars to pass safely, even if the group is in a single file line.
B. Compressing the length of the line, by doubling up, lets cars pass in less time once a wide enough area is reached.
That excuse only works if you are talking to a person that doesn't ride almost every day in or with traffic. It is a rationalization for doing something that makes you a wider obstical not a smaller one. When you are behind a SMV like a EV is it easier to pass if they are driving 2 abreast?

And isn't it the driver of the car that is responsible for passing safely? Are you saying the cyclist is taking that responsibility? Do you ride in group rides much? Is there a signal for double up?

I have never seen a line of slow moving trucks on a three lane road double up so I can pass quicker.

Don't know all of the details but it seems as if the cyclists were a bit like the critical mass people, simply trying to piss off the drivers so after they leave the driver can take it out on normal riders. Just saying.
Robert Foster is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:32 PM
  #108  
I need speed
 
AzTallRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,550

Bikes: Giant Propel, Cervelo P2

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Whether to squeeze to the side or take the lane is a decision I make most every day. Like many things, we are playing the probabilities, and there is one short, high speed stretch where I really should take the lane, but generally don't. There are clearly instances where you are going to be run down no matter what, and there are no doubt times when someone like that woman may not have hit you if you were squeezed on the side. But, from a probability of safe passage standpoint, taking the lane wins.
AzTallRider is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:35 PM
  #109  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Robert Foster
Staw man ... Don't know all of the details but it seems as if the cyclists were a bit like the critical mass people, simply trying to piss off the drivers so after they leave the driver can take it out on normal riders. Just saying.
These are the type of riders that truly dislike any critical mass rides that do not follow the laws. Your attempted comparisons are completely off base.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:37 PM
  #110  
Senior Member
 
NOS88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
At this point, I have to ask, do any of you really think you're going to change the minds of those who have been most prolific and impassioned in this discussion?

__________________
A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking. - S. Wright
Favorite rides in the stable: Indy Fab CJ Ti - Colnago MXL - S-Works Roubaix - Habanero Team Issue - Jamis Eclipse carbon/831
NOS88 is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:38 PM
  #111  
I need speed
 
AzTallRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,550

Bikes: Giant Propel, Cervelo P2

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Robert Foster
That excuse only works if you are talking to a person that doesn't ride almost every day in or with traffic. It is a rationalization for doing something that makes you a wider obstical not a smaller one. When you are behind a SMV like a EV is it easier to pass if they are driving 2 abreast?

And isn't it the driver of the car that is responsible for passing safely? Are you saying the cyclist is taking that responsibility? Do you ride in group rides much? Is there a signal for double up?

I have never seen a line of slow moving trucks on a three lane road double up so I can pass quicker.

Don't know all of the details but it seems as if the cyclists were a bit like the critical mass people, simply trying to piss off the drivers so after they leave the driver can take it out on normal riders. Just saying.
Ah.. last I checked, bikes were a lot narrower than trucks. Try again. And maybe read the thread?

In the groups I ride with, the "double up" sign is typically a horizontal circular motion, indicating a rotating paceline. Or someone simply creating a second line.

You have no basis for your allegations concerning the intent of these riders. "Just Sayin"
AzTallRider is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:42 PM
  #112  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
dguest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Foothills, NC
Posts: 415

Bikes: 2009 Specialized Crosstrail Elite, 2008 Cannondale Six13 3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NOS88
At this point, I have to ask, do any of you really think you're going to change the minds of those who have been most prolific and impassioned in this discussion?

NO and have no intent too. Just putting this out for thought and friendly debate. I am glad to see there is not any name calling and believe a debate and discussion is good.
dguest is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:42 PM
  #113  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by NOS88
At this point, I have to ask, do any of you really think you're going to change the minds of those who have been most prolific and impassioned in this discussion?

Not in the old farts forum, but in some of the other forums the discussion has gotten some cyclist to thinking and reading.

I have chanced the views of several new cyclist I have talked with. I have even fixed a cop and several motorist.

I am not sure it is still happening, but the Hawaii Bicycle League did and may still teach a short class at the Honolulu Police Academy on VC and the reasons, plus the bike laws. One of the reasons we have few conflicts with younger cops here.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.

Last edited by CB HI; 09-08-11 at 02:47 PM.
CB HI is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:47 PM
  #114  
Member
 
Old Whitebelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 38

Bikes: Specialized Secteur Comp Compact, Orange Sub-5, some kind of Phat cruiser, and a bunch of old junk

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
(deleted)

Last edited by Old Whitebelly; 09-08-11 at 02:57 PM. Reason: wrong thread,
Old Whitebelly is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:51 PM
  #115  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Old Whitebelly
I really hate when some ******* in a car refuses to share the road with me. I also really hate it when some ******* on a bike refuses to share the road with me.

I thought the OP asked about laws relating to lane sharing and passing, not about who was or was not willing to be an ******* to get their perceived "fair share" of the road... NOS88 is right; Horses don't get much deader than that.
That was the other thread. Take your meds and sort the confusion out.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:53 PM
  #116  
Senior Member
 
curbtender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,662

Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball

Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1610 Post(s)
Liked 2,592 Times in 1,224 Posts
I ride mostlly as a single. A group ride for me is 3-5. Out here when it gets more organized I see share the road signs, flags and police escort. I'm pretty sure that training rides of larger groups follow a course that's proven to be a safer ride. I see towns, that get overwhelmed with unscheduled riders, pass laws to limit thier group size. I'm sure they do this to give the locals as well as the cyclist a safer ride. On the road we hear more road noise than drivers do and know when we need to take the lane. Or maybe the lack of hearing is why it's posted here in the 50's?
curbtender is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:56 PM
  #117  
Member
 
Old Whitebelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 38

Bikes: Specialized Secteur Comp Compact, Orange Sub-5, some kind of Phat cruiser, and a bunch of old junk

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
That was the other thread. Take your meds and sort the confusion out.
You are right, my mistake. Thanks for pointing it out in a nice friendly manner too, brah
Old Whitebelly is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 02:58 PM
  #118  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern california
Posts: 3,498

Bikes: Lapierre CF Sensium 400. Jamis Ventura Sport. Trek 800. Giant Cypress.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by AzTallRider
Ah.. last I checked, bikes were a lot narrower than trucks. Try again. And maybe read the thread?

In the groups I ride with, the "double up" sign is typically a horizontal circular motion, indicating a rotating paceline. Or someone simply creating a second line.

You have no basis for your allegations concerning the intent of these riders. "Just Sayin"
Nor do you I might add. Neither of us was as close to the situation as the OP. His assessment should have more weight than either of ours. If I assume a car can kill me moving to the left, for those of us that drive on the right is putting myself closer to said dangerous vehicle. I don't remove the safety guard on my table saw for the same reason, I prefer my body parts stay away from the saw blade.

But NOS88 is right. Wasted breath, and who really cares what happens to them or what the officer said?
Robert Foster is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 03:04 PM
  #119  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Old Whitebelly
You are right, my mistake. Thanks for pointing it out in a nice friendly manner too, brah
Your welcome, reponse offered in the same friendly manner as the friendly post.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 03:08 PM
  #120  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern california
Posts: 3,498

Bikes: Lapierre CF Sensium 400. Jamis Ventura Sport. Trek 800. Giant Cypress.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by CB HI
These are the type of riders that truly dislike any critical mass rides that do not follow the laws. Your attempted comparisons are completely off base.
your opinion. neither more or less valid because you weren't there.
Robert Foster is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 03:17 PM
  #121  
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895

Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
+1
One of our own BF members was killed in the bike lane.
Well that settles it as there has "NEVER" been a foum member killed while taking the lane.
Mr. Beanz is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 03:59 PM
  #122  
Senior Member
 
NOS88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by curbtender
I ride mostlly as a single. A group ride for me is 3-5. Out here when it gets more organized I see share the road signs, flags and police escort. I'm pretty sure that training rides of larger groups follow a course that's proven to be a safer ride. I see towns, that get overwhelmed with unscheduled riders, pass laws to limit thier group size. I'm sure they do this to give the locals as well as the cyclist a safer ride. On the road we hear more road noise than drivers do and know when we need to take the lane. Or maybe the lack of hearing is why it's posted here in the 50's?
I was born with my hearing loss.
__________________
A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking. - S. Wright
Favorite rides in the stable: Indy Fab CJ Ti - Colnago MXL - S-Works Roubaix - Habanero Team Issue - Jamis Eclipse carbon/831
NOS88 is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 04:40 PM
  #123  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Beanz
Well that settles it as there has "NEVER" been a foum member killed while taking the lane.
Yeah, jump my case for pointing out the faulty logic, while you ignore the faulty logic:
Originally Posted by dguest
In the very recent past there have been cyclists killed in accidents with cars for trying to prove they were right. In one case the cyclist was struck by a female driver that never even slowed down after striking him. Once she was tracked down by the same trooper that was involved in this incident she stated that she needed to get home. The trooper did his job and arrested her for felony homicide by vehicle, driving while license was revoke for 4 previous DUIs and leaving the scene of an accident involving injury (felony). Once this case went to trial the jury found the driver guilty of driving while license revoked and sentenced her to 8 months probation and permanent revocation of her license.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 04:43 PM
  #124  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Robert Foster
your opinion. neither more or less valid because you weren't there.
Says the guy with all the opinions that he insist are right.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 09-08-11, 04:52 PM
  #125  
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,296
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8281 Post(s)
Liked 9,052 Times in 4,479 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Beanz
Well that settles it as there has "NEVER" been a foum member killed while taking the lane.
Yes, there has. I think the one he is referring to is Sidney, who was killed by an idiot teen who was downloading ringtones on his phone.
big john is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.