Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fitting Your Bike
Reload this Page >

Geometry advice, please

Search
Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

Geometry advice, please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-15 | 04:56 PM
  #1  
Sito's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 217
Likes: 1
From: Madrid, Spain

Bikes: Canyon Aeroad, Votec VRC, Sensa Fermo, Principia R700, Cannondale Bad Boy Ultra, Ciöcc Singlespeed

Geometry advice, please

Hi guys, I am currently riding a Felt F-series aluminium frame and while I like the bike on very long ride the aggressive geometry can be a little uncomfortable. I use a few spacers and have swapped the original 12cm stem for an 11cm version which has improved things but I still get pai nin all sorts of places. So I am looking for a bike upgrade anyway and don't want to go down the full Gran Fondo path but have found a bike that looks exactly what I want in terms of geometry, still sporty but less aggressive than the Felt. It's the Votec VRC Comp which I believe is available in Europe only (I am currently based in Spain).

These are the geometry numbers for the two bikes, the Votec comes with an 11cm stem as standard:

Stack: Felt 616 / Votec 625
Reach: Felt 415 / Votec 407
Top tube: both 605
Head tube: Felt 210 / Votec 218

Looking at these numbers the Votec is about 9mm higher at the front and 8mm shorter, correct? So, with the same number of spacer I would be slightly less stretched and a bit higher up which sounds great. Is that the right conclusion when looking at the numbers above or do I need to take any other things into account in terms of riding position? Any advice is much appreciated!

Thanks

Lars
Sito is offline  
Reply
Old 06-07-15 | 07:49 PM
  #2  
AnthonyG's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,135
Likes: 420
From: Queanbeyan, Australia.
So far I think that you are right. You should however also consider saddle setback. More saddle setback will take the weight off your hands and shoulders which I think is usually a good thing and based on both bikes having the same top tube length but the Votec having less reach then it SHOULD consequently, have more saddle setback and a more relaxed seat tube angle.

It would be good to compare seat tube angles.

Now, do you want to move the saddle back compared to your current Felt? Are you positioned at KOPS(Knee over pedal spindle) already? Moving the saddle back will generally make you more comfortable on a bike by taking the weight off your hands and shoulders.

However, if you are currently positioned at KOPS and want to stay at KOPS then you will need to position the saddle forwards on the new bike, which will make the effective reach even shorter than you think.

Where is the saddle positioned on your current bike. I suggest experimenting by moving the saddle rearwards.

Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 02:30 AM
  #3  
Sito's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 217
Likes: 1
From: Madrid, Spain

Bikes: Canyon Aeroad, Votec VRC, Sensa Fermo, Principia R700, Cannondale Bad Boy Ultra, Ciöcc Singlespeed

Originally Posted by AnthonyG

Where is the saddle positioned on your current bike. I suggest experimenting by moving the saddle rearwards.

Anthony
Hi Anthony, thanks for the reply. I really want to keep the saddle-to-bottom-bracket position as is, just because I seem to have found my optimum in this regard It's pretty much KOPS as with everything else I seem to end up having knee-pain these days....but a little less reach is actually welcome and no problem at all.
Sito is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 05:55 AM
  #4  
AnthonyG's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,135
Likes: 420
From: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Well that sounds good. I'd still want to compare the seat tube angles between the 2 frames just to make sure everything adds up. The Votec, going by the figures should have a more relaxed(lower number) seat tube angle. If it doesn't then somethings amiss.

Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 05:59 AM
  #5  
Blue Belly's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 6
From: Vermont

Bikes: Pinarello Montello, Merckx MX Leader, Merckx Corsa Extra, Pinarello Prologo, Tredici Magia Nera, Tredici Cross

Aluminum is harsh. It's a great material for building bikes but it will beat you to death. You can try a saddle with more padding or less air in tires or bigger.
Merckx geometry coupled slack seat tube angles with aggressive head tube angles. This can resulted in a more comfortable ride with performance handling. Longer chainstays also can take some harshness out of your ride, as they did with some of the early aluminum racing frames.

Last edited by Blue Belly; 06-08-15 at 06:09 AM.
Blue Belly is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 06:46 AM
  #6  
Sito's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 217
Likes: 1
From: Madrid, Spain

Bikes: Canyon Aeroad, Votec VRC, Sensa Fermo, Principia R700, Cannondale Bad Boy Ultra, Ciöcc Singlespeed

Originally Posted by AnthonyG
Well that sounds good. I'd still want to compare the seat tube angles between the 2 frames just to make sure everything adds up. The Votec, going by the figures should have a more relaxed(lower number) seat tube angle. If it doesn't then somethings amiss.

Anthony
Hi again, the seat tube on the Felt is 73 degree, on the Votec it's 72.5. Does that make sense? Half a degree doesn't sound like much...

Head Angle is 74 degree on the Felt and 73 on the Votec.

Lars
Sito is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 06:48 AM
  #7  
Sito's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 217
Likes: 1
From: Madrid, Spain

Bikes: Canyon Aeroad, Votec VRC, Sensa Fermo, Principia R700, Cannondale Bad Boy Ultra, Ciöcc Singlespeed

Originally Posted by Blue Belly
Aluminum is harsh. It's a great material for building bikes but it will beat you to death. You can try a saddle with more padding or less air in tires or bigger.
Merckx geometry coupled slack seat tube angles with aggressive head tube angles. This can resulted in a more comfortable ride with performance handling. Longer chainstays also can take some harshness out of your ride, as they did with some of the early aluminum racing frames.
Yes, but actually, compared to my Principia road bike from the 90s, the Felt feels very comfortably, it has much thinner seat stays and seems to deal better with road vibrations. I also have 25mm tires which makes a difference but the problem is less vibration and more my riding position.
Sito is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 08:31 AM
  #8  
70sSanO's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2,286
From: Mission Viejo

Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970

From your last sentence in your post above, it seems that it is not a geometry question, but fine tuning your fit. I am always cautious when bike geometry, especially HA/SA comes into play on 2 similar sized bikes. Bike handling characteristics change as geometry changes and if your Felt is too aggressive from a handling point of view and you want a more laid back ride, then geometry changes are a benefit. If you love the way your Felt dives into corners and the overall handling, then the Vortec may be disappointing. You have to ride it to see if you like the way it rides.

If it is only riding position, you can get a shorter stem that has more angle to raise the handlebars. If you don't want a "riser" stem, or there is not one that will work, you can probably get an uncut fork and make up the head tube/stack differences between the Felt and Vortec.

As for you Princpia, I'm not familiar with the bike. From the few pictures I have seen, it looks similar to an older aluminum Cannondale. I ride a Cannondale and it is a stiff frame. Fortunately I am running a steel fork that does wonders.

John
70sSanO is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 09:02 AM
  #9  
Sito's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 217
Likes: 1
From: Madrid, Spain

Bikes: Canyon Aeroad, Votec VRC, Sensa Fermo, Principia R700, Cannondale Bad Boy Ultra, Ciöcc Singlespeed

Originally Posted by 70sSanO
From your last sentence in your post above, it seems that it is not a geometry question, but fine tuning your fit. I am always cautious when bike geometry, especially HA/SA comes into play on 2 similar sized bikes. Bike handling characteristics change as geometry changes and if your Felt is too aggressive from a handling point of view and you want a more laid back ride, then geometry changes are a benefit. If you love the way your Felt dives into corners and the overall handling, then the Vortec may be disappointing. You have to ride it to see if you like the way it rides.

If it is only riding position, you can get a shorter stem that has more angle to raise the handlebars. If you don't want a "riser" stem, or there is not one that will work, you can probably get an uncut fork and make up the head tube/stack differences between the Felt and Vortec.

As for you Princpia, I'm not familiar with the bike. From the few pictures I have seen, it looks similar to an older aluminum Cannondale. I ride a Cannondale and it is a stiff frame. Fortunately I am running a steel fork that does wonders.

John
Hi John, given I am already at maximum spacer capacity there isn't much flexibility left. I am planning to get a new bike anyway, so just want to make sure the new one is better in terms of position. The Felt was cheap and only bought as an "intermediate solution", so getting a new fork makes no economic sense. I think it's absolutely great value for money but now I want to sell it and get something a little more high-end. And yes, the Principia frames were quite similar to the Cannondales from the same era. They were made in Denmark, I have the R700 model. It was a very nice frame back then and still is fun to ride nowadays, just a little painful on the spine

Last edited by Sito; 06-08-15 at 09:21 AM.
Sito is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 12:31 PM
  #10  
70sSanO's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2,286
From: Mission Viejo

Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970

Sounds like a good plan. Try to test ride the bike first, or at least get an understanding how it will perform. I guess the Vortec VRC is in the same bike category as the Specialized Roubaix as an endurance bike, so it should be a lot more comfortable nad easier on your body.

Good luck with your decision.

John
70sSanO is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-15 | 01:48 AM
  #11  
AnthonyG's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,135
Likes: 420
From: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Originally Posted by Sito
Hi again, the seat tube on the Felt is 73 degree, on the Votec it's 72.5. Does that make sense? Half a degree doesn't sound like much...

Head Angle is 74 degree on the Felt and 73 on the Votec.

Lars
I haven't done the maths but the fact that the Votec DOES have a half a degree slacker seat tube angle should add up. If the seat tube angles were the same then I would be concerned. Half a degree over 700-800mm adds up.

Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-15 | 02:02 AM
  #12  
Sito's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 217
Likes: 1
From: Madrid, Spain

Bikes: Canyon Aeroad, Votec VRC, Sensa Fermo, Principia R700, Cannondale Bad Boy Ultra, Ciöcc Singlespeed

Thanks, Anthony! Also got some geometry device from the people at Votec and have decided to order the bike, really looking forward to ride it. I have a 100 mile ride in hilly terrain coming up in a couple of weeks, so hopefully I can get my position properly set up before then
Sito is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Witterings
General Cycling Discussion
14
01-05-19 02:49 PM
SlvrDragon50
Road Cycling
10
07-27-16 01:07 AM
jambon
Fitting Your Bike
4
05-12-15 06:18 AM
jimmuller
Classic & Vintage
68
09-01-13 05:46 PM
pdxtex
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
9
11-20-12 12:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.