Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-15-18, 04:20 PM   #26
Kontact
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 2,290
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1370 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
51 to 54 is more than 1cm. Frame reach and stack gets a little funny on small bikes because the HT stops shrinking. But it does move the bars relative to saddle height. Regardless, I didn't get the impression that anyone changed the stems and handlebars for OP's test ride.

If you believe that 51 and 54 sized bikes are identical, then there's not much left to discuss. I can tell you though that between my 54 and 56, there is a huge difference in the way I sit, and it's mainly because of the setup, differences of less than 2 inches.

I think you must have missed the part where I said "could be made to fit identically", even though you responded to it as if you had.


You're saying two different stock bikes in different sizes are going to fit differently. Not the 3cm you initially stated, but they will be different.

I was saying that the difference between the two bikes is so small that it can be corrected for with stem selection, and your responses don't seem to make it clear that you read that or understood what I was pointing out.
Kontact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-18, 05:21 PM   #27
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes:
Posts: 13,111
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 346 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DianetS View Post
Thank you all for the great advice and information. I'm going to put a little more faith in the fit I received - but go armed with a little more knowledge to ask the right questions and maybe not take "no" for an answer. Comments about riding position and posture do make me think. During the fitting, he was correcting my posture - so even though I was trying to be conscious of it during the test ride - perhaps I got lazy and returned to bad habits.

I'm not a speedster, but I do ride long distances. I've never been able to do more than 65 in a day because I'm completely spent by that time (and I'm also a runner so cardio isn't the problem - I just ache all over by that time). My current bike is a 10 year old entry-level Trek that I just walked into the bike store, rode in a circle in the parking lot, and bought. It has served me well but it's time for an upgrade.

Thank you all again. I feel a little less confused and a little better informed.
I would say that if you have ridden a 65 mile day recently with reasonable comfort, you already have a pretty decent reference point for correct fit. A better fit should be based on that fitment. Do you know how to record your contact points so you can reverse any changes you make?
Road Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-18, 05:33 PM   #28
wphamilton
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Posts: 12,895
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1682 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kontact View Post
I think you must have missed the part where I said "could be made to fit identically", even though you responded to it as if you had.
On the contrary, I don't think it's particularly relevant, because likely no one swapped stems and handlebars and moved the seat around for OP's test ride on the BMC Roadmachine 54cm. Most likely, someone moved the seat down, and that's it.

I'm speaking to OP, not arguing with someone who thinks that different sizes of bikes can be made to handle identically. In some cases that's true, in other cases not, and not at issue in this question.

OP's fit on the 54, and by "fit" I mean how she sits on the bike not distance between the contact points (which doesn't fully describe the geometry btw), and I suggest that her "fit" was along the lines of the so-called French Fit which has some of the characteristics she described. I don't see any pictures, so I don't know for sure. However, it's usually achieved by starting with a slightly larger frame (such as a 54 in her case). It could explain why it "felt good".

I hope that OP followed it better than you have, because I suggested that being a difference in how she's sitting, which could be achieved on either bike, means that she should try the smaller bike as well. Would I have suggested that, were I so concerned about her having the "right" frame determined by some exacting "fitting"? Of course not ... somewhere in all of this, you have misinterpreted things. I only hope that I've been more clear to OP.

Quote:
I was saying that the difference between the two bikes is so small that it can be corrected for with stem selection, and your responses don't seem to make it clear that you read that or understood what I was pointing out.
You seem to have an issue with people who disagree with you.
wphamilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-18, 05:38 PM   #29
Kontact
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 2,290
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1370 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
On the contrary, I don't think it's particularly relevant, because likely no one swapped stems and handlebars and moved the seat around for OP's test ride on the BMC Roadmachine 54cm. Most likely, someone moved the seat down, and that's it.

I'm speaking to OP, not arguing with someone who thinks that different sizes of bikes can be made to handle identically. In some cases that's true, in other cases not, and not at issue in this question.

OP's fit on the 54, and by "fit" I mean how she sits on the bike not distance between the contact points (which doesn't fully describe the geometry btw), and I suggest that her "fit" was along the lines of the so-called French Fit which has some of the characteristics she described. I don't see any pictures, so I don't know for sure. However, it's usually achieved by starting with a slightly larger frame (such as a 54 in her case). It could explain why it "felt good".

I hope that OP followed it better than you have, because I suggested that being a difference in how she's sitting, which could be achieved on either bike, means that she should try the smaller bike as well. Would I have suggested that, were I so concerned about her having the "right" frame determined by some exacting "fitting"? Of course not ... somewhere in all of this, you have misinterpreted things. I only hope that I've been more clear to OP.


You seem to have an issue with people who disagree with you.
I don't have an issue with any disagreeing with me, and you don't appear to be disagreeing with me. You just respond to my posts like you are reading something different than what I wrote.

For instance, is it really unclear to you that I know the OP tried the 54 without a stem swap? You're just not reading what I wrote, and then making it personal. I wish you would not do that.
Kontact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-18, 03:58 AM   #30
1500SLR 
Retro bike rider
 
1500SLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Bikes: Trek 1500 SLR DI2 Giant Kronos SRAM Rival
Posts: 194
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
On the contrary, I don't think it's particularly relevant, because likely no one swapped stems and handlebars and moved the seat around for OP's test ride on the BMC Roadmachine 54cm. Most likely, someone moved the seat down, and that's it.

I'm speaking to OP, not arguing with someone who thinks that different sizes of bikes can be made to handle identically. In some cases that's true, in other cases not, and not at issue in this question.

OP's fit on the 54, and by "fit" I mean how she sits on the bike not distance between the contact points (which doesn't fully describe the geometry btw), and I suggest that her "fit" was along the lines of the so-called French Fit which has some of the characteristics she described. I don't see any pictures, so I don't know for sure. However, it's usually achieved by starting with a slightly larger frame (such as a 54 in her case). It could explain why it "felt good".

I hope that OP followed it better than you have, because I suggested that being a difference in how she's sitting, which could be achieved on either bike, means that she should try the smaller bike as well. Would I have suggested that, were I so concerned about her having the "right" frame determined by some exacting "fitting"? Of course not ... somewhere in all of this, you have misinterpreted things. I only hope that I've been more clear to OP.


You seem to have an issue with people who disagree with you.
I have no issue with French fit. Just a handful of seat post and that's it. That's all that's needed. It isn't any faster, it isn't any slower it just is. Pro's have been riding French fit for years, and then Giant introduced compact geometry in the 90s and we're here now with everyone thinking its better. It isn't a French fit bike is more comfortable and it comes a point where your geometry is so aggressive (handle bars slammed and arse in the air) that it is actually less aero.

We came to a point of testing this theory and Froome was actually slower than Pantani in descending. Work that one out if there is a benefit to aggressive fitment. There isn't one. It's life, I ride what I preach. All of my bikes are "French fit" I prefer it. But if you want to ride a more aggressive fitment that is going to be less comfortable and perhaps worse for your back in the long run then you're welcome to ride like that also. It's a matter of choice.

Neither option is wrong, it just seems that the OP was not explained what the difference was, nor did they have enough adjustments done to get a comfortable fit on both bikes. The net aim of the game is to get your back as horizontal and in connection with your aero helmet as possible to reduce drag. The below also includes the UCI illegal superman position. The extreme aero position that some people ride is 2% slower, and sitting on the top tube in a safe position while not being able to pedal 3% faster. A french fit like Pantani riding off the back of the bike is actually in the middle.

None of the more traditional positions including Pantani's will make you significantly slower to the point where you would lose a race. As the professor concluded who studied Froome's descend while pedaling technique. His conclusion was actually not to descend like Froome. Position top tube safe I believe was Sagan. I grew up in the peak of cycling during the early 90s and until the mid to late 2000s. I preach french fit. It was the Once team with riders Alex Zülle, Laurent Jalabert, and Alberto Contador that suggested otherwise by riding the Once TCR. I've always wanted to try one, but I've never been able to find one in good condition to see what the fuss was about and given I was 13 in 1997 I never had the chance to ride one new.
__________________
1500SLR's bike building log

Don't buy upgrades, ride up grades.

Last edited by 1500SLR; 04-16-18 at 04:50 AM.
1500SLR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-18, 08:44 AM   #31
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Posts: 13,423
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Get the 54. You felt the wonderful thing about a bike that that - fun! That's the critical thing. The upper back thing can be fixed with fit and fitness. That's the tiny, fixable thing IMO. The big thing is to love how the bike goes for you. I was out with a woman on her new BMC yesterday. The bunch came to a short, steep hill and she got down in her drops and was just gone. That's the feeling. It might take a year to get the fit just the way you want it. That's normal. My fit evolved for years.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-18, 12:13 PM   #32
Wheever 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NY, NY; Pownal, VT
Bikes: 2015 Trek Domane 6 disk, 2016 Scott Big Jon Fat Bike
Posts: 989
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
No one seems to have questioned which stem/stack configuration was on the Road machine! (The carbon version comes with a convertible bit at the head that lets you change it. if you look at the geometry chart you can see it reflected there.)

I would ask the OP if she could find a way to try out the RM in a 51. It might be as much about the fact that the RM is a more fun bike for her tastes than the Gran Fondo, and is less about the fit/reach. (I didn't like the gran fondo when I tried it.)

Now, at 5'8" with a 32" inseam, I can see either bike fitting her well, depending on things like arm length and waist length. However, I usually counsel going smaller, because it's easier to make a bike fit "larger" than the other way around.

OP: Try and find a road machine in the smaller size!
Wheever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-18, 02:26 PM   #33
Clem von Jones
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 493
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Neck and shoulder pain along with numb hands are indications of too much reach and/or too high bars. I would would be wary of getting too large a frame because of what Wheever mentions above. Too high a stack and too long a reach is difficult to correct, whereas a longer stem on a smaller frame improves weight distribution, stability, and general handling. I think it's better to err on a smaller size. What size is your old Trek? To my mind a 54cm frame fits someone 5'10"ish. It seems to me the bike fitter was about right.

Last edited by Clem von Jones; 04-19-18 at 03:20 PM.
Clem von Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-18, 03:04 PM   #34
L0n3Gr3yW0lf
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Bikes:
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
The first bike I bought didn't feel comfortable at all even though I used it for a long time. I am 1.8 meters (5 feet 9 inch) and 125 kg (275 pounds) and used a mountain bike that felt too small and caused problems for my back, now I am looking into getting another bike (I left my old one back in my country, actually gave it away to my uncle, when I moved).
L0n3Gr3yW0lf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:58 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.
I HAVE A QUESTION