Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

Bike Fit

Old 08-30-19, 09:17 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Bike Fit

Was suggested that I post this here, too. Sorry if I'm doing this wrong.

So I took some measurements and put them into the Competitive Cyclist Fit Calculator. Either I did something entirely wrong (checked all measurements multiple times, usually within 0.125 inches), or I am just not standard. Anyone look at this and think something is grossly wrong?

Also measured wing span at 72.625 inches vs 74 inch height, so -1.375 inch index.

https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/1182536-bike-fit.html

am0n is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 08:07 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Loose Chain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,067

Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times in 56 Posts
How tall are you and what is your true pubic bone height?

PBH is measured in bare feet, your back against the wall, stand up straight and square. Have a wife, gf, buddy, whatever take a one inch hard bound book and shove it up into your crotch, square to the wall until it is hard against the bone and make a mark on the wall at the top of the book. That is your PBH or cycling inseam.

Next, multiply that number by by .883 and set that as saddle crown to BB center (measured along the ST) and that is your starting point saddle height. Then multiply PBH by .65 and that is your ideal seat tube (ST) length measured C/C (for a level top tube). It is also, just so happens to be a good top tube (TT) length starting point.

Me, I like the Lemond fit. The above is a starting point and works really good for the "Leonardo man" body type.

Then you have to adjust to account for differences in the physical built, long arms, long torso, short arms, long torso etc. It is not an exact science. And people have different thoughts on fit. Let me add, the sloped TT bicycle frame has been a godsend for some folks though asthtically I dislike them. For example, one of the most challenging body types to fit is the person with a Michael Phelps body! Looooong arms, loooong torso and short legs. We have to make a series of compromises with off the shelf frames and in the past such folks had to give up some stand over or ride a bike a bit too small and compensate with a long stem and so on. Sloped top tube bikes certainly help such body types to get a much better fit.

Me, long arms, long legs, slightly shorter torso. I am easy to fit.

Last edited by Loose Chain; 09-01-19 at 08:25 AM.
Loose Chain is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 09:59 AM
  #3  
Member
 
BigJonny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Sun Coast, Florida
Posts: 27

Bikes: 1984 Motobecane Mirage Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 4 Posts
Rule of Thumb for Top Tube Height

Hey All,


My personal height preference for straddling my a bike's top tube is to have 1 inch (25mm) to 1 1/2 inches (37mm) from my perineum to the top edge of the tube.


This rule of thumb is a comfortable height for a road bike (I ride a 1984 Motobecane Mirage Sport.)


Other bike configurations, such as BMX, Mountain, etc,. may require more "spacing."


Additionally, personal preferences always trump specs, guidelines and rules of thumbs. . . so, it becomes a "whatever makes you feel comfortable" issue.


Ride hard, ride safe.


J.
BigJonny is offline  
Old 09-01-19, 02:50 PM
  #4  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,620

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3920 Post(s)
Liked 1,982 Times in 1,414 Posts
So you have a short torso. What's the issue? Run a short stem. A very wide range of reach has been found to be comfortable. I had a fitter shorten my reach by 3 cm recently and can't say I notice any difference in comfort at all. Many pros ride small frames with their elbows scrunched back behind their knees, like this guy:



And then there are riders who use a lot of reach, like this woman:


Go to your LBS and sit on some bikes, see how they feel. Numbers are nice but . . .

Personally, I'm in the "lots of reach" camp. Opens the chest, flattens the back, lightens the hands, feels more aero, etc. Learn to love reach.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ejewels
General Cycling Discussion
8
08-07-16 07:18 PM
DefUnct
Road Cycling
26
04-28-16 12:21 PM
dougmon
Fitting Your Bike
16
03-14-16 10:48 PM
elcruxio
Road Cycling
13
05-21-13 11:47 AM
portland376
Road Cycling
1
12-09-09 11:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.