"Tried-and-true" method of measuring inseam ??
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 24
Bikes: None at this moment...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"Tried-and-true" method of measuring inseam ??
Good evening,
It seems there are a few ways to measure your inseam (to discern frame size). Some methods ask for measuring while wearing the (potential) bicycle shoes, other methods ask for measuring while barefooted. And some methods are not clear about how wide to keep your feet apart while measuring inseam.
Is there a "tried-and-true" method of measuring inseam?
Thank you in advance!!
It seems there are a few ways to measure your inseam (to discern frame size). Some methods ask for measuring while wearing the (potential) bicycle shoes, other methods ask for measuring while barefooted. And some methods are not clear about how wide to keep your feet apart while measuring inseam.
Is there a "tried-and-true" method of measuring inseam?
Thank you in advance!!
#2
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,196
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 113 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3733 Post(s)
Liked 1,735 Times
in
1,265 Posts
One measures inseam to get a number to put into a calculation for something. Therefore use the method specified for the calculation. If no method is specified for the calculation, do some more research. There's a method prescribed for every fit calculation, or if no method is prescribed, don't use that calculation - waste of time.
I think the most used calculation is the Competitive Cyclist Bike Fit Calculator, though it often raises more questions than it answers, i.e. there's no one correct formula for all bikes and riders. It does give very good directions for how to take the measurements.
I think the most used calculation is the Competitive Cyclist Bike Fit Calculator, though it often raises more questions than it answers, i.e. there's no one correct formula for all bikes and riders. It does give very good directions for how to take the measurements.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#3
Senior Member
OP is asking about a measurement. There are old ways and there are new ways, but one I've seen a lot is as follows.
Stand barefoot on a hard floor with your back against a wall. Don't wear bulky trousers like blue jeans: compression shorts, cycling shorts, yoga shorts or ... be creative. Pull a large book up between your legs as hard as possible so it presses against your sit bones. Press the book against the wall and have an assistant measure carefully (to the sixteenth of an inch or a millimeter would not be bad) from the top of the book to the floor. Write it down. Measure several more times and use the largest value. That is your cycling inseam length, a best-estimate of the distance from your sit bones to the hard bottom of your heels with straight, locked knees.
Many bike shops have a few apparatus around for helping with this measurement. You can do it that way, or at home using the above procedure and a family member, friend, or significant other as an assistant. Cats and dogs tend not to contribute very well.
This is just one way to measure your cycling inseam. It isn't a fit calculation method or a fitting system. You need a bunch of numbers for those, and this gives you only one of them. But, it is essential.
Stand barefoot on a hard floor with your back against a wall. Don't wear bulky trousers like blue jeans: compression shorts, cycling shorts, yoga shorts or ... be creative. Pull a large book up between your legs as hard as possible so it presses against your sit bones. Press the book against the wall and have an assistant measure carefully (to the sixteenth of an inch or a millimeter would not be bad) from the top of the book to the floor. Write it down. Measure several more times and use the largest value. That is your cycling inseam length, a best-estimate of the distance from your sit bones to the hard bottom of your heels with straight, locked knees.
Many bike shops have a few apparatus around for helping with this measurement. You can do it that way, or at home using the above procedure and a family member, friend, or significant other as an assistant. Cats and dogs tend not to contribute very well.
This is just one way to measure your cycling inseam. It isn't a fit calculation method or a fitting system. You need a bunch of numbers for those, and this gives you only one of them. But, it is essential.
Last edited by Road Fan; 02-06-20 at 10:54 AM.
Likes For Road Fan:
#4
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 12,896
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 278 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3663 Post(s)
Liked 4,116 Times
in
1,958 Posts
+1 on the @Road Fan technique, but i use a yard stick instead of a book, the long extention between my legs (ooopps...
) lets me make sure the measurement is taken perpendicular to the vertical. No assistant needed
.


#5
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,196
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 113 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3733 Post(s)
Liked 1,735 Times
in
1,265 Posts
+1 on the @Road Fan technique, but i use a yard stick instead of a book, the long extention between my legs (ooopps...
) lets me make sure the measurement is taken perpendicular to the vertical. No assistant needed
.



__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#6
Senior Member
+1 on the @Road Fan technique, but i use a yard stick instead of a book, the long extention between my legs (ooopps...
) lets me make sure the measurement is taken perpendicular to the vertical. No assistant needed
.


#7
Senior Member
The 8" spacing would tend to mimic the stance while feet are on the pedals, so I like this approach - if you have to pick an arbitrary criterion, it's probably better if it mimics the actual riding position. If you instead assume you should place your feet shoulder width apart that might be a little wider. If you set up the triangles on paper and calculate the error introduced by making it shoulder width versus 8" (or vice versa) I'm sure the difference will be very small and for my fitting I would neglect it. I also suspect the difference found with actual cycling socks versus barefoot is less than 1 mm, but ... I don't really know. I don't fit other people so I don't have to be Right and Correct. I just have to make my body happy. One reason I take such a lax attitude is that after I have computed the starting point for saddle height, I'm going to (following Carbonfiberboy's often-stated and excellent advice) adjust the height based on riding, to optimize my hip rocking and whether I am stable on the sit bone platforms of the saddle, and have managed pressure distribution against my undercarriage.
#8
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 415
Bikes: Bike Friday Pocket Rocket, Cinelli Hobootleg, Zizzo Liberte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 189 Post(s)
Liked 290 Times
in
159 Posts
+1 on the @Road Fan technique, but i use a yard stick instead of a book, the long extention between my legs (ooopps...
) lets me make sure the measurement is taken perpendicular to the vertical. No assistant needed
.


#9
Senior Member
Yes, indeed! Those problems are why Lennard Zinn's technique uses a thick dowel that will be hard to bend, and a sensitive level on the dowel to see when it's level. A very resourceful person could rig up a device to perhaps allow a plumb line to be attached so that you could capture the vertical distance without an assistant and then measure the length of string with the bob and get the PBH. But, more steps allows for more errors.