Kids MTB - too big?
06-05-20, 01:05 PM
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Kids MTB - too big?
Hi
I have bought a 24" bike for my 6 year old son - he tried a different brand in a shop, and the 20" was almost too small - the 24" was suggested by the retailer. He measures 121 cm.
However; he cannot reach the ground when seated, and he stretches his legs out almost entirely when riding.
It's a nice bike and he likes it, so we will keep it anyway - but should I buy a 20" for him, that he could ride for the next year or so - or will he get used to the "a little too big" bike? Maybe it's too dangerous, or maybe even damaging his knees?
Thanks in advance from Denmark!
I have bought a 24" bike for my 6 year old son - he tried a different brand in a shop, and the 20" was almost too small - the 24" was suggested by the retailer. He measures 121 cm.
However; he cannot reach the ground when seated, and he stretches his legs out almost entirely when riding.
It's a nice bike and he likes it, so we will keep it anyway - but should I buy a 20" for him, that he could ride for the next year or so - or will he get used to the "a little too big" bike? Maybe it's too dangerous, or maybe even damaging his knees?
Thanks in advance from Denmark!
06-06-20, 03:03 AM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times
in
288 Posts
I'm an adult, 152cm, and I ride a 24" wheeled bike these days. I'm of the view that most people, children and adults alike are fitted to bikes that are too large for them so yes, I would put your son on a smaller bike for a while.
I just remembered. I rode a 16" wheeled bike until I was 12. Then I rode an 18" wheeled bike until I was 15 before I got a 24" wheeled bike for the first time. Later on I moved to even larger wheeled bikes yet in hindsight I should have stayed with 24" wheeled bikes.
I just remembered. I rode a 16" wheeled bike until I was 12. Then I rode an 18" wheeled bike until I was 15 before I got a 24" wheeled bike for the first time. Later on I moved to even larger wheeled bikes yet in hindsight I should have stayed with 24" wheeled bikes.
06-06-20, 05:46 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 294 Times
in
221 Posts
Being able to reach the ground from the saddle is a rather unimportant feature in bike fit. It’s very common only to reach with the toes. It’s generally recommended to be able to straddle the bike off saddle and have some margin to the top tube.
Legs ”almost straight” when pedalling sounds just fine, as long as he doesn’t have to flex his foot to pedal with his toes.
Another thing to look for is if he’s rocking his hips to reach the pedals. That’s a fairly reliable sign of a too high saddle.
On numbers alone, a 24” bike sounds big for a 6-year old. But I’m not there. Sizing and fit issues are easier judged visually.
Very likely. Or grow into it.
IMO, that would be more dependent on how he is able to handle the bike than the fit as such. If he has to stretch a lot forward-and-out to reach the bars, that would interfere with bike control. Perhaps enough to add an important amount of risk. However, at that age, the biggest contribution to risk comes from judgement error. I’m not sure if changing handling ability a few % would be important in the big picture.
Not saying it’s impossible, but it’s FAR more common to trigger knee issues by riding with the saddle too low.
Legs ”almost straight” when pedalling sounds just fine, as long as he doesn’t have to flex his foot to pedal with his toes.
Another thing to look for is if he’s rocking his hips to reach the pedals. That’s a fairly reliable sign of a too high saddle.
Very likely. Or grow into it.
IMO, that would be more dependent on how he is able to handle the bike than the fit as such. If he has to stretch a lot forward-and-out to reach the bars, that would interfere with bike control. Perhaps enough to add an important amount of risk. However, at that age, the biggest contribution to risk comes from judgement error. I’m not sure if changing handling ability a few % would be important in the big picture.
Not saying it’s impossible, but it’s FAR more common to trigger knee issues by riding with the saddle too low.
06-08-20, 08:13 AM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Singapore
Posts: 470
Bikes: Voodoo Hoodoo, Linus Libertine
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
9 Posts
Hi
I have bought a 24" bike for my 6 year old son - he tried a different brand in a shop, and the 20" was almost too small - the 24" was suggested by the retailer. He measures 121 cm.
However; he cannot reach the ground when seated, and he stretches his legs out almost entirely when riding.
It's a nice bike and he likes it, so we will keep it anyway - but should I buy a 20" for him, that he could ride for the next year or so - or will he get used to the "a little too big" bike? Maybe it's too dangerous, or maybe even damaging his knees?
Thanks in advance from Denmark!
I have bought a 24" bike for my 6 year old son - he tried a different brand in a shop, and the 20" was almost too small - the 24" was suggested by the retailer. He measures 121 cm.
However; he cannot reach the ground when seated, and he stretches his legs out almost entirely when riding.
It's a nice bike and he likes it, so we will keep it anyway - but should I buy a 20" for him, that he could ride for the next year or so - or will he get used to the "a little too big" bike? Maybe it's too dangerous, or maybe even damaging his knees?
Thanks in advance from Denmark!
06-08-20, 08:15 AM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Singapore
Posts: 470
Bikes: Voodoo Hoodoo, Linus Libertine
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
9 Posts
I'm an adult, 152cm, and I ride a 24" wheeled bike these days. I'm of the view that most people, children and adults alike are fitted to bikes that are too large for them so yes, I would put your son on a smaller bike for a while.
I just remembered. I rode a 16" wheeled bike until I was 12. Then I rode an 18" wheeled bike until I was 15 before I got a 24" wheeled bike for the first time. Later on I moved to even larger wheeled bikes yet in hindsight I should have stayed with 24" wheeled bikes.
I just remembered. I rode a 16" wheeled bike until I was 12. Then I rode an 18" wheeled bike until I was 15 before I got a 24" wheeled bike for the first time. Later on I moved to even larger wheeled bikes yet in hindsight I should have stayed with 24" wheeled bikes.
06-08-20, 10:14 AM
#7
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,158
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5839 Post(s)
Liked 4,461 Times
in
3,076 Posts
I can't reach the ground with both my feet when seated in the saddle. I'm just on a road bike though. Don't know if it should be different for a mountain bike.
But the norm for being stopped on a bike is to be off the saddle. I do sometimes stay in the saddle but lean to one side standing with one foot on the ground.
But the norm for being stopped on a bike is to be off the saddle. I do sometimes stay in the saddle but lean to one side standing with one foot on the ground.
