too much weight on arms?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,351
Bikes: 2015 Jamis Quest Comp
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 270 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
too much weight on arms?
What's the solution if I feel like too much of my weight is on my hands and arms?
Shorter stem? Higher handlebars? Something I'm not thinking of? Just leaning farther and bending my arms more?
Thanks!
Shorter stem? Higher handlebars? Something I'm not thinking of? Just leaning farther and bending my arms more?
Thanks!
#3
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Could be lots of things. Is your saddle tilted nose-down? That could throw your weight forward. Is the bike the right size? Would you prefer a more upright riding position, in which case raising the handlebar may help. The first thing to do is have someone experienced look at you on the bike, and make an assessment of your riding position.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
Actually, The first thing to consider if you have too much weight on your hands is the fore/aft saddle placement. Move the saddle back for less weight on hands and move forward for more weight on hands. LOTS more going on than that but that's the first thing to consider. If your on the shorter side then the seat tube angle on an off the shelf frame is ridiculously steep so getting the saddle position back as far as you can is the first step.
Here's a test. Stand in the middle of the room, now imagine your on a bike and get yourself into a low tuck position. Done? Its easy somehow. Now see where your bottom is. Its WAY behind your feet. Now, back yourself up against a wall and try again. You can't do it can you without falling forward because you can't place any weight behind your feet to counter balance the weight in front of your feet.
Anthony
Here's a test. Stand in the middle of the room, now imagine your on a bike and get yourself into a low tuck position. Done? Its easy somehow. Now see where your bottom is. Its WAY behind your feet. Now, back yourself up against a wall and try again. You can't do it can you without falling forward because you can't place any weight behind your feet to counter balance the weight in front of your feet.
Anthony
Last edited by AnthonyG; 01-17-15 at 08:04 AM.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,351
Bikes: 2015 Jamis Quest Comp
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 270 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I think the saddle position is a good place to start...however once I move it back, I know I'll need to use either a shorter stem, or raid the handlebars, or both.
Thanks.
Thanks.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,866
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
Actually, The first thing to consider if you have too much weight on your hands is the fore/aft saddle placement. Move the saddle back for less weight on hands and move forward for more weight on hands. LOTS more going on than that but that's the first thing to consider. If your on the shorter side then the seat tube angle on an off the shelf frame is ridiculously steep so getting the saddle position back as far as you can is the first step.
Here's a test. Stand in the middle of the room, now imagine your on a bike and get yourself into a low tuck position. Done? Its easy somehow. Now see where your bottom is. Its WAY behind your feet. Now, back yourself up against a wall and try again. You can't do it can you without falling forward because you can't place any weight behind your feet to counter balance the weight in front of your feet.
Anthony
Here's a test. Stand in the middle of the room, now imagine your on a bike and get yourself into a low tuck position. Done? Its easy somehow. Now see where your bottom is. Its WAY behind your feet. Now, back yourself up against a wall and try again. You can't do it can you without falling forward because you can't place any weight behind your feet to counter balance the weight in front of your feet.
Anthony
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,866
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
#8
Senior Member
Now see where your bottom is. Its WAY behind your feet. Big, big light bulb for me!!! Thank you Anthony!
Cheers,
David B.
Cheers,
David B.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
31 Posts
KOPS is overrated. It doesn't matter if your knee cap isn't "precisely" over the spindle of your pedal. In my experience, anyway. Often riders will slide back in the saddle for maximum leg extension in big gears, or slide forward for high rpm hammering, so there goes perfect KOPS. I do think you shouldn't be grossly far from KOPS but I think an inch off is fine for most people.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
Most short riders are positioned way in front of KOPS by bicycle manufacturers. They need to have the saddle moved back as far as it can be to get anywhere near KOPS.
Being behind KOPS is a relaxing position but its not so easy to spin high cadences when behind KOPS in my experience. My view is that most recreational riders SHOULD be on bikes that have them behind KOPS yet FAR to many recreational riders are set in front of KOPS by major bike manufacturers. Being a little in front of KOPS might be OK on a time trial bike but putting recreational riders in front of KOPS is well, STUPID!
Anthony
#12
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
In my experience, the LBS is the one who sets up the saddle at KOPS for your leg length. How would a manufacturer know the length of the rider's legs? I'm going to move mine back today and see what happens. Do I need to move my cleat position on my shoes as well?
#13
Banned
add more saddle setback and the C of G shifts to your Butt, & reduced on your arms .
& you can sit up more.. Higher handlebars closer to You ..
Touring rather than racer's posture. less need for speed ?
& you can sit up more.. Higher handlebars closer to You ..
Touring rather than racer's posture. less need for speed ?
Last edited by fietsbob; 03-10-15 at 12:05 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
Anthony
#15
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
If you want a bike that's made for your body, you'll need to go to a custom bike builder. Manufacturers make bikes for the average person's measurements for their height. They'd go broke otherwise. Go to the thread in bike fit https://www.bikeforums.net/fitting-yo...-you-ride.html asking what size bike do you ride and how tall are you and you'll see.
Last edited by Lars Halstrom; 03-10-15 at 04:44 PM. Reason: added link