Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fitting Your Bike
Reload this Page >

too much weight on arms?

Search
Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

too much weight on arms?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-15, 08:22 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,351

Bikes: 2015 Jamis Quest Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 270 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
too much weight on arms?

What's the solution if I feel like too much of my weight is on my hands and arms?

Shorter stem? Higher handlebars? Something I'm not thinking of? Just leaning farther and bending my arms more?

Thanks!
12strings is offline  
Old 01-16-15, 11:16 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Bend your arms more. More sit-ups if necessary.
johnny99 is offline  
Old 01-17-15, 03:01 AM
  #3  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Could be lots of things. Is your saddle tilted nose-down? That could throw your weight forward. Is the bike the right size? Would you prefer a more upright riding position, in which case raising the handlebar may help. The first thing to do is have someone experienced look at you on the bike, and make an assessment of your riding position.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 01-17-15, 07:47 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times in 289 Posts
Actually, The first thing to consider if you have too much weight on your hands is the fore/aft saddle placement. Move the saddle back for less weight on hands and move forward for more weight on hands. LOTS more going on than that but that's the first thing to consider. If your on the shorter side then the seat tube angle on an off the shelf frame is ridiculously steep so getting the saddle position back as far as you can is the first step.

Here's a test. Stand in the middle of the room, now imagine your on a bike and get yourself into a low tuck position. Done? Its easy somehow. Now see where your bottom is. Its WAY behind your feet. Now, back yourself up against a wall and try again. You can't do it can you without falling forward because you can't place any weight behind your feet to counter balance the weight in front of your feet.

Anthony

Last edited by AnthonyG; 01-17-15 at 08:04 AM.
AnthonyG is offline  
Old 01-17-15, 09:54 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,351

Bikes: 2015 Jamis Quest Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 270 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I think the saddle position is a good place to start...however once I move it back, I know I'll need to use either a shorter stem, or raid the handlebars, or both.

Thanks.
12strings is offline  
Old 01-17-15, 06:58 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,866

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times in 504 Posts
Originally Posted by AnthonyG
Actually, The first thing to consider if you have too much weight on your hands is the fore/aft saddle placement. Move the saddle back for less weight on hands and move forward for more weight on hands. LOTS more going on than that but that's the first thing to consider. If your on the shorter side then the seat tube angle on an off the shelf frame is ridiculously steep so getting the saddle position back as far as you can is the first step.

Here's a test. Stand in the middle of the room, now imagine your on a bike and get yourself into a low tuck position. Done? Its easy somehow. Now see where your bottom is. Its WAY behind your feet. Now, back yourself up against a wall and try again. You can't do it can you without falling forward because you can't place any weight behind your feet to counter balance the weight in front of your feet.

Anthony
This is a good thought process. I like to get my center of gravity over the BB axis when I'm in the saddle and holding the bars comfortably. Then position the saddle so it contacts my sit-bones correctly when balanced. I may have more saddle pressure in this position, but that just means the saddle design and position also have to be correct for me.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 01-17-15, 06:59 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,866

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times in 504 Posts
Originally Posted by 12strings
I think the saddle position is a good place to start...however once I move it back, I know I'll need to use either a shorter stem, or raid the handlebars, or both.

Thanks.
Yes, I agree! You may need an adjustment or two before you're done.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 02-22-15, 01:56 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Anchorage
Posts: 226

Bikes: Devinci Oslo

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Now see where your bottom is. Its WAY behind your feet. Big, big light bulb for me!!! Thank you Anthony!
Cheers,
David B.
md11mx is offline  
Old 03-09-15, 10:56 PM
  #9  
Full Member
 
Lars Halstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
What happens to knee over pedal spindle positioning or cleat positioning when you move the saddle backwards?
Lars Halstrom is offline  
Old 03-09-15, 11:11 PM
  #10  
jyl
Senior Member
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times in 31 Posts
KOPS is overrated. It doesn't matter if your knee cap isn't "precisely" over the spindle of your pedal. In my experience, anyway. Often riders will slide back in the saddle for maximum leg extension in big gears, or slide forward for high rpm hammering, so there goes perfect KOPS. I do think you shouldn't be grossly far from KOPS but I think an inch off is fine for most people.
jyl is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 01:26 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times in 289 Posts
Originally Posted by Lars Halstrom
What happens to knee over pedal spindle positioning or cleat positioning when you move the saddle backwards?
Well assuming that you were at KOPS to begin with then you simply move behind KOPS.

Most short riders are positioned way in front of KOPS by bicycle manufacturers. They need to have the saddle moved back as far as it can be to get anywhere near KOPS.

Being behind KOPS is a relaxing position but its not so easy to spin high cadences when behind KOPS in my experience. My view is that most recreational riders SHOULD be on bikes that have them behind KOPS yet FAR to many recreational riders are set in front of KOPS by major bike manufacturers. Being a little in front of KOPS might be OK on a time trial bike but putting recreational riders in front of KOPS is well, STUPID!

Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 07:42 AM
  #12  
Full Member
 
Lars Halstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
In my experience, the LBS is the one who sets up the saddle at KOPS for your leg length. How would a manufacturer know the length of the rider's legs? I'm going to move mine back today and see what happens. Do I need to move my cleat position on my shoes as well?
Lars Halstrom is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 12:01 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
add more saddle setback and the C of G shifts to your Butt, & reduced on your arms .

& you can sit up more.. Higher handlebars closer to You ..

Touring rather than racer's posture. less need for speed ?

Last edited by fietsbob; 03-10-15 at 12:05 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 03:32 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times in 289 Posts
Originally Posted by Lars Halstrom
In my experience, the LBS is the one who sets up the saddle at KOPS for your leg length. How would a manufacturer know the length of the rider's legs? I'm going to move mine back today and see what happens. Do I need to move my cleat position on my shoes as well?
Bike fitters are good at fine tuning your position but its the manufacturer of the bike who has to get your position in the ball park. Sometimes they don't even try. They are more concerned about a number on a specification sheet, even though they know that the resultant riding position will be terrible.

Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 04:36 PM
  #15  
Full Member
 
Lars Halstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
If you want a bike that's made for your body, you'll need to go to a custom bike builder. Manufacturers make bikes for the average person's measurements for their height. They'd go broke otherwise. Go to the thread in bike fit https://www.bikeforums.net/fitting-yo...-you-ride.html asking what size bike do you ride and how tall are you and you'll see.

Last edited by Lars Halstrom; 03-10-15 at 04:44 PM. Reason: added link
Lars Halstrom is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MikeOK
Fitting Your Bike
15
07-19-17 11:44 PM
htotaza
Road Cycling
14
05-20-15 02:58 PM
justaguest
Fitting Your Bike
17
04-24-14 07:03 PM
NZier
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
24
05-28-13 08:15 PM
gvon79
Road Cycling
19
03-17-10 02:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.