![]() |
Different models of the Big Apple tires?
Hi,
I've been looking into Schwalbe's Big Apple tires, and I noticed there are different version, and I wonder how they differ. There's the Big Apple Performance Wire and Big Apple Plus HS 430. There might be other ones, I'm not sure. Anyway, any idea how they differ? Edit: It seems that the Plus offer more puncture protection. I have a different question. I currently have Kenda Kwest 20 x 1.5" tires, and I wonder if replacing them with 20 x 2" Big Apple tires would slow me down. |
Is better cushioning worth the hypothetical loss of a possible mile or so per hour? I personally would think comfort is more important. YMMV.
|
I think Big Apples will be faster. Kenda Kwest is a good one but BAs are better. Don't be tempted to pump them over 50psi.
|
Originally Posted by tds101
(Post 17709168)
Is better cushioning worth the hypothetical loss of a possible mile or so per hour? I personally would think comfort is more important. YMMV.
|
Originally Posted by tds101
(Post 17709168)
Is better cushioning worth the hypothetical loss of a possible mile or so per hour? I personally would think comfort is more important. YMMV.
I don't buy it unless your at the top of a road bikes performance envelope. My 36 pound, now 41 with added riding gear Tour Easy recumbent had a 700 x 28c on it, the tire needed 95-100 psi to protect the rim. Max psi was 115,,really ? I don't think so... I'm not racing. The ride was terrible, It beat me to death, every tiny road imperfection went right into the bike. I replaced It with a 700 x 38C, max Psi was 80 for this tire, I run 75... The ride is fantastic, No Noticeable speed loss at all as far as I can tell. On my new 20" folder, P8 I wanted fat tires, wanted the Big Apples, the 20 x 2.00",, I got the 20 x 1.75" and am very happy. The other one I test rode with 20 x 1.25" was harsh, felt disconnected and every sidewalk crack made it to me... IMO due to a 20" tire's much reduced circumference Fatter is far more Important as a comfort factor.. As for rolling resistance,, Bha ! Humbug ! How about we get stronger :P Loosing 1 mph,,, learn to spin better, the faster you can spin the more comfortable that next gear is and the less It's like mashing so say's my knee's.... ,I don't race so,,, "I personally would think comfort is more important." ,,, You betcha ! |
The most important factor in tyre speed is tyre loss, not width or pressure. Tyre losses are from squirming rubber (not a big factor in BAs with its almost smooth tread) and tyre casing suppleness, and I strongly suspect BAs are substantially better than Kendas. So I expect a small improvement in speed.
|
Here is an article on tyre research which I believe to be the last word.
The Tire Pressure Revolution, by Jan Heine | Road Bike Rider |
Well, my point was IF you lose 1 mph with fatter tires WHO CARES!!! The butt saving comfort is worth the risk. Me, I'm a fast rider when on my bikes. I've never had a slowdown with fatties. I'd say, for a newbie, reading up on this subject might be enlightening. But, unless your a competitive athlete, then a slightly slower roll is no big deal. And, for most, I doubt they roll any slower anyways.
PS: I'm not the op, so please let him/her know what's up. Me,...I always go fatter tires. Where I live it's pothole hell!!! Lol!!! |
Originally Posted by jur
(Post 17710839)
Here is an article on tyre research which I believe to be the last word.
The Tire Pressure Revolution, by Jan Heine | Road Bike Rider [h=2][/h]"Tire pressure does not significantly affect your bike’s rolling resistance, but the casing construction of your tires does. This means that you can ride lower pressures without going slower, and that wide tires are no slower than narrow ones – as long as they have similar casings. The fastest tires have supple casings that consume less energy when they flex, and transmit fewer vibrations, creating a win-win situation. These tires roll super-fast no matter at what pressure you run them." this sounds very logical to me and dovetails nicely with the claims made regarding big apples on Balloonbikes - the principle. |
Thanks for the comments, everyone. I'll contact the bike shop where I bought the bike just to make sure I can install 2" tires, and then I'll buy them if they can fit.
|
Originally Posted by YonathanZ
(Post 17710891)
Thanks for the comments, everyone. I'll contact the bike shop where I bought the bike just to make sure I can install 2" tires, and then I'll buy them if they can fit.
|
Originally Posted by tds101
(Post 17710903)
From the sound of it the bike shop is giving you incorrect information. Just go purchase a set of Big Apple's from a store they can be returned to if your afraid. I really doubt you'll have any issues with fit. Your making the upgrade more complicated than necessary.
|
Originally Posted by YonathanZ
(Post 17710908)
No one sells them here. I'll be ordering from bike24.com, and shipping alone is 20 euros. I want to be sure before I spend 55 dollars on tires.
|
Originally Posted by tds101
(Post 17710959)
Ah, I understand. Your cautiousness is fully justified. Just take the wheels off and measure.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Measure the width of the FORK, not the rim of the tire. The rim width is irrelevant.
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=444493 |
Originally Posted by tds101
(Post 17711037)
Measure the width of the FORK, not the rim of the tire. The rim width is irrelevant.
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=444493 |
Originally Posted by YonathanZ
(Post 17711047)
Very close to 3 inches. Like, 2.9 point something. Similar width where the rear wheel is. Why doesn't the rim width matter? The shop where I had a inner tube replaced a few months ago said that rim won't fit a tire wider than 1.75", but that's not the shop that sold me the bike, so they might be wrong.
Measure the fork width like tds101 said and measure your brake calipur width,, where it would go around the wider tire.. I betcha a six pack of beer your rims are fine for 2.15" wide Big apples,, Umm IF I loose this bet,, It's gonna be cheap beer and you gotta come get It ! :P |
Originally Posted by osco53
(Post 17711061)
Again, take your tire off the rim and give us In MM Inside rim width just In case you have some really skinny rims and that I doubt..
Measure the fork width like tds101 said and measure your brake calipur width,, where it would go around the wider tire.. I betcha a six pack of beer your rims are fine for 2.15" wide Big apples,, Umm IF I loose this bet,, It's gonna be cheap beer and you gotta come get It ! :P |
The width of the rim won't be an issue because you DON'T have the high end slim profile wheelset on that bike. The guy at the bike shop was wrong. I've been through it before. Big Apple tires will fit your bike PERFECTLY!!! I'll even bet you beer!!! :thumb:
|
Originally Posted by YonathanZ
(Post 17708787)
Hi,
Anyway, any idea how they differ? Edit: It seems that the Plus offer more puncture protection. one is for E- bikes,, rated for big speeds,,, one is basic,, I bet softer,,lighter,, Also look at Big Apples new brother,,Big Ben :P |
Originally Posted by tds101
(Post 17711069)
The width of the rim won't be an issue because you DON'T have the high end slim profile wheelset on that bike. The guy at the bike shop was wrong. I've been through it before. Big Apple tires will fit your bike PERFECTLY!!! I'll even bet you beer!!! :thumb:
And yeah, you're right. So can I just order the 2.15" Big Ben and get it over with? My arse will thank me. |
Originally Posted by osco53
(Post 17711071)
Click on the model name of said tire,,like you noticed,, on has better puncture protection,,,
one is for E- bikes,, rated for big speeds,,, one is basic,, I bet softer,,lighter,, Also look at Big Apples new brother,,Big Ben :P |
Originally Posted by YonathanZ
(Post 17711066)
Must I take the wheel off? .
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=444496http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=444497 |
Originally Posted by osco53
(Post 17711078)
Well No IMO it would be easier,,all we need to see is Inside rim width,, with one of these,,
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=444496http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=444497 |
BTW FWIW I rode 10 very Intense single track miles today on my mountain bike.. I set several personal records :P
I'm gonna have to start wearing long pants,,my legs are so Rad,, or I guess I can carry a can-o-mace to fight off the wimin folk :P Just sayin |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.