Downtube folding bike
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,498
Bikes: Many Downtube Folders :)
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times
in
17 Posts
I did not go with a 9sp at first due to cost. I'd love to swap over now if I had a choice. However, just last week I was told 9sp components would not be available.
I hope they will be available in January, if so I will spec them on the Downtube IX.
Thanks,
Yan
I hope they will be available in January, if so I will spec them on the Downtube IX.
Thanks,
Yan
Originally Posted by jasong
I'm curious - is there a reason that the current models couldn't hold a 9 speed rear drivetrain now? I'm sure cost is a factor; it seems like 8 speed stuff is fairly cheaper than that. But I've also heard that chainline becomes more of an issue on a folder because of reduced wheelbase, and also it's a real 8 speed drivetrain, whereas in most bikes only 7 of the 8 speeds would be recommended for each chainring.
I guess the current freehub will hold a 9 speed cassette since they're the same size as an 8 speed.
Which chain are you spec'ing for use with 9 speeds? Something more bendy than normal? I've read the SRAM chains are a bit noisier than the shimano (9 speed) chains, implying that some chains are a bit better suited for bending than others.
I guess the current freehub will hold a 9 speed cassette since they're the same size as an 8 speed.
Which chain are you spec'ing for use with 9 speeds? Something more bendy than normal? I've read the SRAM chains are a bit noisier than the shimano (9 speed) chains, implying that some chains are a bit better suited for bending than others.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 853
Bikes: 2003 KHS F20-Westwood folding & enough parts to make several more bikes...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jasong
Af, I wasn't in doubt about the cassette replacement (assuming that a normal freehub is in use here). It's the narrow wheelbase that can make this very challenging (not as much lateral distance over which the chain can bend).
I *think* it's the same cassette width so as long as an 8-speed work vis-a-vis chain angle, a 9-would be identical - it just packs more cogs in the same space.
Am I off base with any of that?
__________________
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 328
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by af895
If I'm interpreting what you're saying correctly, your concern has to do with greater distance between smallest and largest cog in a 9-speed cassette versus and 8-speed - with a short wheelbase the
There is indeed a bit greater bend in the extremes of the individual cogs, because each cog is a bit narrower. So while the left side of the chain is laterally as far left on the big cog for 8sp/9sp, the right side of it is a fraction of a millimeter further left. Imagining decreasing the wheelbase to an arbitrarily small value where it's obvious that the chain couldn't bend well means that somewhere between this value and a normal bike wheelbase is where a difficulty will arise.
But, as Yan has just posted, apparently there isn't an issue since that wasn't the reason for not including 9 speed. Perhaps on a bit smaller folder. FYI - I had read this in regard to mods people had used for trying to do a derailleur solution on 16" bikes (where you rarely do seem to see a multispeed derailleur, but instead a flat chainline and internal speed hub).
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 328
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by downtube
I did not go with a 9sp at first due to cost. I'd love to swap over now if I had a choice. However, just last week I was told 9sp components would not be available.
This flexibility precisely what I've been looking for in a folder design. And I'll be looking forward to playing with my new one - I just bought a VIII online.
#55
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BruceMetras
Hi Chris,
The included bag is terrific, made well, and the bike fits in easily for me.
Bruce
The included bag is terrific, made well, and the bike fits in easily for me.
Bruce
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 853
Bikes: 2003 KHS F20-Westwood folding & enough parts to make several more bikes...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
jpscunil: try flipping the bike upside-down or "slide" the bag onto the bike so the zipper is on the bottom before closing it.
Just suggesting that because of this pic: https://www.downtube.com/images/Bikes_7-14/BikeinBag.jpg
Which shows the stand you're referring to on the zipper side of the bag.
Just suggesting that because of this pic: https://www.downtube.com/images/Bikes_7-14/BikeinBag.jpg
Which shows the stand you're referring to on the zipper side of the bag.

__________________
#57
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by af895
jpscunil: try flipping the bike upside-down or "slide" the bag onto the bike so the zipper is on the bottom before closing it.
Just suggesting that because of this pic: https://www.downtube.com/images/Bikes_7-14/BikeinBag.jpg
Which shows the stand you're referring to on the zipper side of the bag.
Just suggesting that because of this pic: https://www.downtube.com/images/Bikes_7-14/BikeinBag.jpg
Which shows the stand you're referring to on the zipper side of the bag.

BTW, it is easiest to leave the bike right side up, and put the cover over the bike, then turn the bike upside down - the zipper is then on top.
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Rafael, California
Posts: 2,097
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
6 Posts
Originally Posted by downtube
I did not go with a 9sp at first due to cost. I'd love to swap over now if I had a choice. However, just last week I was told 9sp components would not be available.
I hope they will be available in January, if so I will spec them on the Downtube IX.
Thanks,
Yan
I hope they will be available in January, if so I will spec them on the Downtube IX.
Thanks,
Yan
Hi Downtubers!!
Still really enjoying my VIIIFS.. here's a couple of pics showing my update over the weekend. First time for me for anything like this... I laced up the 8spd Shimano Nexus 'red band' to an Alex16 rim. Very cool to ride... Slick and quiet.. easy to do with the horizontal dropouts. The Nexus has a 307% overall gear ratio...about the same as a 9spd mega-range 11-34...
Bruce
ps for Yan... I could use a couple more of those seatpost shims....thanks!
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 881
Bikes: Gilmour lugged steel, Bianchi Volpe, Bike Friday Pocket Rocket
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
dangit! you beat me to the punch! as you know, I had the same idea for my downtube viii, but I am afraid the vertical dropouts make it a far less appealing idea. may still try it with a singleator or some such jury-rigging, but yours looks great!
#61
Radfahrer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 656
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BruceMetras
Still really enjoying my VIIIFS.. here's a couple of pics showing my update over the weekend. First time for me for anything like this... I laced up the 8spd Shimano Nexus 'red band' to an Alex16 rim. Very cool to ride... Slick and quiet.. easy to do with the horizontal dropouts. The Nexus has a 307% overall gear ratio...about the same as a 9spd mega-range 11-34...
Bruce
Bruce
I was thinking of converting my VIIIFS into a fixed gear, but since the hinge of the rear suspension arm is not at the bottom bracket I fear that every time I hit a bump it is going to mess up the chain tension or throw the chain. How is the chain tension holding up for you, since you don't run any chain tensioner?
__________________
TH 1.81 (133kg*62)
TH 1.81 (133kg*62)
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Rafael, California
Posts: 2,097
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
6 Posts
Originally Posted by v1nce
Nice back wheel! Good job on the lacing. How many spokes and how long did the lacing take start to finish?
Bruce
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Rafael, California
Posts: 2,097
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
6 Posts
Originally Posted by Rincewind8
Bruce,
I was thinking of converting my VIIIFS into a fixed gear, but since the hinge of the rear suspension arm is not at the bottom bracket I fear that every time I hit a bump it is going to mess up the chain tension or throw the chain. How is the chain tension holding up for you, since you don't run any chain tensioner?
I was thinking of converting my VIIIFS into a fixed gear, but since the hinge of the rear suspension arm is not at the bottom bracket I fear that every time I hit a bump it is going to mess up the chain tension or throw the chain. How is the chain tension holding up for you, since you don't run any chain tensioner?
When I set up the chain tension initially, I loaded the rear suspension first, set what I considered nomal tension and that was it. It does tend to tighten when suspension is compressed, so if you set it tight unloaded, it will be too tight when ridden. Just came back from my 10mi lunch run and it worked perfect. The shifting is very smooth and the hub surprisingly quiet in any gear. I jumped a few curbs for grins and didn't loose the chain. I can't see how it would, but my impending trail riding should be a good test. I don't know how critical chain tension is on a fixed gear bike, but worse case scenario, a tensioner could be added.
Bruce
#65
Bromptonaut
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 1,736
Bikes: 1994 Diamond Back Racing Prevail ti; Miyata 914, Miyata 1000, 2017 Van Nicholas Chinook
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
That is cool. Now, any imput on those working with a 7s cassete and derailleur at the same time?
Your bike looks awesome by the way!
Your bike looks awesome by the way!
__________________
Feel free to follow me on Instagram
Feel free to follow me on Instagram
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 328
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rafael Guerra
That is cool. Now, any imput on those working with a 7s cassete and derailleur at the same time?
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 881
Bikes: Gilmour lugged steel, Bianchi Volpe, Bike Friday Pocket Rocket
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rafael Guerra
That is cool. Now, any imput on those working with a 7s cassete and derailleur at the same time?
Your bike looks awesome by the way!
Your bike looks awesome by the way!
https://www.sram.com/en/sram/comfort/...ubcassette.php
#68
Bromptonaut
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 1,736
Bikes: 1994 Diamond Back Racing Prevail ti; Miyata 914, Miyata 1000, 2017 Van Nicholas Chinook
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
No, sorry for my lack of details:
My curiosity is around a geared hub (speed hub) used simultaneously with a regular 6,7,8 or 9 speed cassete.
Without a front derailleur, you can still reach 126 gears (14rohloff x9speed cassete).
My bike cannot fit a front derailleur, so I may consider in the future a speed hub if that is do-able (if I can get it and keep the current 7 speeds that I have)
Thank you,
Rafael
My curiosity is around a geared hub (speed hub) used simultaneously with a regular 6,7,8 or 9 speed cassete.
Without a front derailleur, you can still reach 126 gears (14rohloff x9speed cassete).
My bike cannot fit a front derailleur, so I may consider in the future a speed hub if that is do-able (if I can get it and keep the current 7 speeds that I have)
Thank you,
Rafael
__________________
Feel free to follow me on Instagram
Feel free to follow me on Instagram
#69
Radfahrer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 656
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rafael Guerra
Without a front derailleur, you can still reach 126 gears (14rohloff x9speed cassete).

__________________
TH 1.81 (133kg*62)
TH 1.81 (133kg*62)
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Rafael, California
Posts: 2,097
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
6 Posts
Originally Posted by Rafael Guerra
No, sorry for my lack of details:
My curiosity is around a geared hub (speed hub) used simultaneously with a regular 6,7,8 or 9 speed cassete.
Without a front derailleur, you can still reach 126 gears (14rohloff x9speed cassete).
My bike cannot fit a front derailleur, so I may consider in the future a speed hub if that is do-able (if I can get it and keep the current 7 speeds that I have)
Thank you,
Rafael
My curiosity is around a geared hub (speed hub) used simultaneously with a regular 6,7,8 or 9 speed cassete.
Without a front derailleur, you can still reach 126 gears (14rohloff x9speed cassete).
My bike cannot fit a front derailleur, so I may consider in the future a speed hub if that is do-able (if I can get it and keep the current 7 speeds that I have)
Thank you,
Rafael
Bruce
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Rafael, California
Posts: 2,097
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
6 Posts
Originally Posted by jasong
Where did you buy the Nexus-8? Price? Any feelings of inefficiencies with it?
That's cool!
That's cool!
I don't find the Nexus inefficient. Actually, the opposite. It shifts smooth, the chainline is always straight, it's pretty quiet, the ratios are nice and you can tailor the overall gear ratio with easily replaceable sprockets from 13t to 21t. In the last couple of days of riding, it is faster than before, but I attribute that in part to the 100psi Kenda Kwest on the rear. It does weigh a little more than the stock wheel/derailleur setup, but the extra mass is at least in the best place possible, in the center of the wheel.
Bruce
Last edited by BruceMetras; 11-03-05 at 10:12 AM.
#72
Bromptonaut
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 1,736
Bikes: 1994 Diamond Back Racing Prevail ti; Miyata 914, Miyata 1000, 2017 Van Nicholas Chinook
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
That is what I was considering actually.
I have a trip to south america (already scheduled for this december) that will be my final test for the current configuration of my bike. If I feel the need of more gears (either low or high) my only solution is a hub, and the SRAM dualdrive is one of my options.
Now, the 3 gears that it brings to the bike, are those low-equal-high compared to a non-geared hub or Super-low/low/still-low or high/higher/highest?
In other words, will it increase my range or just increase my number of gears in one direction (low or high).
Thank you,
Rafael
I have a trip to south america (already scheduled for this december) that will be my final test for the current configuration of my bike. If I feel the need of more gears (either low or high) my only solution is a hub, and the SRAM dualdrive is one of my options.
Now, the 3 gears that it brings to the bike, are those low-equal-high compared to a non-geared hub or Super-low/low/still-low or high/higher/highest?
In other words, will it increase my range or just increase my number of gears in one direction (low or high).
Thank you,
Rafael
__________________
Feel free to follow me on Instagram
Feel free to follow me on Instagram
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Rafael, California
Posts: 2,097
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
6 Posts
Originally Posted by Rafael Guerra
That is what I was considering actually.
I have a trip to south america (already scheduled for this december) that will be my final test for the current configuration of my bike. If I feel the need of more gears (either low or high) my only solution is a hub, and the SRAM dualdrive is one of my options.
Now, the 3 gears that it brings to the bike, are those low-equal-high compared to a non-geared hub or Super-low/low/still-low or high/higher/highest?
In other words, will it increase my range or just increase my number of gears in one direction (low or high).
Thank you,
Rafael
I have a trip to south america (already scheduled for this december) that will be my final test for the current configuration of my bike. If I feel the need of more gears (either low or high) my only solution is a hub, and the SRAM dualdrive is one of my options.
Now, the 3 gears that it brings to the bike, are those low-equal-high compared to a non-geared hub or Super-low/low/still-low or high/higher/highest?
In other words, will it increase my range or just increase my number of gears in one direction (low or high).
Thank you,
Rafael
One more option, although not inexpensive is a SpeedDrive. I have one of these going into a Jet XP when I get the time.. They are terrific, Swiss made, and another solution for extending the gear range of a single chainring bike.
Bruce
Last edited by BruceMetras; 11-03-05 at 10:11 AM.
#74
Bromptonaut
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 1,736
Bikes: 1994 Diamond Back Racing Prevail ti; Miyata 914, Miyata 1000, 2017 Van Nicholas Chinook
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Rincewind8
Why do you need 126 gears? Or anything close to that? Are you trying to set a speed record and pull a 500lb trailer with the same bike? 

Not really! I just live in Florida (still looking for a place on earth as flat as Florida) and mainly use the bike inside an University campus and as a recreational vehicle (50 miles a week at most). for these purposes, the bike is actually almost perfect ( a little low geared if I get picky).
However, I travel at least once a year to Brazil, where climbing mountains is a common practice. Since the idea is to have my bike as my only bike, I am just trying to expand my gear option.
I don't have a front derailleur, so I would never reach 100+ gears. All I need is some way to compensate the lack of 2 chainrings. Seems like a geared hub is a good option...I am just refining my research about it.
Besides the options mentioned here, is there anything else that can be done? (budget aprox US200.00)
Rafael
__________________
Feel free to follow me on Instagram
Feel free to follow me on Instagram
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,427
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Well Rafael i was thinking about just using a Sturmey Archer 3 or 5 speed (cheap as NOS) and a triple front chain ring... Is this even possible, and especially is it possible on a folder? The range wouldn't be massive and the gears wouldn't be loads but enough for quite a lot of applications. Plus it would be cheap & durable i guess. But maybe it is totally unworkable? I don't know.