Quickest of these from A to B?
#26
To fold or not to fold?
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hampstead
Posts: 192
Bikes: Mezzo, DT IXFS, Raleigh 20 (soon...)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by maunakea
To this excellent discussion, I would add, for nnn's consideration, the cockpit. The bikes you listed have very different cockpits, which becomes an issue if you are a sigma or two off the bike's design target. Ever had a fast bike that you hate to ride?
#27
Car free since 1995
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,050
Bikes: M5 Carbon High Racer, Trek Emonda SL6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
6 Posts
Originally Posted by EvilV
...remember, a bike doesn't have to cost the earth, it's only a bike.
#28
Bicycling Gnome
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 55.0N 1.59W
Posts: 1,877
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pm124
Very true! But if you are going to spend the money rather than save for retirement, there's nothing better to spend your money on.
Just worked out that I was putting out 250 watts of power in climbing the 800 metre hill to my home this afternoon. I did my 10 miles again today. Climbing that hill used up as much energy as I might extract from half a chocolate biscuit. Doesn't seem enough somehow. It felt like three chocolate biscuits at least!
Take a look here and depress yourself about how little energy cycling uses. Maybe I should go back to running instead:
https://www.kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm
#29
Car free since 1995
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,050
Bikes: M5 Carbon High Racer, Trek Emonda SL6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
6 Posts
Originally Posted by EvilV
Well, as a retired person myself, you'll understand why I'm glad I didn't spend a fortune on bikes when I was younger. LOL.
Just worked out that I was putting out 250 watts of power in climbing the 800 metre hill to my home this afternoon. I did my 10 miles again today. Climbing that hill used up as much energy as I might extract from half a chocolate biscuit. Doesn't seem enough somehow. It felt like three chocolate biscuits at least!
Take a look here and depress yourself about how little energy cycling uses. Maybe I should go back to running instead:
https://www.kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm
Just worked out that I was putting out 250 watts of power in climbing the 800 metre hill to my home this afternoon. I did my 10 miles again today. Climbing that hill used up as much energy as I might extract from half a chocolate biscuit. Doesn't seem enough somehow. It felt like three chocolate biscuits at least!
Take a look here and depress yourself about how little energy cycling uses. Maybe I should go back to running instead:
https://www.kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 527
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EvilV
Well, as a retired person myself, you'll understand why I'm glad I didn't spend a fortune on bikes when I was younger. LOL.
Just worked out that I was putting out 250 watts of power in climbing the 800 metre hill to my home this afternoon. I did my 10 miles again today. Climbing that hill used up as much energy as I might extract from half a chocolate biscuit. Doesn't seem enough somehow. It felt like three chocolate biscuits at least!
Take a look here and depress yourself about how little energy cycling uses. Maybe I should go back to running instead:
https://www.kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm
Just worked out that I was putting out 250 watts of power in climbing the 800 metre hill to my home this afternoon. I did my 10 miles again today. Climbing that hill used up as much energy as I might extract from half a chocolate biscuit. Doesn't seem enough somehow. It felt like three chocolate biscuits at least!
Take a look here and depress yourself about how little energy cycling uses. Maybe I should go back to running instead:
https://www.kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm
I just thought I would tell you that while I am no expert, the calorie counter you are using seems to be way off. I think it is off because I have had several other sites (like 3 or 4 others) tell me a different number, and they were all within 100 calories of each other. This one just seems "more accurate" because they ask for so many variables, but it is inaccurate none the less.
I KNOW it's wrong because for 2 months I lost 30 lbs by keeping a strict log of my workouts and my daily caloric intake. 1 pound lost is equal to burning 3500 calories. By doing my own calculations, I can fairly accurately tell how much I'm burning in my workouts (I also know how many calories I need to maintain my current weight, without exercise, or my Base Metabolic Rate). I know that if I ride at about 14-15 mph for 2 hours that I can burn 1,600-1,700 calories. Your counter tells me that I only burned 1,100. If this were true, I would never have lost the weight that I lost.
Juan
#32
Part-time epistemologist
Originally Posted by maunakea
To this excellent discussion, I would add, for nnn's consideration, the cockpit. The bikes you listed have very different cockpits, which becomes an issue if you are a sigma or two off the bike's design target. Ever had a fast bike that you hate to ride?
I have ridden a Birdy a few times. Best riding small-wheeled folder in my opinion. Although I have not ridden the new tikit nor the DT Mini. The Birdy also fits a wide range of bodies too. I just wish that one could roll it while folded.