Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Folding Bikes
Reload this Page >

Quickest of these from A to B?

Search
Notices
Folding Bikes Discuss the unique features and issues of folding bikes. Also a great place to learn what folding bike will work best for your needs.

Quickest of these from A to B?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-07, 01:14 PM
  #26  
To fold or not to fold?
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hampstead
Posts: 192

Bikes: Mezzo, DT IXFS, Raleigh 20 (soon...)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by maunakea
To this excellent discussion, I would add, for nnn's consideration, the cockpit. The bikes you listed have very different cockpits, which becomes an issue if you are a sigma or two off the bike's design target. Ever had a fast bike that you hate to ride?
Which really points to the need to try out a bunch and take a view on which feels right. Of course, if you are able to buy under your firm's cyclescheme (with around 50% off retail price), even if you end up selling it within a year, you'll still make a profit (particularly if you buy a bike with good residual value, like the Brompton). So buy one. What is there to lose?
matt52 is offline  
Old 05-28-07, 07:52 AM
  #27  
Car free since 1995
 
pm124's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,050

Bikes: M5 Carbon High Racer, Trek Emonda SL6

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by EvilV
...remember, a bike doesn't have to cost the earth, it's only a bike.
Very true! But if you are going to spend the money rather than save for retirement, there's nothing better to spend your money on.
pm124 is offline  
Old 05-28-07, 10:01 AM
  #28  
Bicycling Gnome
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 55.0N 1.59W
Posts: 1,877
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pm124
Very true! But if you are going to spend the money rather than save for retirement, there's nothing better to spend your money on.
Well, as a retired person myself, you'll understand why I'm glad I didn't spend a fortune on bikes when I was younger. LOL.



Just worked out that I was putting out 250 watts of power in climbing the 800 metre hill to my home this afternoon. I did my 10 miles again today. Climbing that hill used up as much energy as I might extract from half a chocolate biscuit. Doesn't seem enough somehow. It felt like three chocolate biscuits at least!


Take a look here and depress yourself about how little energy cycling uses. Maybe I should go back to running instead:

https://www.kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm
EvilV is offline  
Old 05-28-07, 12:45 PM
  #29  
Car free since 1995
 
pm124's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,050

Bikes: M5 Carbon High Racer, Trek Emonda SL6

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by EvilV
Well, as a retired person myself, you'll understand why I'm glad I didn't spend a fortune on bikes when I was younger. LOL.



Just worked out that I was putting out 250 watts of power in climbing the 800 metre hill to my home this afternoon. I did my 10 miles again today. Climbing that hill used up as much energy as I might extract from half a chocolate biscuit. Doesn't seem enough somehow. It felt like three chocolate biscuits at least!


Take a look here and depress yourself about how little energy cycling uses. Maybe I should go back to running instead:

https://www.kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm
The good news is that you just need to spend your retirement savings on a heavier bike, and you'll be all set. Seriously, though, as a physician, I wouldn't pay that much heed. Not taken into consideration are factors such as the energy required to build up muscle, etc. We often assume the human body is more efficient than it is.
pm124 is offline  
Old 05-28-07, 08:54 PM
  #30  
too many bikes
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 662
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
and the C/V benefit, worth more than the calorie burn IMO.
maunakea is offline  
Old 05-29-07, 05:10 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 527
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EvilV
Well, as a retired person myself, you'll understand why I'm glad I didn't spend a fortune on bikes when I was younger. LOL.



Just worked out that I was putting out 250 watts of power in climbing the 800 metre hill to my home this afternoon. I did my 10 miles again today. Climbing that hill used up as much energy as I might extract from half a chocolate biscuit. Doesn't seem enough somehow. It felt like three chocolate biscuits at least!


Take a look here and depress yourself about how little energy cycling uses. Maybe I should go back to running instead:

https://www.kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm
Hi,

I just thought I would tell you that while I am no expert, the calorie counter you are using seems to be way off. I think it is off because I have had several other sites (like 3 or 4 others) tell me a different number, and they were all within 100 calories of each other. This one just seems "more accurate" because they ask for so many variables, but it is inaccurate none the less.

I KNOW it's wrong because for 2 months I lost 30 lbs by keeping a strict log of my workouts and my daily caloric intake. 1 pound lost is equal to burning 3500 calories. By doing my own calculations, I can fairly accurately tell how much I'm burning in my workouts (I also know how many calories I need to maintain my current weight, without exercise, or my Base Metabolic Rate). I know that if I ride at about 14-15 mph for 2 hours that I can burn 1,600-1,700 calories. Your counter tells me that I only burned 1,100. If this were true, I would never have lost the weight that I lost.

Juan
juan162 is offline  
Old 05-29-07, 12:00 PM
  #32  
Part-time epistemologist
 
invisiblehand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,870

Bikes: Jamis Nova, Bike Friday triplet, Bike Friday NWT, STRIDA, Austro Daimler Vent Noir, Hollands Tourer

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 122 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by maunakea
To this excellent discussion, I would add, for nnn's consideration, the cockpit. The bikes you listed have very different cockpits, which becomes an issue if you are a sigma or two off the bike's design target. Ever had a fast bike that you hate to ride?
Excellent point (in my opinion).

I have ridden a Birdy a few times. Best riding small-wheeled folder in my opinion. Although I have not ridden the new tikit nor the DT Mini. The Birdy also fits a wide range of bodies too. I just wish that one could roll it while folded.
invisiblehand is offline  
Old 05-30-07, 01:33 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Fear&Trembling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 637
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just wish that one could roll it while folded.
You can, racks (post 2006) come with skate wheels.
Fear&Trembling is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.