![]() |
Hey jur, sorry for the delay in answering, I have been out of town for a spell. The new width is a bit more than 12 inches, or around 31 cm. What makes it a bit wide is the barend that has a backward protrusion. Had I chosen barends that only go forward I would could have saved an inch of space there. Another place where there is added width is the right back roller (refer to above pic). The original roller was small and mounted at the inside of the rack. With the wider inline skate wheel I opted to mount it on the outside, for stability when folded, and it looks better. Also, the riser bar has a curve to it that slightly adds to the width. Brompton specs the folded width of the M type as 9.8 inches, which is a bit on the smallish side if you ask me. I think it is more around a little less than 10 1/2 inches. I can live with the slightly wider width, and I hardly notice the difference as I can still park it in its usual corner, and it I can push it through the subway turnstile with no prblems.
My folding basket bag arrived, and it fits quite well and does not appear to interfere with the cockpit controls. I think then that my setup is one up on the S type Brommie, since it can accommodate all bags while the S Brommie can only use the S bag. I will test it out on an actual ride later and report, along with pics. |
Mods
I like your modified Brommie. I too didn't like the mushy brakes on my L6 so took the inner cables out and greased them thoroughly and then put them back. Wow! What a difference. They performed very well going up and down the Col d'Aubisque and down the Col de Soulor and the Tourmalet.
Why do you not fit clipless SPDs? It improves bike handling no end. I couldn't wait to get rid of the folding pedal. I fitted bar ends as well - Titec stubbies which don't affect folding. The modification I really want to know about is fitting a front mech and double chainset say a compact 50-34 or 52-39. Does anyone know how to contact Steve Parry about his cast bracket to attach the front mech to or do people use other means to attach a front mech to the seat tube? Thanks, Ariane. |
Originally Posted by Ariane
(Post 8686236)
Does anyone know how to contact Steve Parry about his cast bracket to attach the front mech to or do people use other means to attach a front mech to the seat tube?
|
nice mods! I tried to find a hi-rise bar to do the same mod and found the tioga r60 with a 60mm rise. Unfortunately the centre bulge actually begins before the bend so I couldn't thread the bars through - very frustrating. I may take a look at the azonic bar as a cheaper alternative to the S-stem.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Ariane
(Post 8686236)
I...............
I couldn't wait to get rid of the folding pedal. ........ The modification I really want to know about is fitting a front mech and double chainset say a compact 50-34 or 52-39............ or do people use other means to attach a front mech to the seat tube? Thanks, Ariane. Here's the combination I use (yes, my chain needs oil :-)) which involves manually lifting the chain from small to big, which I find ok, as I only need the small ring on steep, say 1 in 8, & steeper. If you search recent threads you'll find EvilV has posted some info' on front mech's. |
Thats a very neat gear solution.
Any probs with the new outer cog catching clothes ? And YES you must oil that chain (or use a dry lub ... eg try waxoil) :) |
Originally Posted by bykerouac
(Post 7906192)
poboxnyc, I have several skate wheels ranging from 56mm to 100mm and I tried several combinations. This combo seems to work out rather well as far as rolling the folded bike goes, so I stuck with it. it looks quite nice too!
http://piofort.zenfolio.com/img/v4/p663567532-4.jpg |
Originally Posted by Simple Simon
(Post 8688562)
.......
Any probs with the new outer cog catching clothes ? And YES you must oil that chain (or use a dry lub ... eg try waxoil) :) No clothes catching, although I do usually wear a reflective band around my right ankle. Waxoyl, good idea, I'll try that thanks. I think I've left it so long this time, as oiling it causes the back wheel to become filthy & it's a continuous cleaning job! This approach to gears meant I didn't need to change the bottom bracket, as the chain line for the big ring is standard, so I think it's probably the simplest & cheapest way to try out low gears. I did try a 39 t like EvilV has, but it's not low enough for some of the hills I'll encounter. I suspect a front mech' wouldn't cope easily with the rather large jump from small to big ring, so I'll stick to manual, unless anyone has any bright ideas? John |
Originally Posted by cyclistjohn
(Post 8696437)
I suspect a front mech' wouldn't cope easily with the rather large jump from small to big ring, so I'll stick to manual, unless anyone has any bright ideas?
|
Originally Posted by cyclistjohn
(Post 8696437)
I suspect a front mech' wouldn't cope easily with the rather large jump from small to big ring, so I'll stick to manual, unless anyone has any bright ideas?
|
Originally Posted by LWaB
(Post 8714361)
Front mechs can cope with a wider range than you think, if you are mechanically sympathetic as you change gears. After all, wide range double cranksets (e.g. 46 & 28t chainrings) used to be seen fairly often on touring bikes, as were half-step + granny set-ups with 20t jumps between small and middle chainrings.
steve Perry recomended the campaq Mirarge for the mod (generally)? from what I can remember this was to cope with large changes...... |
Originally Posted by cyclistjohn
(Post 8688497)
I actually bought a second folding pedal from a fellow Brompton rider, who prefers SPD's like you. I have several folding pedals, but they all fold outwards of the pedal. The Brompton design is smarter in that it folds *inwards* of the pedal, saving a massive amount of space in comparison (although care is required to avoid scraping the rear triangle at some crank angles when folded).
Here's the combination I use (yes, my chain needs oil :-)) which involves manually lifting the chain from small to big, which I find ok, as I only need the small ring on steep, say 1 in 8, & steeper. If you search recent threads you'll find EvilV has posted some info' on front mech's. |
Originally Posted by LWaB
(Post 8714361)
Front mechs can cope with a wider range than you think, if you are mechanically sympathetic as you change gears. After all, wide range double cranksets (e.g. 46 & 28t chainrings) used to be seen fairly often on touring bikes, as were half-step + granny set-ups with 20t jumps between small and middle chainrings.
John |
Originally Posted by Ariane
(Post 8759114)
....... Surely a conventional double can be fitted? What are the dimensions of the Brompton bottom bracket are they shared by other BB makes? Are there alternatives available that can accomodate a double chainset?
Like lots of other bits on a Brompton, the bottom bracket is a "standard" size, & one is free to fit one of several "standards" according to the desired crankset. Bear in mind my desire was to test what low gear range I need without going to great expense in the process :-) |
Hi
I have a P type. I felt the handlebars were too high and the bike was not rigid. I replaced just the bars with a 2.5 inch riser bars for an MTB The result is excellent. Rigid and a good riding position. The other change I recommend is to replace the pedals with SPD pedals. Best Rog |
The new Dual pivot brakes seem to be lacking in cable adjustment, just a token at the lever..
I've been considering the V noodle with the adjuster, that gets used with V drop bar levers. so this may be a reinforcing encouragement... Older single pivot CLB calipers had the adjustment on the caliper.. |
bykerouac, very nice bike!
What is the motivation for the corks? If it is to provide resistance to the handle clamp you may want to look at these plugs http://www.ergon-bike.com/us/en/product/ls100 I noticed that you are using regular seat clamps. Did not know that they fit. I may do the same if it preserves better the pitch adjustment when removed. If you want to go all the way with brake mods, here is an interesting example with V brakes. Am not sure how it was done. Possibly some brazing. http://www.flickr.com/photos/brompfi...n/photostream/ |
Appears the V noodle is hard on the paint on the side of the fork.
the newer fork adds a braze on that may be useful for others, to make a housing guide/standoff. They put it there, later, to fit a disc to keep the brake cable off the tire of a mudguard-less bike. |
Hi Bykerouac,
Being a tall rider do you find that the reach isn't great enough, i.e. the distance from the saddle to the handlebars isn't far enough as the S-types stem curves further forwards Thanks, Steve |
Really using my Brompton bag on the front to grocery shop. As many others have found out, the roller wheels are too small for that, they cause run and wear on the shock block.
The local bike shop has a bin of used roller blade wheels which the owner let me go through. Two good ones and longer bolts, back in business! https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...0282f4a23.jpeg |
Wow! 15-year-old thread.
|
Originally Posted by tcs
(Post 23065264)
yikes! |
Originally Posted by 3speedslow
(Post 23065238)
Really using my Brompton bag on the front to grocery shop. As many others have found out, the roller wheels are too small for that, they cause run and wear on the shock block.
The local bike shop has a bin of used roller blade wheels which the owner let me go through. Two good ones and longer bolts, back in business! |
Yes you do! The bike came from them to the previous owner. Looked awesome so I kept it on.
On NC coast, we have Blackbeard the pirate. Now there Redbeard the Brompton. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:41 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.