Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Folding Bikes Discuss the unique features and issues of folding bikes. Also a great place to learn what folding bike will work best for your needs.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-10-10, 11:48 AM   #1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Bikes: Brompton, Dahon Vitesse D5
Posts: 1,911
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Thudbuster continued

I got my hands on an older model Thudbuster LT about a month ago. I've quite enjoyed it so far and have spent a while fiddling with it & working out what suits me best. After the recent snow and ice the London roads are more mangled than ever, potholes abound, so the combination of fat tyres plus Thudbuster keeps me feeling reasonable safe. There's been a bit of a discussion over on the Dahon forums recently and I thought I'd repeat something I brought up there and add a few thoughts.

I read a review once, one of the only somewhat negative reviews that I've seen, stating that the arc of travel is contrary to what would be most efficient, i.e. what you really want to dissipate impact is first vertical motion which arcs into the horizontal. That makes sense but doesn't take into account the changing angle of the frame as the wheels respond to bumps, which is kind of the selling point of the Thudbuster. What I've found in riding it is that with quite stiff elastomers (the ones recommended for my weight) the beginning of the travel, er, vector, is very much horizontal, whereas with softer elastomers my weight compresses the elastomers more, so the early stage of travel is more vertical (further into the arc), and that's when it feels like the Thudbuster is working fairly well. One problem with that is that it also means the saddle position is further back, something I'm not keen on.

The preload adjustment is a misnomer as it's really a topping-out limiter. It doesn't change how the elastomers respond to your weight at all, it just sets the limit to the uppermost point of travel, and I guess can prevent a 'flappy' topping out with soft elastomers. The way to get real preload adjustment would be to insert spacers between the 2 elastomers. . . I suppose one could cut the black elastomers into thin discs and add them into the mix.
chagzuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-10, 04:24 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,329
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 260 Post(s)
I used a TB LT for about a year; I preferred stiffer elastomers than the recommended and I liked it a lot. These days I have a Birdy, a Mini and a Moulton, all with rear suspension, making the TB redundant.
jur is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:50 PM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.
  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.