![]() |
[Dahon] So many models, so little time...
Hello
At this point, I'm still not sure whether to get a Dahon or a cheaper knock-off (with gear hub or derailleur) as a folding bike for the occasional week-end getaway on easy terrains. 26" wheels are a bit big to stick on the train, and I guess 16" wheels are probably too slow to ride 40-60km/day. Between the "Urban Utility Bikes" section and the "Urban Performance Bikes" section, Dahon offers more than twenty models. How do all those models differ, so that I make an informed choice? Thank you. |
the curve series folds slightly more compact due to their 16" wheels.
Mu series is the 20" version of the curve. the number at the end indicates how many speeds. gear hub will usually be slightly more expensive than derailer models. otherwise, there are some minor difference in quality of parts |
Since you will be carrying it on and off a train, weight might be a factor. So, checkout Steel vs. Aluminum frames and Derailleur vs. Internal Geared Hub (aka: IGH).
Also, gear range and "spacing" (hills?) could be important...and, if you are tall, like I am (6'3"), how the bike fits is also a factor. From our experience, the lower end Dahon's and the cheaper folders did not meet our needs in the latter two categories. Have fun. Lou |
Thanks for the infos.
BTW, does someone know if it's OK for Dahons to multiple Gear Inches by 0.08 to get metres of development? Wikipedia says that "some bicycles incorporate internally geared hubs, or other components that change the gear ratio, and these other components must be taken into account when calculating gearing". |
try this: http://www.gear-calculator.com/#
|
I second the warning about weight. I owned a (steel) Speed TR fully kitted with racks, fenders, and a dynohub. I wouldn't have enjoyed lugging it around on trains.
|
There are many other non folding bikes that are not 'cheaper Dahon knock off'. Do you consider them as well? Take Brompton for example, very compact fold (16" wheels), good ridablility (40-60km should not be a problem), heavy but rolls nicely when folded, has rear suspension, available with wide gear range (300%) and has a great long term support and part availability.
There are many options, it depends on your budget. The new Dahon site is here http://dahonbikes.com/index.php/bike..._bicycles.html |
Originally Posted by kamtsa
(Post 13724404)
There are many options, it depends on your budget.
Most of us didn't start out at the top of the folding bike price range. Lou |
Originally Posted by kamtsa
(Post 13724404)
There are many other non folding bikes that are not 'cheaper Dahon knock off'. Do you consider them as well? Take Brompton for example
Originally Posted by kamtsa
(Post 13724404)
The new Dahon site is here http://dahonbikes.com/index.php/bike..._bicycles.html
Originally Posted by Joe Remi
(Post 13723872)
I second the warning about weight. I owned a (steel) Speed TR fully kitted with racks, fenders, and a dynohub. I wouldn't have enjoyed lugging it around on trains.
Originally Posted by Foldable Two
(Post 13724622)
Based upon price range OP said he/she was looking at, I figured they had a modest budget.
|
Originally Posted by Winfried
(Post 13725876)
I guess you meant "There are many other folding bikes". Although I have the money to buy a Brompton, I'm not sure I want to spend so much on a folding bike that I'll only use once in a while on week-ends outside the city. Besides, how fast can 16" wheelers go on flat land?.
As for lower cost folders, there are good alternative such as Downtube and Citizen. Another alternative is craigslist, you can find good deals there, including Dahons.
Originally Posted by Winfried
(Post 13725876)
Thanks. Does someone know who owns dahon.com at this point, after mother + son moved to ternbicycles.com? When comparing dahon.com and dahonbikes.com, I notice the latter offers less models. I guess it's a consequence of the split.
|
Money is not a problem, but it's just that I don't like spending a lot for stuff I don't use often. Lou |
Originally Posted by kamtsa
(Post 13729175)
If you think that 16" bikes must be 'slow', try a 6sp Brompton S, you will be surprised.
|
Originally Posted by Winfried
(Post 13730534)
You mean that with the right gearing (eg. 52T + 8-speed 11/30), a 16" can go as fast as a regular bike?
((794 * 1.08) / 2.54) / 3.14 = 107.51793 http://www.brompton.co.uk/page.asp?p=3069 I am using the -12% option. It gets only to 87 GI but gives extra low range for steep hills. |
Originally Posted by Winfried
(Post 13730534)
You mean that with the right gearing (eg. 52T + 8-speed 11/30), a 16" can go as fast as a regular bike?
|
Thanks for the infos.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.