Green Cruizer Brands...made in Chinese
These folders are incredibly inexpensive. Anyone have any experience with any of the models on this website. I'm considering getting a 20" wheel model.
http://www.green-cruiser.com/soloroc...ding-bike.html Thanks! |
any one of these would be better than any "green cruiser":
http://toronto.en.craigslist.ca/bra/bik/3536703586.html http://toronto.en.craigslist.ca/tor/bid/3597741647.html http://toronto.en.craigslist.ca/tor/bik/3651766470.html |
Originally Posted by smallwheeler
(Post 15340705)
any one of these would be better than any "green cruiser":
http://toronto.en.craigslist.ca/bra/bik/3536703586.html http://toronto.en.craigslist.ca/tor/bid/3597741647.html http://toronto.en.craigslist.ca/tor/bik/3651766470.html I think I`d go for number one, the red one :) |
me too ;)
|
Hi,
Its looks decent enough for the money, and is very a different ball game to a vintage bike for about the same money that would likely need a lot of work to restore it to its original working condition, and even more money, time and expense to get them to go and stop properly by modern standards. Still it is a generic bike made to a particular spec with lots of brand badges added, that no doubt are easily removed. Carefully look at the bits you get and don't get. E.g. for that bike they mention "level 1" components. Generally "level 1" is steel and "level 2" is alloy. Generally for an alloy framebike you want "level 2" bits, not just the seatpost, even though the forks are often still steel. I really can't understand why somebody would think a 40 year old $100 Hungarian made bike that probably needs a complete rebuild would be a better buy for a new user. rgds, sreten. Had a Hungarian made 3 speed folder 30 years ago. Recently aquired a budget 6 speed chinese folder. Both needed some adjustment and tweaking. A 40 year old bike would need a lot more. |
did you guys even look at the adverts? one of those bikes is being sold by a bike shop and is fully tuned up and under warranty... the raleigh twenty looks like its in great condition..
sorry, but i can never understand why someone would spend 2-300 on a new folding bike only to have to spend another hundred (now youre at the 400 price point) on upgrades and still be stuck with the z-grade frame and hinge components. its nonsensical. i could never, in good conscience, recommend that to anyone. the only reason i can think that you would, is because misery loves company... |
Originally Posted by smallwheeler
(Post 15344030)
did you guys even look at the adverts? two of those bikes are being
sold by a bike shop and are fully tuned up and under warranty... Only one of them that I can see, and not the one recommended. One look at the chain of the twenty indicates it needs work. I wouldn't trust the brakes of any of them. rgds, sreten. |
Originally Posted by sreten
(Post 15344065)
Hi,
Only one of them that I can see, and not the one recommended. One look at the chain of the twenty indicates it needs work. rgds, sreten. Why should the bikeshops have all the fun? |
Originally Posted by badmother
(Post 15344075)
No problem. Smallwheeler and I can do the tuneup just as good as any bikeshop, and that way we get to choose the colour of the chain and and and.....
Why should the bikeshops have all the fun? with pleasure ... ;););) |
Hi,
Well its beyond me how people can recommend a used bike over a new one without having any real clue as to the state of wear of the bike, and what needs servicing. Warranties can be utterly useless depending on terms. Why must those bikes be better than anything you can now buy new ? (even though I remember the folder I had years ago more fondly than my current bike, then I was very fit, I doubt I'd like it now, in timewarped condition.) rgds, sreten. |
i wasnt suggesting that in ALL circumstances a used bike will be better than a new cheapie bike. OF COURSE it depends on condition. it is a fact, however, that a bike like a raleigh twenty was robustly built compared to today's cheapies. thats why they are still around and serviceable 40+ years later (and incidentally, why so many people love them). can you imagine a "green cruiser" being around in even 10 years?
|
Originally Posted by badmother
(Post 15344075)
No problem. Smallwheeler and I can do the tuneup just as good
as any bikeshop, and that way we get to choose the colour of the chain and and and..... Why should the bikeshops have all the fun? That is hardly the point given the original post, and the fact your into doing up old folders essentially irrelevant and thus pointless foisting your opinion of what would be a "good" bike on someone who wants to buy a working bike, not buy a restoration project. Why are you recommending a possible world of pain to someone who probably knows not very much about bicycles ? And not addressing the fundamental question originally asked ? Which is - is this a good bike for the money, if not, what is ? rgds, sreten. |
Originally Posted by sreten
(Post 15344210)
Hi,
That is hardly the point given the original post, and the fact your into doing up old folders essentially irrelevant and thus pointless foisting your opinion of what would be a "good" bike on someone who wants to buy a working bike, not buy a restoration project. Why are you recommending a possible world of pain to someone who probably knows not very much about bicycles ? And not addressing the fundamental question originally asked ? Which is - is this a good bike for the money, if not, what is ? rgds, sreten. |
Originally Posted by smallwheeler
(Post 15344189)
i wasnt suggesting that in ALL circumstances a used bike will be better than a new cheapie bike.
OF COURSE it depends on condition. it is a fact, however, that a bike like a raleigh twenty was robustly built compared to today's cheapies. thats why they are still around and serviceable 40+ years later (and incidentally, why so many people love them). can you imagine a "green cruiser" being around in even 10 years? Since getting back into biking I've noticed a lot of "cheap" bicycles that are still going - not in the best condition - but probably in completely original condition - they are at least as resilient as any basic British or American bike that is not maintained, probably more. The idea that my cheap bike won't last very long, when every component on it allthough cheap is better or the same than any made 30 years ago is just ridiculous. (30 year old components for cheap bikes of course.) The idea that you can survive making poor components to be sold to gullible westerners given the scale of the global bike market doesn't make any sense. (Of course you can sell them poor designs, very different matter.) The basic components are all sound and will last at least as long as older stuff. rgds, sreten. The Twenty has a nice frame, comparitively, the rest .... There is every reason to assume a modern basic properly maintained bike will last as long as the old ones, but also every reason to assume a cheap basic bike will not be maintained properly if at all in the West. |
Originally Posted by sreten
(Post 15344366)
The idea that you can survive making poor components to be sold to gullible
westerners given the scale of the global bike market doesn't make any sense. |
Originally Posted by smallwheeler
(Post 15344388)
they only need to sell you one... ;)
|
Thanks everyone! A heated discussion can often stir up some new insights and you've all given me plenty to mull over. We do have a local dealer here, so the next step would be to go for a test ride. I was kind of hoping though that someone here already had some hands on experience with the brand.
|
best advice: test ride a variety of bikes..
|
|
Why is this thread full of stuff about vintage folders? As I can attest as the owner of an old Peugeot, and current Dahon Speed TR and Speed UNO; the relationship between those old European folders and the OP's question is non-existent.
|
the relationship between a speed TR and a "green cruiser" is also non-existent..
|
Originally Posted by smallwheeler
(Post 15345137)
the relationship between a speed TR and a "green cruiser" is also non-existent..
|
the point of my original suggestion was twofold:
1. the cheap junkie bike that he was contemplating spending 200 on was in no way worth the money. 2. its possible to find something interesting locally on craigslist or at a LBS. i dont understand why that's so difficult to grasp. ive owned a raleigh twenty and i've also had the displeasure of owning a "citizen tokyo" which is comparable to the "green cruiser". the raleigh twenty was superior to that piece of garbage in every possible way. that experience is what i base my opinion and advice to others on. |
Originally Posted by smallwheeler
(Post 15345563)
the point of my original suggestion was twofold:
1. the cheap junkie bike that he was contemplating spending 200 on was in no way worth the money. 2. its possible to find something interesting locally on craigslist or at a LBS. i dont understand why that's so difficult to grasp. ive owned a raleigh twenty and i've also had the displeasure of owning a "citizen tokyo" which is comparable to the "green cruiser". the raleigh twenty was superior to that piece of garbage in every possible way. that experience is what i base my opinion and advice to others on. You have no experience with the "green cruiser" - which is what he asked about - and keep directing him to completely different bikes. I fail to see how this is helpful. |
Originally Posted by Joe Remi
(Post 15345595)
What's difficult to grasp is why you keep responding to the OP's question with answers that have nothing to do with it. A $600 Dahon? That's triple the price of the bike he asked about. If he wanted to spend 600 on a folder, I doubt he would be asking about the $200 one.
You have no experience with the "green cruiser" - which is what he asked about - and keep directing him to completely different bikes. I fail to see how this is helpful. steering him away from a z-grade bike WAS my intention. i think the fewer of us who actually have an experience with a "green crusier" the better off we'll all be. i know the dahon was out of the price range, but i just happened to see it and thought it was a good deal. |
@sreten and Joe Remi
First of all, you are not the OP so it is not really importent if you are happy with the advice we give. Secondly, where is all the anger (and all the time you spend expressing it here) comming from? Any idea why Smallwheeler and I are the only peopel responding? Peopel ask and ask and ask, without taking the time to read first. If they did they would find that unless you know what you are doing, and unless you can do some wrenching there is no way to get a fairly good bike for next to nothing! Most peopel are cheap when buying bikes. Often it may be better to buy nothing instead of buying cheap. If you have no money and really need a folder then looking for a used better quality bike is the best you can do. The money spent on a cheap one can be totally wasted. If you have no money and no food you may have to start growing food. If you have no money and no folder you may have to start learning, unless you can trade favours. Ask any LBS if they are willing to take in a no name cheapo bike and tune it to work well, and what it would cost. We have been watching sreten (kicking and screaming) learning that "better tyres are better- and the best is to buy them on sale". The experience has been like watching somebody trying to take a XL christmas tree the wrong way (top first) trough the dor. Could you plse learn more quietly about the rest of the bike? I learned from my mother that "Empty drums make a lot of noice". I think I`ll change my profile. |
Originally Posted by badmother
(Post 15345907)
@sreten and Joe Remi
First of all, you are not the OP so it is not really importent if you are happy with the advice we give. Secondly, where is all the anger (and all the time you spend expressing it here) comming from? Any idea why Smallwheeler and I are the only peopel responding? Peopel ask and ask and ask, without taking the time to read first. If they did they would find that unless you know what you are doing, and unless you can do some wrenching there is no way to get a fairly good bike for next to nothing! Most peopel are cheap when buying bikes. Often it may be better to buy nothing instead of buying cheap. If you have no money and really need a folder then looking for a used better quality bike is the best you can do. The money spent on a cheap one can be totally wasted. If you have no money and no food you may have to start growing food. If you have no money and no folder you may have to start learning, unless you can trade favours. Ask any LBS if they are willing to take in a no name cheapo bike and tune it to work well, and what it would cost. We have been watching sreten (kicking and screaming) learning that "better tyres are better- and the best is to buy them on sale". The experience has been like watching somebody trying to take a XL christmas tree the wrong way (top first) trough the dor. Could you plse learn more quietly about the rest of the bike? I learned from my mother that "Empty drums make a lot of noice". I think I`ll change my profile. |
Originally Posted by Joe Remi
(Post 15345934)
I see nothing helpful in that.
|
Originally Posted by Leo1903
(Post 15340567)
These folders are incredibly inexpensive. Anyone have any experience with any of the models on this website. I'm considering getting a 20" wheel model.
http://www.green-cruiser.com/soloroc...ding-bike.html Thanks! My advice when considering inexpensive folding bikes is to be very leery of aluminum frames and to only buy one that people have actual experience riding for a period of time. I have a KHS Mocha (6061 aluminum) that has a very large hinge, far stouter than most in it's price range and after less than a year it wore out and I had to fix it, something that entailed machining and welding skills. However my Citizen Miami's hinge (steel frame) shows no signs of wear and has absolutely no play in it even without the clamp being cinched down and it's been folded and unfolded several hundred times in a little less than a year. |
Since, like every other poster on the thread, I too have no absolutely no experience of the Solorock 20", I feel qualified to weigh in ;)
At the price I'd risk it. It doesn't look like a lemon. Not sure I'd trust it to hold up to 150 km a week commuting in all weathers year in year out, but then nobody ever used ye olde Eastern Bloc folders for that either. Today's fold better, have a lot more alloy and good brakes. You may be pleasantly surprised. Always a good winter/rain/pub/concert bike if and when you move on. That vintage Road King, admittedly, looks quite lovely. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:51 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.