![]() |
btw, I think its "piqued" not peaked Just sayin'
|
It's also it's not its, in this case ;)
|
Will a titanium frame eventually be available directly from swift? I'd buy one then, since the warranty would be for the lifetime of my bike.
|
Originally Posted by tds101
(Post 16803691)
Will a titanium frame eventually be available directly from swift? I'd buy one then, since the warranty would be for the lifetime of my bike.
The bike is expected at the end of June. |
Originally Posted by jur
(Post 16803872)
At this time this is a private one-off being built for me with Peter's blessing. Once I get it and it's a great success, we could see if there is a way forwards. It would have to be a commercial success, or at least not result in a loss for Xootr. Stating the obvious.
The bike is expected at the end of June. |
Originally Posted by jur
(Post 16803872)
At this time this is a private one-off being built for me with Peter's blessing. Once I get it and it's a great success, we could see if there is a way forwards. It would have to be a commercial success, or at least not result in a loss for Xootr. Stating the obvious.
The bike is expected at the end of June. Wonder what the shipping costs of a bike frame are from Brooklyn to New Zealand, and who's paying, Peter or you? By the way, when I ordered my Swift from Peter oh six years ago or something I think, it came with with defective bolt holes, and despite the warranty I had to pay the shipping back to NY from AZ, but peter said that what he'd do for me was exchange my aluminum frame for a new steel one when it went into production, but I guess it never did (I haven't been following the updates here in recent years, and in fact just recently went back to riding). As for the inherent inevitability of aluminum cracking, I don't know. DC-3's are made of aluminum and many of them built in the 1930's are still flying. |
Originally Posted by werewolf
(Post 16807936)
Wonder what the shipping costs of a bike frame are from Brooklyn to New Zealand, and who's paying, Peter or you? By the way, when I ordered my Swift from Peter oh six years ago or something I think, it came with with defective bolt holes, and despite the warranty I had to pay the shipping back to NY from AZ, but peter said that what he'd do for me was exchange my aluminum frame for a new steel one when it went into production, but I guess it never did (I haven't been following the updates here in recent years, and in fact just recently went back to riding).
As for the inherent inevitability of aluminum cracking, I don't know. DC-3's are made of aluminum and many of them built in the 1930's are still flying. |
First pics of the first Swift Ti:http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t...5.jpg~original
|
beautiful titanium swift frame. :-)
|
Originally Posted by Thasiet
(Post 16434179)
Titanium can crack when it's welded incompetently (i.e, by an "artisan"). Aluminum weathers fatigue better than people fear; just look at all the B-52s and KC-135s still flying 60 years after their manufacture. Not saying one is better or worse. Here's MY wishlist for a Swift Folder (and why I don't own one):
1) threadless headset so I can remove the fork for efficient packing 2) splittable dropout to run carbon belt drive 3) disc brakes Basically, I wanna Bike Friday Silk that isn't made by dirty hippies in Oregon. Which definitely also rules out the HPM Swift. And while it's not that I don't love BF's unironic use of the Comic Sans MS typeface (I truly do), everything else about their brand image makes me want to club baby seals, buy stock in Halliburton, and run straight pipes on my motorcycle. And they cost too much. Alas, the Silk ticks all the boxes for me feature-wise. Sigh. |
Originally Posted by jur
(Post 16877451)
First pics of the first Swift Ti:http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t...5.jpg~original
|
Originally Posted by jur
(Post 16877451)
First pics of the first Swift Ti:
What's the weight? Like the second set of cable guides toward the rear of the top tube. Wish my frame had those. And those dropouts... do they taper to points as sharp as they look in the image? Is this designed for the same fork? |
|
Originally Posted by mark03
(Post 16878511)
Ooooh, aaaahh...
What's the weight? Like the second set of cable guides toward the rear of the top tube. Wish my frame had those. And those dropouts... do they taper to points as sharp as they look in the image? Is this designed for the same fork? The dropouts/track ends are quite pointy. The fork geometry is the same as the stock Xootr fork but I ordered a nice Ti fork, plus Ti seatpost and Ti stem/riser. |
Originally Posted by jur
(Post 16880472)
I was faced with the difficult choice between weight and frame stiffness. I was very concerned that I would end up with a frame that is too flexible to be able to ride hard, so I chose to err on the side of caution and spec'ed thick-walled tubes for the main tubes. So from my weight calculations the tubing alone is about 1.8kg. The welds will add some so I expect 2kg or more.
The dropouts/track ends are quite pointy. The fork geometry is the same as the stock Xootr fork but I ordered a nice Ti fork, plus Ti seatpost and Ti stem/riser. the frame reminds me of the montague folding bikes. :-) |
Sweet looking frame.. are you going 451 with this? what drivetrain? where're the rest of the bits??? :beer:
|
Originally Posted by BruceMetras
(Post 16880814)
Sweet looking frame.. are you going 451 with this? what drivetrain? where're the rest of the bits??? :beer:
451 wheels, I left off the V-brake pivots. I will have to assess the ride quality, and based on that, might start a second version. I already have some ideas for improvement. Disc brake mounts might be one of them, so wheel size is an easy choice. |
Jur,
The pix look great! I would be very interested in a group buy for this Ti frame. In fact, with a couple of additional changes, I would commit to two frames. |
Originally Posted by prathmann
(Post 16427741)
I have nothing against your plan to have a titanium version of your bike - sounds like something I'd like to have as well. But I am skeptical about the idea that one frame material is inevitably going to fail and some other material will be immune. In normal use any bike frame is going to be subjected to stresses above the nominal fatigue limit - so given enough use it will eventually fail. But 'enough use' may well be more use than it gets in the lifetime of its owner, or it may fail much more quickly due to some flaw in the material, manufacture, or design.
My personal experience is that I've only had one aluminum bike (and it's not a folder) - a 25 year old Cannondale with 125 kmiles and no failure. OTOH, my steel-framed folder had a frame crack develop with only about one tenth the mileage of the Cannondale. Fortunately the manufacturer was very good about fixing the problem and got me back on the road quickly and at no cost to myself. |
Jur--No question you will have the coolest folder out there!
|
For any Ti lovers, I envisage the following process:
1. I get my frame, fork seatpost etc etc, build the bike up. 2. I go for rides. Many rides. 3. I tear myself away and write a review of the bike, plus any recommendations for improvement. 4. We liaise with Peter Reich about how to proceed, since the design belongs to him. Peter gave me permission to get one successful frame built, but not to go into a business arrangement. My design tweaks: * I made the twin top tube design change because the builder did not have a large enough oval tube. I did some engineering calcs on the tube torsional stiffness and tried to get something close to the aluminium version's stiffness. * I designed an easier-to-produce pivot for the fold, and a way to make a pivot on the dual tube system. * I made a small change to the geometry to accommodate a slightly shorter fork. * I made the top tube 25mm longer for a slightly taller average rider. * I omitted the brake pivots. I will use this one with road brakes. * I added cable stops, cable tie points and a cable pulley boss at the bottom rear of the seat tube for easier derailleur cable installations. I don't regard any of these as radical enough to justify calling it anything else but a true blue Swift. |
Disc brakes,...that's what I'd luv on a Ti Swift!!!
|
Originally Posted by mark03
(Post 16878511)
Ooooh, aaaahh...
What's the weight? Like the second set of cable guides toward the rear of the top tube. I have also put in a query whether disc brake fittings could be fitted with no problems. |
Originally Posted by jur
(Post 16889247)
Actually I just realised that is a mistake. The left side should have had the 2, and the right the 1. Email sent.
I have also put in a query whether disc brake fittings could be fitted with no problems. |
jur, sign me up for the next batch of Ti Swifts. Alfine 11 IGH with mechanical disc brakes. Hydraulic disc brakes have more stopping power and about 1000x more maintenance problems.
In addition to the longer maintube, did you opt for the 12" handlepost? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:52 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.