Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Foo (https://www.bikeforums.net/foo/)
-   -   Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L is DA BAMB. (https://www.bikeforums.net/foo/473266-canon-70-200mm-f-2-8-l-da-bamb.html)

MrCrassic 10-04-08 03:48 PM

Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L is DA BAMB.
 
I'm going to post some sample photos from my shoots today. This lens is amazing. I can see why it costs near $2,000. The only disad is that it doesn't do macro. However, it is amazingly sharp all across the zoom range, and the bokeh at f/2.8 is beautiful. I haven't hit the point of lens diffraction, but I had no problems shooting at f/11.

In other news, if you don't have the 50mm f/1.8 for your Canon camera, then get that lens right now. It is dirt cheap (relatively speaking), and is one of the sharpest primes Canon puts out right now. Pros use this lens for headshots.

Samples of 50mm at HUGE focal lengths:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3075/...f825db.jpg?v=0

http://photos-e.ak.facebook.com/phot...94916_1977.jpg

Samples of 70-200mm L (at huge zoom lengths):

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3239/...a64048.jpg?v=0

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3165/...0a6e8f.jpg?v=0

Lamplight 10-04-08 04:14 PM

Ooh great choice! I never could justify one of those with my meager abilities, but I do have the 50mm/1.8 and it was well worth the money. I'd like to start photographing again, but I've kind of exhausted all my subject matter around here.

MrCrassic 10-04-08 04:16 PM

I'm borrowing the lens from my school newspaper. I'm returning it Tuesday. I might get up early to catch a bike race and shoot some money photos.

I'm returning it on Tuesday, which is okay since I'm getting my 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 lens by that point. :)

timmyquest 10-04-08 04:18 PM

You can get a 70-200 f/2.8 non IS, used, for about $900. It's a great lens, my workhorse for sure.

MrCrassic 10-04-08 04:23 PM


Originally Posted by timmyquest (Post 7603310)
You can get a 70-200 f/2.8 non IS, used, for about $900. It's a great lens, my workhorse for sure.

Can you handhold that? The IS helped me out immensely.

I'm slowly upgrading my arsenal, but VERY slowly. Each lens will be more expensive than the last :)

Plus, if I decide to go telephoto, I want to get something with a STUPID zoom range. I'll probably start with a cheaper 100-400mm (is it worth it?) or just drop the dollar and get anything that goes up to 600mm.

I want to shoot grasshoppers. :p

timmyquest 10-04-08 05:00 PM


Originally Posted by MrCrassic (Post 7603334)
Can you handhold that? The IS helped me out immensely.

I'm slowly upgrading my arsenal, but VERY slowly. Each lens will be more expensive than the last :)

Plus, if I decide to go telephoto, I want to get something with a STUPID zoom range. I'll probably start with a cheaper 100-400mm (is it worth it?) or just drop the dollar and get anything that goes up to 600mm.

I want to shoot grasshoppers. :p

They say 1/focal length to be safe, i can get sharp shots at 200mm at probably as low as 1/125. Just takes practice, like anything else.

I typically use it for sports so i prefer to be around 1/400 at least in which case the IS does nothing. I rarely use something that long indoors so it's not usually an issue.

ehidle 10-04-08 05:01 PM


Originally Posted by MrCrassic (Post 7603169)
I'm going to post some sample photos from my shoots today. This lens is amazing.

Yeah, but what about the important question?

Does it fit in a jersey pocket? :D

ehidle 10-04-08 05:02 PM


Originally Posted by MrCrassic (Post 7603334)
I want to shoot grasshoppers. :p

From 3 miles away? :)

x136 10-04-08 05:19 PM


Originally Posted by ehidle (Post 7603492)
Yeah, but what about the important question?

Does it fit in a jersey pocket? :D

Lens in one, body in another. Mini-tripod or a flash unit in the third. :P

ehidle 10-04-08 05:35 PM


Originally Posted by x136 (Post 7603560)
Lens in one, body in another. Mini-tripod or a flash unit in the third. :P

I love my point-and-shoot...

http://www.krunker.com/wp-content/up...gle%5B2%5D.jpg

It takes good enough pictures for me :) I have a Minolta StSi analog camera I haven't touched since about 2002. Hah...

timmyquest 10-04-08 06:05 PM

Two completely different things. comparing them is stupid...

ehidle 10-04-08 06:16 PM


Originally Posted by timmyquest (Post 7603758)
Two completely different things. comparing them is stupid...

So, why are you?

timmyquest 10-04-08 06:19 PM


Originally Posted by ehidle (Post 7603802)
So, why are you?

What the hell are you talking about?

ehidle 10-04-08 06:21 PM


Originally Posted by timmyquest (Post 7603822)
What the hell are you talking about?

I don't know... I thought your comment was directed at me... either way, you compared the two, then commented that comparing the two was stupid... I just thought that was funny...

Ed in GA 10-04-08 06:22 PM


Originally Posted by MrCrassic (Post 7603334)
Can you handhold that?

Hmmmm, Photographers, for years, have held 200+ primes and 70-200/300 zooms with no problem whatsoever.

All you have to do is learn the proper form with which to hold your camera. Basically, making a tripod out of your arms and body.

In lens and in body shake reduction is a wonderful thing for low light or long F/L shooting, but proper form helps more than anything.

Others may, and probably will, have differing opinions.

cyclokitty 10-04-08 06:23 PM

I have a Nikon D40x so I can't use the Canon 50mm, but practically everyone on the nikonians forum raves about the Nikon 50 mm f/1.8, and it is definitely on my to buy list.

Nice shots, MrCrassic. I especially like the escalator photo.

Ed in GA 10-04-08 06:24 PM


Originally Posted by MrCrassic (Post 7603169)
Samples of 50mm at HUGE focal lengths:

**********??

Did you mean.... 50mm at Large aperture settings?

ehidle 10-04-08 06:28 PM


Originally Posted by Ed in GA (Post 7603834)
All you have to do is learn the proper form with which to hold your camera. Basically, making a tripod out of your arms and body.

I wonder how much a pro bike^H^H^H^Hcamera fit costs... :p

Ed in GA 10-04-08 06:30 PM


Originally Posted by ehidle (Post 7603852)
I wonder how much a pro bike^H^H^H^Hcamera fit costs... :p

Hey, come on down. I'll make you a really good deal on a camera fit...... :lol:

timmyquest 10-04-08 06:39 PM


Originally Posted by ehidle (Post 7603830)
I don't know... I thought your comment was directed at me... either way, you compared the two, then commented that comparing the two was stupid... I just thought that was funny...

It was directed at you, and no...i didn't. Nice try...

ehidle 10-04-08 07:18 PM


Originally Posted by timmyquest (Post 7603906)
It was directed at you, and no...i didn't. Nice try...

*sigh* yes, you did... but I'm not going to argue with you... you completely missed the message of the communication in the first place...

Welcome to my ignore list..

timmyquest 10-04-08 07:51 PM


Originally Posted by ehidle (Post 7604069)
*sigh* yes, you did... but I'm not going to argue with you... you completely missed the message of the communication in the first place...

Welcome to my ignore list..

Glad to be there...Please quote me next time you say something so ludicrous.

On a more related note...i've needed a medium range zoom for a very long time now. After agonizing over it for quite a while, i finally pushed "buy" for a 24-70 f/2.8. I want to keep it, but i can't justify it. I got $200 off so if anything i can turn it around for a profit...if i do convince myself to sell it...like i should...

Be careful touching nice glass, it's hard to let it go in the future.

huytheskigod 10-04-08 08:29 PM


Originally Posted by ehidle (Post 7603830)
I don't know... I thought your comment was directed at me... either way, you compared the two, then commented that comparing the two was stupid... I just thought that was funny...

Yes he did compare an IS to non-IS lens but...his comment of "comparing the two is stupid" was in reference to your comment about point and shoots. Comparing an SLR to a Point and Shoot is stupid. They are two completely different animals.

On topic; I have a coworker that has that lens and I hope to try it out once I get my camera. I still want to try out that Sigma lens I mentioned in your other post which I hear is pretty darn close to this lens but half the price.

Jynx 10-04-08 08:32 PM


Originally Posted by timmyquest (Post 7603758)
Two completely different things. comparing them is stupid...

Noone is comparing them except for you. lol. Listen to ehidle. He made a statement that he liked his point and shoot totally unrelated to any DSLR discussion. You are the one who mentioned comparisons.

This thread is going in the crapper real fast like most of the threads timmyquest replies in when he takes everything way to personally.

garysol1 10-04-08 08:33 PM


Originally Posted by MrCrassic (Post 7603334)
Can you handhold that? The IS helped me out immensely.

70-200 is very easy to handhold with out IS when shooting outdoors. The IS really comes in handy if you use a 1.4 converter and or shooting indoors at a slower shutter speed. Rule of thumb is when shutter speed is lower than the focal length ...use IS


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:56 PM.


Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.